New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry
June 15, 2026 —
Richard R. Volack & Denis Serkin - Peckar & Abramson, PCOn June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI.
Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities.
Reprinted courtesy of
Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and
Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC
Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com
Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Prevents Coverage for Collapse
April 27, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment to the insurer after agreeing that the policy’s anti-concurrent causation clause barred coverage. Lido Hospitality, Inc. v. AIX Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 Iii. App. Unpub. LEXIS 133 (Ill. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2026).
One of the brick veneer walls of the Lido Motel collapsed during a windstorm. Lido reported the loss it its insurer, AIX. AIX investigated and determined that the brick veneer collapsed due to pervasive wear and tear and corrosion of the underlying infrastructure that secured the veneer- specifically the components that anchored or tied the masonry veneer to the underlying wooden substrate.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Risks of Using an AI Chatbot for Legal Advice: Lessons from United States v. Heppner
April 08, 2026 —
Payne & Fears LLPImagine that you are an executive (who is not a lawyer) and are concerned about what your company plans to do is legal. You could call your lawyer who might bill you for the call. Or, you can ask your AI chatbot, such as Claude or ChatGPT, about the legal risk. The chatbot will likely compliment you on the incisive question, provide you with highly confident answer (that may or may not be right) and will not bill you on an hourly basis.
That is essentially what financial services executive Bradley Heppner did. It did not end well. A federal court recently ruled that Heppner’s chats with the AI tool Claude were not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. That means that the other side (in this case, the federal government) could get access to his chatbot prompts, uploads and responses, and learn a great deal about, for example, whether Heppner knew what he was doing was illegal.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Payne & Fears LLP
Sausage-Making Often Relies on the Good Sense of the Chef Rather than the Recipe
June 23, 2026 —
Garret D. Murai - California Construction Law BlogEven for lawyers, the rules governing litigation can get complex and convoluted. Does something need to be filed? What needs to be filed? When is the deadline for filing?
Simple questions with not always with straightforward answers.
This was the case in
R & J Sheet Metal, Inc. v. W.E. O’Neil Construction Co. of California, 111 Cal.App.5th 878 (2025), which involved sheet metal panels lost when they fell into the Port of Long Beach harbor.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
LA Fire Victims Can Pursue City Utility Claims, Judge Rules
March 10, 2026 —
Jef Feeley & Maxwell Adler - BloombergThe water and power utility that serves the city of Los Angeles must face hundreds of lawsuits faulting its response to the massive 2025 wildfire that leveled one of the city’s premier seaside neighborhoods and caused tens of billions of dollars in damage.
In a significant victory for fire victims, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Samantha Jessner concluded in a
written ruling Thursday that a unique California law allows property and business owners to pursue claims that the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power failed to supply enough water to fight the blaze that consumed the Pacific Palisades area.
Over strong objections from lawyers for the nation’s largest public utility, Jessner finalized a tentative ruling she issued last week concluding victims have a legal basis to move forward with allegations a city reservoir drained for repairs left fire hydrants with inadequate water pressure and helped the wind-whipped blaze get out of control.
Reprinted courtesy of
Jef Feeley, Bloomberg and
Maxwell Adler, Bloomberg Read the full story...
Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss
April 20, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026).
Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds.
Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day deadline for filing a proof of loss to one year, or until September 28, 2023. Bay Haven did not submit its proofs of loss until November 2023. FEMA granted an extension but only for the specific amounts in the November requests. Hartford did not waive the 60-day proof of loss requirement for any other proof of loss. Hartford paid the amounts reflected in the November submissions.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI
March 03, 2026 —
Christopher J. Olsen, Freddy X. Muñoz & Gary M. Stein - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a go‑to tool for aggregating and summarizing large volumes of data, formulating and testing arguments, and even sketching litigation strategies. But a recent ruling from the Southern District of New York serves as a stark warning: when clients turn to generative AI for legal strategy, they may be unknowingly turning privileged information over to a third party and then creating documents that may later be discoverable in litigation. In a closely watched bench decision, Judge Rakoff ruled that AI‑generated documents created by the target of a criminal investigation using Anthropic’s Claude were not privileged despite being generated with information learned from his attorneys to support his potential legal defense and then shared with his counsel. The decision highlights the unresolved and increasingly consequential intersection of AI, privilege, and discovery.
