BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness Onalaska Washington Medical building expert witness Onalaska Washington condominiums expert witness Onalaska Washington retail construction expert witness Onalaska Washington concrete tilt-up expert witness Onalaska Washington custom homes expert witness Onalaska Washington structural steel construction expert witness Onalaska Washington custom home expert witness Onalaska Washington multi family housing expert witness Onalaska Washington hospital construction expert witness Onalaska Washington townhome construction expert witness Onalaska Washington housing expert witness Onalaska Washington parking structure expert witness Onalaska Washington institutional building expert witness Onalaska Washington mid-rise construction expert witness Onalaska Washington office building expert witness Onalaska Washington high-rise construction expert witness Onalaska Washington casino resort expert witness Onalaska Washington tract home expert witness Onalaska Washington industrial building expert witness Onalaska Washington Subterranean parking expert witness Onalaska Washington condominium expert witness Onalaska Washington
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Onalaska, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Onalaska Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Central Washington Home Builders Association
    Local # 4909
    3301 W Nob Hill Blvd
    Yakima, WA 98902
    http://www.cwhba.org

    Lewis-Clark Home Builders Association
    Local # 1310
    1313 6TH ST
    CLARKSTON, WA 99403
    http://www.lcbca.qwestoffice.net

    Home Builders Association of Tri-Cities
    Local # 4911
    10001 W Clearwater Ave
    Kennewick, WA 99336
    http://www.hbatc.com

    Lower Columbia Contr Assoc
    Local # 4922
    PO Box 2306
    Longview, WA 98632
    http://www.lcca.net

    Building Industry Association of Washington-State
    Local # 4900
    111 W 21st Avenue
    Olympia, WA 98501
    http://www.biaw.com

    Olympia Master Builders
    Local # 4933
    1211 State Ave NE
    Olympia, WA 98506
    http://www.omb.org

    MBuilders Association of Pierce County
    Local # 4977
    PO Box 1913 Suite 301
    Tacoma, WA 98401
    http://www.mbapierce.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Onalaska Washington

    New Plan Submitted for Explosive Demolition of Old Tappan Zee Bridge

    How Concrete Mistakes Added Cost to the Recent Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge Project

    The Relevance and Reasonableness of Destructive Testing

    Progress, Property, and Privacy: Discussing Human-Led Infrastructure with Jeff Schumacher

    DIR Reminds Public Works Contractors to Renew Registrations Before January 1, 2016 to Avoid Hefty Penalty

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “A Fastball Right to the Bean!”

    Prompt Payment More Likely on Residential Construction Jobs Than Commercial or Public Jobs

    Federal Court Opinion Has Huge Impact on the Construction Industry

    Attorney's Erroneous Conclusion that Limitations Period Had Not Expired Was Not Grounds For Relief Under C.C.P. § 473(b)

    Apartment Building Damaged by Cable Installer’s Cherry Picker

    Louisiana Couple Sues over Defects in Foreclosed Home

    Five-Year Statute of Limitations on Performance-Type Surety Bonds

    Want More Transit (and Federal Funding)? Build Housing That Supports It

    Coloradoans Deserve More Than Hyperbole and Rhetoric from Plaintiffs’ Attorneys; We Deserve Attainable Housing

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    The One New Year’s Resolution You’ll Want to Keep if You’re Involved in Public Works Projects

    Illinois Court Assesses Factual Nature of Term “Reside” in Determining Duty to Defend

    A Loud Boom, But No Serious Injuries in World Trade Center Accident

    Federal Arbitration Act Preempts Pennsylvania Payment Act

    Notes from the Nordic Smart Building Convention

    Massive Fire Destroys Building, Firefighters Rescue Construction Worker

    Resolve to Say “No” This Year

    Condos Down in Denver Due to Construction Defect Litigation

    Caveat Emptor (“Buyer Beware!”) Exceptions

    Colorado Passes Construction Defect Reform Bill

    Under Privette Doctrine, A Landowner Delegates All Responsibility For Workplace Safety to its Independent Contractor, and therefore Owes No Duty to Remedy or Adopt Measures to Protect Against Known Hazards

    Construction and Design Contracts—They Are More Important Than You Might Think! (Law Note)

    Illinois Supreme Court Holds That the Implied Warranty of Habitability Does Not Extend to Subcontractors

    Professional Liability Alert: Joint Client Can't Claim Privilege For Communications With Attorney Sued By Another Joint Client

    Boston Contractor Faces More OSHA Penalties

    Teaming Agreements- A Contract to Pursue a Solicitation and Negotiate

    Hawaii Construction Defect Law Increased Confusion

    What Does “Mold Resistant” Really Mean?

