Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss
April 20, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026).
Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds.
Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day deadline for filing a proof of loss to one year, or until September 28, 2023. Bay Haven did not submit its proofs of loss until November 2023. FEMA granted an extension but only for the specific amounts in the November requests. Hartford did not waive the 60-day proof of loss requirement for any other proof of loss. Hartford paid the amounts reflected in the November submissions.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Pulling the Plug, Preserving the Product: Protecting Rights to a Modular Subcontractor’s Work Post-Termination
June 08, 2026 —
Paul Williamson - ConsensusDocsVolumetric Modular Construction (VMC) is a building method where a structure is divided into large components or modules, fabricated in an offsite factory and then transported to a construction site for assembly.[
1] Proponents of VMC hail it as a cost-efficient alternative to traditional building methods that leads to more consistent quality and shorter construction duration.[
2] Due to a growing labor shortage, high demand for compressed project schedules, and stagnant construction productivity rates, the construction industry is embracing VMC.[
3] A recent report on the market size of prefabricated construction estimates that from 2026 to 2031, VMC will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.16% and become a 413.11-billion-dollar industry.[
4]
As VMC becomes more prevalent, owners, general contractors, and subcontractors must consider how to effectively contract for modular construction. One important consideration, which this article focuses on, is navigating termination of a modular subcontractor.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Paul Williamson, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Mr. Williamson may be contacted at
pwilliamson@pecklaw.com
Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers
July 13, 2026 —
Garret D. Murai - California Construction Law BlogNomos LLP Partner Garret Murai has been recognized as a 2026 Northern California Super Lawyer honoree in the area of Construction Litigation. This is the thirteenth consecutive year he has been recognized by Super Lawyers.
Super Lawyers, an annual listing of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and personal achievement, is limited to no more than five percent (5%) of lawyers in a state who are selected through a multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research evaluation and peer reviews by practice area.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
Pay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted Line
August 03, 2026 —
Christian Fernandez & Matthew Racioppo - Snell & WilmerBuried deep in the fine print of a subcontract, a pay-if-paid clause may be looming. If you are a subcontractor or supplier, misreading these clauses can put your cash flow at risk. If you are an owner or general contractor, drafting them incorrectly can leave you with obligations you never intended — or unenforceable protections you were counting on.
It is more important than ever to understand when pay-if-paid clauses hold up and when they do not, as well as recent litigation and drafting trends. Whether you are negotiating a new agreement, reviewing your standard form contracts, or staring down a payment dispute, understanding how Arizona law treats pay-if-paid clauses is essential. In this article, we break down key considerations, walk through the legal standards Arizona courts apply, and offer practical tips to consider to help you protect your payment rights on the next project.
Reprinted courtesy of
Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer and
Matthew Racioppo, Snell & Wilmer
Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com
Mr. Racioppo may be contacted at mracioppo@swlaw.com
Read the full story...
Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy
July 20, 2026 —
Anna M. Perry, Rachel S. Kindseth & Nina Catanzaro - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.I. Course of Construction Exclusions
Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy.
General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party.
Reprinted courtesy of
Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.,
Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and
Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com
Read the full story...
Chambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and Attorneys
March 03, 2026 —
SheppardSheppard has been recognized by Chambers Global 2026 in the following practice areas:
- Privacy & Data Security in the United States
- Projects: Power & Renewables: Transactional in the United States
- Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy in the United States
Additionally, the following Sheppard partners have been recognized by Chambers Global 2026:
- Justin Boose (Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy – USA)
- Will Chen (Intellectual Property: International Firms – South Korea)
- David Chun (Intellectual Property – South Korea)
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Sheppard
'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall
May 26, 2026 —
Elaine Silver - Engineering News-RecordPeter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across
Quick Note: Aim to Avoid a Stay to your Miller Act Payment Bond ClaimInsurer's Judgment on the Pleadings Based Upon Expected Injury Exclusion ReversedGilbane Project Exec Completes His Mission Against the OddsCutting the Salt Out: Tips for Avoiding Union Salting ChargesOSHA: What to Expect in 2022Team Temporarily Stabilizes Delaware River Bridge CrackScott Saylin Expands Employment Litigation and Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & FearsSupreme Court of Oregon Affirms Decision in Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, et al.Cross-Office Team Secures Litigation Stay and Order of Arbitration on Behalf of Hotel DeveloperWhen to Withhold Retention Payments on Private or Public ProjectsThe Black Woman Architect Who Hopes to Change the Face of Design in AmericaRuling Dealing with Constructive Changes, Constructive Suspension, and the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair DealingCold Stress Safety and ProtectionBusiness Risk Exclusions (j) 5 and (j) 6 Found AmbiguousFederal Contract Termination For ConvenienceBWB&O Recognized Among 2026 Best Law Firms® in the United StatesWorkers Charge Negligence In 2022 Kansas City-Area Bridge CollapseBrenner Base Tunnelers Conquer Peaks and Valleys in the AlpsA Survey of New Texas Environmental LawsPrime Contractor & Surety’s Recovery of Attorney’s Fees in Miller Act LawsuitWilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in 2021 Best Lawyers in America and Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch!Evolving Climate Patterns and Extreme Weather Demand New Building MethodsConstruction Defects Uncertain Role in Coverage in PennsylvaniaCalling the ShotsMichigan Supreme Court Finds Faulty Subcontractor Work That Damages Insured’s Work Product May Constitute an “Occurrence” Under CGL PolicyNewark Trial Team Defends “No Cause” With Appellate Affirmance Of 2023 Jury VerdictStair Collapse Points to Need for Structural InspectionsDiscovery Requests in Bad Faith Litigation Considered by CourtFlorida Governor Bans Foreign Citizens From Buying Land in FloridaNew Executive Order: Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice for AllPublic Contract Code 9204 – A New Mandatory Claims Process for Contractors and Subcontractors – and a Possible Trap for the UnwaryReminder: You Can’t Make Others Indemnify You for Your Own ActionsSold Signs Fill Builder Lots as U.S. Confidence Rises: Economy1st District Joins 2nd District Court of Appeals and Holds that One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement ClaimsWill On-Site Robotics Become Feasible in Construction?Eastern District of Pennsylvania Confirms Carrier Owes No Duty to Defend Against Claims for Faulty WorkmanshipSan Francisco House that Collapsed Not Built to PlanReasonable Expectations – Pennsylvania’s Case by Case Approach to the Sutton RuleThe Value of Photographic Evidence in Construction LitigationConstruction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments BuildingContract Should Have Clear and Definite Terms to Avoid a Patent AmbiguityNarberth Mayor Urges Dubious Legal ActionOccurrence-Based Insurance Policies and Claims-Made Insurance Policies – There’s a Crucial Difference Virginia Chinese Drywall “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and number of “occurrences”California to Build ‘Total Disaster City’ for TrainingDon’t Put All Your Eggs in the Silent-Cyber BasketSettlement Ends Construction Defect Lawsuit for SchoolBlackstone to Buy Chicago’s Willis Tower for $1.3 BillionBusiness Interruption Claim UpheldInjury to Employees Endorsement Eliminates Coverage for Insured EmployerBest Lawyers® Recognizes 49 White and Williams AttorneysHHMR Joins Forces with HBF at 2025 Blitz Build: Building More Than Just RampsFive Steps Employers Should Take In the Second Year Of the COVID-19 PandemicCSLB “Fast Facts” for Online Home Improvement MarketplacesWisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Asbestos Exclusion in Alleged Failure to Disclose CaseNJ Condo Construction Defect Case Dismissed over Statute of LimitationsDot I’s and Cross T’s When It Comes to Construction Licensure RequirementsDraft Federal Legislation Reinforces Advice to Promptly Notify Insurers of COVID-19 LossesLos Angeles Considering Census of Seismically Unstable BuildingsConsider Arbitration Provision in Homebuilder’s Warranty and Purchase-and-Sale AgreementCanada's Ex-Attorney General Set to Testify About SNC-Lavalin ScandalNew York Appellate Court Holds Insurer’s Failure to Defend Does Not Constitute a “Reasonable Excuse” Required to Overturn JudgmentTHE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT HAS RULED THAT THE RIGHT TO REPAIR ACT (SB800) IS THE EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIMS NOT INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURIES WHETHER OR NOT THE UNDERLYING DEFECTS GAVE RISE TO ANY PROPERTY DAMAGE in McMillin Albany LLInvest In America Act Offers 494 Billion In Funding to U.S. Infrastructure and Millions of New JobsGRSM Named Among 2026 “Best Law Firms” by Best Lawyers®After Breaching Its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Pay Market Rates for Defense Counsel
