BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Wickett Texas low-income housing expert witness Wickett Texas production housing expert witness Wickett Texas tract home expert witness Wickett Texas townhome construction expert witness Wickett Texas parking structure expert witness Wickett Texas mid-rise construction expert witness Wickett Texas condominiums expert witness Wickett Texas retail construction expert witness Wickett Texas custom homes expert witness Wickett Texas Subterranean parking expert witness Wickett Texas casino resort expert witness Wickett Texas landscaping construction expert witness Wickett Texas custom home expert witness Wickett Texas industrial building expert witness Wickett Texas institutional building expert witness Wickett Texas multi family housing expert witness Wickett Texas housing expert witness Wickett Texas condominium expert witness Wickett Texas office building expert witness Wickett Texas hospital construction expert witness Wickett Texas structural steel construction expert witness Wickett Texas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Wickett, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Wickett Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Heart of Texas Builders Association
    Local # 4575
    PO Box 20697
    Waco, TX 76702
    http://www.hotbawaco.com

    Forest Country Chapter
    Local # 4555
    PO Box 630983
    Nacogdoches, TX 75963


    Home Builders Association of San Angelo
    Local # 4557
    4172 South Jackson
    San Angelo, TX 76903
    http://www.hbasa.com

    El Paso Assn of Bldrs
    Local # 4527
    6046 Surety Dr
    El Paso, TX 79905
    http://www.elpasobuilders.com

    Deep East Texas Association of Builders
    Local # 4548
    PO Box 153337
    Lufkin, TX 75915
    http://www.detab.org

    Temple Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4501
    PO Box 2002
    Temple, TX 76503
    http://www.tahb.org

    Permian Basin Home Builders Association
    Local # 4540
    4305 N Garfield St Ste 224
    Midland, TX 79705
    http://www.pbhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Wickett Texas

    Identifying and Accessing Coverage in Complex Construction Claims

    Ninth Circuit Finds Policy’s Definition of “Policy Period” Fatal to Insurer’s “Related Claims” Argument

    CGL Insurer’s Duty to Defend Insured During Pre-Suit 558 Process: Maybe?

    Two Things to Consider Before Making Warranty Repairs

    Another Colorado District Court Refuses to Apply HB 10-1394 Retroactively

    Housing Sales Hurt as Fewer Immigrants Chase Owner Dream

    Mississippi Floods Prompt New Look at Controversial Dam Project

    West Virginia Wild: Crews Carve Out Corridor H Through the Appalachian Mountains

    What the FIU Bridge Collapse Says About Peer Review

    Exclusion for Construction of Condominiums Includes Faulty Construction of Retaining Wall

    Nancy Conrad to Serve as President of the Pennsylvania Bar Association

    BHA has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports Wounded Warrior Project at WCC Seminar

    Micropiles for bad soil: a Tarheel victory

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Based on New Information …”

    A Court-Side Seat: Guam’s CERCLA Claim Allowed, a “Roundup” Verdict Upheld, and Judicial Process Privilege Lost

    How Technology Reduces the Risk of Façade Defects

    Civil RICO Case Against Johnny Doc Is Challenging

    Calling Hurricanes a Category 6 Risks Creating Deadly Confusion

    WSHB Ranks No.10 in Law360’s Best of Law Firms for Women

    General Contractor Supporting a Subcontractor’s Change Order Only for Owner to Reject the Change

    Indemnity: What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You!

    Dispute Over Exhaustion of Primary Policy

    Insured’s Breach of Contract Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss, but Bad Faith Claim Does Not

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Lead Paint: The EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule

    Gone Fishing: Tenant’s Insurer Casts A Line Seeking To Subrogate Against The Landlord

    Client Alert: Disclosure of Plaintiff’s Status as Undocumented Alien to Prospective Jury Panel Grounds for Mistrial

    Cross-Office Team Secures Summary Judgment Win in Negligence Action with $2M Demand

    Ensuing Loss Provision Found Ambiguous

    Fifth Circuit Holds Insurer Owes Duty to Defend Latent Condition Claim That Caused Fire Damage to Property Years After Construction Work

    Are You Overpromising on Your Construction Contracts? Here's How to Build With Transparency

    Forget Palm Springs—Santa Fe Is the New Mecca for Modern Architecture

    Builder and County Tussle over Unfinished Homes

    Margins May Shrink for Home Builders

    Blue Gold: Critical Water for Critical Energy Materials

    The Moving Finish Line: Statutes of Limitation and Repose Are Not Always What They Seem

    Restoring the USS Alabama: Surety Lessons From an 80-Year-Old Battleship

    A Bill for an Act Concerning Workers’ Compensation – 2014 Edition

    Appellate Attorney’s Fees and the Significant Issues Test

    OSHA Set to Tag More Firms as Severe Violators Under New Criteria

    Unrelated Claims Against Architects Amount to Two Different Claims

    Unlicensed Contracting and Florida Statute S. 489.128

    Owner Bankruptcy: What’s a Contractor to Do?

    CSLB Reminds California Public Works Contractors to Renew Their Public Works Registration

    PFAS and the Challenge of Cleaning Up “Forever”

    Haight’s Sacramento Office Has Moved

    Business Risk Exclusions Bar Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Social Distancing and the Impact on Service of Process Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Fire Protection You Can Trust Starts With the Right Testing

    Handshake Deals Gone Wrong
    Corporate Profile

    WICKETT TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than four thousand building and construction related expert designations, the Wickett, Texas Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Wickett and the surrounding areas.

