BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Hillister Texas tract home expert witness Hillister Texas condominiums expert witness Hillister Texas casino resort expert witness Hillister Texas landscaping construction expert witness Hillister Texas industrial building expert witness Hillister Texas high-rise construction expert witness Hillister Texas institutional building expert witness Hillister Texas custom homes expert witness Hillister Texas townhome construction expert witness Hillister Texas hospital construction expert witness Hillister Texas condominium expert witness Hillister Texas parking structure expert witness Hillister Texas office building expert witness Hillister Texas housing expert witness Hillister Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Hillister Texas Medical building expert witness Hillister Texas structural steel construction expert witness Hillister Texas low-income housing expert witness Hillister Texas retail construction expert witness Hillister Texas custom home expert witness Hillister Texas multi family housing expert witness Hillister Texas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hillister, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hillister Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Bryan College Station
    Local # 4518
    230 Southwest Pkwy
    College Station, TX 77840
    http://www.bcsbuilders.org

    Building Industry Association of the Highland Lakes
    Local # 4558
    1401 Broadway St Ste B1
    Marble Falls, TX 78654
    http://www.bia-highlandlakes.com/

    Home Builders Association of Greater Austin
    Local # 4512
    8140 Exchange Dr
    Austin, TX 78754
    http://www.austinhomebuilders.com

    Central Texas Home Builders Association
    Local # 4539
    PO Box 2229
    Harker Heights, TX 76548
    http://www.cthba.com

    Texas Association of Builders
    Local # 4500
    313 E 12th St Ste 210
    Austin, TX 78701
    http://www.texasbuilders.org

    Temple Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4501
    PO Box 2002
    Temple, TX 76503
    http://www.tahb.org

    Home Builders Association of SE Texas
    Local # 4515
    5655 Eastex Freeway Ste M6A
    Beaumont, TX 77706
    http://www.hbaset.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hillister Texas

    Georgia Court Rules that Separate Settlements Are Not the End of the Matter

    Flood Sublimits Do Not Apply to Loss Caused by Named Windstorm

    Wichita Condo Association Files Construction Defect Lawsuit

    UK's Biggest Construction Show Bans 'Promo Girls'

    New York Court of Appeals Finds a Proximate Cause Standard in Additional Insured Endorsements

    Greg Dillion & Newmeyer Dillion Named 2019 Good Scout Award Recipient

    Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks

    Comparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part I

    Avoiding Wage Claims in California Construction

    Creative Avenue for Judgment Creditor to Collect a Judgment

    Not All Design-Build Projects are Created Equal

    Compliance with Contractual and Jurisdictional Pre-Suit Requirements is Essential to Maximizing Recovery

    Town Sues over Defective Work on Sewer Lines

    Insurers Get “Floored” by Court of Appeals Regarding the Presumptive Measure of Damages in Consent Judgments

    Contractor Sued for Contract Fraud by Government

    American Roads Are Paved With Inefficiency

    Alert: AAA Construction Industry Rules Update

    Judgment Stemming from a Section 998 Offer Without a Written Acceptance Provision Is Void

    Terms of Your Teaming Agreement Matter

    Let’s Get Specific: Rhode Island Court Asserts Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Manufacturer

    BWB&O Partner Tyler Offenhauser and Associate Lizbeth Lopez Won Their Motion for Summary Judgment Based on the Privette Doctrine

    The National Labor Relations Board Joint Employer Standard is Vacated by the Eastern District of Texas

    CISA Clarifies – Construction is Part of Critical Infrastructure Activities

    Washington State Lawmakers Pass Statewide Rent Stabilization Legislation

    Court of Appeals Rules that HOA Lien is not Spurious, Despite Claim that Annexation was Invalid

    Why Is It So Hard to Kill This Freeway?

    Project Completion Determines Mechanics Lien Recording Deadline

    Cable-Free Elevators Will Soar to New Heights, and Move Sideways

    Toddler Crashes through Window, Falls to his Death

    DOE Abruptly Cancels $13B Cleanup Award to BWXT-Fluor Team

    Travelers’ 3rd Circ. Win Curbs Insurers’ Asbestos Exposure

    Trump Replaces Architect to Lead $300 Million Ballroom Design

    Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Finding of No Coverage for Interior Leak

    Follow Up on Continental Western v. Shay Construction

    Materialmen’s Lien Against Condominium Name the Proper Parties

    Mexico’s Construction Industry Posts First Expansion Since 2012

    Houston’s High Housing Demand due to Employment Growth

    Homebuilders See Record Bearish Bets on Shaky Recovery

    Building with Recycled Plastics – Interview with Jeff Mintz of Envirolastech

    Significant Increase in Colorado Tort Damages Caps Now in Effect Under Recent Legislation

    The Coverage Fun House Mirror: When Things Are Not What They Seem

    Haight Welcomes Elizabeth Lawley

    Noncompete Agreements: How to Navigate the Changing Landscape

    DC Metro Extension’s Precast Supplier Banned from Federal Contracts

    California Enacts New Claims Resolution Process for Public Works Projects

    Thinking About a Daubert Motion to Challenge an Expert Opinion?

    Breaking Down Homeowners Association Laws In California

    Pa. Contractor Pleads No Contest to Prevailing-Wage Charges, Pays Workers $20.7M

    Las Vegas HOA Conspiracy & Fraud Case Delayed Again

    Newmeyer & Dillion Announces Three New Partners
    Corporate Profile

    HILLISTER TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand building and construction related expert designations, the Hillister, Texas Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims evaluation and expert support services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which comprise construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Hillister and the surrounding areas.

