FAULKTON SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

What if the Supreme Court Overrules the Reciprocal Tariffs? Plan Now for Refunds, Protests, and Contract Reconciliation

December 15, 2025 — Brett W. Johnson, T. Troy Galan, Cole Craghan & Thomas Williams - Snell & Wilmer
As the U.S. Supreme Court weighs the legality of President Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs,” companies that sell goods internationally face a pivotal inflection point. If the tariffs are struck down, the decision will not simply unwind a trade policy — it may trigger a complex refund process involving billions of dollars in tariffs. This will lead to disputes over who receives repayment, and potential friction between suppliers and customers whose contracts passed tariff costs downstream. Such disputes appear to be on the horizon, as the U.S. Supreme Court considered oral arguments on the reciprocal tariffs on November 5, 2025, and several Justices signaled their skepticism about whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) permits the president to impose tariffs unilaterally. While the outcome remains uncertain, businesses that act now to preserve refund rights and clarify contractual obligations may be best positioned to receive refunds and avoid costly disputes if the tariffs are ordered to be repaid. Reprinted courtesy of Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer, T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer, Cole Craghan, Snell & Wilmer and 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes 14 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys March 03, 2026 — Snell & Wilmer
LOS ANGELES AND ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 14 attorneys in its Los Angeles and Orange County offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers publication. Of those 15, six were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a

Reducing Rework on Construction Projects Benefits Budget, Schedule and Financial Loss

February 10, 2026 — Brian Clarke - Construction Executive
The costs of not building it right the first time is statistically staggering—some research suggests up to 20% of the total project costs. This article highlights the costs of re-work, provides a financial worksheet to track the costs of re-work, and a trusted tool to help reduce the impact of re-work. Typically, when discussing rework, one thinks of the labor and material co

Second Circuit Revives Policyholder’s Negligence Claim Against Agent

December 08, 2025 — Latosha M. Ellis, Geoffrey B. Fehling & Yosef Itkin - Hunton Insurance Recovery Blog
From insurance agents and wholesalers to risk consultants and policyholders, there are many parties involved in commercial insurance transactions. While each has an important part to play, the policyholder-agent relationship is particularly important to ensure both sides understand their respective roles and obligations when an agent assists in obtaining coverage. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently provided important guidance under New York law about the scope of an insurance agent’s responsibilities, particularly when an agent, at a policyholder’s request, expressly takes on tasks beyond simply procuring coverage. The decision underscores that an agent’s obligations can extend beyond standard procurement duties by express agreement, though the outcome could differ under the law of another jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Latosha M. Ellis, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Geoffrey B. Fehling, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Yosef Itkin, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Ellis may be contacted at lellis@hunton.com Mr. Fehling may be contacted at gfehling@hunton.com Mr. Itkin may be contacted at yitkin@hunton.com Read the full story...

---

Court Resolves Disagreement on the Amount of the Deductible

December 02, 2025 — Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii
After a windstorm caused damage to the insured’s building and repair materials, the court sided with the insured in determining the amount of the deductible. Semaho, Inc. v. AMCO Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193521 (D. Colo. Sept. 30, 2025). Semaho owned two commercial buildings insured under a policy issued by AMCO. The buildings were damaged in a windstorm and Semaho’s contractor stored the building materials for the repairs on one building’s roof. A second windstorm then seriously damaged the building materials stored on the roof. Semaho submitted a claim for the lost building materials. Coverage was undisputed but the parties disagreed over which deductible should apply to Semaho’s claim. The key policy provision stated that the deductible should be calculated separately for the “building” and for certain categories of “personal

