BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Washington County Vermont Subterranean parking expert witness Washington County Vermont condominium expert witness Washington County Vermont townhome construction expert witness Washington County Vermont high-rise construction expert witness Washington County Vermont custom home expert witness Washington County Vermont structural steel construction expert witness Washington County Vermont production housing expert witness Washington County Vermont retail construction expert witness Washington County Vermont mid-rise construction expert witness Washington County Vermont tract home expert witness Washington County Vermont condominiums expert witness Washington County Vermont housing expert witness Washington County Vermont office building expert witness Washington County Vermont concrete tilt-up expert witness Washington County Vermont low-income housing expert witness Washington County Vermont hospital construction expert witness Washington County Vermont landscaping construction expert witness Washington County Vermont custom homes expert witness Washington County Vermont institutional building expert witness Washington County Vermont parking structure expert witness Washington County Vermont Medical building expert witness Washington County Vermont
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Washington County, Vermont

    Vermont Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent. H423 introduced April 2006. Will require prior written notice to contractors and builders will have 21 days to respond in writing their intention to inspect, repair, replace, compensate or dispute.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Washington County Vermont

    Licensure is required for asbestos, plumbing, and electrical trades. Corporations must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & Remodelers Assn of VT
    Local # 4700
    136 James Brown Dr
    Williston, VT 05495


    Home Builders & RA of Northern Vermont Inc
    Local # 4705
    136 James Brown Dr
    Williston, VT 05495
    http://www.vtbuilders.com

    Home Builders & Rem of Southern Vermont
    Local # 4703
    PO Box 784
    Rutland, VT 05702
    http://www.cvthomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Washington County Vermont

    OSHA Penalties—What Happened with International Nutrition

    California Case Is a Reminder That Not All Insurance Policies Are Alike Regarding COVID-19 Losses

    What You Need to Know About Additional Insured Endorsements

    BOOK CLUB SERIES: Everything You Want to Know About Construction Arbitration But Were Afraid to Ask

    Express Warranty Trumping Spearin’s Implied Warranty

    Almost Nothing Is Impossible

    At $350 Million, Beverly Hillbillies Mansion Is Most Expensive in U.S.

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Wrap Music to an Insurer’s Ears?”

    ACEC Research Institute Report: Real Risk of AI Isn’t Technology. It’s the Org Chart.

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized as Super Lawyers

    Filing Motion to Increase Lien Transfer Bond (Before Trial Court Loses Jurisdiction Over Final Judgment)

    Colorado House Bill 17-1279 – A Misguided Attempt at Construction Defect Reform

    US Appeals Court Slams FERC on Long-Muddled State Environmental Permits

    Check The Boxes Regarding Contractual Conditions Precedent to Payment

    Land Use Team Wins Appeal for Affordable Senior Housing Development in San Francisco

    Anatomy of an Insurance Dispute

    Connecticut Crumbling Concrete Cases Not Covered Under "Collapse" Provision in Homeowner's Policy

    Best Practices: Commercial Lockouts in Arizona

    Ensuring Arbitration in Construction Defect Claims

    Risks of Using an AI Chatbot for Legal Advice: Lessons from United States v. Heppner

    Incorporation by Reference in Your Design Services Contract– What Does this Mean, and Are You at Risk? (Law Note)

    Green Home Predictions That Are Best Poised to Come True in 2014 and Beyond (guest post)

    U.K. Construction Unexpectedly Strengthens for a Second Month

    Florida’s Construction Defect Statute of Repose

    Balancing Cybersecurity Threats in Smart Cities: Is the Potential Convenience of “Smart” Intersections Worth the Risk?

    Denver Parking Garage Roof Collapses Crushing Vehicles

    Coverage Rejected Under Owned Property and Alienated Property Exclusions

    Contractor Gets Green Light to Fix Two Fractured Girders at Salesforce Transit Center

    School System Settles Design Defect Suit for $5.2Million

    Haight’s John Arbucci and Kristian Moriarty Selected for Super Lawyers’ 2020 Southern California Rising Stars

    Spreading Cracks On FIU Bridge Failed to Alarm Project Team

    Construction Trust Fund Statutes: Know What’s Required in the State Where Your Project Is Underway

    Condo Owners Suing Bank for Failing to Disclose Defects

    David M. McLain, Esq. to Speak at the 2014 CLM Claims College

    Industry Standard and Sole Negligence Defenses Can’t Fix a Defect

    Florida Condo Collapse Victims Reach $1 Billion Settlement

    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associate Melina Lowe Win Verdict Finding No Liability in Favor of Condo Owners

    Withdrawal Liability? Read your CBA

    Ex-Construction Firm That Bought a $75m Michelangelo to Delist

    HOA Coalition Statement on Construction-Defects Transparency Legislation

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    Chinese Telecommunications Ban to Expand to Federally Funded Contracts Effective November 12, 2020

