BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Blakely Island Washington institutional building expert witness Blakely Island Washington high-rise construction expert witness Blakely Island Washington retail construction expert witness Blakely Island Washington office building expert witness Blakely Island Washington concrete tilt-up expert witness Blakely Island Washington custom home expert witness Blakely Island Washington Subterranean parking expert witness Blakely Island Washington parking structure expert witness Blakely Island Washington mid-rise construction expert witness Blakely Island Washington landscaping construction expert witness Blakely Island Washington hospital construction expert witness Blakely Island Washington structural steel construction expert witness Blakely Island Washington condominium expert witness Blakely Island Washington multi family housing expert witness Blakely Island Washington low-income housing expert witness Blakely Island Washington casino resort expert witness Blakely Island Washington condominiums expert witness Blakely Island Washington townhome construction expert witness Blakely Island Washington industrial building expert witness Blakely Island Washington housing expert witness Blakely Island Washington Medical building expert witness Blakely Island Washington
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Blakely Island, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Blakely Island Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Skagit-Island Counties Builders Association
    Local # 4960
    15571-A Peterson Rd
    Burlington, WA 98233
    http://www.sicba.org

    San Juan Home Builders Chapter
    Local # 4938
    PO Box 1561
    Eastsound, WA 98245


    Building Industry Association of Whatcom County
    Local # 4984
    1650 Baker Creek Place
    Bellingham, WA 98226
    http://www.biawc.com

    Jefferson County Home Builders Association
    Local # 4947
    PO Box 1399
    Port Hadlock, WA 98339
    http://www.jeffcohomebuilders.com

    North Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 4927
    PO Box 748
    Port Angeles, WA 98362


    Home Builders Association of Spokane
    Local # 4966
    5813 E 4th Ave Ste 201
    Spokane, WA 99212
    http://www.shba.com

    MBuilders Association of King & Snohomish Counties
    Local # 4955
    335 116th Ave SE
    Bellevue, WA 98004
    http://www.masterbuildersinfo.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Blakely Island Washington

    Colorado Court of Appeals to Rule on Arbitrability of an HOA's Construction Defect Claims

    Reminder: Pay if Paid Not All Encompassing (but Could it be?)

    Construction Firms Complain of Missed Payments on Redevelopment Project

    Insurer Must Indemnify Additional Insured After Settlement

    Leftover Equipment and Materials When a Contractor Is Abruptly Terminated

    Millennials Want Houses, Just Like Everybody Else

    Parties Can Agree to Anything In A Settlement Agreement………Or Can They?

    New York Restrictions on Flow Through Provision in Subcontracts

    Occurrence-Based Insurance Policies and Claims-Made Insurance Policies – There’s a Crucial Difference

    United States Supreme Court Limits Class Arbitration

    L.A. Makes $4.5 Billion Bet on Olympics After Boston Backs Out

    Recent Changes in the Law Affecting Construction Defect Litigation

    Fifth Circuit Certifies Eight-Corners Duty to Defend Issue to Texas Supreme Court

    Macron Visits Notre Dame 2 Years After Devastating Fire

    How Finns Cut Construction Lead Times in Half

    Tall Mass Timber Buildings Now Possible Under 2021 IBC Code Changes

    Insurance Policy’s “No Voluntary Payment” Clauses Lose Some Bite in Colorado

    First Look at Long List of AEC Firms Receiving PPP Loans

    History and Gentrification Clash in a Gilded Age Resort

    White and Williams Announces Lawyer Promotions

    Connecticut Supreme Court Again Asked to Determine the Meaning of Collapse

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    Is it time for a summer tune-up?

    California Statutes Authorizing Public-Private Partnership Contracting

    To Ease Housing Crunch, Theme Parks Are Becoming Homebuilders

    The Nightmare Scenario for Florida’s Coastal Homeowners

    Construction Project Bankruptcy Law

    Brazil Congress Chiefs Deny Wrongdoing in Petrobras Scandal

    Does a Broker Forfeit His or Her Commission for Technical Non-Compliance with Department of Real Estate Statutory Requirements?

    Remembering Joseph H. Foster

    Insured's Commercial Property Policy Deemed Excess Over Unobtained Flood Policy

    Colorado’s Workers’ Compensation Act and the Construction Industry

    Insurer’s “Failure to Cooperate” Defense

    Meet BWB&O’s 2026 Best Lawyers in America!

    Is The Enforceability Of A No-Damage-For-Delay Provision Inappropriate For Summary Judgment

    Nevada Legislature Burns Insurers' Rights to Offer Eroding Limits

    Additional Insured Prevails on Summary Judgment For Duty to Defend, Indemnify

    Conflicts of Laws, Deficiency Actions, and Statutes of Limitations – Oh My!

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    Are Construction Defect Claims Covered Under CGL Policies?

