BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin condominium expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin office building expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin custom home expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin production housing expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin housing expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin tract home expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Buffalo County Wisconsin
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Buffalo County, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Buffalo County Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Central Wisc Home Builders Association
    Local # 5180
    2135 8th Street S
    Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494
    http://www.cwhba.com

    Golden Sands Home Builders Association
    Local # 5118
    1001 Theater Dr
    Plover, WI 54467
    http://gshba.org

    Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5168
    920 W Association Dr
    Appleton, WI 54914
    http://www.vhba.com

    Brown County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5124
    PO Box 13194 811 Packerland Drive
    Green Bay, WI 54307
    http://www.bchba.org

    Manitowoc County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5143
    1011 South 10th St Ste 103
    Manitowoc, WI 54220
    http://www.manitowoccountyhomebuilders.com

    Winnebago Home Builders Association
    Local # 5190
    4041 State Road 91 Suite A
    Oshkosh, WI 54904
    http://www.whba.net

    Wolf River Builders Association
    Local # 5193
    PO Box 595
    Shawano, WI 54166



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Buffalo County Wisconsin

    Insurer's Denial of Coverage to Additional Insured Constitutes Bad Faith

    Eye on Housing Examines Costs of Green Features

    Nevada Lawmakers Had Private Meetings on Construction Defects

    Behavioral Science Meets Construction: Insights from Whistle Rewards

    Supreme Court Overrules Longstanding Decision Supporting Collection of Union Agency Fees

    Economic Damages and the Right to Repair Act: You Can’t Have it Both Ways

    County Officials Refute Resident’s Statement that Defect Repairs Improper

    How Helsinki Airport Uses BIM to Create the Best Customer Experience

    CA Supreme Court Set to Rule on Important Occurrence Issue Certified by Ninth Circuit

    Insurer Must Pay for Matching Siding of Insured's Buildings

    Top 10 Lessons Learned from a Construction Attorney

    California Supreme Court Finds that When it Comes to Intentional Interference Claims, Public Works Projects are Just Different, Special Even

    Nevada Construction Defect Lawyers Dead in Possible Suicides

    Several Lewis Brisbois Partners Recognized by Sacramento Magazine in List of Top Lawyers

    Little Known Florida Venue Statue Benefitting Resident Contractors

    Court Makes an Unsettling Inference to Find that the Statute of Limitations Bars Claims Arising from a 1997 Northridge Earthquake Settlement

    Prompt Payment More Likely on Residential Construction Jobs Than Commercial or Public Jobs

    Another Colorado District Court Refuses to Apply HB 10-1394 Retroactively

    Indemnity Payment to Insured Satisfies SIR

    ASCE Statement on National Dam Safety Awareness Day - May 31

    California’s Right To Repair Act Is The Sole Remedy For Damages For Construction Defects In New Residential Construction

    Specific Performance of an Option Contract to Purchase Real Property is Barred Absent Agreement on All Material Terms

    The Burden of Betterment

    Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?

    Seyfarth’s Construction Team Releases 2025 50-State Notice Requirements Guide for Construction Professionals

    Contract And IP Implications Of Design Professionals Monetizing Non-Fungible Tokens Comprising Digital Construction Designs

    Congratulations to Partner Madeline Arcellana on Her Selection as a Top Rank Attorney in Nevada!

    Governor Murphy Approves Legislation Implementing Public-Private Partnerships in New Jersey

    Industry News: New Partner at Burdman Law Group

    Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims

    Revised Federal Rule Regarding Class-Wide Settlements

    House Passes Bill to Delay EPA Ozone Rule

    Second Circuit Court Differentiates the Standard for Determining Evident Partiality for a Neutral Arbitrator and a Party-Appointed Arbitrator

    HOA Coalition Statement on Construction-Defects Transparency Legislation

    California Attempts to Tackle Housing Affordability Crisis

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Occurrence-Based Insurance Policies and Claims-Made Insurance Policies – There’s a Crucial Difference

    Illinois Insureds are Contesting One Carrier's Universal Denial to Covid-19 Losses

    Rikus Locati Selected to 2024 Northern California Rising Stars!

    Gen Xers Choose to Rent rather than Buy

    2024 Update to CEB’s Mechanics Liens Now Available

    Shimmick Gets Nod for Second Pilot Pile at Settling Millennium Tower

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Business Interruption, COVID-19 Claims Under Pollution Policy Fails

    Gene Witkin Joins Ross Hart’s Mediation Team at AMCC

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    New York City Construction: Boom Times Again?

    Lawsuit Gives Teeth to Massachusetts Pay Law

    NY Construction Safety Firm Falsely Certified Workers, Says Manhattan DA

    Insurance Litigation Roundup: “Post No Bills!”