    Bad Faith Claim for Inadequate Investigation Does Not Survive Summary Judgment

    Traub Lieberman Partner and Firm Co-Chair Lisa L. Shrewsberry Named Top 25: 2025 Westchester County Super Lawyers®

    Subrogation Waiver Unconscionable in Residential Fuel Delivery Contract

    Civility Is Key in Construction Defect Mediation

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap - The Mediator's Proposal

    Notice and Claims Provisions In Contracts Matter…A Lot

    Construction Jobs Keep Rising, with April Gain of 33,000

    Commerce City Enacts Reform to Increase For-Sale Multifamily Housing
    Corporate Profile

    WASHINGTON COUNTY VERMONT CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Washington County, Vermont Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Utilizing captive resources which comprise construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Washington County and the surrounding areas.

    Washington County Vermont architectural expert witnessWashington County Vermont construction expertsWashington County Vermont construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessWashington County Vermont slope failure expert witnessWashington County Vermont civil engineer expert witnessWashington County Vermont eifs expert witnessWashington County Vermont defective construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Washington County, Vermont

    Amended Again?! Critical Changes to RPAPL § 881: What New York Contractors and Construction Managers Need to Know

    March 10, 2026 —
    Recent amendments to New York’s RPAPL § 881 will significantly change how project teams obtain and maintain access to adjoining properties for construction-related work. The 2025 amendment signed into law by Governor Hochul, and the newly enacted 2026 revisions, will directly impact general contractors (GCs) and construction managers (CMs), as well as their trade contractors who regularly confront neighbor‑access, support‑of‑excavation, and protection‑of‑adjoining‑property challenges. Although we do not advise that GCs and CMs get involved in the “weeds” of license agreements or the prosecution of an action to obtain access pursuant to an RPAPL § 881 action, which are typically owner responsibilities, GCs and CMs should understand the change in law, as there may be circumstances where they are responsible for securing access. This alert outlines the key statutory changes and explains the operational, scheduling, insurance, and risk‑management implications for the New York construction industry. Reprinted courtesy of Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and David Polazzi, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com Mr. Polazzi may be contacted at dpolazzi@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit

    April 20, 2026 —
    In Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    June 08, 2026 —
    Foxborough, MA — April 1st, 2026— Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), a national law firm focused exclusively on representing policyholders in insurance coverage disputes, is pleased to announce the opening of its new office in Foxborough, Massachusetts. The expansion marks another milestone in the firm’s continued growth and deepens SDV’s ability to serve clients across the region. The new location strengthens SDV’s presence in Massachusetts and expands the firm’s capacity to support both existing and anticipated client needs in an increasingly complex insurance landscape. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners — Verified Statements of Claim Under the Colorado Public Works Act

    August 25, 2026 —
    Editor’s Note: Wadsworth Revisited In August 2024, following the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, we published Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims. At the time, the decision warranted a significant warning to contractors and subcontractors performing public work in Colorado. The Court of Appeals concluded that Wadsworth’s verified statement of claim improperly included unliquidated delay damages and that, because the claim was excessive, Wadsworth forfeited its right to recover the amounts included in the claim. We cautioned contractors to carefully scrutinize verified statements of claim and to avoid including unliquidated damages or amounts that were not yet due and payable. The Colorado Supreme Court has now reversed that decision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Olivia Barden, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    High-Rise Design and Construction: Then, Now, and Next

    March 16, 2026 —
    The Empire State Building was built in 14 months. Since 2010, the average completion time for a 200-meter-plus building has increased from 4.3 to 5.8 years. Buildings have become more complex, and there's more regulation than in the 1930s. Still, there are ways to make high-rise construction more efficient. An Unlikely Benchmark From 1930 When construction began on the Empire State Building on March 17, 1930, the world was in the midst of the Great Depression. That turned out to be an advantage. Contractors Starrett Brothers & Eken had access to a vast, motivated workforce, peaking at 3,439 workers on a single day in August 1930. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Steel Cooling: Steel Costs Steadily Decline After Pandemic Price Shock

    May 12, 2026 —
    Steel prices have continued trending downward after several years of volatility, according to Gordian’s latest analysis based on RSMeans Data. After dramatic spikes during the pandemic-era supply disruptions, the market has gradually stabilized as supply chains improve and demand softens in some construction segments. However, selective volatility and tariff uncertainty continue to influence pricing across the sector. Key findings from the report include:
    • Steel prices declining: The national average price of structural steel fell to about $2,343.93 per ton in January 2026, down 5.38% from the previous quarter and 7.18% year over year.
    • Longer-term price correction: Steel costs have been trending downward since 2024 after earlier volatility driven by inflation, supply shortages and global demand swings.
    Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Chambers USA 2026 Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Attorneys and Practices

    August 11, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its attorneys have received 57 individual recognitions in their respective fields, by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2026. These prestigious rankings are driven by independent interviews with clients of the firm and members of the legal community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer