Beyond the Storm: How Non-Hurricane Catastrophes Expose Florida’s Construction Defect Blind Spot
August 11, 2026 —
Franchesco “Frank” Soto & Amanda L. Gonzalez - Ball JanikOn June 8, 2026, a magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck the Gulf near the coast of Cuba, the largest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the Gulf since seismic monitoring began in 1950. Buildings swayed, offices were evacuated, and many residents along the east coast of Florida, from Miami-Dade to Jacksonville, felt the ground shake. Although no tsunami followed and reported structural damage was limited, this event exposed a blind spot that Florida property owners, developers, and their counsel cannot afford to ignore: catastrophic stress on Florida buildings does not always come in the form of a named storm.
Florida property owners have grown accustomed to preparing for wind, storm surge, floods, and torrential rain. Far less attention is paid to earthquakes, sinkholes, tornadoes, hail, and non-tropical flooding, each of which can place unexpected stress on buildings not designed with those forces top of mind and can trigger deficiencies in buildings that were not otherwise known, expose design failures, and create an urgency for both insurance claims and subsequent litigation.
Non-Hurricane Triggers of Latent Defects
Seismic activity is the clearest example. Florida’s building code accounts for wind loads, not seismic forces, meaning even a moderate earthquake can reveal weaknesses in curtain wall systems, structural connections, or foundations that were already marginal. Sinkholes, driven by Florida’s karst limestone geology, remain a persistent threat, particularly in Central Florida, where subsurface voids can undermine foundations without warning. Non-tropical flooding, like the record rainfall that flooded South Florida in June 2024, can intrude through building envelopes and waterproofing systems that were never stress-tested for such volumes of water. Tornadoes and hail, while more localized, can cause roofing and envelope failures that mimic, mask, or trigger latent construction defects.
The Litigation and Coverage Disputes That Follow
When one of these events strikes a building already carrying undisclosed or unresolved construction defects, the resulting disputes become considerably more complex. Property owners and associations must move quickly to document existing conditions and distinguish damage caused by the event from pre-existing defective construction, the same causation issue that arises in the hurricane context under Chapter 558, but often without the benefit of established precedent or adjuster experience with these less common events.
Insurance coverage disputes frequently follow close behind. Carriers may dispute whether an earthquake, flood, or other peril is covered at all, particularly where policies contain earthquake or flood exclusions requiring separate endorsements, or anti-concurrent causation language that can bar coverage entirely when a covered peril combines with an uncovered one, such as pre-existing defective construction, to cause a loss. Sinkhole claims carry their own statutory framework under Florida law, requiring specific testing protocols and reporting before a claim is compensable. Developers and contractors, in turn, may find themselves defending Chapter 558 claims while simultaneously litigating with their own carriers over defense and indemnity obligations.
Practical Risk Mitigation Strategies
Property owners, associations, and developers can take several concrete steps to reduce their exposure. First, maintain thorough documentation, including engineering reports, maintenance logs, and photographs, well before any event occurs. This documentation is often the deciding factor in causation disputes. Second, engage structural engineers and consultants immediately following any seismic event, unusual flooding, or storm damage, regardless of whether a hurricane is involved. Prompt inspection preserves evidence and can help prevent inadvertent waiver of construction defect claims. Third, review insurance policies regularly with counsel or a broker to confirm earthquake, flood, and sinkhole coverage matches the property’s actual risk profile, rather than assuming a standard property policy responds to every peril. Fourth, avoid rushing to remediate before conditions are documented and/or before consulting counsel. Well-intentioned repairs can inadvertently compromise evidence needed to prove a defect claim.
The June earthquake was a reminder that Florida’s catastrophic risk profile extends beyond hurricane season. Property owners, associations, and developers who build readiness plans around all forms of catastrophic stress, not just named storms, will be far better positioned when the next unexpected event occurs.
Franchesco “Frank” Soto is a partner in
Ball Janik’s Construction Defect Practice Group in Miami. He may be reached at fsoto@balljanik.com.
Amanda L. Gonzalez is a litigation attorney in
Ball Janik’s Construction Defect Practice Group in Miami. She may be reached at agonzalez@balljanik.com.
