BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia low-income housing expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia hospital construction expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia Medical building expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia casino resort expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia institutional building expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia retail construction expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia townhome construction expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia condominiums expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia multi family housing expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia custom homes expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia condominium expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia housing expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia office building expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia parking structure expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia custom home expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia industrial building expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia landscaping construction expert witness Sweet Briar Virginia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Sweet Briar, Virginia

    Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB558; H 150; §55-70.1) Warranty extension applicable to single-family but not HOAs: in addition to any other express or implied warranties; It requires registered or certified mail notice to "vendor" stating nature of claim; reasonable time not to exceed six months to "cure the defect".


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Sweet Briar Virginia

    A contractor's license is required for all trades. Separate boards license plumbing, electrical, HVAC, gas fitting, and asbestos trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Virginia-State
    Local # 4800
    707 E Franklin St
    Richmond, VA 23219
    http://www.hbav.com

    Home Builders Association of Richmond
    Local # 4872
    400 North Ridge Road
    Richmond, VA 23229
    http://www.hbar.org

    Home Builders Association of Central VA
    Local # 4827
    20334 Timberlake Rd Ste 3
    Lynchburg, VA 24502
    http://www.HBACV.org

    Home Builders Association of Rappahannock
    Local # 4847
    PO Box 88
    Wicomico Church, VA 22579


    Roanoke Regional Home Builders Association
    Local # 4881
    1626 Apperson Dr
    Salem, VA 24153
    http://www.rrhba.com

    New River Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 4837
    PO Box 2010
    Christiansburg, VA 24068
    http://www.nrvhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Southside VA
    Local # 4863
    10300 Corporate Road
    Petersburg, VA 23805
    http://www.hbaofsouthside.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Sweet Briar Virginia

    Damages to Property That is Not the Insured's Work Product Are Covered

    Colorado Construction Defect Action Reform: HB 17-1279 Approved by Colorado Legislature; Governor’s Approval Imminent

    LEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over Demolition

    But Wait There’s More: Preserving Claims on Commonwealth Projects

    A Survey of New Texas Environmental Laws

    GOP, States, Industry Challenge EPA Project Water Impact Rule

    GRSM Team Wins Summary Judgment in Million-Dollar HOA Dispute

    Second Circuit Denies Petitions for Review of EPA’s Final Regulations to Establish Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures

    Out of Eastern Europe, a Window Into the Post-Pandemic Office

    ASCE Statement on House Passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    Surety’s Several Liability Under Bonds

    Drug Company Provides Cure for Development Woes

    Failure to Comply with Sprinkler Endorsement Bars Coverage for Fire Damage

    Defective Sprinklers Not Cause of Library Flooding

    Specification Challenge; Excusable Delay; Type I Differing Site Condition; Superior Knowledge

    Massachusetts High Court: Attorney's Fee Award Under Consumer Protection Act Not Covered by General Liability Insurance Policy

    Claims Made Insurance Policies

    Form Contracts are Great, but. . .

    Harsh New Time Limits on Construction Defect Claims

    “Incidental” Versus “Direct” Third Party Beneficiaries Under Insurance Policies in Which a Party is Not an Additional Insured

    New Window Insulation Introduced to U.S. Market

    District Court Awards Summary Judgment to Insurance Firm in Framing Case

    Construction Defect Specialist Joins Kansas City Firm

    How to Fireproof a Neighborhood

    Is It Time to Digitize Safety?

    Miami Building Boom Spreads Into Downtown’s Tent City

    Heads I Win, Tails You Lose. Court Finds Indemnity Provision Went Too Far

    Don’t Forget to Mediate the Small Stuff

    Affordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 Trillion

    Forensic Team Finds Fault with Concrete Slabs in Oroville Dam Failure

    Exclusion Bars Coverage For Cosmetic Hail Damage to Roof

    Georgia Supreme Court Addresses Anti-Indemnity Statute

    How AI Can Become a Design Adviser

    Submitting Claims on Government Projects Can Be Tricky

    Build, Baby, Build. But Not Like This, Britain.

    Insurers Dispute Sharing of Defense in Construction Defect Case

    CCPA Class Action Lawsuits Are Coming. Are You Ready?

    Ensuring Efficient Arbitration of Construction Disputes Involving Mechanic’s Liens

    Boston Nonprofit Wants to Put Grown-Ups in Dorms

    Pennsylvania Court Finds that Two Possible Causes Can Prove a Product Malfunction Theory of Liability

    ASCE Statement on Passing of Senator Dianne Feinstein

    Ninth Circuit: Speculative Injuries Do Not Confer Article III Standing

    25 Years of West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar

    With Wildfires at a Peak, “Firetech” Is Joining Smart City Lineups

    White and Williams Obtains Reversal on Appeal of $2.5 Million Verdict Against Electric Utility Company

    We Won’t Permit That Excuse!

