BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominiums expert witness Glencross South Dakota structural steel construction expert witness Glencross South Dakota custom homes expert witness Glencross South Dakota Medical building expert witness Glencross South Dakota casino resort expert witness Glencross South Dakota tract home expert witness Glencross South Dakota townhome construction expert witness Glencross South Dakota multi family housing expert witness Glencross South Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Glencross South Dakota industrial building expert witness Glencross South Dakota custom home expert witness Glencross South Dakota landscaping construction expert witness Glencross South Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Glencross South Dakota production housing expert witness Glencross South Dakota housing expert witness Glencross South Dakota low-income housing expert witness Glencross South Dakota retail construction expert witness Glencross South Dakota condominium expert witness Glencross South Dakota office building expert witness Glencross South Dakota parking structure expert witness Glencross South Dakota hospital construction expert witness Glencross South Dakota institutional building expert witness Glencross South Dakota
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Glencross, South Dakota

    South Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Glencross South Dakota

    No state license is required. A license is required for asbestos, plumbing, electrical, and well drilling trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Aberdeen Home Builders Association
    Local # 4315
    PO Box 201
    Aberdeen, SD 57402
    http://www.aberdeenhba.com

    Watertown Area Home Builders
    Local # 4375
    PO Box 1271 1017 6th Ave SE
    Watertown, SD 57201
    http://www.orgsites.com/sd/wahba

    South Dakota Home Builders Association
    Local # 4300
    PO Box 1218
    Pierre, SD 57501
    http://www.sdhomebuilders.com

    Oahe Home Builders Association
    Local # 4360
    PO Box 221
    Pierre, SD 57501


    Brookings Regional Builders Association
    Local # 4323
    PO Box 323
    Brookings, SD 57006
    http://brookings.buildpal.com

    Black Hills Home Builders Association
    Local # 4301
    3121 W Chicago St
    Rapid City, SD 57702
    http://www.blackhillshomebuilders.com

    Mitchell Area Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 4340
    PO Box 1152
    Mitchell, SD 57301



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Glencross South Dakota

    Claim for Consequential Damages Survives Motion to Dismiss

    How Long is Your Construction Warranty?

    Harrisburg Sought Support Before Ruinous Incinerator Retrofit

    New York's Highest Court Says Asbestos Causation Requires Evidence Of Sufficient Exposure To Sustain Liability

    HB 20-1046 - Private Retainage Reform - Postponed Indefinitely

    Would You Trade a Parking Spot for an Extra Bedroom?

    New Jersey Supreme Court Holding Impacts Allocation of Damages in Cases Involving Successive Tortfeasors

    Congratulations to Karen Baytosh and August Hotchkin on Their Recognition as 2021 Nevada Legal Elites!

    BWB&O is Recognized in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®!

    Haight’s Kristian Moriarty Selected for Super Lawyers’ 2021 Southern California Rising Stars

    Explore Legal Immigration Options for Construction Companies

    Delays in Filing Lead to Dismissal in Moisture Intrusion Lawsuit

    Insurance Tips for Contractors

    Nondelegable Duty of Care Owed to Third Persons

    Trump Abandons Plan for Council on Infrastructure

    Puerto Rico Grid Restoration Plagued by Historic Problems, New Challenges

    There’s the 5 Second Rule, But Have You Heard of the 5 Year Rule?

    Supreme Court Rejects “Wholly Groundless” Exception to Question of Arbitrability

    How to Build a Water-Smart City

    For Whom Additional Insured Coverage Applies in New York

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- The Claim

    How a 10-Story Wood Building Survived More Than 100 Earthquakes

    ‘The Ground Just Gave Out’: How a Storm’s Fury Ravaged Asheville

    Foreclosure Deficiency: Construction Loan vs. Home Improvement Loan

    Insured Under Property Insurance Policy Should Comply With Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    ASCE Statement on Hurricane Milton and Environmental Threats

    Think Before you Execute that Release – the Language in the Release Matters!

    Bar Against Forum Selection Clauses in Construction Contracts Extended to Design Professionals

    Twenty States Challenge Dismantling of FEMA Resilient Infrastructure Program

    Condo Collapse Spurs Hometown House Member to Demand U.S. Rules

    Balancing the Right to Repair With Evidence Preservation in Construction Defect Litigation

    CEO: Power Isn’t the Only Electrical Challenge for AI Data Centers

    In Florida, Component Parts of an Improvement to Real Property are Subject to the Statute of Repose for Products Liability Claims

    Lewis Brisbois Appellate Team Scores Major Victory in Bad Faith Insurance Action

    Construction Defects and Warranties in Maryland

    Construction Up in United States

    Harmon Tower Case Settled Prior to Start of Trial

    Is Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?

    California Supreme Court to Examine Arbitration Provisions in Several Upcoming Cases

    Were Condos a Bad Idea?

    Gilbert’s Plan for Downtown Detroit Has No Room for Jail

    A Lot of Cheap Housing Is About to Get Very Expensive

    Students for Fair Admissions: Shaking the Foundations of EEOC Programs and M/WBE Requirements

    Improperly Installed Flanges Are Impaired Property

    Trio of White and Williams Attorneys Named Top Lawyers by Delaware Today

    St Louis County Approves Settlement in Wrongful Death Suit

    2022 Project of the Year: Linking Los Angeles

    Home Builders and Developers Beware: SC Supreme Court Beats Up Hybrid Arbitration Clauses Mercilessly

    24/7 Wall Street Reported on Eight Housing Markets at All-Time Highs
    Corporate Profile

    GLENCROSS SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Glencross, South Dakota Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. In connection with regional assets which comprise design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Glencross region.

