BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Eatonville Washington custom homes expert witness Eatonville Washington production housing expert witness Eatonville Washington concrete tilt-up expert witness Eatonville Washington structural steel construction expert witness Eatonville Washington institutional building expert witness Eatonville Washington low-income housing expert witness Eatonville Washington Subterranean parking expert witness Eatonville Washington custom home expert witness Eatonville Washington industrial building expert witness Eatonville Washington parking structure expert witness Eatonville Washington multi family housing expert witness Eatonville Washington townhome construction expert witness Eatonville Washington casino resort expert witness Eatonville Washington landscaping construction expert witness Eatonville Washington housing expert witness Eatonville Washington mid-rise construction expert witness Eatonville Washington hospital construction expert witness Eatonville Washington retail construction expert witness Eatonville Washington office building expert witness Eatonville Washington condominium expert witness Eatonville Washington condominiums expert witness Eatonville Washington
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Eatonville, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Eatonville Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Washington-State
    Local # 4900
    111 W 21st Avenue
    Olympia, WA 98501
    http://www.biaw.com

    Olympia Master Builders
    Local # 4933
    1211 State Ave NE
    Olympia, WA 98506
    http://www.omb.org

    Central Washington Home Builders Association
    Local # 4909
    3301 W Nob Hill Blvd
    Yakima, WA 98902
    http://www.cwhba.org

    MBuilders Association of Pierce County
    Local # 4977
    PO Box 1913 Suite 301
    Tacoma, WA 98401
    http://www.mbapierce.com

    Home Builders Association of North Central
    Local # 4957
    PO Box 2065
    Wenatchee, WA 98801
    http://www.nchba.cc

    Lewis-Clark Home Builders Association
    Local # 1310
    1313 6TH ST
    CLARKSTON, WA 99403
    http://www.lcbca.qwestoffice.net

    Home Builders Association of Tri-Cities
    Local # 4911
    10001 W Clearwater Ave
    Kennewick, WA 99336
    http://www.hbatc.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Eatonville Washington

    Demolition Started for Boston’s $200M Professional Women’s Soccer Stadium Renovation Despite Looming Trial

    “Bee” Careful: Unique Considerations When Negotiating a Bee Storage Lease Agreement

    ZLien Startup has Discovered a Billion in Payments for Clients

    Architect Not Responsible for Injuries to Guests

    California Assembly Passes Expedited Dam Safety for Silicon Valley Act

    Brazil's Success at Hosting World Cup Bodes Well for Olympics

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Tear Down This Wall!”

    Texas Shortens Cut-Off Date for Suits Against Homebuilders Who Provide a 6-Year Written Warranty

    Construction Contract Basics: Venue and Choice of Law

    Supreme Court Holds That Prevailing Wage Statute is Constitutional

    Were Quake Standards Illegally Altered for PG&E Nuclear Power Plant?

    Construction Litigation Group Listed in U.S. News Top Tier

    Pennsylvania Federal Court Finds No Coverage For Hacking Claim Under E&O Policy

    Now Available: Seyfarth’s 50 State Lien Law Notice Requirements Guide (2023-2024 Edition)

    Gaps in Insurance Created by Complex Risks

    California Trial Court Clarifies Application of SB800 Roofing Standards and Expert’s Opinions

    Florida’s Supreme Court Resolves Conflicting Appellate Court Decisions on Concurrent Causation

    Exact Dates Not Needed for Construction Defect Insurance Claim

    Cape Town Seeks World Cup Stadium Construction Collusion Damages

    Fixing the Problem – Not the Blame

    Creeping Incrementalism in Downstream Insurance: Carriers are Stretching Standard CGL Concepts to Untenable Limits

    Resolving Condominium Construction Defect Warranty Claims in Maryland

    Production of Pre-Denial Claim File Compelled

    New York Amends Prompt Payment Act: Retainage Above 5% in Private Construction Contracts Now Void

    In Colorado, Primary Insurers are Necessary Parties in Declaratory Judgment Actions

    A Third of U.S. Homebuyers Are Bidding Sight Unseen

    At Long Last, the Colorado Legislature Gets Serious About Construction Defect Reform – In a Constructive Way

    More Money Down Adds to U.S. First-Time Buyer Blues: Economy

    California Commission Recommends Switching To Fault-Based Wildfire Liability Standard for Public Utilities

    Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Annual Forum Meeting in New Orleans

    Federal Court Asks South Dakota Supreme Court to Decide Whether Injunction Costs Are “Damages,” Adopts Restatement’s Position on Providing “Inadequate” Defense

    North Carolina Federal Court Holds “Hazardous Materials” Exclusion Does Not Bar Duty to Defend Under CGL Policy for Bodily Injury Claims Arising Out of Direct Exposure to PFAs

    Wood Wizardry in Oregon: Innovation Raises the Roof for PDX Terminal

    Sometimes, Being too Cute with Pleading Allegations is Unnecessary

    Houston Home Sales Fall for the First Time in Six Months

    Microwave Transmission of Space-Based Solar Power: The Focus of New Attention

    The Pandemic of Litigation Sure to Follow the Coronavirus

    An Obligation to Provide Notice and an Opportunity to Cure May not End after Termination, and Why an Early Offer of Settlement Should Be Considered on Public Works Contracts

    Jarred Reed Named to the National Black Lawyers’ “Top 40 Under 40” List for Second Consecutive Year

    Court finds subcontractor responsible for defending claim

    A Funny Thing Happened to My Ground Lease in Bankruptcy Court

    Mandatory Arbitration Provision Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Alabama Limits Duty to Defend for Construction Defects

    Tony Sonnett Secures Highly Favorable Verdict for Client in Admitted Liability Case in Which Plaintiff Sought $34.5M

    Apartment Building Damaged by Cable Installer’s Cherry Picker

    Harlem Developers Reach Deal with Attorney General

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (09/12/23) – Airbnb’s Future in New York City, MGM Resorts Suffer Cybersecurity Incident, and Insurance Costs Hitting Commercial Real Estate

    Construction Defect Fund Approved for Bankrupt Las Vegas Builder

    CC&Rs Not the Place for Arbitration Agreement, Court Rules

    CAUTION: Terms of CCP Section 998 Offers to Compromise Must Be Fully Contained in the Offer Itself
    Corporate Profile

    EATONVILLE WASHINGTON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 construction related expert witness designations, the Eatonville, Washington Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking meaningful resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which comprise construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Eatonville and the surrounding areas.