Insurer’s Late Notice Argument Fails Due to Lack of Prejudice

December 30, 2025 — Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii
The court refused to dismiss the insured’s claim for hail damage based on late notice because the insurer failed to demonstrate it had suffered prejudice. Borene UMC v. Church Mut. Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210767 (W.D. Texas Oct. 27, 2025). Boerne UMC owned multiple buildings that were allegedly damaged during a hailstorm that occurred in May 2021. In August 2022, Boerne hired a contractor to inspect the roofs. The contractor found damage to several roofs and HVAC units and prepared an estimate for repair of over $700,000. Boerne submitted a claim to its insurer, Church Mutual on November 17, 2022. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

---

Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss

April 20, 2026 — Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii
The court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026). Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds. Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day

Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Finding of No Coverage for Interior Leak

March 24, 2026 — Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii
Applying California law, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that water damage caused by a leaking pipe over time was not covered under the insured’s homeowners’ policy. Mojica v. State Farm General Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32405 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 2025). A small hole, slightly larger than a pen tip in size, developed in a pressurized hot water pipe. The resulting leak lasted for nearly six days and released enough water to saturate and ruin all the subflooring and flooring in the insureds’ home. The Economic Loss Rule and Tort Claims by Owners against Design Professionals November 09, 2025 — Stu Richeson - The Dispute Resolver
This blog post looks at the question of when a project owner, who has a contract with the design professional, may assert an action against a design professional in negligence for purely economic losses. Actions against design professional can arise under a number of legal theories, but the two most common are contract and tort. Tort claims focus on duties imposed by law, while contract claims center on obligations agreed upon by the parties. The distinction often determines whether a plaintiff can recover purely economic losses and whether privity of contract is required. The distinction between contract and tort is significant due to the availability of different remedies, limitations periods, and burdens of proof. It is normally to a plaintiff's advantage to get both tort and contract claims before the trier of fact when the same facts will sustain either cause of action, because access to multiple theories of recovery may permit a plaintiff to avoid legal or remedial pitfalls which may apply to one cause of action but not another. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Stone & Webster Eng'g Corp., 725 F. Supp. 656 (N.D.N.Y. 1989). Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Stu Richeson, Riess LeMieux
Mr. Richeson may be contacted at sricheson@rllaw.com

---

Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Arguing the Fees Are Inextricably Intertwined

December 02, 2025 — David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal Updates
Attorney’s fees are a big part of any dispute. And the attorney’s fees should be because fees are a factor and can ultimately drive the outcome of a dispute. No one wants to spend $100,000 in fees to recover $100,000, so the conversation regarding attorney’s fees needs to be had early. Generally, a party can recover reasonable attorney’s fees if authorized by contract or by statute. So, there would need to be a prevailing party attorney’s fees provision in a contract, if suing on a contract, or there would need to be a statute authorizing the recovery of attorney’s fees, if suing on a statute. Then, there is authority that the party still needs to prevail on the significant issues in the dispute, as determined by the trial court (or binding arbitrator), in order to be the prevailing party for purposes of attorney’s fees. (Absent that, you are dealing with a proposal for settlement to create a procedural basis to recover fees, which is explained here.) Reasonable attorney’s fees, however, does not mean you will recover 100% of your attorney’s fees. Some percentage will presumably be discounted meaning becoming 100% whole when factoring in attorne
Defects, Delays and Change Orders

Report Highlights Trends in Construction Tech, Digitization, and AI

Blackstone to Buy Cosmopolitan Resort for $1.73 Billion

FBI Makes Arrest Related to Saipan Casino Construction

More on the VCPA and Construction

Los Angeles Team Obtains Favorable Verdict for Client in High-Stakes Slip-and-Fall Case

Thanks for the Super Lawyers Nod for 2019!

The Construction Lawyer as Problem Solver

Developer Pre-Conditions in CC&Rs Limiting Ability of HOA to Make Construction Defect Claims, Found Unenforceable

Washington’s Court of Appeals Protects Contracting Parties’ Rights to Define the Terms of their Indemnity Agreements

Burden Supporting Termination for Default

The American Rescue Plan Act: What Restaurants Need to Act on NOW

D.R. Horton Earnings Rise as Sales and Order Volume Increase

Eighth Circuit Affirms Judgment for Bad Faith after Insured's Home Destroyed by Fire

Construction Defect Settlement in Seattle

Balestreri Potocki & Holmes Attorneys Named 2020 Super Lawyers and Rising Star

Mandatory Attorneys’ Fee Award for Actions Brought Under the Underground Utility Damage Prevention Act

Pulte Home Corp. v. CBR Electric, Inc.