Actual Controversy Without Actual Exhaustion: California Supreme Court Allows Declaratory Relief and Bad Faith Claims Against Excess Insurers
August 24, 2026 —
Kyle A. Rudolph - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.California courts were previously split on the issue of whether an insured may bring declaratory relief claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance. Some California courts held that the actual exhaustion of underlying insurance was necessary, whereas other courts allowed for these types of claims to proceed.[
1]
Recently, the California Supreme Court addressed this split of authority and, in doing so, handed down a significant win for policyholders. In Fox Paine & Company, LLC, et al. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al., the Court held that insureds may proceed with bringing forth viable declaratory relief and bad faith claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance.[
2] A summary of the Court’s opinion is provided below.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at
KRudolph@sdvlaw.com
Voluntary Dismissal of an Indemnity Claim Does Not Make the Subcontractor a “Prevailing Party,” Washington Court of Appeals Holds
September 21, 2026 —
Margarita Kutsin - Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCIn
King County v. Walsh Construction Company II, LLC, No. 86503-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 2025), an unpublished decision from Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals, the Court affirmed the denial of a subcontractor’s request for prevailing-party attorney fees under an indemnity clause after the general contractor voluntarily dismissed its indemnity claims. Because the indemnity claim was no longer live and no determination of fault had occurred, the Court held that the trial court did not err in denying the request. ACS represented Walsh, the general contractor, in securing the denial of the fee request at the trial court that the Court of Appeals affirmed.
A Pass-Through Indemnity Claim That Ended Before Fault Was Decided
The dispute arose out of a public works contract under which King County hired Walsh Construction Company II, LLC (“Walsh”) to construct and install a conveyance pipeline. After the pipeline broke, King County sued Walsh for breach of contract and warranty, expressly identifying both Walsh and its subcontractor, Mears Group Inc., (“Mears”) as responsible. Walsh tendered defense and indemnity to Mears under the subcontract.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Margarita Kutsin, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCMs. Kutsin may be contacted at
margarita.kutsin@acslawyers.com
“The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough
June 02, 2026 —
Andrew Lintner - Colorado Construction Litigation BlogIn construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative.
At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise.
Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLCMr. Lintner may be contacted at
alintner@hhmrlaw.com
Snell & Wilmer’s Los Angeles Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Los Angeles Business Journal
September 15, 2026 —
Snell & WilmerLOS ANGELES – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce that its Los Angeles office has been named one of the
2026 Best Places to Work by the Los Angeles Business Journal as part of its annual Best Places to Work awards. The recognition honors outstanding employers across the Los Angeles region that are fostering strong workplace cultures and creating positive employee experiences. Selections are based on confidential employee surveys conducted by Workforce Research Group, which evaluate organizations on leadership, corporate culture, communication, employee engagement, and other key workplace factors.
“We are honored to be recognized as one of the Best Places to Work in Los Angeles,” said
Joshua Schneiderman, managing partner of the firm’s Los Angeles office. “This recognition reflects the collaborative culture we have built and the dedication of our attorneys and professional staff who contribute to making our office a great place to work. We remain committed to providing opportunities for growth, fostering meaningful connections, and supporting our team members’ continued success.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Snell & Wilmer
New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client
May 26, 2026 —
Lewis BrisboisNew York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall.
The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Your AEC Firm Has a Memory Problem. Here Is How to Fix It
June 01, 2026 —
Aarni Heiskanen - AEC BusinessAEC companies trying to operationalize AI often find they lack the data foundation on which to build. There may be an abundance of data hidden in documents, but you can’t reliably use it for AI.