    Wickett Texas construction defect expert witnessWickett Texas construction safety expertWickett Texas fenestration expert witnessWickett Texas construction expert witnessesWickett Texas construction claims expert witnessWickett Texas construction forensic expert witnessWickett Texas construction expert witness public projects
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Wickett, Texas

    The Great Escape: Non-Invalidation Clauses and Property Damage Claims

    October 20, 2026 —
    At their core, non-invalidation clauses (“NICs”) recognise an important commercial reality: an insured cannot control everything that happens at its premises. In the event that an insured finds itself in breach of a condition or warranty owing to events that have increased the risk of damage to its property, but which were outside its authority, knowledge or beyond its control, a NIC may prevent the insurer from avoiding the claim. For that reason, they’re an important tool in an insured’s coverage arsenal. Although there is relatively little caselaw on NICs, their purpose was recognised in The Seashell of Lisson Grove Ltd v Aviva Insurance Ltd [2011] EWHC 1761 (Comm) (on which we wrote a previous article – The Good, the Bad & the Ugly: #26 The Good: The Seashell of Lisson Grove Ltd v Aviva) Reprinted courtesy of Abigail Smith, SDV Fenchurch and Kaarthiga Manimaran, SDV Fenchurch Ms. Smith may be contacted at abigail.smith@sdvfenchurch.uk Ms. Manimaran may be contacted at kaarthiga.manimaran@sdvfenchurch.uk Read the full story...

    Sausage-Making Often Relies on the Good Sense of the Chef Rather than the Recipe

    June 23, 2026 —
    Even for lawyers, the rules governing litigation can get complex and convoluted. Does something need to be filed? What needs to be filed? When is the deadline for filing? Simple questions with not always with straightforward answers. This was the case in R & J Sheet Metal, Inc. v. W.E. O’Neil Construction Co. of California, 111 Cal.App.5th 878 (2025), which involved sheet metal panels lost when they fell into the Port of Long Beach harbor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Pulling the Plug, Preserving the Product: Protecting Rights to a Modular Subcontractor’s Work Post-Termination

    June 08, 2026 —
    Volumetric Modular Construction (VMC) is a building method where a structure is divided into large components or modules, fabricated in an offsite factory and then transported to a construction site for assembly.[1] Proponents of VMC hail it as a cost-efficient alternative to traditional building methods that leads to more consistent quality and shorter construction duration.[2] Due to a growing labor shortage, high demand for compressed project schedules, and stagnant construction productivity rates, the construction industry is embracing VMC.[3] A recent report on the market size of prefabricated construction estimates that from 2026 to 2031, VMC will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.16% and become a 413.11-billion-dollar industry.[4] As VMC becomes more prevalent, owners, general contractors, and subcontractors must consider how to effectively contract for modular construction. One important consideration, which this article focuses on, is navigating termination of a modular subcontractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Paul Williamson, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Williamson may be contacted at pwilliamson@pecklaw.com

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    May 26, 2026 —
    The insurer successfully moved for summary judgment, eliminating the insured’s claim for roof damage due to windstorm. Mulas v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20537 (Jan. 30, 2026). The insureds’ commercial property sustained windstorm damage during Hurricane Ian. Westchester denied the claim. The insureds believed Westchester wrongfully denied coverage for roof damage and various interior damage to property. The insureds also argued that Westchester’s actual cash value (ACV) payment did not reflect the fully insured loss. The insureds sued and Westchester moved for summary judgment. Westchester argued the roof damage was not covered because Hurricane Ian did not cause the damage. Westchester hired an engineer who determined the roof damage was not caused by wind from Hurricane Ian. Westchester pointed out that the insureds’ expert also found no wind damage on the roof. The insureds offered no other evidence suggesting the hurricane caused roof damage. Therefore, the insureds could not show that Westchester breached the policy by denying coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Perennial Question, Perennial Answer? EPA and Army Corps Propose Year-Round Standard for WOTUS that Could Reshape Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

    October 12, 2026 —
    Federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction may be about to get considerably narrower. On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) announced a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking that would limit federal authority over streams and wetlands to those containing water year-round—a “perennial” standard that would go beyond even what the Supreme Court required in Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023). The supplemental notice offers two options for revising the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA): One would define “relatively permanent” waters as perennial, and the other would require perennial surface water to establish a wetland’s continuous surface connection to a jurisdictional water. If adopted, either option would substantially reduce the number of streams, wetlands and other water features subject to federal permitting, with the sharpest effects in arid and semi-arid regions where rainfall patterns leave many waterways dry for portions of the year. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    In-House Insight at CSC

    October 26, 2026 —
    Elaine Y. Lee, Partner in P&A’s Los Angeles office, sat down with Third Thursday to discuss effective collaboration with in-house counsel, strategies for resolving construction disputes, and the factors that can help determine the best path forward. This discussion previews her upcoming Construction Super Conference panel, “Same But Different: How In-House Legal Teams Vary in Approach, Role, and Decision-Making,” on December 2nd. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Y. Lee, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Ms. Lee may be contacted at elee@pecklaw.com

    11 Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    August 24, 2026 —
    Congratulations to the 11 Payne & Fears attorneys included in the 2027 Edition of “Lawyer of the Year” and The Best Lawyers In America®. Attorneys have been recognized in the following practice areas: “Lawyer of the Year” (2027 Edition) Orange County
    • Benjamin A. Nix
      • Trade Secrets Law
    The Best Lawyers in America® (2027 Edition) Irvine, CA
    • Jeffrey K. Brown
      • Employment Law – Management
      • Labor Law – Management
      • Litigation – Labor and Employment
    • Daniel F. Fears
      • Employment Law – Management
      • Labor Law – Management
      • Litigation – Labor and Employment
    • Daniel M. Livingston
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Litigation – Real Estate
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.