BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Arpin Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Arpin Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Arpin Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Arpin Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Arpin Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Arpin Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Arpin Wisconsin custom home expert witness Arpin Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Arpin Wisconsin tract home expert witness Arpin Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Arpin Wisconsin office building expert witness Arpin Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Arpin Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Arpin Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Arpin Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Arpin Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Arpin Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Arpin Wisconsin condominium expert witness Arpin Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Arpin Wisconsin housing expert witness Arpin Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Arpin Wisconsin
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Arpin, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Arpin Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Brown County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5124
    PO Box 13194 811 Packerland Drive
    Green Bay, WI 54307
    http://www.bchba.org

    Golden Sands Home Builders Association
    Local # 5118
    1001 Theater Dr
    Plover, WI 54467
    http://gshba.org

    Central Wisc Home Builders Association
    Local # 5180
    2135 8th Street S
    Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494
    http://www.cwhba.com

    Wolf River Builders Association
    Local # 5193
    PO Box 595
    Shawano, WI 54166


    Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5168
    920 W Association Dr
    Appleton, WI 54914
    http://www.vhba.com

    Chippewa Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5104
    4319 Jeffers Rd Ste 200
    Eau Claire, WI 54703
    http://www.cvhomebuilders.com

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235
    http://www.dchba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Arpin Wisconsin
    Corporate Profile

    ARPIN WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Arpin, Wisconsin Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking meaningful resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Arpin region.

    Arpin Wisconsin stucco expert witnessArpin Wisconsin structural concrete expertArpin Wisconsin soil failure expert witnessArpin Wisconsin construction expert witness public projectsArpin Wisconsin expert witness commercial buildingsArpin Wisconsin consulting architect expert witnessArpin Wisconsin testifying construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Arpin, Wisconsin

    We’re Burning Tokens to Clean Up Bad PDFs

    August 24, 2026 —
    Last Thursday, researchers from Tampere and Aalto universities reported on preliminary results of two AI- and digitalization-related projects. One project demonstrated how AI can automate the Bill of Materials process; the other tried to quantify the impact of data-driven construction and AI. The conclusion was that AI-powered automation can dramatically increase productivity, but unevenly. However, the substantial benefits may come from better outcomes rather than project efficiency. Various standards, company-specific practices, project-specific schemas, and traditions are designed for humans to comprehend. 2D drawings and text documents as PDF files, Excel sheets, and design and planning software have the information, but not the data in ideal form for automation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    May 14, 2026 —
    Huge Congratulations to Partner Kevin Wheeler and Associate Lindsey Wells for securing a strong result on a Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed on behalf of their client, the City of Murrieta. This was a complex, multi-party matter arising from a residential gas leak and explosion, where Plaintiffs alleged the City and MFPD failed to properly respond to the incident. After multiple complaints were consolidated and extensive defense work narrowed the case, eighteen plaintiffs remained asserting five causes of action against the City, prompting a comprehensive MSJ/MSA targeting liability, causation, and damages. The Court’s ruling reflects a significant win, particularly on the immunity framework. The Court eliminated the core negligence and assumed-duty claims arising from fire protection and emergency response activities. It further disposed of the misrepresentation and public nuisance claims. At the end of the day, three plaintiffs were dismissed entirely for failure to comply with Government Claims Act requirements, further reducing the scope of the case. While the dangerous condition claim remains, it does so in a very limited posture. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Supply Chain Is a Legal Exposure—Not Just a Force Majeure Problem

    September 08, 2026 —
    This is not another force majeure article. The supply-chain related legal exposure that contractors are carrying today—in sanctions risk, specification non-compliance, warranty exposure and regulatory volatility—extends well beyond what even a well-drafted force majeure clause protects. An engineering, procurement and construction contractor on a gas-fired power plant discovers during commissioning that transformer oil in a critical unit contains Russian-origin naphthenic base oil, which is a prohibited source under Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions. The contractor didn’t source it. A subsupplier two tiers below made the substitution when disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz tightened the primary supply chain for this specialty product and no one in the purchase-order chain flagged it. The procurement decision is long done and the documentation trail that should have caught it doesn’t exist. Reprinted courtesy of Owen Newman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Mr. Newman may be contacted at oknewman@duanemorris.com

    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke Win Final Summary Judgment on Behalf of Homeowner’s Insurance Company