    Hillister Texas construction expert witness consultantHillister Texas construction project management expert witnessHillister Texas consulting engineersHillister Texas window expert witnessHillister Texas expert witness roofingHillister Texas construction defect expert witnessHillister Texas roofing and waterproofing expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hillister, Texas

    Rebuilding in Fire-Damaged Los Angeles One Year Later

    January 26, 2026 —
    As wildfires, and subsequent mudslides become more frequent and destructive across Los Angeles, rebuilding efforts must go beyond policy reform to address a critical, often overlooked challenge: the condition of the land itself. Mayor Karen Bass’ recent executive actions–streamlining approvals, reducing fees and allowing rebuilt homes to be up to 10% larger–mark meaningful progress in cutting red tape. But while these changes may make rebuilding easier on paper, difficulties remain hidden beneath the rubble. Before the Blueprint, the Groundwork In hillside neighborhoods like Pacific Palisades, where entire communities have been reduced to ash, rebuilding does not only begin with drawings or permits–it may begin with stabilizing the land. Many of the coastal and hillside neighborhoods are naturally unstable, and since many homes were built prior to 1956–pre-codification of artificial fill for building pads–slope reinforcement, soil replacement, deep foundation systems, engineered grading or some other forms of mitigation are required. These measures are not only time-intense and highly technical, but they are also expensive and often not covered by insurance. Reprinted courtesy of Zoltan Pali, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    End of an (Endangerment) Era

    February 23, 2026 —
    On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the repeal of the 2009 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and the elimination of all federal GHG emission standards for motor vehicles and engines.1 The EPA characterized the action as the “single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history.”2 This development marks a fundamental shift in federal climate policy under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and is expected to trigger immediate and extensive litigation. In Massachusetts v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court held that GHGs qualify as “air pollutants” under the CAA and that the EPA must determine whether emissions from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare under CAA Section 202(a).3 Following this decision, on December 7, 2009, the EPA issued two findings. First, the EPA classified six different GHGs as threatening public health and welfare. Second, the EPA determined that emissions from new motor vehicles contribute to that endangerment.4 Although the findings themselves imposed no direct regulatory requirements, they served as the legal predicate for GHG emission standards for light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles, and later for other CAA programs affecting statutory sources. In 2012, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the Endangerment Finding and related regulations.5 Reprinted courtesy of Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer, Christopher P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    April 20, 2026 —
    For 29 years, Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP has grown alongside the clients and communities we proudly serve. What began as a single office in Orange County has evolved into a multi-state firm with 11 locations across five states. Today, we are proud to be supported by a dedicated team of more than 200 attorneys and over 400 employees who work every day to deliver exceptional service and results. This milestone is not just about where we started; it’s about the people who have helped shape who we are today. Our continued growth reflects the strength of our relationships, the trust of our clients and partners, and the commitment of our team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    HHMR Honored as a 2026 Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work Recipient

    March 10, 2026 —
    We are pleased to share that Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell has been named a 2026 Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work honoree, a recognition grounded entirely in direct feedback from our own team members. The Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work program, in partnership with Quantum Workplace, ranks organizations based on anonymous employee engagement survey results that measure culture, leadership, communication, trust, team dynamics, and satisfaction. This year’s list includes 65 companies across the Denver metropolitan area, judged by the people who know these workplaces best: their employees. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    The Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry. The Facts Behind the Dispute The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tara Martens Miller, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Miller may be contacted at tmmiller@swlaw.com

    Deck Built, Towers Stalled: $1B Fenway Center Air-Rights Project Hits Turbulence

    December 15, 2025 —
    Boston finds itself with a nearly completed, two-acre deck built over the Massachusetts Turnpike without vertical construction rising from it—an uncommon and consequential stall for one of the city’s most complex air-rights undertakings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Course of Conduct Can Serve as Waiver or Modification of Parties’ Contract

    December 22, 2025 —
    When you enter into a contract, the language in the contract means something. And if you don’t follow what the contract says, it will be used against you. It can be used to support the argument that you breached the contract. Or it can be used to demonstrate your lack of compliance with the contract does not entitle you to the recourse you are seeking. However, this does not mean under certain circumstances the language of the contract cannot be waived or modified by the parties’ course of conduct. In a recent dispute, an owner and contractor sued each other under a cost-plus contract. The contractor recorded a construction lien and moved to foreclose its construction lien. The owner claimed it was over-charged and claimed the contractor breached the contract. The contractor also claimed it was not timely paid with improperly withheld payment applications. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the contractor, which was affirmed on appeal based on the parties’ course of dealing:
    The trial court concluded that, although the parties’ cost-plus contract required that all change orders be approved in writing, the summary judgment record established that this provision was routinely waived by the parties’ course of dealing: [owner] would orally request changes to the project; [contractor] would perform those changes; and [owner] would pay the invoices for those changes.
    Moscato Corp. v. Mutchnik Construction Group, Inc., 411 So.3d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Florida’s Proposed HB 255: A Quiet Shift That Could Reshape Condo Defect Liability

    January 21, 2026 —
    In Florida, developers and contractors work under strict clocks. Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes, sets two firm deadlines for construction claims: a four-year statute of limitations and a seven-year statute of repose. Those timelines govern when an owner or condominium association may pursue claims for alleged defects. Once the repose period ends, the claim is barred regardless of when the problem surfaced. Condominium law complicates that scheme. Section 718.124 delays the start of the limitation and repose periods on association claims until control of the board shifts from the developer to the unit owners. The logic is simple: a developer-controlled board cannot be expected to sue the developer. The practical effect is more sweeping. If turnover occurs late in the life of a project, the repose period may remain tolled for years, extending exposure far beyond the seven years that apply everywhere else. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matt Maranges, Jones Walker
    Mr. Maranges may be contacted at mmaranges@joneswalker.com