BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Clay County Tennessee multi family housing expert witness Clay County Tennessee casino resort expert witness Clay County Tennessee landscaping construction expert witness Clay County Tennessee tract home expert witness Clay County Tennessee mid-rise construction expert witness Clay County Tennessee Medical building expert witness Clay County Tennessee office building expert witness Clay County Tennessee concrete tilt-up expert witness Clay County Tennessee low-income housing expert witness Clay County Tennessee hospital construction expert witness Clay County Tennessee industrial building expert witness Clay County Tennessee parking structure expert witness Clay County Tennessee condominium expert witness Clay County Tennessee housing expert witness Clay County Tennessee custom home expert witness Clay County Tennessee Subterranean parking expert witness Clay County Tennessee condominiums expert witness Clay County Tennessee institutional building expert witness Clay County Tennessee custom homes expert witness Clay County Tennessee retail construction expert witness Clay County Tennessee high-rise construction expert witness Clay County Tennessee
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Clay County, Tennessee

    Tennessee Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2787/SB2931 & HB 2771/SB 2201; Title 66, Chptr 36) Homeowners must serve written notice of a defect 15 days after its discovery; Contractors, upon receipt of the notice, have 10 business days to inspect the residence and inform any subcontractors it believes are reasonably responsible on the defect. Within 10 business days after notice of the claim, the subcontractor must serve a written response to contractor. Within 30 days after receipt of notice of a defect, the contractor must provide written notice of intention (repair, replace, monetarily compensate or reject) to the homeowner.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Clay County Tennessee

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Clarksville-Montgomery Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 4406
    PO Box 1167
    Clarksville, TN 37041
    http://www.clarksvillehba.org

    Home Builders Association of Gr Kingsport
    Local # 4445
    1200 E Sevier Ave
    Kingsport, TN 37664
    http://www.kingsporthomebuilders.com

    Johnson City Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4494
    1001 N Roan St
    Johnson City, TN 37601
    http://www.jcahba.org

    Greene County Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 4464
    70 Afton Road
    Afton, TN 37616


    Home Builders Association of Tennessee
    Local # 4400
    213 5th Ave N Ste 200
    Nashville, TN 37219
    http://www.hbat.org

    Home Builders Association of Upper Cumberland
    Local # 4491
    PO Box 243
    Cookeville, TN 38503
    http://www.uchba.com

    Home Builders Association of Dyer Co
    Local # 4425
    1075 Cooper Dr
    Dyersburg, TN 38024



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Clay County Tennessee

    Depreciation of Labor in Calculating Actual Cash Value Against Public Policy

    Reducing Rework on Construction Projects Benefits Budget, Schedule and Financial Loss

    Recycled Water and New Construction. New Standards Being Considered

    Supreme Court Holds That Prevailing Wage Statute is Constitutional

    Unwrapped Pipes Lead to Flooding and Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Owner Can’t Pursue Statutory Show Cause Complaint to Cancel Lien… Fair Outcome?

    Incorporate Sustainability in Building Design to Meet Green Construction Goals

    Delays and Suspension of the Work Under Fixed Price Government Contract

    Contractual Indemnification Limitation on Florida Public Projects

    Georgia Court Clarifies Landlord Liability for Construction Defects

    Repairs Could Destroy Evidence in Construction Defect Suit

    What I Love and Hate About Updating My Contracts From an Owners’ Perspective

    Canada Cooler Housing Market Boosts Poloz’s Soft Landing

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    Excess Policy Triggered Once Retention Paid, Even if Loss Not Covered By Excess

    Home Sales and Stock Price Up for D. R. Horton

    Window Installer's Alleged Faulty Workmanship On Many Projects Constitutes Multiple Occurrences

    Third Circuit Court of Appeals Concludes “Soup to Nuts” Policy Does Not Include Faulty Workmanship Coverage

    Property Damage to Insured's Own Work is Not Covered

    DA’s Office Checking Workers Comp Compliance

    One-Upmanship by Contractors In Prevailing Wage Decision Leads to a Bad Result for All . . . Perhaps

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    Candis Jones Named “On the Rise” by Daily Report's Georgia Law Awards

    Enforceability of Contract Provisions Extending Liquidated Damages Beyond Substantial Completion

    General Indemnity Agreement Can Come Back to Bite You

    Recent Opinions Clarify Enforceability of Pay-if-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts

    Float-In of MassDOT Span Sails, But Delay Dispute Lingers

    Navigating the DOT’s Interim Final Rule on DBE Certification Standards - and Preparing for the (Bumpy) Road Ahead

    Zoning Hearing Notice Addressed by Georgia Appeals Court

    Helsinki Stream City: A Re-imagining Outside the System

    Surplus Lines Carriers Cannot Compel Arbitration in Louisiana

    How Robotics Can Improve Construction and Demolition Waste Sorting

    California Case Is a Reminder That Not All Insurance Policies Are Alike Regarding COVID-19 Losses

    Edgewater Plans to Sue Over Pollution During Veterans Field Rehab

    Unpredictable Opinion Regarding Construction Lien (Reinstatement??)

