BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Smith County Texas low-income housing expert witness Smith County Texas condominiums expert witness Smith County Texas retail construction expert witness Smith County Texas tract home expert witness Smith County Texas custom home expert witness Smith County Texas structural steel construction expert witness Smith County Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Smith County Texas townhome construction expert witness Smith County Texas high-rise construction expert witness Smith County Texas mid-rise construction expert witness Smith County Texas condominium expert witness Smith County Texas office building expert witness Smith County Texas parking structure expert witness Smith County Texas hospital construction expert witness Smith County Texas Medical building expert witness Smith County Texas production housing expert witness Smith County Texas housing expert witness Smith County Texas custom homes expert witness Smith County Texas industrial building expert witness Smith County Texas landscaping construction expert witness Smith County Texas institutional building expert witness Smith County Texas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Smith County, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Smith County Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Big Country Home Builders Association
    Local # 4506
    4398 Crawford Dr
    Abilene, TX 79602
    http://www.bigcountryhba.com

    Tyler Area Builders Association
    Local # 4569
    1504 West Grande Blvd St A
    Tyler, TX 75703
    http://www.tylerareabuilders.com

    East Texas Builders Association
    Local # 4542
    2023 Alpine Rd
    Longview, TX 75601
    http://www.easttexasbuilders.org

    Permian Basin Home Builders Association
    Local # 4540
    4305 N Garfield St Ste 224
    Midland, TX 79705
    http://www.pbhba.org

    Builders Association of Greater Fort Worth
    Local # 4530
    70001 Blvd 26 Ste 323
    Fort Worth, TX 76180
    http://www.fortworthbuilders.org

    El Paso Assn of Bldrs
    Local # 4527
    6046 Surety Dr
    El Paso, TX 79905
    http://www.elpasobuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Greater Dallas
    Local # 4524
    5816 West Plano Pkwy
    Plano, TX 75093
    http://www.dallasbuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Smith County Texas

    Court Denies Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract Claim and Further Denies Motion to Exclude Insured's Expert

    LA Home Destroyed in Palisades Fire Draws More Than 60 Offers

    Law Firm's Business Income, Civil Authority Claim Due to Hurricanes Survives Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Federal District Court Addresses Anti-concurrent Cause Language in Property Policy

    Excess-Escape Other Insurance Provision Unenforceable to Avoid Defense Cost Contribution Despite Placement in Policy’s Coverage Grant

    Google, Environmentalists and University Push Methane-Leak Detection

    Best Lawyers Recognizes Twelve White and Williams Lawyers

    Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Insureds Can Use Extrinsic Evidence to Prove Duty to Defend

    Contract Disputes Act and Jurisdictional Requirements

    Court’s Ruling on SB800 “Surprising to Some”

    Subsequent Owners of Homes Again Have Right to Sue Builders for Construction Defects

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC Announces Leadership Changes and New Vision for Growth

    The Choice Is Yours – Or Is It? Anti-Choice-of-Laws Statutes Applicable to Construction Contracts

    Res Judicata Bars Insured from Challenging Insurer's Use of Schedule to Deduct Depreciation from the Loss

    Packard Condominiums Settled with Kosene & Kosene Residential

    Spring 2025 Environmental Update: New Cases, New Rules and Other Developments

    Challenging and Defending a California Public Works Stop Payment Notice: Affidavit vs. Counter-Affidavit Process

    Seventh Circuit Finds “Additional Insured” Requirements Met Where Non-Party Subcontractor Was Proximate Cause of Underlying Injuries

    5 Questions about New York's Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act

    Traub Lieberman Partner Eric D. Suben and Associate Laura Puhala Win Summary Judgment in Favor of Insurer, Determining it has No Duty to Defend

    Rights Afforded to Employees and Employers During Strikes

    Europe’s Satellites Could Help Catch the Next Climate Disaster

    Cause Still Unclear in March Retaining Wall Collapse on $900M NJ Interchange

    Product Liability Alert: “Sophisticated User” Defense Not Available by Showing Existence of a “Sophisticated Intermediary”

