BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Aransas County Texas institutional building expert witness Aransas County Texas high-rise construction expert witness Aransas County Texas hospital construction expert witness Aransas County Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Aransas County Texas parking structure expert witness Aransas County Texas landscaping construction expert witness Aransas County Texas structural steel construction expert witness Aransas County Texas casino resort expert witness Aransas County Texas condominium expert witness Aransas County Texas custom home expert witness Aransas County Texas custom homes expert witness Aransas County Texas industrial building expert witness Aransas County Texas condominiums expert witness Aransas County Texas Subterranean parking expert witness Aransas County Texas retail construction expert witness Aransas County Texas housing expert witness Aransas County Texas production housing expert witness Aransas County Texas townhome construction expert witness Aransas County Texas multi family housing expert witness Aransas County Texas tract home expert witness Aransas County Texas Medical building expert witness Aransas County Texas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Aransas County, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Aransas County Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Laredo Builders Association
    Local # 4593
    201 W Hillside Suite 3
    Laredo, TX 78041
    http://www.laredobuilders.org

    Builders Association of Corpus Christi
    Local # 4521
    5325 Yorktown Blvd
    Corpus Christi, TX 78413
    http://www.bacctexas.org/

    Builders Association of Victoria
    Local # 4572
    5105 E Airline Rd
    Victoria, TX 77904
    http://www.vctbuilders.org

    Galveston Area Builders & Remodelers Association
    Local # 4533
    P O Box 1037
    Santa Fe, TX 77517
    http://www.galvestonbuilders.org/

    Builders Association of Greater San Antonio
    Local # 4560
    3625 Paesanos Parkwary
    San Antonio, TX 78231
    http://www.sabuilders.com

    Greater New Braunfels Home Builders Association
    Local # 4503
    625 W San Antonio St
    New Braunfels, TX 78130
    http://www.newbraunfelshomebuilders.com

    Greater Houston Builders Association
    Local # 4536
    9511 W Sam Houston Pkwy N
    Houston, TX 77064
    http://www.ghba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Aransas County Texas

    Just Because You Record a Mechanic’s Lien Doesn’t Mean You Get Notice of Foreclosure

    Municipal Ordinances Create Additional Opportunities for the Defense of Construction Defect Claims in Colorado

    Insured's Remand of Bad Faith Action Granted

    FDOT Races to Re-Open Storm-Damaged Pensacola Bridge

    Hunton Insurance Practice, Attorneys Recognized in 2024 Edition of The Legal 500 United States

    Tejon Ranch Co. Announces Settlement of Litigation Related to the Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement

    Bad Faith Claim For Independent Contractor's Reduced Loss Assessment Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Waiver of Subrogation Enforced, Denying Insurers Recovery Against Additional Insured in $500 Million Off-Shore Oil Rig Loss

    SIG Earnings Advance 21% as U.K. Construction Strengthens

    Illinois Court of Appeals Addresses What It Means to “Reside” in Property for Purposes of Coverage

    URGENT: 'Catching Some Hell': Hurricane Michael Slams Into Florida

    CARB Issues Proposed Climate Disclosure Regulations

    Federal Court Enforces “Limits” and “Most We Will Pay” Clauses in Additional Insured Endorsement

    Big Policyholder Win in Michigan

    Five Facts About Housing That Will Make People In New York City and San Francisco Depressed

    Ohio: Are Construction Defects Covered in Insurance Policies?

    Attorneys' Fees Awarded as Part of "Damages Because of Property Damage"

    Discussing Parametric Design with Shajay Bhooshan of Zaha Hadid Architects

    Florida Former Public Works Director Fined for Ethics Violation

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2024 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Texas Shortens Its Statute of Repose To 6 Years, With Limitations

    Orange County Team Obtains Unanimous Defense Verdict in Case Involving Failed Real Estate Transaction

    NTSB Cites Design Errors in Fatal Bridge Collapse

    Court Upholds Appraisers' Use of "Increased Cost of Construction" Provision

    How the Cumulative Impact Theory has been Defined

    Statute of Limitations Bars Lender’s Subsequent Action to Quiet Title Against Junior Lienholder Mistakenly Omitted from Initial Judicial Foreclosure Action

    A Win for Policyholders: Court Finds Flood Exclusion Inapplicable to Plumbing Leaks Caused by Hurricane Rainfall

    Are You Overpromising on Your Construction Contracts? Here's How to Build With Transparency

    Construction Managers, Are You Exposing Yourselves to Labor Law Liability?

    Engineering Seals Versus Contracts ‘Under Seal’ (Two Very Different Things)

    Unjust Enrichment and Express Contract Don’t Mix

    Measure Of Damages for Breach of Construction Contract

    Thoughts on New Pay if Paid Legislation

    Demanding a Reduction in Retainage

    Contrasting Expert Opinions Result in Denial of Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

    Insured Versus Insured Clause Does Not Bar Coverage

    Top Developments: 2025 - Issue 2

    The Future Looks Bright for Construction in 2015

    Washington Court Limits Lien Rights of Construction Managers

    High School Gym Closed by Construction Defects

    California Fire Lawyers File Suit Against PG&E on Behalf of More Than 50 Wildfire Victims

    Drones, Googleplexes and Hyperloops

    Will a Notice of Non-Responsibility Prevent Enforcement of a California Mechanics Lien?