    November 02, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke won final summary judgment on behalf of their client, a homeowner’s insurance company. The case related to a claim for damage caused by Hurricane Milton, which was reported more than ten months after the date of loss. The homeowner’s insurance company reviewed historical aerial photography of the roof and determined that there was no evidence of damage immediately after the Hurricane, which was inconsistent with the condition of the roof when it was inspected more than ten months later. Additionally, the homeowner’s insurance company was unable to determine when the interior water damage occurred due to the delay in reporting the claim. After a lawsuit was filed, the Traub Lieberman team took depositions of the Plaintiffs and the opposing expert and eventually filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based on the failure to timely report the claim and resulting prejudice to their client. The Court granted the Motion for Summary Judgment finding that notice of the claim was untimely as a matter of law and that the Plaintiffs failed to rebut the legal presumption of prejudice to the insurance company. As a result of the ruling, the insurance company has a valid claim for attorney’s fees. Reprinted courtesy of Ryan S. Parker, Traub Lieberman, Robert Biferie, Traub Lieberman and Matthew Groteke, Traub Lieberman Mr. Parker may be contacted at rparker@tlsslaw.com Mr. Biferie may be contacted at rbiferie@tlsslaw.com Mr. Groteke may be contacted at mgroteke@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    September 15, 2026 —
    A $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    August 03, 2026 —
    P&A partners Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide. Reprinted courtesy of Venue for Miller Act Payment Bond When Project is Outside of Us

    Colorado Mayors Should Not Sacrifice Homeowners to Lure Condo Developers

    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    BHA has a Nice Swing Benefits the Wounded Warrior Project
    Ninth Circuit Resolves Federal-State Court Split Regarding Whether 'Latent' Defects Discovered After Duration of Warranty Period are Actionable under California's Lemon Law Statute

    EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360

    Texas Restricts Foreign Ownership of Real Property

    America’s Bridges and the Need for Bridge Infrastructure Investment

    No Indemnity Coverage Where Insured Suffers No Loss

    New York Restaurant and Bar Fire Caused by Electric Defect

    Pinterest Nixes Big San Francisco Lease Deal in Covid Scaleback

    Counter the Rising Number of Occupational Fatalities in Construction

    Contractors: Revisit your Force Majeure Provisions to Account for Hurricanes

    To Bee or Not to Bee - CA Court Finds Denial of Coverage Based on Exclusion was Premature Where Facts had not been Judicially Determined

    U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Powers of the Nation’s Bankruptcy Courts

    Defend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret Law

    General Contractors: Consider Importance of "Primary Noncontributory" Language

    Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?

    Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Arguing the Fees Are Inextricably Intertwined

    Witt Named to 2017 Super Lawyers

    Don’t Assert as a Counterclaim to a Lien Foreclosure Lawsuit an Order to Show Cause Claim

    The Godfather of Solar Predicts Its Future

    Texas Federal District Court Dismisses COVID-19 Claim

    Smoke and Soot Constitute Direct Physical Loss

    Roadway Contractor Owed Duty of Care to Driver Injured Outside of Construction Zone

    Bad Faith in the First Party Insurance Context

    OSHA Updates: You May Be Affected

    California MCLE Seminar at BHA Sacramento July 11th

    Defenses Raised Three-Years Too Late Estop Insurer’s Coverage Denial

    2017 California Construction Law Update

    LLMs in Construction: Where They Fail and Where They Shine

    Kentucky Court Upholds Arbitration Award, Denies Appeal

    Winning Construction Disputes: Strategic Negotiation for Better Outcomes

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    Housing Agency Claims It Is Not a Party in Construction Defect Case

    Insurers May Not Be Required to Defend Contractors In a Florida §558 Proceeding

    Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV Show

    Governor Signs AB5 Into Law — Reshaping California's Independent Contractor Classification Landscape

    Ex-Corps Worker Pleads Guilty to Bribery on Afghan Contract

    Texas Granted Primacy Over Class VI Carbon Storage Wells

    Eminent Domain Bomb Threats Made on $775M Alabama Highway Project

    Haight’s Sacramento Office Has Moved

    Residential Building Sector: Peaking or Soaring?

    How Small Mistakes Can Have Serious Consequences Under California's Contractor Licensing Laws.

    You Filed a Mechanic’s Lien. Then You Discovered a Mistake. Now What?

    Certified Question Asks Washington Supreme Court Whether Insurer is Bound by Contradictory Certificate of Insurance

    2017 Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure

    Baltimore Project Pushes To Meet Federal Deadline

    Damp Weather Not Good for Wood

    Urban Retrofits, Tall Buildings, and Sustainability

    Forensic Team Finds Fault with Concrete Slabs in Oroville Dam Failure

    Wisconsin “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar Announced for 2014

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes
    1880">Insurer’s Discovery Requests Ruled to be Overbroad in Construction Defect Suit

    South Carolina Homeowners May Finally Get Class Action for Stucco Defects

    What I Learned at My First NAWIC National Conference

    2016 California Construction Law Upate

    Allegations Confirm Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Pandemic Magnifies Financial Risk in Construction: What Executives Can Do to Speed up Customer Payments

    Would You Trade a Parking Spot for an Extra Bedroom?

    Grupo Mexico Spill Sparks Public Scrutiny of $150 Million Mop-Up

    Design-Assist, an Ambiguous Term Causing Conflict in the Construction Industry[1]

    Rebuilding After the 2025 Southern California Fires