BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Keeling Virginia housing expert witness Keeling Virginia Medical building expert witness Keeling Virginia casino resort expert witness Keeling Virginia low-income housing expert witness Keeling Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Keeling Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Keeling Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Keeling Virginia office building expert witness Keeling Virginia townhome construction expert witness Keeling Virginia condominiums expert witness Keeling Virginia tract home expert witness Keeling Virginia hospital construction expert witness Keeling Virginia custom home expert witness Keeling Virginia parking structure expert witness Keeling Virginia custom homes expert witness Keeling Virginia retail construction expert witness Keeling Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Keeling Virginia institutional building expert witness Keeling Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Keeling Virginia condominium expert witness Keeling Virginia industrial building expert witness Keeling Virginia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Keeling, Virginia

    Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB558; H 150; §55-70.1) Warranty extension applicable to single-family but not HOAs: in addition to any other express or implied warranties; It requires registered or certified mail notice to "vendor" stating nature of claim; reasonable time not to exceed six months to "cure the defect".


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Keeling Virginia

    A contractor's license is required for all trades. Separate boards license plumbing, electrical, HVAC, gas fitting, and asbestos trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tidewater Builders Association
    Local # 4854
    2117 Smith Ave
    Chesapeake, VA 23320
    http://www.tbaonline.org

    Builders & Associates of Southern VA
    Local # 4829
    PO Box 10178 Ste 28
    Danville, VA 24543


    Peninsula Housing & Builders Association
    Local # 4844
    760 McGuire Pl
    Newport News, VA 23601
    http://peninsulahousing.org/

    Home Builders Association of Southside VA
    Local # 4863
    10300 Corporate Road
    Petersburg, VA 23805
    http://www.hbaofsouthside.com

    New River Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 4837
    PO Box 2010
    Christiansburg, VA 24068
    http://www.nrvhba.com

    Roanoke Regional Home Builders Association
    Local # 4881
    1626 Apperson Dr
    Salem, VA 24153
    http://www.rrhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Central VA
    Local # 4827
    20334 Timberlake Rd Ste 3
    Lynchburg, VA 24502
    http://www.HBACV.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Keeling Virginia

    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Nuclear Energy Gets a Much-Needed Boost

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Policyholder Can “Stack” the Limits of Each Primary Policy After Asbestos Claim

    Quick Note: COVID-19 Claim – Proving Causation

    California Supreme Court Addresses “Good Faith” Construction Disputes Under Prompt Payment Laws

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jason Moberly Caruso As Its Newest Partner

    Hawaii Federal District Court Again Rejects Coverage for Faulty Workmanship

    When Customers Don’t Pay: What Can a Construction Business Do

    Fifth Circuit: Primary Insurer Relieved of Duty to Defend Without Release of Liability of Insured

    Cuba: Construction Boom Potential for U.S. Construction Companies and Equipment Manufacturers?

    The Other Side of the North Dakota Oil Boom: Evictions

    Be Careful in Contracting and Business

    Homebuilding Down in North Dakota

    Privileged Communications With a Testifying Client/Expert

    New York Converting Unlikely Buildings into Condominiums

    New Case Alert: Oregon Supreme Court Prohibits Insurer’s Attempt to Relitigate Insured’s Liability

    Steel-Fiber Concrete Link Beams Perform Well in Tests

    No Additional Insured Coverage for Subcontractor's Work Outside Policy Period

    A Win for Policyholders: Court Finds Flood Exclusion Inapplicable to Plumbing Leaks Caused by Hurricane Rainfall

    Construction Insurance Costs for New York Schools is Going Up

    Solar Power Inc. to Build 30-Megawatt Project in Inner Mongolia

    Pre-Covid Construction Contracts Unworkable as Costs Surge, Webuild Says

    Business Interruption Claim Granted in Part, Denied in Part

    When Cyber Crooks Steal Payments, Think Insurance Makes Up The Loss? Think Again.

    Skanska Found Negligent for Damages From Breakaway Barges

    Brazil's Success at Hosting World Cup Bodes Well for Olympics

    Does the UCC Apply to the Contract for the Sale of Goods and Services

    To Sea or Not to Sea: Fifth Circuit Applies Maritime Law to Offshore Service Contract, Spares Indemnity Provision from Louisiana Oilfield Indemnity Act

    Want to Stay Up on Your Mechanic’s Lien Deadlines? Write a Letter or Two

    COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims Four Years Later: What Have We Learned?

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Water Damage Claims

    Philadelphia Proposed Best Value Procurement Bill

    New York Appellate Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage” for Asbestos Claims and Other Coverage Issues

    Working Safely With Silica: Health Hazards and OSHA Compliance

    London Is Falling Down and It's Because of Climate Change

    Can We Compel Insurers To Cover Construction Defect in General Liability Policies?

    Workers at Two NFL Stadiums Test Positive for COVID-19, But Construction Continues

    Fifth Circuit Requires Causal Distinction for Ensuing Loss Exception to Faulty Work Exclusion

    Research Project Underway to Prepare Water Utilities for Wildfire Events

    That Boilerplate Language May Just Land You in Hot Water

    Construction Upturn in Silicon Valley

    Executive Order 14275: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Federal Court Upholds Privity Requirement in Additional Insured Endorsement; Finds No Equitable Estoppel

    #1 CDJ Topic: McMillin Albany LLC v Superior Court of California

    The Architects Who Dream of a New Stone Age

    That’s Common Knowledge! Failure to Designate an Expert Witness in a Professional Negligence Case is Not Fatal Where “Common Knowledge” Exception Applies

    MBS’s $500 Billion Desert Dream Just Keeps Getting Weirder

    Denial of Motion to Dissolve Lis Pendens Does Not Automatically Create Basis for Certiorari Relief
    Corporate Profile

    KEELING VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand building and claims related expert witness designations, the Keeling, Virginia Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert consulting services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Keeling construction industry.

    Keeling Virginia expert witness structural engineerKeeling Virginia forensic architectKeeling Virginia construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessKeeling Virginia building code expert witnessKeeling Virginia engineering expert witnessKeeling Virginia architect expert witnessKeeling Virginia architectural engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Keeling, Virginia

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    August 03, 2026 —
    P&A partners Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide. Reprinted courtesy of Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Michael S. Zicherman, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Mr. Zicherman may be contacted at mzicherman@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Construction Liens: Liening for Amounts Not Yet Technically Due Does Not Mean Lien Is Fraudulent

    August 11, 2026 —
    A 2024 bankruptcy ruling, In re Edgewater Construction Group, Inc., 657 B.R. 668 (S.D.Fla. 2024), touched upon an interesting issue when it comes to construction liens. Is a construction lien fraudulent simply because the lien includes amounts not yet due? Not necessarily. In this bankruptcy dispute, the subcontractor debtor (that filed for bankruptcy) recorded two construction liens on projects. The general contractor argued in the bankruptcy court that the subcontractor debtor’s liens were fraudulent. As to the first lien, the general contractor argued that the lien was fraudulent because it included amounts that the debtor knew the general contractor had already paid to the debtor’s subcontractors/suppliers. The bankruptcy court disagreed: “The Court finds that, although the Debtor had been told that [the general contractor] had paid these subcontractors, in light of the ongoing dispute between Debtor and [the general contractor], it was reasonable for the Debtor to demand proof. Debtor’s subsequent filing of a partial satisfaction of lien once the Debtor received the requested proof of payment from [the general contractor] counters any claim of willful exaggeration.” In re Edgewater Construction Group, supra, at 672-673. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    The Architects Who Dream of a New Stone Age

    October 26, 2026 —
    Most of the world’s longest-standing buildings have one thing in common: They are made from stone. Still, you’d be hard-pressed to find this civilization-outlasting material as a structural element in modern construction. Many stone buildings are imposters: thin veneers of limestone or granite disguising concrete and steel skeletons. In its day job as Earth’s crust, stone is currently holding up entire cities, countries and continents. But it’s rarely used to its full potential as a load-bearing material that can be stronger than concrete. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Hahn, Bloomberg

    How AI Turns Construction Documents Into Procurement Intelligence

    May 05, 2026 —
    MEP equipment accounts for up to 40% of costs on data center or hospital projects, has lead times ranging from 20 weeks to over a year, and has historically been the most underserved area in construction software. In this episode, I speak with Victor Muchiri from BuildVision about what it actually takes to make AI useful in construction procurement, not as a pilot, but in production. We dig into why you cannot simply upload a set of construction drawings to ChatGPT and trust the output. Construction documents are complex, cross-referenced, and consequential. Without deep domain context, such as manufacturer ontologies, equipment taxonomies, and engineering expertise, AI produces plausible results, not reliable ones. BuildVision’s approach is to act as a harness around AI models, wrapping them in construction-specific knowledge so the output can be trusted for real procurement decisions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Italian Court Convicts 32 in Morandi Bridge Collapse Case

    August 25, 2026 —
    Former Autostrade per l'Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci was sentenced to 12 years in prison July 16 after an Italian court handed down the first criminal verdicts stemming from the 2018 Morandi Bridge collapse in Genoa that killed 43 people. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    July 20, 2026 —
    The Utah Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed, in the construction context, Utah’s strict approach to enforcing integration clauses to preclude parol evidence and other legal theories that would vary the written terms of a contract. In Reid v. All Surface LC, 2025 UT App 134, decided last September, the court affirmed in all respects the trial court’s grant of summary judgment based on the strength of an integration clause against a homeowner who sued a contractor for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, negligence, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability. More recently, however, the same court rejected those same arguments in Tidwell v. Jensen, 2026 UT App 13 as to tort claims arising from a used car sale. The facts in Reid were sympathetic to the plaintiff. After being told she had a mold issue near a defective basement shower, the plaintiff solicited bids. A remediation contractor advised that while it could address the mold, the shower replacement should be handled by someone else. The plaintiff contacted All Surface LC, a shower replacement contractor. During an interview, the sales representative stated that All Surface could “do full mold remediation, tear everything out, and reframe the shower.” The plaintiff ultimately retained All Surface, expecting it would both resolve the mold issues and replace the shower. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark O. Morris, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Morris may be contacted at mmorris@swlaw.com

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...