    Glencross South Dakota construction forensic expert witnessGlencross South Dakota construction expert witness consultantGlencross South Dakota construction claims expert witnessGlencross South Dakota building expertGlencross South Dakota OSHA expert witness constructionGlencross South Dakota expert witness concrete failureGlencross South Dakota architectural expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Glencross, South Dakota

    SDV Celebrates 30th Anniversary Press Release

    April 08, 2026 —
    Trumbull, Connecticut – Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV) is proud to announce the celebration of its 30th anniversary. Founded in 1996 by three attorneys in a small New Haven, Connecticut office, SDV was built on a clear and focused mission: representing policyholders in insurance coverage matters. Three decades later, that commitment remains at the core of the firm’s identity and has been instrumental in its continued success and reputation nationwide. Today, SDV is a nationally recognized boutique firm with 50 attorneys serving policyholders across the United States. Building on its longstanding reputation for excellence and client advocacy, the firm is pleased to announce the opening of its newest office in Massachusetts—an exciting milestone that reflects SDV’s continued growth. The new office is led by Managing Partner Anna Perry. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    GRSM Attorneys Named Finalists in 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards

    March 10, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani attorneys have been shortlisted as finalists for Corporate Counsel’s 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) Awards, which honor women leaders who have demonstrated a commitment to advancing the empowerment of women in the legal profession. In the Law Firm Internal Collaborative Leadership category, Stephanie Jones was recognized for her exceptional ability to foster collaboration, mentor talent, and align colleagues across GRSM. Jones has consistently demonstrated leadership rooted in trust, inclusion, and shared purpose, qualities that have strengthened the firm during a period of extraordinary growth. Her impact on the firm’s culture and success will continue as she steps into her role as Chief Operating Partner in June 2026, where she will further build on her leadership in fostering teamwork, mentorship, and alignment across the firm’s national platform. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Texas Supreme Court Rules for Road Contractors in Critical Legal Immunity Test

    January 26, 2026 —
    The Texas Supreme Court overturned an earlier ruling by appeals court judges clarifying who is protected by the Texas Dept. of Transportation's legal immunity shield. It is a state law barring lawsuits against contractors for auto accidents as long as the contractors build according to the design. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    April 27, 2026 —
    Under Florida’s Lien Law, there’s an affirmative defense or affirmative claim known as a “fraudulent lien.” The fraudulent lien defense or claim is set out in Florida Statute s. 713.31. This defense also extends to payment bond claims, whether under a private statutory payment bond (Florida Statute s. 713.23) or a public payment bond (Florida Statute s. 255.05), as it pertains to the notice of nonpayment. A notice of nonpayment needs to be served within 90 days from final furnishing to preserve a claimant’s rights against the bond. However, there really has not been a case, until now, that discusses a “fraudulent notice of nonpayment.” In K&M Electric Supply, Inc. v. Brown Electrical Solutions, LLC, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D672a (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), a prime contractor and surety prevailed at the trial level on their fraudulent notice of nonpayment defense based on a supplier’s notice of nonpayment and action against a public payment bond (under Florida Statute s. 255.05). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Reminder: You Can’t Make Others Indemnify You for Your Own Actions

    January 13, 2026 —
    I have spoken about Virginia Code 11-4.1 and the prohibition on forcing others to indemnify for the actions of the indemnitees on a few occasions here at Construction Law Musings (See Uniwest Posts). The Western District of Virginia gave its take on indemnification clauses and why they need to be carefully drafted in a December 2024 case, Sauer Construction, LLC v. MC3 Solutions, LLC et al. In Sauer, the Court looked at, among other things, an indemnification provision between MC3, a subcontractor to Sauer, and MC3s sub-subcontractor, Bonitz Flooring Group. This was the relatively typical construction dispute where a general contractor sues a subcontractor and then that subcontractor sues its supplier and sub-subcontractors for indemnity pursuant to its contract. When faced with the indemnification claim, Bonitz argued that the indemnification provision violated the Va. Code 11-4.1 because it required Bonitz to indemnify MC3 for MC3’s actions. The provision follows the break. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Insurer’s Late Notice Argument Fails Due to Lack of Prejudice

    December 30, 2025 —
    The court refused to dismiss the insured’s claim for hail damage based on late notice because the insurer failed to demonstrate it had suffered prejudice. Borene UMC v. Church Mut. Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210767 (W.D. Texas Oct. 27, 2025). Boerne UMC owned multiple buildings that were allegedly damaged during a hailstorm that occurred in May 2021. In August 2022, Boerne hired a contractor to inspect the roofs. The contractor found damage to several roofs and HVAC units and prepared an estimate for repair of over $700,000. Boerne submitted a claim to its insurer, Church Mutual on November 17, 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Parking Garage Partially Collapses in Dearborn, Mich., Trapping One

    March 31, 2026 —
    A multi-level parking garage that partially collapsed in Dearborn, Mich., is fenced off and the city has started the legal process allowed under state law to demolish the privately-owned structure due to alleged dangerous conditions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    An “Agreement to Agree” Is Not a Binding Contract

    January 13, 2026 —
    A driving issue in a recent dispute was whether a binding contract existed simply through the selection of a proposal in response to a solicitation. Or, was there nothing more than an “agreement to agree,” which does not create a binding contract. There is an important distinction between a binding contract an an “agreement to agree.” A Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) issued a Request for Proposals otherwise referred to as an RFP. The RFP specifically stated that the CRA and proposer will be contractually bound only if and when a written contract is executed between the parties. A proposer was notified that it was selected as the winning proposer however a written contract was never executed because the proposer was subsequently disqualified. The proposer filed a lawsuit claiming it was wrongfully disqualified and prevailed. The trial court found it was entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to a contract that had been formed when the proposer’s proposal was originally accepted. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com