    Conditional Payment Bond Consideration-Make Sure There Is Pay-If-Paid Provision

    Delay In Noticing Insurer of Loss is Not Prejudicial

    The Construction Lawyer as Counselor

    Florida Continues Enacting Tort Reforms, This Time Shortening the Statute of Repose

    Trump Administration Announces New Eviction Moratorium

    Details Matter: The Importance of Strictly Following Public Bid Statutes

    Colorado Supreme Court Issues Decisions on Statute of Limitations for Statutory Bad Faith Claims and the Implied Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege

    Going Digital in 2019: The Latest Technology for a Bright Future in Construction

    Court Finds That SIR Requirements are Not Incorporated into High Level Excess Policies and That Excess Insurers’ Payment of Defense Costs is Not Conditioned on Actual Liability

    Attorneys Fees Under California’s Prompt Payment Statutes. Contractor’s “Win” Fails the Sniff Test

    Client Alert: Catch Me If You Can – Giorgio Is No Gingerbread Man

    A Contractual Liability Exclusion Doesn't Preclude Insurer's Duty to Indemnify

    David M. McLain, Esq. to Speak at the 2014 CLM Claims College

    Additional Insured Obligations and the Underlying Lawsuit

    Texas exclusions j(5) and j(6).

    A New Perspective on Mapping Construction Sites with the Crane Camera System

    The Ever-Growing Thicket Of California Civil Code Section 2782
    Corporate Profile

    ONALASKA WASHINGTON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Onalaska, Washington Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Utilizing captive resources which comprise building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Onalaska and the surrounding areas.

    Onalaska Washington expert witness windowsOnalaska Washington defective construction expertOnalaska Washington structural engineering expert witnessesOnalaska Washington building code compliance expert witnessOnalaska Washington construction defect expert witnessOnalaska Washington civil engineer expert witnessOnalaska Washington construction experts
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Onalaska, Washington

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    HHMR Honored as a 2026 Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work Recipient

    March 10, 2026 —
    We are pleased to share that Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell has been named a 2026 Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work honoree, a recognition grounded entirely in direct feedback from our own team members. The Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work program, in partnership with Quantum Workplace, ranks organizations based on anonymous employee engagement survey results that measure culture, leadership, communication, trust, team dynamics, and satisfaction. This year’s list includes 65 companies across the Denver metropolitan area, judged by the people who know these workplaces best: their employees. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Elliott Backed Venture Sues Lloyds Over Avant Cladding, Times Reports

    February 17, 2026 —
    Elliott Investment Management and British housing tycoon Jeff Fairburn, joint-venture partners in UK homebuilder Avant Homes Group, are suing Lloyds Banking Group Plc over who should pay to fix properties that fail to meet post-Grenfell fire-safety standards, the Times reported. Avant, which faces remediation costs of at least £107 million ($146 million) for potentially dangerous cladding, argues that Lloyds should shoulder part of the bill because most of the developments were built before 2014, when the homebuilder was under the bank’s ownership, the Times reported. Cladding has become a contentious issue in the UK following the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017, in which dozens died after flames spread rapidly through flammable exterior cladding on the West London high-rise, laying bare deep failures in Britain’s building safety regulations. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eamon Farhat, Bloomberg

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Colorado Court Affirms Attorneys’ Fee Award Against Plaintiff’s Counsel for Pursuing Unsupported CCPA Claims

    August 03, 2026 —
    The Colorado Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial court’s award of more than $241,000 in attorney fees against a plaintiffs’ attorney who continued to pursue unsupported claims arising out of a residential construction dispute. Although the opinion was not selected for official publication under C.A.R. 35(e) and therefore has no precedential value, it nevertheless provides an instructive reminder that Colorado courts are willing to impose significant financial consequences when claims lack substantial justification. For builders, developers, contractors, insurers, and defense counsel, the case is worth reading, not because it announces new law, but because it demonstrates that Colorado’s fee-shifting statute remains a meaningful tool when unsupported claims continue long after they should have been abandoned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations

    February 17, 2026 —
    The construction industry is defined by its commitment to "Critical Path" scheduling. From the moment a project breaks ground, every stakeholder—from the MEP sub to the owner’s rep—is focused on sequencing. We know that you cannot hang drywall before the rough-in is inspected, and you cannot pour a slab-on-grade until the vapor barrier is verified. Yet, when these projects devolve into litigation, the legal community often abandons the logic of sequencing. We rush headlong into "The Mediation Day"—a high-stakes, expensive, one-day marathon where we expect dozens of parties, hundreds of insurance layers, and thousands of pages of expert reports to magically align into a settlement by 6:00 PM. As we open our calendars for the new year, it is time for a professional resolution. We must stop treating mediation as a single-day event and start treating it as a managed, sequenced process. The centerpiece of this resolution is the “Tee-Up Day.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joël Bertet, ResolveBertet
    Mr. Bertet may be contacted at joel@resolvebertet.com

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com