    Supreme Court Upholds Prevailing Wage Statute

    Court of Appeal Opens Pandora’s Box on Definition of “Contractor” for Forum Selection Clauses

    Florida trigger

    Caterpillar Forecast Tops Estimates as Construction Recovers

    Suing a Local Government in Land Use Cases – Part 1 – Substantive Due Process

    Courts Will Not Rewrite Your Post-Loss Property Insurance Obligations

    Managing Once-in-a-Generation Construction Problems – Part II

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    Colorado Court of Appeals Confirms: Prevailing Parties Can Recover “Fees on Fees” — Reinforcing Why Builders Should Strike Attorneys’ Fee Clauses From Their Contracts

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized by Best Lawyers®

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized as Super Lawyers – Two Recognized as Rising Stars

    Putting 3D First, a Model Bridge Rises in Norway

    A Property Tax Exemption, Misapplied, in Texas

    Why You May Not Want a Mandatory Mediation Clause in Your Construction Contract

    The Requirement to Post Collateral Under General Agreement of Indemnity Is Real

    Is Settling a Bond Claim in the Face of a Seemingly Clear Statute of Limitations Defense Bad Faith?

    If We Want Affordable Housing, Local Governments Must Look in the Mirror

    Former Ill. House Speaker Sentenced to 7.5 Years for Corruption Involving ComEd

    Insurer Wrongfully Denies Coverage When Household Member Fails to Submit to EUO

    Keller Group Fires Two Executives in Suspected Australia Profits Reporting Fraud

    Can a Non-Union Company Be Compelled to Arbitrate?

    A Few Green Building Notes

    Empowering Success: The Advantages of Female Attorneys in Construction Defect Law

    Contractor Sues for $5.7M in Pay for Iowa Jail Project

    Connecticut Federal District Court Follows Majority Rule on Insurance Policy Anti-Assignment Clauses

    Los Angeles Team Secures Defense Verdict for Public Entity Client in High-Exposure Personal Injury Case
    Corporate Profile

    SMITH COUNTY TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Smith County, Texas Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with the effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Smith County and the surrounding areas.

    Smith County Texas roofing construction expertSmith County Texas construction defect expert witnessSmith County Texas consulting general contractorSmith County Texas expert witnesses fenestrationSmith County Texas expert witness concrete failureSmith County Texas contractor expert witnessSmith County Texas building consultant expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Smith County, Texas

    Mandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .

    July 13, 2026 —
    In the past week or so mandatory arbitration has been all the rage. From those that argue that arbitration is becoming more burdensome than litigation, to my friend and fellow construction attorney Scott Wolfe who gives great advice on how to make arbitration worth it again. You can place me in the camp of those that think that mandatory arbitration clauses of the type typically found in contracts can add a layer of expense that can be unnecessary. However, if an arbitration clause is carefully drafted, and properly used, these clauses an be helpful in assuring that the streamlining effect for which arbitration was created actually occurs. Because the contract is king in Virginia, these provisions can essentially create the rule of civil procedure used to resolve any dispute relating to the project. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Andrea DeField Among Nation’s Top Young Litigators

    September 08, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage team is proud to celebrate the recognition of Andrea DeField on Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 40 & Under List, an annual ranking that highlights the nation’s leading litigators age 40 and under. Andrea was one of only six Hunton lawyers selected and was recognized in the South region. Benchmark Litigation’s 40 & Under List honors attorneys who have distinguished themselves through significant case work, client feedback, and peer review. This honor reflects Andrea’s reputation as one of the country’s leading policyholder-side insurance recovery litigators and her standing as a trusted advisor to companies facing some of today’s most complex insurance and risk management challenges. As head of Hunton’s cyber insurance practice, Andrea has built her career helping companies manage risk and maximize insurance recovery. Her practice spans the full spectrum of insurance-related issues, from advising clients on contractual risk transfer and insurance program design to representing policyholders in high-stakes coverage and bad faith disputes. She has guided clients through some of the most complex and widely publicized losses in recent years and helps companies recover under a broad range of insurance products, including D&O, professional liability, crime, property, cyber, and general liability policies. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Two Important Points Regarding the Miller Act