    Eatonville Washington testifying construction expert witnessEatonville Washington ada design expert witnessEatonville Washington building code compliance expert witnessEatonville Washington window expert witnessEatonville Washington expert witnesses fenestrationEatonville Washington construction expert witness consultantEatonville Washington soil failure expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Eatonville, Washington

    373 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    October 06, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 373 of the firm’s attorneys were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® including the prestigious “Lawyer of the Year” honors, and “Ones to Watch” list. Attorneys listed as Ones to Watch typically have been in practice for five to nine years. “Lawyer of the Year” recognition is awarded to individual lawyers with the highest overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic region. Only one lawyer is recognized for each practice area and location. The following Snell & Wilmer attorneys were named 2027 “Lawyer of the Year” award recipients: Cortland P. Andrews, Troy J. Aramburu, Brian L. Blaylock, M. Lawrence Brown, Brian D. Cunningham, Michael M. Donahey, Jason Ebe, Matthew P. Fischer, Brett W. Johnson, Nathan G. Kanute, William A. Kastin, Timothy J. Kay, James D. Kilroy, Joseph A. Kroeger, Matthew L. Lalli, John F. Lomax, Anne M. Meyer, Robin L. Miskell, Patrick J. Paul, Amit D. Ranade, and M. Roxanne Veliz. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    Endorsement is Void Where Compliance is Impossible

    September 21, 2026 —
    The Sixth Circuit found that the insured’s loss of property due to fire was covered despite noncompliance with an endorsement requiring encompassing the property. 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mut Group, Inc., et al., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19156 (6th Cir. June 29, 2026). The insured, 3371 Reading, owned a building undergoing renovation. After the structure burned down, 3371 Reading made a claim under its policy with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. Ohio Casualty relied on an endorsement requiring fencing round the jobsite. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

    September 28, 2026 —
    Continuing the trend from last year, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is excited to announce that thirteen members of our firm have received recognition from Best Lawyers® in America for 2027. The Best Lawyers in America® has been an annual publication since 1983 and focuses on the top legal talent across the United States and the globe. Through its rankings, Best Lawyers® provides a comprehensive guide to legal representation for individuals and businesses alike. Over time, Best Lawyers® has been recognized as one of the leading publications for attorney achievements and references. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    Partner Bryan Stofferahn and Our Walnut Creek Team Secure Summary Judgment in a $28 Million Premises Liability Case!

    September 15, 2026 —
    BWB&O is proud to announce that Partner Bryan Stofferahn and the Walnut Creek Team secured a Summary Judgment on behalf of the firm’s clients, resulting in a complete dismissal of a negligence and premises liability claim. Plaintiff, a teenager, was riding his bicycle on private commercial property when he was struck by a vehicle. Plaintiff was in a coma for 6 weeks and developed major neurocognitive dysfunction from a traumatic brain injury. BWB&O’s clients are a commercial property owner and property management company, who Plaintiff contended were liable for his injuries based on the design, condition, operation, and management of the premises. Plaintiff had demanded $28 million in settlement of the claims against all defendants. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP

    White and Williams LLP Secures $42.4 Million Award for Ventana DBS LLC in Philadelphia Marriott Construction Litigation

    July 27, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Construction and Surety Practice attorneys secured a significant victory for client Ventana DBS LLC in a complex commercial construction dispute before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Commerce Division. The trial team, led by Bill Taylor, retired Partner, and Craig O'Neill, Co-Chair of the Construction and Surety Practice Group, with support from Lindsay Liebman, Counsel, Zachary Roth, Partner, Kristen Nichols Wright, Associate, and Sue Ferrante, Legal Secretary, obtained a $42.4 million award on Ventana's claims for unpaid work, delay costs, CASPA penalties and interest, attorneys’ fees and other project-related costs arising from the construction of the Marriott W/Element Hotel Project in Philadelphia. To achieve this result, the White and Williams team managed an extensive discovery period over the course of four-years of litigation, conducted over sixty depositions, participated in court-ordered mediation and arbitration proceedings, and successfully represented Ventana during a bifurcated trial that spanned over the course of a year. Reprinted courtesy of Craig O'Neill, White and Williams, Lindsay Liebman, White and Williams, Kristen Nichols Wright, White and Williams, Zachary Roth, White and Williams and William Taylor, White and Williams Mr. O'Neill may be contacted at oneillc@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Liebman may be contacted at liebmanl@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Wright may be contacted at wrightk@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Roth may be contacted at rothz@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Taylor may be contacted at taylorw@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    June 02, 2026 —
    In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com

    CEO: Power Isn’t the Only Electrical Challenge for AI Data Centers

    April 14, 2026 —
    Everyone knows that data centers are voracious consumers of electricity. In fact, the U.S. is currently scrambling to meet unprecedented levels of power demand not seen since the early days of electrification and the widespread adoption of air conditioning. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Francesco "Frio" Iorio, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com