    California Precludes Surety from Asserting Pay-When-Paid Provision as Defense to Payment Bond Claim

    Specification Challenge; Excusable Delay; Type I Differing Site Condition; Superior Knowledge

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    Musk Backs Off Plan for Tunnel in Tony Los Angelenos' Backyard

    White and Williams Elects Four Lawyers to Partnership, Promotes Six Associates to Counsel

    Comparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part I

    Broker Not Negligent When Insured Rejects Additional Coverage

    Discussion of the Discovery Rule and Tolling Statute of Limitations

    Court Narrowly Interprets “Faulty Workmanship” Provision

    Spreading Cracks On FIU Bridge Failed to Alarm Project Team
    Corporate Profile

    BLAKELY ISLAND WASHINGTON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Blakely Island, Washington Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets comprising construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Blakely Island construction industry.

    Blakely Island Washington multi family design expert witnessBlakely Island Washington structural concrete expertBlakely Island Washington construction expertsBlakely Island Washington construction cost estimating expert witnessBlakely Island Washington construction claims expert witnessBlakely Island Washington expert witness structural engineerBlakely Island Washington hospital construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Blakely Island, Washington

    SDV Celebrates 30th Anniversary Press Release

    April 08, 2026 —
    Trumbull, Connecticut – Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV) is proud to announce the celebration of its 30th anniversary. Founded in 1996 by three attorneys in a small New Haven, Connecticut office, SDV was built on a clear and focused mission: representing policyholders in insurance coverage matters. Three decades later, that commitment remains at the core of the firm’s identity and has been instrumental in its continued success and reputation nationwide. Today, SDV is a nationally recognized boutique firm with 50 attorneys serving policyholders across the United States. Building on its longstanding reputation for excellence and client advocacy, the firm is pleased to announce the opening of its newest office in Massachusetts—an exciting milestone that reflects SDV’s continued growth. The new office is led by Managing Partner Anna Perry. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Insured’s Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment to dispose of the insured’s bad faith claim was unsuccessful. Page v. State Farm Lloyds, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102293 (E.D. Texas March 18, 2026). Plaintiff insured alleged that hail and a windstorm caused damage to his property. The damage was reported to the defendant insurer. A claims adjuster inspected the property. Defendant then paid plaintiff $24,493.06, which was the total of the estimated damage minus depreciation and the deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Massachusetts Construction Industry Continues to Wait While Prompt Payment Law Is Put to the Test

    March 31, 2026 —
    Earlier this month, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) heard argument in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co. et al., a dispute concerning the state’s Prompt Payment Act (PPA). Although a decision has yet to be issued, it could potentially pose widespread implications for high-value private construction projects moving forward – and perhaps backwards. The PPA, G. L. c. 149, § 29E, enacted by the Massachusetts Legislature in 2010, has become a keystone in the construction industry. It was enacted to address, in part, downstream cash flow issues that tend to pervade construction projects by mandating a series of strict guidelines for submitting, and responding to, payment applications for private projects valued over $3,000,000. Amongst these requirements are set timeframes to respond to an application, as well as what must be contained in an application rejection. Critically, if an owner or upper-tier contractor fails to fully comply with all the statutory requirements in response to a proper payment application, the application is automatically “deemed to be approved” and payable. Significantly, however, this is not always the end of the line. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Catherine Maronski, Robinson Cole
    Ms. Maronski may be contacted at cmaronski@rc.com

    Identifying Unfair Clauses in Construction Contracts

    February 17, 2026 —
    In 1979, virtually all projects were completed under form contracts. As I started practicing construction law, it seemed that most form contracts were generally fair. They were negotiated by industry groups and over the next 10-20 years they appeared to become fairer. We could and did compare provisions in the AIA documents, the Federal contract forms, and the EJCDC agreements. When we did, we found subtle differences, but broad similarities in their approach to contract risk allocation. Today many (most?) private projects are done with “manuscript” contracts – instruments tailored to the owner’s interests. And many public entities have developed their own contracts. And not all those clauses seem so fair. This month I focus on contract clauses that I consider unfair. And while unfairness, like beauty, may be in the eye of the beholder, I think that the clauses described below aptly fit that descriptor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Curtis W. Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com

    HHMR Honored as a 2026 Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work Recipient

    March 10, 2026 —
    We are pleased to share that Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell has been named a 2026 Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work honoree, a recognition grounded entirely in direct feedback from our own team members. The Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work program, in partnership with Quantum Workplace, ranks organizations based on anonymous employee engagement survey results that measure culture, leadership, communication, trust, team dynamics, and satisfaction. This year’s list includes 65 companies across the Denver metropolitan area, judged by the people who know these workplaces best: their employees. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law

    June 29, 2026 —
    Daily Journal (California) featured an article by Construction Law partner Brenda Radmacher, “A new path for construction defects in California.” The piece, published on June 15, 2026, examines Assembly Bill 1903 and its potential to significantly reshape California’s construction defect framework, particularly for common interest properties. The article highlights how AB 1903 would overhaul the state’s current right-to-repair system by mandating completion of prelitigation procedures, raising requirements for defect claims, strengthening developers’/builders’ rights to repair, and introducing a voluntary “certified building” program. The legislation aims to rebalance competing interests by reducing litigation-driven costs while preserving protections for homeowners. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Radmacher may be contacted at bradmacher@seyfarth.com