    September 15, 2026 —
    A recent Miller Act case, U.S. f/u/b/o Boundless Management Outsourcing Group, LLC v. Endurance Assurance Corp, 2026 WL 2241491 (D. Puerto Rico 2026), confirms two important points when it comes to the Miller Act. In this case, a subcontractor pursued a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit more than one year after its work was finished. The subcontractor also asserted a claim against the federal government. The lawsuit was dismissed. Below are two takeaway points to consider if you are dealing with a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. First, as it relates the claim against the federal government, the federal district court followed authority that held that the Miller Act does NOT include a waiver of sovereign immunity against the federal government. “[T]he Court does not identify any clear language in the Miller Act expressly waiving the United States or its agencies’ sovereign immunity.” Endurance Assurance Corp., supra at *3. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    2026 Colorado Super Lawyers Recognizes 11 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    May 05, 2026 —
    DENVER – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that eleven attorneys in its Denver office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers publication. Of those eleven, four were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    A Permitting Base Checklist for Data Centers and Power Plants

    June 02, 2026 —
    There is a lot of talk these days about “license to operate” for data centers, meaning management of the relationships with stakeholders and broader communities concerning both the benefits and adverse consequences of locating a facility in a particular locale. Here, we are speaking of “license to operate” more literally—namely, the legal and regulatory permitting and approval requirements for a privately owned data center whether by itself or colocated with a power generating plant. Our Base Checklist includes generally and potentially applicable permitting requirements for development and operation, using California as an example. (Taking legal authority Frank Sinatra out of context, “If you can make it there, you can make it anywhere.”) The actual requirements for a given facility would depend, in part, on local law, including planning and zoning laws and plans, and the environment of the site. Just as examples, additional permitting and mitigation requirements might apply if sensitive receptors are located nearby (e.g., noise mitigation for residential dwellings), if sensitive and protected biological resources (e.g., jurisdictional waters and/or protected species) would be impacted, or if the present or former land uses require additional measures (e.g., hazardous materials remediation, mitigation for conversion of prime farmland, or protection of cultural resources). The scope of permit requirements would ultimately be determined by the applicable regulatory agencies and by the lead and responsible agencies under the applicable state environmental land use regime—in our reference case here, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. McDonough, Pillsbury, Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury and Stacey C. Wright, Pillsbury Mr. McDonough may be contacted at michael.mcdonough@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Wright may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Prevents Coverage for Collapse

    April 27, 2026 —
    The appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment to the insurer after agreeing that the policy’s anti-concurrent causation clause barred coverage. Lido Hospitality, Inc. v. AIX Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 Iii. App. Unpub. LEXIS 133 (Ill. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2026). One of the brick veneer walls of the Lido Motel collapsed during a windstorm. Lido reported the loss it its insurer, AIX. AIX investigated and determined that the brick veneer collapsed due to pervasive wear and tear and corrosion of the underlying infrastructure that secured the veneer- specifically the components that anchored or tied the masonry veneer to the underlying wooden substrate. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law

    June 29, 2026 —
    Daily Journal (California) featured an article by Construction Law partner Brenda Radmacher, “A new path for construction defects in California.” The piece, published on June 15, 2026, examines Assembly Bill 1903 and its potential to significantly reshape California’s construction defect framework, particularly for common interest properties. The article highlights how AB 1903 would overhaul the state’s current right-to-repair system by mandating completion of prelitigation procedures, raising requirements for defect claims, strengthening developers’/builders’ rights to repair, and introducing a voluntary “certified building” program. The legislation aims to rebalance competing interests by reducing litigation-driven costs while preserving protections for homeowners. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Radmacher may be contacted at bradmacher@seyfarth.com