    Georgia Appellate Court Supports County Claim Against Surety Company’s Failure to Pay

    Surge in Home Completions Tamps Down Inflation as Fed Meets

    Differing Site Conditions Produce Differing Challenges

    Prevailing Wages Don’t Stop at the Jobsite, Says Washington Court
    Corporate Profile

    SWEET BRIAR VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction and design related expert witness designations, the Sweet Briar, Virginia Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Sweet Briar region.

    Sweet Briar Virginia architectural engineering expert witnessSweet Briar Virginia architecture expert witnessSweet Briar Virginia concrete expert witnessSweet Briar Virginia expert witness windowsSweet Briar Virginia building expertSweet Briar Virginia expert witness roofingSweet Briar Virginia consulting engineers
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Sweet Briar, Virginia

    GRSM Attorneys Named Finalists in 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards

    March 10, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani attorneys have been shortlisted as finalists for Corporate Counsel’s 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) Awards, which honor women leaders who have demonstrated a commitment to advancing the empowerment of women in the legal profession. In the Law Firm Internal Collaborative Leadership category, Stephanie Jones was recognized for her exceptional ability to foster collaboration, mentor talent, and align colleagues across GRSM. Jones has consistently demonstrated leadership rooted in trust, inclusion, and shared purpose, qualities that have strengthened the firm during a period of extraordinary growth. Her impact on the firm’s culture and success will continue as she steps into her role as Chief Operating Partner in June 2026, where she will further build on her leadership in fostering teamwork, mentorship, and alignment across the firm’s national platform. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Additional Insureds Owed a Defense in Underlying Personal Injury Suit

    March 03, 2026 —
    The court granted partial summary judgment on the duty to defend to two additional insureds who were named as defendants in the underlying personal injury suit. In re Third St. Equity, LLC, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234909 (E.D. N. Y. Dec. 2, 2025). Third Street Equity LLD hired Developing NY State, LLC as the contractor for a construction project. Developing NY entered a subcontract agreement with Capital Source Concrete NY LLC for concrete work as well as labor and services for a construction project. The subcontract required that Capital Concrete keep the construction site free of debris, waste material or rubbish. Further, Capital Concrete was responsible for compliance with OSHA safety regulations. It was also agreed that Capital Concrete would obtain liability and workers compensation insurance naming Third Street and Developing NY as additional insureds. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit

    April 20, 2026 —
    In Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    Ayushi Neogi Published in ADC Defense Comment on Arbitration in Evolving Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape

    May 12, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel Ayushi Neogi has authored an article in the Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California and Nevada’s Defense Comment magazine examining the shifting landscape of arbitration following the Ending Forced Arbitration Act. Titled “Compelling Arbitration in a Post-Ending Forced Arbitration Act, Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape,” the article analyzes how recent legislative changes are reshaping arbitration strategy, particularly as employees gain greater ability to bypass arbitration in certain claims. Neogi provides practical insight into how courts are responding and what this means for defense counsel navigating increasingly complex and plaintiff-friendly environments. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    April 27, 2026 —
    The explosive growth of data‑center load—driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing and the expansion of digital infrastructure across industries—has forced U.S. energy regulators into unfamiliar territory. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is actively considering how large, concentrated loads can be powered without compromising grid reliability or shifting costs to other customers. FERC has not yet issued a standalone rulemaking on data centers. But make no mistake, the regulatory framework is quietly and deliberately being built. For developers, hyperscalers, utilities and investors, the period before FERC finalizes its next round of decisions represents the critical window to crystallize advocacy and structure transactions in ways that anticipate regulatory change. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Tampa Team Obtains Highly Favorable Verdict for Property Owner Client in Lawsuit over Traffic Accident

    March 24, 2026 —
    Tampa Managing Partner John Rine and Partner Nick Dareneau obtained a very favorable verdict for their property owner client in a Sarasota County trial in a lawsuit arising from a traffic accident. At the end of closing arguments, plaintiff’s counsel requested appropriately $18 million from the jury. The jury returned a net verdict of just over a thousand dollars. The plaintiff was on a scooter and was involved in an accident with an SUV in a parking lot intersection. Our firm represented the property owner. The plaintiffs argued that the landscape vegetation was too tall and violated the sight lines of the two drivers, and that the height of the shrubbery violated the owner’s landscaping contract and a local sight line ordinance. They also argued that the intersection lacked a stop sign in contrast to the other six parking lot entrances, which had stop signs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy

    March 24, 2026 —
    Introduction On many construction projects, particularly large projects facing schedule pressure, owners may begin occupying or using portions of the project before the work reaches substantial completion. This is often due to operational needs, phased turnover, or market demands that drive owners to take possession of all or part of a project while construction activities are ongoing. While early occupancy may seem practical, it can blur the lines of responsibility between owner and contractor and can create significant legal and practical complications. These disputes are especially common on large, complex projects where punch list work, system commissioning, and closeout activities overlap with owner use. Without clear documentation and carefully drafted contract provisions, early occupancy can undermine an owner’s ability to enforce completion requirements while simultaneously exposing the contractor to claims of delay, inefficiency, or interference. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sydney Koby, Jones Walker
    Ms. Koby may be contacted at skoby@joneswalker.com