HIDALGO COUNTY TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

Surety Requiring Collateral Security Under General Agreement of Indemnity

September 08, 2026 — David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal Updates
In order to procure bonds (payment and performance bonds), you need to sign a General Agreement of Indemnity (referred to as the “GAI”) with the surety (bonding company). It does not matter the surety issuing the bonds, the terms and conditions in the General Agreement of Indemnity are largely consistent. These terms and conditions are one-sided written in favor of the surety. This is because bonds are not insurance. When a surety issues such bonds, it is doing so under the premise that it will get reimbursed every penny that it incurs relative to its exposure- whether incurred in attorney’s fees, consulting costs, or remediating a default or claim under the applicable bond. The General Agreement of Indemnity is one of the most powerful contracts in construction and is a contract that is not to be taken lightly. It provides the surety numerous rights in the event of a claim. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

---

RONI: What You Lose by Not Investing in AI – With Sam Zolfagharian

September 21, 2026 — Aarni Heiskanen - AEC Business
Sam Zolfagharian returns to the AEC Business Podcast for her second appearance. She is an AI strategist, keynote speaker, and the author of two books, Disrupt It and Future by Design. She spoke at the AI in AEC conference in Helsinki in March, and we picked up the conversation where that keynote left off. The starting point was a question her clients keep raising. Executives are being asked by their boards about the return on their AI investments, and many of them do not have an answer they trust. This episode is about what to measure instead, and when the dollar figure finally becomes the right number to look at. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

---

Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (6/24/26) – HUD to Fund AI Grants, Luxury Hotel Deal Investment Activity to Surge, ESPCs to Fund Energy and Infrastructure Improvements

July 06, 2026 — Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law Blog
In our latest roundup, data centers are exposed to climate change, commercial tenant sues CoStar, cities see opportunities in emerging sports markets, and more!

• With deferred maintenance growing and capital dollars stretched thin, local governments are using ESPCs to fund energy and infrastructure improvements through future operational savings. (Vicky Uhland, Construction Dive)
• The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is offering up to $3 million in grants for local governments to deploy automated permitting and building code systems. (Ryan Kushner, Construction Dive)
• Luxury hotel deals are set to see a surge in investment activity due to strong fundamentals and strengthening capital markets. (Noor Adatia, Hotel Dive)

Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

---

Leading Boutiques Combine to Form SDV Fenchurch, A Global Law Firm for Insurance Policyholders

September 15, 2026 — SDV Fenchurch
TRUMBULL, Conn., and LONDON, Sept. 1, 2026 — Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), Fenchurch Law, Wesolowski Abogados, and CLIR & Fenchurch and their partner members in Asia, Europe and North America combined today to launch SDV Fenchurch, a global law firm built exclusively to represent policyholders and the brokers who advise them. Structured as a Swiss verein, SDV Fenchurch unites dedicated insurance-recovery practices across eight jurisdictions in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Turkey, and Singapore. With over 90 lawyers devoted to insurance coverage matters, the firm is among the largest policyholder-side practices in the world and, by number of jurisdictions with full-time policyholder counsel capabilities, the most geographically extensive. The founders are brought together by a single shared mission: to act solely for policyholders, never the insurers, in insurance disputes. This is in stark contrast to most international firms with insurance practices, which mostly represent insurers only. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of SDV Fenchurch

---

Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Wind Damage

June 29, 2026 — Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii
The court found that a six-month delay in reporting damage from wind did not comply with the policy’s notice requirements. Touchmark Hotel Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61910 (S.D. N. Y. March 24, 2026). A storm caused damage to Touchstone’s hotel on January 4, 2023. Touchstone’s corporate representative, Rohit Patel, testified that he was not at the property on the day of the storm. In a telephone call the next day, the manager of the property reported to Patel that he observed detached shingles from the roof the hotel in the parking lot. Patel testified that he did not file a claim at that time because Touchmark’s employees did not detect any water leakage in the building and because he did not believe that the cost of the damage from the storm would exceed the policy’s deductible. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

---

Location, Location, Location — But Which One? The Few Words in Your Construction Contract that Pick Where You Fight

June 29, 2026 — Brad Sands - ConsensusDocs
Most professionals know the old real estate line: location, location, location. It turns out to be just as true for construction contracts as it is for property. Consider a recent case involving a project owner that hired two design firms for a project. When issues arose during construction, the owner sued the design firms in state court in Brazoria County, Texas, pursuant to the forum selection clause in the parties’ contracts. The defendants then removed the case to the federal district court in Galveston, a courthouse in a different county. But the owner wanted the case back in Brazoria County state court. Whether it got its wish came down to two words in the contract: “situated in.” This article is about words like those. A construction contract’s forum selection clause names the place for the fight nobody plans to have, and where that fight happens can shape how it goes. This article explains why the wording in your forum selection clause deserves careful reading before you sign a construction contract. It is not a deep dive into the mechanics of federal removal jurisdiction, and it is not an academic comparison of the terms “forum” and “venue.” Instead, it is a practical look at how courts actually read these clauses, so the location of a future fight is the one you intended. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Brad Sands, Jones Walker, LLP
Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