    Aurora Joins other Colorado Cities by Adding a Construction Defect Ordinance

    Liquidated Damages: Too High and It’s a Penalty. Too Low and You’re Out of Luck.

    Damages in First Trial Establishing Liability of Tortfeasor Binding in Bad Faith Trial Against Insurer

    DC Circuit Issues Two Important Clean Air Act and Administrative Law Decisions

    French Government Fines National Architects' Group $1.6M Over Fee-Fixing

    You Are Not A “Liar” Simply Because You Amend Your Complaint

    For US Cities in Infrastructure Need, Grant Writers Wanted

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (5/22/24) – Federal Infrastructure Money, Hotel Development Pipelines, and Lab Space Construction

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “I Never Had a Chance”

    Florida High-Rise for Sale, Construction Defects Possibly Included

    Colorado Supreme Court Finds Economic Loss Rule Applies to Allegations of Willful and Wanton Conduct

    Court of Appeal Puts the “Equity” in Equitable Subrogation

    Colorado Supreme Court Decision Could Tarnish Appraisal Process for Policyholders

    Home Improvement in U.S. Slowing or Still Intact -- Which Is It?

    Finding Plaintiff Intentionally Spoliated Evidence, the Northern District of Indiana Imposes Sanction
    Corporate Profile

    CLAY COUNTY TENNESSEE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Clay County, Tennessee Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Clay County and the surrounding areas.

    Clay County Tennessee construction expert testimonyClay County Tennessee expert witness structural engineerClay County Tennessee construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessClay County Tennessee architect expert witnessClay County Tennessee structural engineering expert witnessesClay County Tennessee expert witness windowsClay County Tennessee construction project management expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Clay County, Tennessee

    GRSM Secures Complete Judgment for Defense in Years-Long Dispute Spanning Multiple Venues

    June 22, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani’s Hartford, Connecticut, and Dallas offices recently secured a complete defense judgment and recovery of attorney’s fees and costs in an arbitration on behalf of a longtime client, concluding a dispute that lasted several years and traversed multiple jurisdictions. The dispute initially arose in Texas state court, and almost immediately, the claimant began pursuing the matter aggressively, a pattern that continued until the day judgment was entered in GRSM’s client’s favor. GRSM’s team mounted a strong defense, achieving an early success in compelling mandatory arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Structural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC Tower

    September 01, 2026 —
    New York City has expanded its investigation into the structural failure at the former Pfizer headquarters tower in Midtown Manhattan as the Dept. of Investigation confirmed a parallel inquiry and the Dept. of Buildings directed the property owner to retain third-party engineering oversight. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Global Insights Center: Monthly Newsletter

    June 15, 2026 —
    May in Review Last month, inflation moved higher, with Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rising to 3.8% year over year, up from 3.3% the prior month. The increase was driven primarily by energy prices, particularly gasoline, reflecting ongoing disruptions tied to the Middle East conflict. Labor market data were broadly stable. The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%, wage growth increased modestly to 3.6%, while job growth continued to be geographically concentrated in the Southern states, particularly cities in Texas. On an occupational basis, healthcare once again led job gains, especially in home health services, a trend we have consistently highlighted. Business formations increased during the month, with notable strength in e commerce and digital services firms. Manufacturing activity also improved, particularly in semiconductors, IT equipment, and natural gas–related energy infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Global Insights Center Staff, The Hartford

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    August 11, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Court Rules Insurer AIG Can't Claw Back $50M Storm Payout From Turner

    October 20, 2026 —
    A Delaware court judge ruled earlier this month that insurer AIG cannot claw back $50 million from Turner Construction for two insurance claim payouts it has made to New York University's Langone Medical Center. The dispute relates to the 2012 flooding of the university's Manhattan hospital center during Superstorm Sandy in October 2012. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com