Facts
Bradley Heppner received a grand jury subpoena and hired attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to represent him. After learning he was a target of the investigation, but before he was arrested, he created 31 documents with Claude using information from his attorneys to outline a potential defense strategy. He was later arrested on charges of securities and wire fraud, and federal agents seized his electronic devices, which contained the 31 documents that had been provided to his attorneys. Mr. Heppner argued that the documents were created to prepare his potential defense strategy in anticipation of an indictment, but he conceded that he made the decision to prepare the reports on his own, i.e., not at the direction of counsel. He nevertheless claimed the documents were protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and work pr
The Law Clinic Paves Way to the Digitalization of Built Environment ProcessesA Court-Side Seat: Clean Air, Clean Water, Citizen Suits and the Summer of 2022Still Going, After All This Time: the Sacketts, EPA and the Clean Water Act$2B Waldorf Astoria Renovation in NYC Resumes After Jobsite FatalityFourth Circuit Finds Insurer Reservation of Rights Letters Inadequate to Preserve Coverage Defenses Under South Carolina LawCorps Releases Final Report on $29B Texas Gulf Coast Hurricane Defense PlanHow is Negotiating a Construction Contract Like Buying a Car?Staten Island Villa Was Home to Nabisco 'Nilla' Wafer InventorHarlem Developers Reach Deal with Attorney GeneralReview the Terms and Conditions of Purchase Orders- They Could be Important!Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co.Key Legal Issues to Consider Before and After Natural DisastersConsumer Product Safety Commission RecallsNYC Shuts 9 Pre-Kindergartens for Health, Safety IssuesDid the Court of Appeals Just Raise the Bar for California Contractors to Self-Report Construction-Related Judgments?“Pay When Paid” Provisions May Not Be Dead, at Least Not YetObama Asks for $302 Billion to Fix Bridges and PotholesPublic Adjuster Cannot Serve As Disinterested AppraiserDusseldorf Evacuates About 4,000 as World War II Bomb DefusedSometimes It’s Okay to Destroy EvidenceGreystone on Remand Denies Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment To Bar Coverage For Construction DefectsStormy Seas Ahead: 5th Circuit to Review Whether Maritime Law Applies to Offshore Service ContractConstruction Law Client Alert: California’s Right to Repair Act (SB 800) Takes Another Hit, Then Fights BackAlleged Negligent Misrepresentation on Condition of Home is Not an Occurrence Causing Property DamageFire Raging North of Los Angeles Is Getting Fuel From Dry WindsBeam Fracture on Closed Mississippi River Bridge Is at Least Two Years OldCan We Compel Insurers To Cover Construction Defect in General Liability Policies?New York Appellate Court Expands Policyholders’ Ability to Plead and Seek Consequential DamagesDistrict Court denies Carpenters Union Motion to Dismiss RICO case- What it MeansTraub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2025 New York – Metro Super Lawyers® and Rising StarsThink Twice Before Hedging A Position Or Defense On A Speculative Event Or OccurrenceWest Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar Announced for 2014Eleventh Circuit Holds that EPA Superfund Remedial Actions are Usually Entitled to the FTCA “Discretionary Function” ExemptionMaine Case Demonstrates High Risk for Buying Home “As Is”140 Days Until The California Consumer Privacy Act Becomes Law - Why Aren't More Businesses Complying?Toll Brothers Faces Construction Defect Lawsuit in New JerseyNY Construction Safety Firm Falsely Certified Workers, Says Manhattan DACongratulations to Newport Beach Partner Tyler D. Offenhauser and Associate Therese M. Ellis for Securing a Dismissal on a Premises Liability and Negligence Case!SCOTUS, Having Received Views of Solicitor General, Will Decide Whether CWA Regulates Indirect Discharge of Pollutants Into Navigable Water Via GroundwaterThinking About a Daubert Motion to Challenge an Expert Opinion?Before Celebrating the Market Rebound, Builders Need to Read the Fine Print: New Changes in Construction Law Coming Out of the RecessionGeorgia Federal Court Says Fact Questions Exist As To Whether Nitrogen Is An “Irritant” or “Contaminant” As Used in Pollution ExclusionHaight’s 2020 San Diego Super Lawyers and Rising StarsCourt Retained Jurisdiction to Enforce Settlement Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 Despite Dismissal of ComplaintCrane Dangles and So Do Insurance QuestionsAyushi Neogi Published in ADC Defense Comment on Arbitration in Evolving Plaintiff-Friendly LandscapeContractor’s Claim for Interest on Subcontractor’s Defective Work Claim Gains Mixed ResultsTop 10 Cases of 2019Elizabeth Lofts Condo Owners Settle with Plumbing SupplierBuilder’s Risk Coverage—Construction DefectsNew York Office Secures Victory in Trip & Fall Case After Bronx Supreme Court Grants Motion for ReargumentCalifornia Supreme Court Rights the “Occurrence” Ship: Unintended Harm Resulting from Intentional Conduct Triggers Coverage Under Liability Insurance PolicyIndirect Benefit Does Not Support Unjust Enrichment Claim Against Prime ContractorNew York Condominium Association Files Construction Defect SuitDocumentation Important for Defending Construction Defect ClaimsHawaii Appellate Court Finds Appraisers Limited to Determining Amount of LossContractors and Force Majeure: Contractual Protection from Hurricanes and Severe WeatherGRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior CourtThe Metaphysics of When an Accident is an “Accident” (or Not) Under Your Insurance PolicyTrump Budget Would Slash Some Construction Spending, Boost Transportation ProjectsIllinois Court Addresses Rip-And-Tear Coverage And Existence Of An “Occurrence” In Defective Product SuitCross-Motions for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings for COVID-19 Claim DeniedMiorelli Doctrine’s Sovereign Immunity in Public Construction Contracts — Not the Be-All and End-AllThe Potential (Second) Death of Project Labor AgreementsWhite and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2021Legislation Update: S-865 Public-Private Partnerships in New Jersey Passed by Both Houses-Awaiting Governor’s SignatureNew Certification Requirements for Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns and Service-Disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Concerns Seeking Public Procurement ContractsTexas Federal District Court Dismisses COVID-19 Claim