Does Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code Impact Your Constructi
Defense Victory in Breach of Fiduciary Action

Quick Note: Not In Contract With The Owner? Serve A Notice To Owner.

Denial of Coverage For Bodily Injury After Policy Period Does Not Violate Public Policy

New York Condominium Association Files Construction Defect Suit

Florida Condo Collapse Victims Reach $1 Billion Settlement

Court Throws Wet Blanket On Prime Contractor's Attorneys' Fees Request In Prompt Payment Case

Power to the Office Worker

Attorney-Client Privilege in the Age of Cyber Breaches

Appetite for Deconstruction

“Based On”… What Exactly? NJ Appellate Division Examines Phrase and Estops Insurer From Disclaiming Coverage for 20-Month Delay

Nailing Social Media: The Key to Generating Leads for Construction Companies

1st District Joins 2nd District Court of Appeals and Holds that One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement Claims

24th Annual West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar A Success

Building Industry Association of Southern California Announces 2025 Legends Nominees

Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Recognized as Largest Litigation Presence in Sacramento

ASCE Statement on House Passage of Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

Connecticut’s New False Claims Act Increases Risk to Public Construction Participants

Concrete Worker Wins Lawsuit and Settles with Other Defendant

Quick Note: Liability Insurer’s Duty to Defend and Duty to Indemnify

Detect and Prevent Construction Fraud

Weyerhaeuser Leaving Home Building Business

New-Home Sales in U.S. Unexpectedly Fall to Four-Month Low

Construction Manager’s Win in Michigan after Michigan Supreme Court Finds a Subcontractor’s Unintended Faulty Work is an ‘Occurrence’ Under CGL

Construction Contracts Need Amending Post COVID-19 Shutdowns

Business Risk Exclusions (j) 5 and (j) 6 Found Ambiguous

The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- The Claim

U.S. State Adoption of the National Electrical Code

PFAS, HFCs and Related Chemicals in the Data Center Industry

Defense Owed to Directors and Officers Despite Insured vs. Insured Exclusion

Elon Musk's Boring Co. Is Feuding With Texas Over a Driveway

Reinventing the Building Envelope – Interview with Gordon A Geddes

Governmental Action Exclusion Bars Claim for Damage to Insured's Building

Construction Defect Dispute Governed by Contract Disputes Act not yet Suited to being a "Suit"

Avoiding Disaster Due to Improper Licensing

Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .

Colorado Court Holds No Coverage for Breach of Contract Claim

Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom

Not If, But When: Newly Enacted Virginia Legislation Bans “Pay-If-Paid” Clauses In Construction Contracts

140 Days Until The California Consumer Privacy Act Becomes Law - Why Aren't More Businesses Complying?

California Enacts New Claims Resolution Process for Public Works Projects

Coffee Beans, Mars and the 50 States: Civil Code 1542 Waivers and Latent Defects

Commercial Real Estate in 2023: A Snapshot

Floating Cities May Be One Answer to Rising Sea Levels

Utility Contractor Held Responsible for Damaged Underground Electrical Line

Miller Act Payment Bond Surety Bound to Arbitration Award

Prime Contractor & Surety’s Recovery of Attorney’s Fees in Miller Act Lawsuit

Partner John Toohey is Nominated for West Coast Casualty’s Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence!

BWB&O is Recognized in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®!

BWB&O Senior Associate Kyle Riddles and Associate Alexandria Heins Obtain a Trial Victory in a Multi-Million Dollar Case!

Construction Defect Headaches Can Be Avoided