BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia condominium expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia custom home expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia housing expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia retail construction expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia Medical building expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia tract home expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia industrial building expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia production housing expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia townhome construction expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia hospital construction expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia parking structure expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia institutional building expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia landscaping construction expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia condominiums expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia office building expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia multi family housing expert witness Pleasants County West Virginia
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pleasants County, West Virginia

    West Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB440: Requires builders notify homeowners with Notice to consumer required; response to claim within 30 days and negotiations to conclude within 90 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pleasants County West Virginia

    In 1991, the West Virginia Legislature adopted into law Chapter 21, Article 11 of the State Code. This law was established to set specific professional guidelines for contractors as well as to protect state businesses and consumers who utilize their services. The new law paved the way for creation of the Contractor Licensing Board which is made up of state businessmen, contractors and construction specialists.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Mid Ohio Valley
    Local # 5072
    PO Box 556
    Parkersburg, WV 26102
    http://www.hbamov.org

    Eastern Panhandle Home Builders Association
    Local # 5023
    430 Randoph St Ste C
    Martinsburg, WV 25401
    http://easternwvhomebuilders.org/

    Home Builders Association of No Central WV
    Local # 5054
    4 Riddle Court
    Morgantown, WV 26505
    http://www.ncwvhba.org

    Highlands Chapter
    Local # 5021
    PO Box 1847
    Elkins, WV 26241


    Potomac Highlands Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5030
    PO Box 452
    Mathias, WV 26812


    Midwestern Chapter Of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5040
    110 Pleasant Colony Dr
    Evans, WV 25241


    Northern Panhandle Chapter
    Local # 5046
    112 19th St
    Wheeling, WV 26003



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pleasants County West Virginia

    The First UK Hospital Being Built Using AI Technology

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (6/4/24) – New CRE Litmus Tests, Tech Integration in Real Estate and a Jump in Investor Home Purchases

    Suffolk Construction Drywall Suits Involve Claim for $3 Million in Court Costs

    New Homes in Palo Alto to Be Electric-Car Ready

    LA Lakers Partially Survive Motion to Dismiss COVID-19 Claims

    The Construction Gigaprojects Report

    Washington Court Tunnels Deeper Into the Discovery Rule

    Sewage Flowing in London’s River Thames Draws Green Bond Demand

    New York Signs Biggest Offshore Wind Project Deal in the Nation

    Mediation Fails In Federal Lawsuit Seeking Damages From Sureties for Alleged Contract Fraud

    Agrihoods: The Best of Both Worlds

    No Coverage for Hurricane Sandy Damage

    Court of Appeals Expands Application of Construction Statute of Repose

    States and Municipalities Advance Climate Change Lawsuits as Trump Administration Seeks to Block Them

    It’s Not What You Were Thinking!

    Former Sponsor of the Lenox Facing Suit in Supreme Court

    $24 Million Verdict Against Material Supplier Overturned Where Plaintiff Failed to Prove Supplier’s Negligence or Breach of Contract Caused an SB800 Violation

    NAHB Reports on U.S. Jobs Created from Home Building

    Boston-area Asbestos-Abatement Firms Face Wage and Safety Complaints

    New Member Added to Seattle Law Firm Williams Kastner

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    Construction Termination Issues Part 4: What to Do When They Want to Fire You, the Architect or Engineer

    Solar Energy Isn’t Always Green

    Dorian Lashes East Canada, Then Weakens Heading Out to Sea

    2023 Construction Law Update

    Navigating the Construction Burrito: OCIP Policies in California’s Construction Defect Cases

    Lienor Dealing With “Show Cause” Summons by Condominium Unit Owner

    Pine River’s Two Harbors Now Targets Non-Prime Mortgages

    The COVID-19 Impact: Navigating the Legal Landscape’s New Normal

    Home Builders Wear Many Hats

    US Appeals Court Halts OSHA Vaccine Mandate, Unclear How Long

    Mercury News Editorial Calls for Investigation of Bay Bridge Construction

    Nebraska Court Ruling Backs Latest Keystone XL Pipeline Route

    A Look at Trending Legislative Changes Impacting Workers' Comp

    Actual Controversy Without Actual Exhaustion: California Supreme Court Allows Declaratory Relief and Bad Faith Claims Against Excess Insurers

    Data Center Construction and the AEC Partner of the Future

    Environmental Update: Regulatory Notes – April 2025

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Protecting the Integrity of Referral Sources under Florida Statute s. 542.335