    Construction-Industry Clients Need Well-Reasoned and Clear Policies on Recording Zoom and Teams Meetings
    ongratulates Nicole Nuzzo on OCBA Professionalism and Ethics Committee Appointment

    Congress Relaxes Several PPP Loan Requirements

    GA Federal Court Holds That Jury, Not Judge, Generally Must Decide Whether Notice Was Given “As Soon as Practicable” Under First-Party Property Damage Policies

    Appraisers May Determine Causation

    Third Circuit Holds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Despite Insured’s Expectations

    California Condo Architects Not Liable for Construction Defects?

    "Resilient Rebuild Hub" Helps Wildfire-Impacted Homeowners Build Back Stronger

    Risk Management for Condominium Conversions

    Can a Receiver Prime and Strip Liens Against Real Property?

    Winning Attorney Fees in Litigation as a California Construction Contractor or Subcontractor

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/17/23) – A Flop in Flipping, Plastic Microbes and Psychological Hard Hats

    “You Can’t Make Me Pay!”

    Taking Service Network Planning to the Next Level

    Court Retained Jurisdiction to Enforce Settlement Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 Despite Dismissal of Complaint
    Corporate Profile

    BUFFALO COUNTY WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Buffalo County, Wisconsin Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with regional assets which comprise licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Buffalo County region.

    Buffalo County Wisconsin architect expert witnessBuffalo County Wisconsin construction expert testimonyBuffalo County Wisconsin construction expertsBuffalo County Wisconsin multi family design expert witnessBuffalo County Wisconsin slope failure expert witnessBuffalo County Wisconsin concrete expert witnessBuffalo County Wisconsin construction forensic expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Buffalo County, Wisconsin

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    June 22, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – June 10, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce Yvette Davis, Evan Kalooky, Beth Obra-White, Sean Paden, Michael Parme, Jeffrey Schmid, and Julieanne Yanez have joined the firm as partners. Four of these partners are joining the San Diego office, which further strengthens the firm’s General Liability and Construction Litigation practices and enhances Kahana Feld’s ability to serve clients across a broad range of complex matters in the region. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Presumption of Prejudice Applies to All Affirmative Defenses Regarding Insured’s Failure to Comply with Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    June 23, 2026 —
    n a recent property insurance coverage dispute, an issue on appeal pertained to the “prejudice” jury instruction associated with the insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. The trial court found that the prejudice only pertained to prompt notice and not other post-loss policy conditions. This was reversed on appeal as prejudice applied to ALL the post loss policy conditions that the insured failed to comply with, not just the prompt notice requirement. The prejudice presumption applies to all affirmative defenses regarding an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. Consider this discussion when dealing with an insurer raising prejudice as an affirmative defense to do an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions, and the associated burdens of proof: On appeal, [the insurer] contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury that the presumption of prejudice was inapplicable to all of its post-loss obligation defenses except prompt notice. We agree. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Drilling Rig Topples at Citadel Miami Headquarters Site, Injuring Four

    October 12, 2026 —
    An 85-ft drilling rig working at the site of Citadel's planned global headquarters in Miami toppled into Brickell Bay Drive Sept. 14, striking vehicles and a construction container, sending three workers and a motorist to hospitals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    What Prevents Innovation in Construction from Taking Off

    September 15, 2026 —
    In construction, we have the knowledge, technology, and innovative people to radically improve our performance, yet we’re still stuck in old ways. Why is that? I attended an annual gathering for real estate and construction professionals at Rakennustieto Oy, Finland’s leading building information provider. The day before, a half-day seminar was held at the same venue. During both events, we discussed the need for change in the construction sector. Everyone agreed that we need to radically improve how we produce and share information. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    June 02, 2026 —
    Developers and practitioners evaluating data center projects in Arizona face a regulatory environment shifting on three fronts simultaneously. Federal executive orders are opening new land, streamlining permitting, and channeling financial incentives toward qualifying projects — but they are not preempting the state and local rules that most directly affect project economics. A carve-out in the December 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Executive Order preserves Arizona’s authority over data center infrastructure, meaning the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) rate-classification docket, municipal zoning restrictions, water-use ordinances, and pending grid cost-allocation legislation remain the binding constraints on project feasibility. Understanding where federal tailwinds end and state and local headwinds begin is essential for any developer sizing risk or selecting sites in the state. The Federal Landscape: An Interlocking Framework of Executive Orders Five interlocking executive orders are accelerating data center development nationally, but none overrides Arizona’s authority over siting energy, or infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Jonathan Aihie Named to The National Bar Association’s “Top 40 Under 40” List

    August 03, 2026 —
    Fort Lauderdale Partner Jonathan Aihie was recently named to The National Bar Association (NBA) “Top 40 Under 40” list. The NBA “Top 40 Under 40” recognizes the nation's top lawyers under the age of 40 who demonstrate professional excellence, leadership, and commitment to the community. Recipients represent a broad cross-section of the legal profession, including private practice, government, academia, the judiciary, corporate counsel, and public service. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois