BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia institutional building expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia hospital construction expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia production housing expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia industrial building expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia condominiums expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia housing expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia parking structure expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia multi family housing expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia retail construction expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia custom homes expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia Medical building expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia low-income housing expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia office building expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia tract home expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia landscaping construction expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia casino resort expert witness Shortt Gap Virginia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Shortt Gap, Virginia

    Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB558; H 150; §55-70.1) Warranty extension applicable to single-family but not HOAs: in addition to any other express or implied warranties; It requires registered or certified mail notice to "vendor" stating nature of claim; reasonable time not to exceed six months to "cure the defect".


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Shortt Gap Virginia

    A contractor's license is required for all trades. Separate boards license plumbing, electrical, HVAC, gas fitting, and asbestos trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    New River Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 4837
    PO Box 2010
    Christiansburg, VA 24068
    http://www.nrvhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Southside VA
    Local # 4863
    10300 Corporate Road
    Petersburg, VA 23805
    http://www.hbaofsouthside.com

    Peninsula Housing & Builders Association
    Local # 4844
    760 McGuire Pl
    Newport News, VA 23601
    http://peninsulahousing.org/

    Roanoke Regional Home Builders Association
    Local # 4881
    1626 Apperson Dr
    Salem, VA 24153
    http://www.rrhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Central VA
    Local # 4827
    20334 Timberlake Rd Ste 3
    Lynchburg, VA 24502
    http://www.HBACV.org

    Home Builders Association of Virginia-State
    Local # 4800
    707 E Franklin St
    Richmond, VA 23219
    http://www.hbav.com

    Tidewater Builders Association
    Local # 4854
    2117 Smith Ave
    Chesapeake, VA 23320
    http://www.tbaonline.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Shortt Gap Virginia

    Disjointed Proof of Loss Sufficient

    DIR Public Works Registration System Down, Public Works Contractors Not to be Penalized

    Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Is Still in Trouble, Two Major Reviews Say

    Barratt Said to Suspend Staff as Contract Probe Continues

    Contractor Walks Off Job. What are the Owner’s Damages?

    Fla. Researchers Probe 'Mother of All Sinkholes'

    Fraud, the VCPA and Construction Contracts

    EPA Coal Ash Cleanup Rule Changes Send Utilities, Agencies Back to Drawing Board

    Architect Responds to Defect Lawsuit over Defects at Texas Courthouse

    Pay Loss Provision Does Not Preclude Assignment of Post-Loss Claim

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    Learning from Production Homes of the Past

    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field

    Measures Landlords and Property Managers Can Take in Response to a Reported COVID-19 Infection

    Bond Principal Necessary on a Mechanic’s Lien Claim

    Advice to Georgia Homeowners with Construction Defects

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water

    Changes To Commercial Item Contracting

    Florida Litigation Team Delivers Crushing Summary Judgment Victory for National Home Builder

    Modular Homes Test Energy Efficiency Standards

    Florida Courts Say that Developers Are Responsible for Flooding

    Insurer’s Duty to Defend: When is it Triggered? When is it Not?

    More Musings From the Mediation Trenches

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2024 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Massachusetts Settlement Targets Mortgage-Backed “Homeowner Benefit” Agreements

    U.S. Construction Spending Rose in 2017 by Least in Six Years

    $2B Waldorf Astoria Renovation in NYC Resumes After Jobsite Fatality

    San Diego Appellate Team Prevails in Premises Liability Appeal

    Construction Termination Part 2: How to Handle Construction Administration When the Contractor Is Getting Fired

    Hunton Insurance Recovery Lawyers Ranked by Chambers as Top Insurance Practitioners

    Rachel Reynolds Selected as Prime Member of ADTA

    New York Court Enforces Construction Management Exclusion

    Fire Damages Unfinished Hospital Tower at NYU Langone Medical Center

    Contract Void Ab Initio: Key Insights into the KBR vs. Corps of Engineers Affirmative Defense

    I-35W Bridge Collapse may be Due to “Inadequate Load Capacity”

    Disaster Remediation Contracts: Understanding the Law to Avoid a Second Disaster

    Groundbreaking on New Boulder Neighborhood

    Nader Eghtesad v. State Farm General Insurance Company

    Hawaii Federal District Rejects Another Construction Defect Claim

    ASCE Statement on Hurricane Milton and Environmental Threats

    Implied Warranty Claims–Not Just a Seller’s Risk: Builders Beware!

    Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment in Leaky Condo Conversion

    Scott Saylin Expands Employment Litigation and Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    The “Ugly” Property Next Door is Ruining My Property Value

    What Makes Building Ventilation Good Enough to Withstand a Pandemic?

    While Starts Fall, Builder Confidence and Permits are on the Rise

    No Repeal Process for Rejected Superstorm Sandy Grant Applications

    How Helsinki Airport Uses BIM to Create the Best Customer Experience

    Navigating Disruption to Construction Projects Flowing From the America First Trade Policy

    Construction Defects Up Price and Raise Conflict over Water Treatment Expansion
    Corporate Profile

    SHORTT GAP VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Shortt Gap, Virginia Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Shortt Gap and the surrounding areas.

    Shortt Gap Virginia construction project management expert witnessShortt Gap Virginia construction defect expert witnessShortt Gap Virginia reconstruction expert witnessShortt Gap Virginia consulting architect expert witnessShortt Gap Virginia delay claim expert witnessShortt Gap Virginia concrete expert witnessShortt Gap Virginia construction expert witness public projects
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Shortt Gap, Virginia

    Seattle Team Obtains Summary Judgment in Real Estate Broker Professional Liability Action

    July 20, 2026 —
    Seattle Partner Kathleen A. Nelson and Associate Synova M. L. Edwards prevailed on a hotly contested motion for summary judgment in Whatcom County, Washington court in a real estate broker professional liability action. The plaintiff filed an action against Lewis Brisbois' clients, a real estate agent and brokerage firm, among several others, including the title company, purchasers and others related to the sale of real property following his complicated and long running divorce action. These claims primarily arose out of the clients’ reliance on an order signed by the court in the underlying divorce action. The order allowed the clients to execute the purchase and sale agreement, as the plaintiff was non-cooperative. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    2026 Colorado Super Lawyers Recognizes 11 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    May 05, 2026 —
    DENVER – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that eleven attorneys in its Denver office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers publication. Of those eleven, four were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    The Firm Turns 16!

    July 20, 2026 —
    I have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want. Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wildlife biology degree and is currently in Casper, Wyoming working for Wyoming Game & Fish, my second oldest is an assistant director of admissions at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, and has celebrated his second wedding anniversary, and my oldest has celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. Our home in Captiva, Florida continues its recovery from from Hurricane Ian and subsequent hurricanes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill

    “He Chose…Poorly: How Bad DSC Clauses Lead to Project Doom in the Last Crusade of Construction Risk”

    March 10, 2026 —
    “We do not follow maps to buried treasure, and X never, ever marks the spot.” That’s the advice that Indiana Jones offered in the Last Crusade film. But what’s beneath the surface isn’t just important to adventure archaeologists. It has real-world application to our industry, where success depends on the stability of materials below the surface. The study of geology and soils has ancient roots. Egyptians relied on soil stability for the pyramids; Rome built a continent-wide roadway system utilizing subgrade preparation techniques; Medieval builders implemented a rudimentary foundation pier system; Henri Gautier studied what is now called the “angle of repose” for French retaining walls in the early 18th Century. Through the 19th Century, contractors bore the risk of the stability of their work, and the attendant peril of unforeseen site conditions. But in the early 20th Century, design trades continued to develop increased understanding of soil and underground conditions. In the 1920’s US federal contracts began employing “differing site conditions” clauses, which provided for cost/time adjustments if subsurface conditions differed from expectations. Industry forms followed the federal policy, and these clauses became almost universally accepted. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Lee Banta, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Banta may be contacted at lbanta@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    July 27, 2026 —
    On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “…furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work….” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    April 14, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025). Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood. Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    2026 Top Business Risks for Construction and Engineering Companies

    May 26, 2026 —
    The 2026 Allianz Risk Barometer revealed some surprising findings for construction and engineering businesses. Now in its fifteenth year, this annual business risk ranking by corporate insurer Allianz Commercial incorporates the views of 3,338 global risk management professionals on the main perils on their radar for the year. Survey respondents included construction and engineering risk experts who identified the threats keeping them up at night. Here is how they ranked the top industry risks for 2026: Natural Catastrophes Natural catastrophe risk retains the top spot, with 38% of construction and engineering respondents citing this risk as their leading concern for 2026. From the insurance perspective, economic and insured losses remained high, albeit lower than the 10-year average. The evolving nature of natural catastrophes continues to pose significant challenges to businesses and the (re)insurance industry. Insured losses from natural catastrophes are set to reach $107 billion for 2025, according to Swiss Re—the sixth year in a row they have exceeded $100 billion, while economic losses are well in excess of $200 billion. Reprinted courtesy of Darren Tasker, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...