---

Alexander Hopkins Authors Law360 Article on Wisconsin Supreme Court Coverage Decision

October 06, 2026 — Alexander G. Hopkins - SDV Fenchurch
Alexander Hopkins recently authored an Expert Analysis for Law360 examining a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court decision addressing coverage for water damage arising from alleged construction defects. In “Wis. Coverage Ruling Rejects Strict Ensuing Loss Test,” Alex explores the relationship between construction defect exclusions and ensuing loss provisions, and what the decision means for policyholders seeking coverage when an excluded condition contributes to subsequent damage. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Alexander G. Hopkins, SDV Fenchurch
Mr. Hopkins may be contacted at alexander.hopkins@sdvfenchurch.us

---

Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy

July 20, 2026 — Anna M. Perry, Rachel S. Kindseth & Nina Catanzaro - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
I. Course of Construction Exclusions Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy. General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct phy
What Are The Most Commonly Claimed Issues In Construction Defect Litigation?

Do Not Pass Go! Duty to Defend in a Professional Services Agreement (law note)

Yellowstone Park Aims for Quick Reopening After Floods

John Boyden, Alison Kertis Named “Top Rank Attorneys” by Nevada Business Magazine

Los Angeles Seeks Speedier Way to Build New Affordable Homes

Insurer Must Defend Construction Defect Claims

California Storm Raises Mudslide Risk, Closes Interstate

Homeowner Sues
Burden to Prove Exception to Exclusion Falls on Insured

South Carolina Supreme Court Finds that Consequential Damage Arise From "Occurrence"

Why Federal and State Agencies are Considering Converting from a “Gallons Consumed” to a “Road Usage” Tax – And What are the Risks to the Consumer?

Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

The Leaning Tower of San Francisco

Continuing Breach Doctrine

The Court-Side Seat: FERC Reviews, Panda Power Plaints and Sovereign Immunity

The Importance of the Recent Amendment to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence

ASCE Statement on Calls to Suspend the Federal Gas Tax

Mississippi Supreme Court Addresses Earth Movement Exclusion

USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

BHA’s Next MCLE Seminar in San Diego on July 25th

The Biggest Trials Coming to Courts Around the World in 2021

Was Jury Right in Negligent Construction Case?

The Biggest Change to the Mechanics Lien Law Since 1963

Couple Perseveres to Build Green

HOA Foreclosure Excess Sale Proceeds Go to Owner

Florida Enacts Sweeping Tort Reform Legislation, Raising Barriers to Insurance Coverage Claims

Three Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

Failure to Comply with Sprinkler Endorsement Bars Coverage for Fire Damage

Town Sues over Defective Work on Sewer Lines

In South Carolina, Insurer's Denial of Liability Does Not Waive Attorney-Client Privilege for Bad Faith Claim

Trumark Homes Hired James Furey as VP of Land Acquisition

Tenth Circuit Reverses District Court's Ruling that Contractor Entitled to a Defense

Wilke Fleury ranked in Best Lawyers’ Best Law Firms!!

Alabama “occurrence” and subcontractor work exception to the “your completed work” exclusion

LA’s $1.2 Billion Graffiti Towers Put on Sale After Bankruptcy

No Coverage Based Upon Your Prior Work Exclusion

Illinois Joins the Pack on Defective Construction as an Occurrence

Federal Miller Act Payment Bond Claim: Who Gets Paid and Who Does Not? What Are the Deadlines?

Lessons from the Sept. 19 Mexico Earthquake

NY Project Produces America's First Utility Scale Wind Power

$24 Million Verdict Against Material Supplier Overturned Where Plaintiff Failed to Prove Supplier’s Negligence or Breach of Contract Caused an SB800 Violation

Solar Power Inc. to Build 30-Megawatt Project in Inner Mongolia

How Concrete Mistakes Added Cost to the Recent Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge Project

History and Gentrification Clash in a Gilded Age Resort

Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (11/8/23) – New Handling of Homelessness, Decline in Investments into ESG Funds, and Shrinking of a Homebuyer’s Dollar

Extrinsic Evidence, or Eight Corners? Texas Court Sheds Light on Determining the Duty to Defend

Construction Contract Clauses Only a Grinch Would Love – Part 4

High-Rise Condominium Construction Design Defects, A Maryland Construction Lawyer’s Perspective

Toxic Drywall Not Covered Under Homeowner’s Policy

10-story Mass Timber 'Rocking' Frame Sails Through Seismic Shake Tests

Engineers Found ‘Hundreds’ of Cracks in California Bridge

Construction Defects Lead to Demolition

Summarizing Changes to NEPA in the Fiscal Responsibility Act (P.L. 118-5)

Manhattan Site for Supertall Condo Finds New Owner at Auction

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denies Review of Pro-Policy Decision

Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

Stormy Skies Ahead? Important News Regarding a Hard Construction Insurance Market

Tesla Finishes First Solar Roofs—Including Elon's House