    Kahana Feld Secures Discontinuance with Prejudice in Fraudulent Case

    FEMA Offers Recovery Tips for California Wildfire Survivors

    Condominium Construction Defect Resolution in the District of Columbia

    Condo Collapse Spurs Hometown House Member to Demand U.S. Rules

    Hong Kong Property Tycoon Makes $533 Million Bet on Solar

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    DC Metro Extension’s Precast Supplier Banned from Federal Contracts
    Corporate Profile

    ARANSAS COUNTY TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Aransas County, Texas Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to the construction industry's most recognized companies, legal professionals, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. In connection with in house assets which include licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Aransas County and the surrounding areas.

    Aransas County Texas civil engineering expert witnessAransas County Texas construction project management expert witnessesAransas County Texas construction expert witness consultantAransas County Texas construction expertsAransas County Texas construction forensic expert witnessAransas County Texas stucco expert witnessAransas County Texas OSHA expert witness construction
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Aransas County, Texas

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Honorees!

    February 23, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, John Toohey, and Tyler Offenhauser have been named to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers list. Notably, Nicole Whyte was also selected to the Top 50 Orange County Super Lawyers list, an honor reflecting her outstanding work, leadership, and impact in the legal community. Partners Kyle Riddles and Courtney Serrato, along with Associate Kevin Moore, were also recognized as 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance

    July 13, 2026 —
    Following the Department of Labor’s 2023 Davis-Bacon rule changes, federal construction contractors faced a pressing question: not whether paying prevailing wages is required, but how far those obligations could extend. Could they reach off-site material suppliers? Delivery drivers? Contracts that omitted Davis-Bacon clauses entirely? A recent federal court decision in AGC of America v. US Department of Labor answers these questions in important ways, vacating several disputed provisions and giving contractors greater certainty when pricing, bidding, and administering federal construction projects. The ruling addresses three aspects of the 2023 regulations that sought to extend Davis-Bacon obligations beyond their traditional scope. By vacating those provisions, the decision creates a more predictable compliance environment and reinforces an important principle: Davis-Bacon enforcement works best when contractors, workers, and regulators operate under clear, objective rules. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Irving may be contacted at sirving@pecklaw.com

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Damage from Frozen Pipes Excluded from Coverage

    March 31, 2026 —
    Applying Texas law, the federal district court found there was no coverage for damage to the insured’s commercial building due to the bursting of frozen pipes. Barona v. State Farm Lloyds, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 257379 (S.D. Texas Dec. 12, 2025). Freezing weather froze Barona’s plumbing fixtures, causing significant water damage to the commercial property when the plumbing eventually expanded and burst. State Farm sent an inspector. During the inspection, Barona stated that he turned off the heat to his building but did not shut off the water supply or drain the pipes. State Farm denied covered based on the policy’s exclusion for frozen plumbing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Pay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted Line

    August 03, 2026 —
    Buried deep in the fine print of a subcontract, a pay-if-paid clause may be looming. If you are a subcontractor or supplier, misreading these clauses can put your cash flow at risk. If you are an owner or general contractor, drafting them incorrectly can leave you with obligations you never intended — or unenforceable protections you were counting on. It is more important than ever to understand when pay-if-paid clauses hold up and when they do not, as well as recent litigation and drafting trends. Whether you are negotiating a new agreement, reviewing your standard form contracts, or staring down a payment dispute, understanding how Arizona law treats pay-if-paid clauses is essential. In this article, we break down key considerations, walk through the legal standards Arizona courts apply, and offer practical tips to consider to help you protect your payment rights on the next project. Reprinted courtesy of Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer and Matthew Racioppo, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com Mr. Racioppo may be contacted at mracioppo@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    May 14, 2026 —
    Huge Congratulations to Partner Kevin Wheeler and Associate Lindsey Wells for securing a strong result on a Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed on behalf of their client, the City of Murrieta. This was a complex, multi-party matter arising from a residential gas leak and explosion, where Plaintiffs alleged the City and MFPD failed to properly respond to the incident. After multiple complaints were consolidated and extensive defense work narrowed the case, eighteen plaintiffs remained asserting five causes of action against the City, prompting a comprehensive MSJ/MSA targeting liability, causation, and damages. The Court’s ruling reflects a significant win, particularly on the immunity framework. The Court eliminated the core negligence and assumed-duty claims arising from fire protection and emergency response activities. It further disposed of the misrepresentation and public nuisance claims. At the end of the day, three plaintiffs were dismissed entirely for failure to comply with Government Claims Act requirements, further reducing the scope of the case. While the dangerous condition claim remains, it does so in a very limited posture. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com