    Court Strikes Down Reasonable Construction Defect Settlement

    How Drones are Speeding Up Construction

    What Rich Millennials Want in a Luxury Home: 20,000 Square Feet

    California Homeowners Can Release Future, Unknown Claims Against Builders

    Malerie Anderson Named to D Magazine’s 2023 Best Lawyers Under 40

    Construction Defect Leads to Death of Worker

    Enforcement Of Contractual Terms (E.G., Flow-Down, Field Verification, Shop Drawing Approval, And No-Damage-For-Delay Provisions)

    Subcontractor Exception to Your Work Exclusion Paves the Way for Coverage

    Good and Bad News on Construction Employment

    BWBO Celebrating Attorney Award and Two New Partners

    Structuring Water Resilience for Data Center Development: Water Rights, Reuse Incentives, and Emerging Disclosure Risk

    Privette: The “Affirmative Contribution” Exception, How Far Does It Go?
    Corporate Profile

    PLEASANTS COUNTY WEST VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction related expert witness designations, the Pleasants County, West Virginia Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Pleasants County and the surrounding areas.

    Pleasants County West Virginia contractor expert witnessPleasants County West Virginia construction claims expert witnessPleasants County West Virginia building code compliance expert witnessPleasants County West Virginia consulting architect expert witnessPleasants County West Virginia construction defect expert witnessPleasants County West Virginia consulting engineersPleasants County West Virginia construction cost estimating expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pleasants County, West Virginia

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    August 11, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    September 01, 2026 —
    The Michigan Court of Appeals found the insured was not covered for water damage because the commercial space was left vacant. Cherry Hill Recreation Center, Inc. v. Conifer Ins Co., 2026 Mich, App. LEXIS 5099 (Mich Ct. App. June 18, 2026). Alan Abbas purchased a bowling alley. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and executive orders issued by the governor, Abbas was unable to operate the bowling center for several months. During the winter, Abbas allowed the thermostat to drop significantly, with the building expected to be around 43 degrees Fahrenheit. He later admitted the sprinkler system’s pipes were not protected against freezing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    May 14, 2026 —
    SAN DIEGO – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that two attorneys in the San Diego office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars publication. Rising Stars is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. To be eligible for inclusion, a candidate must be either 40 years old or younger or in practice for 10 years or less. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research and peer nominations, with no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state named to the Rising Stars list. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    What Is the Independent Tort Doctrine? New Case Explains…

    August 24, 2026 —
    Florida’s Sixth District Court of Appeals in Atout v. HHM Land Trust Dated October 29, 2013, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1569a (Fla. 6th DCA 2026) recently included an extensive discussion on Florida’s independent tort doctrine. The independent tort doctrine is an important legal doctrine, particularly when parties are in contractual privity. This doctrine stands for the proposition that tort claims must be independent of any breach of contract. See Atout, supra. The Sixth District’s extensive discussion analyzed the indicators to determine this “independence,” which may arise from the source of the duty, the asserted conduct, the damages sought, or even public policy: Unlike claims that rely on contractual relationships, an “independent” tort is often characterized by a duty imposed by law rather than by agreement. As to this consideration, United States District Court Judge Steven Merryday has explained that the independent tort doctrine honors the same divide as the economic loss rule, but rather than looking at the nature of the loss, it focuses on the source of the duty allegedly breached. “If a contract imposes a duty, and the defendant breaches that duty, the plaintiff must sue for breach of contract. If society imposes the duty, the plaintiff must sue in tort.” Following this reasoning, courts should consider whether the alleged breach of a duty in tort coincides or overlaps with a duty imposed by a contract. If the duty at issue is within the scope of a contract, and the relationship of the parties that led to the creation of that duty stems from a contract, then that duty’s source is from contract and any alleged tort claims based on a breach of those duties may not be “independent.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Special Counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters Appointed Chair of the ABA’s Commission on Women in the Profession

    October 06, 2026 —
    Special counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters was recently appointed as the chair of the American Bar Association’s Commission on Women in the Profession. Established in 1987, the Commission was created to assess the status of women in the legal sector and remove barriers to their professional advancement. As chair, Lorie will lead a 12-member roster of commissioners, and a panel of special advisers, dedicated to ensuring equal participation and systemic equity for women lawyers across the justice system and pursuing various studies to identify issues uniquely facing women in the profession, including disparate treatment, training and recruitment, parenting, and other issues. Most recently, the Commission in late July 2026 issued a groundbreaking study about issues affecting the mental health and well-being of women lawyers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act

    June 15, 2026 —
    Most, if not all, jurisdictions, including the federal government, have what is known as a “Prompt Payment Act.” The objective is to ensure prompt payment. If prompt payment is not made, the Prompt Payment Act provides for interest penalties, as well as potentially other costs such as attorney’s fees. But the thing is, it’s not as simple as untimely payment to support the recourse and interest penalties the applicable Prompt Payment Act affords. And the teeth associated with the applicable Prompt Payment Act are not as sharp as perhaps the party claiming untimely payment prefers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com