The lack of data quality was a key topic discussed at the AI in AEC 2026 conference. During the event, I met many experts working to solve this problem, including
Pavlina Nikolova,
Egnyte‘s EMEA AEC Practice Lead. The chat and her presentation highlighted the challenges a
Condo Developers Buy in Washington despite Construction Defect LitigationLos Angeles Wildfires Will Cause Significant Insured Losses, Ranking Amongst the Most Destructive in California's HistoryCalifornia Appeals Court Remands Fine in Late Completion CaseBurlingame Construction Defect Case Heading to TrialNo Coverage for Tenant's Breach of Contract ClaimsUK Construction Output Rises Unexpectedly to Strongest Since MayTriple Points to the English Court of Appeal for Clarifying the Law on LDsSupreme Court Limits EPA’s Options for Wastewater Discharge PermitsMultiple Construction Errors Contributed to Mexico Subway CollapseInclude Contract Clauses for Protection Against Ever-Evolving Construction ChallengesTraub Lieberman Partner Jessica Kull Obtains Favorable Arbitration Award In Year-Long High-Stakes Construction Defect CaseFour Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars ListsCalifornia Team Secures Appellate Victory on Behalf of Celebrity Comedian Kathy Griffin in Dispute with Bel Air NeighborDoes a Broker Forfeit His or Her Commission for Technical Non-Compliance with Department of Real Estate Statutory Requirements?Contractor to Repair Defective Stucco, Plans on Suing SubcontractorContractor Removed from Site for Lack of InsuranceHow to Prevent Forest Fires by Building Cities With More WoodBridging the Information Gap of Alternative Delivery Methods on Public ProjectsNewmeyer Dillion Announces Partner John Van Vlear Named to Board Of Groundwater Resources Association Of CaliforniaHard to Believe It, Construction Law Musings is 16Details Matter: The Importance of Strictly Following Public Bid StatutesConnecticutt Class Action on Collapse Claims Faces Motion to DismissInsureds Prevail on Summary Judgment Addressing Responsibility for Water LeakSouth Adams County Water and Sanitation District Takes Proactive Step to Treat PFAS, Safeguard Water SuppliesPillsbury Insights – Navigating the Real Estate Market During COVID-19Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond ClaimsHEI Civil's Colorado Division is Awarded the 2024 NUCA William H. Feather Safety Award For 1,000,000+ ManhoursReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/20/24) – Construction Backlog Falls, National Association of Realtors Settle Litigation, and Commercial Real Estate Market’s Effect on City CutsCan Anyone Save Gary, Indiana?Catching Killer Clauses in Contract NegotiationsConstruction Termination Issues Part 5: What if You are the One that Wants to Quit?Construction Contract Basics: No Damages for DelayFirst-Party Statutory Bad Faith – 60 Days to Cure Means 60 Days to CureNew Executive Order Prohibits Federal Contractors from Engaging in DEI Through Employment and Procurement ActivitiesInsurer Obligated to Cover Preventative Remediation of Construction DefectsDenver Passed the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance2016 California Construction Law UpateProtect Against Design Errors With Owners Protective Professional Indemnity CoverageAnticipatory Repudiation of a Contract — The Prospective BreachTax Increase Pumps $52 Billion Into California ConstructionWashington Supreme Court Upholds King County Ordinance Requiring Utility Providers to Pay for Access to County’s Right-of-Way and Signals Approval for Other Counties to Follow SuitFloors Collapse at Russian University in St. PetersburgKahana Feld Texas Team Obtains a Summary Judgment MotionEngineer Proposes Slashing Scope of Millennium Tower Pile UpgradeCongratulations to Gianna Liddy on Her Promotion to PartnerEqual Access to Justice Act Fee Request Rejected in Flood CasePhiladelphia Proposed Best Value Procurement BillM&A Representation and Warranty Insurance Considerations in the Wake of the Coronavirus PandemicPractical Advice: Indemnification and Additional Insured Issues RevisitedSales of New U.S. Homes Rose More Than Forecast to End 2014COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims Four Years Later: What Have We Learned?Why the Total Recordable Incident Rate Doesn’t Tell the Whole Safety StoryGrupo Mexico Spill Sparks Public Scrutiny of $150 Million Mop-UpHawaii Supreme Court Construes Designated Premises Endorsement In Insured's FavorPJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load DemandThe Court Rules in Favor of Partners Benjamin Price and Ajay Ahluwalia’s Arbitration Ruling Awarding Damages!First Circuit Broadly Interprets Exclusion in Commercial General Liability Policy Under Current Massachusetts LawCumulative Impact Claims and Definition by Certain BoardsGreen Home Predictions That Are Best Poised to Come True in 2014 and Beyond (guest post)The Salt Lake Tribune Names Snell & Wilmer a Winner of the Top Workplaces 2025 Award Contractors’ Right to Sue in Washington Requires RegistrationMcCarthy Workers Test Fall-Protection Harnesses Designed to Better Fit Women
