BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Dane Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Dane Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Dane Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Dane Wisconsin production housing expert witness Dane Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Dane Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Dane Wisconsin condominium expert witness Dane Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Dane Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Dane Wisconsin tract home expert witness Dane Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Dane Wisconsin office building expert witness Dane Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Dane Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Dane Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Dane Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Dane Wisconsin custom home expert witness Dane Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Dane Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Dane Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Dane Wisconsin housing expert witness Dane Wisconsin
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Dane, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Dane Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Wisconsin Builders Association (State)
    Local # 5100
    4868 High Crossing Blvd
    Madison, WI 53704
    http://www.wisbuild.org

    Metro Builders Association of Gr Milwaukee
    Local # 5148
    N16 W23321 Stoneridge Dr
    Waukesha, WI 53188
    http://www.mbaonline.org

    Madison Area Builders Association
    Local # 5132
    5936 Seminole Centre Ct
    Madison, WI 53711
    http://www.maba.org

    Mid Wisconsin Home Builders Association
    Local # 5181
    PO Box 865
    Portage, WI 53901
    http://www.mwhba.org/

    Lakeland Builders Association
    Local # 5128
    1560 N Country Club Pkwy
    Elkhorn, WI 53121
    http://www.lakelandba.com

    Sheboygan Cty Home Builders Association
    Local # 5159
    435 E Mill Street
    Plymouth, WI 53073
    http://www.schba.org

    Home Builders Association of Fond Du Lac & Dodge Cos
    Local # 5116
    490 W Rolling Meadows Dr
    Fond Du Lac, WI 54937
    http://www.homebuildersfdldodge.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Dane Wisconsin

    Study Finds Construction Cranes Vulnerable to Hacking

    Cross-Office Team Secures Defense Verdict in Favor of Client in Asbestos Case

    Home Buyers Lose as U.S. Bond Rally Skips Mortgage Rates

    Review the Terms and Conditions of Purchase Orders- They Could be Important!

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims

    Why Clinton and Trump’s Infrastructure Plans Leave Us Wanting More

    Manhattan to Get Tall, Skinny Tower

    Real Estate Firms Push to Preserve Carried Interest Tax Break

    Engineer Proposes Slashing Scope of Millennium Tower Pile Upgrade

    Big Changes and Trends in the Real Estate Industry

    Texas Voids Out-of-State Forum and Choice of Law Clauses in Construction Contracts

    Veterans Day – Thank You for Your Service

    Defense Owed for Product Liability Claims That Do Not Amount to Faulty Workmanship

    2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar – Recap

    Massive Wildfire Near Boulder, Colo., Destroys Nearly 1,000 Homes and Businesses

    Eleventh Circuit Asks Georgia Supreme Court if Construction Defects Are Caused by an "Occurrence"

    San Francisco Sues Over Sinking Millennium Tower

    President Trump’s “Buy American, Hire American” Executive Order and the Construction Industry

    Los Angeles Wildfires Rage on, Destroying Structures and Displacing Residents

    Federal Court Ruling Bolsters the “Your Work” Exclusion in Standard CGL Policies

    Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy

    Recent Supreme Court Decision Could Have Substantial Impact on Builders

    Insurer Rejects Claim on Dolphin Towers

    Extreme Rainfall Is Becoming More Frequent and Deadly

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose in June at a Slower Pace

    GRSM Secures Complete Judgment for Defense in Years-Long Dispute Spanning Multiple Venues

    OSHA Set to Tag More Firms as Severe Violators Under New Criteria

    Claim for Collapse After Demolition of Building Fails

    WSHB Partner Sheila Fix Selected as Los Angeles Business Journal's Woman of Influence in Construction, Engineering, and Architecture

    Ohio School Board and Contractor Meet to Discuss Alleged Defects

    Architectural Democracy – Interview with Pedro Aibéo

    Creative Avenue for Judgment Creditor to Collect a Judgment

    Firm Announces Remediation of Defective Drywall

    The Burden of Betterment

    Real Protection for Real Estate Assets: Court Ruling Reinforces Importance of D&O Insurance

    Colorado Finally Corrects Thirty-Year Old Flaw in Construction Defect Statute of Repose

    The Independent Tort Doctrine (And Its Importance)

    Not Everything is a Pollutant: A Summary of Recent Cases Supporting a Common Sense and Narrow Interpretation of the CGL's Pollution Exclusion

    Chambers USA 2021 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    What is Toxic Mold Litigation?

    Europe’s Satellites Could Help Catch the Next Climate Disaster

    This Is the Most Remote and Magical Hotel on Earth

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Hold the Pickles, Hold the Lettuce?”

    Pa. Contractor Pleads No Contest to Prevailing-Wage Charges, Pays Workers $20.7M

    Nailing Social Media: The Key to Generating Leads for Construction Companies

    What Are The Most Commonly Claimed Issues In Construction Defect Litigation?

    “The Myth of Sisyphus”

    No Coverage Under Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/24/24) – Omni Hotels Hit with Cyberattack, Wisconsin’s Low-Interest Loans for Home Construction, and Luxury Real Estate Sales Increase

    Under Construction – November 2025
    Corporate Profile

    DANE WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Dane, Wisconsin Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Employing in house assets which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Dane and the surrounding areas.

    Dane Wisconsin building expertDane Wisconsin construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessDane Wisconsin construction expertsDane Wisconsin multi family design expert witnessDane Wisconsin structural engineering expert witnessesDane Wisconsin civil engineer expert witnessDane Wisconsin construction scheduling expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Dane, Wisconsin

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Achieving Sustainability Through Design-Build Delivery: Part I – An Overview

    September 21, 2026 —
    This article was written for the AGC’s Law in Brief and first appeared here. Sustainability is no longer optional. What was once a matter of public policy or corporate preference has become a regulatory mandate and is reshaping how construction projects are designed, built, and operated. This mandate is not solely figurative. Rather, states have started to follow Europe’s lead by beginning to codify sustainability requirements into regulations and law. California led the charge by adding mandatory embodied-carbon emissions regulations into CALGreen, and other states, such as New York, have introduced bills to implement similar requirements. Owners, designers, and builders must now treat sustainability not as aspirational, but as a clearly defined contract issue from the outset, particularly where the project is expected to achieve a third-party rating, meet energy or resiliency targets, qualify for incentives, or comply with evolving green building codes. In the federal public sector, construction contracts include a layered compliance framework—executive order-inspired policy, FAR-mandated clauses, and enduring statutory requirements—requiring contractors to integrate sustainability into design, material selection, and lifecycle management. Staying ahead means aligning with regulatory standards, conducting life-cycle cost analyses, and embedding sustainability into every procurement and construction decision. Reprinted courtesy of Joshua M. Pruett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Jennifer L. Harris, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Tiffany A. Harrod, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Pruett may be contacted at jpruett@pecklaw.com Ms. Harris may be contacted at jharris@pecklaw.com Ms. Harrod may be contacted at tharrod@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    June 08, 2026 —
    In a case out of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, F.O.G., LLC v. Department of the Interior, CBCA 8203, 2026 WL 1191881 (CBCA 2026) a contractor claimed damages that included “financial hardship” damages due to slow payments. The financial hardship damages included personal damages to the contractor’s president and his wife. Are these damages recoverable? Drumroll…The Board ruled that the contractor cannot recover such financial hardship damages. As it relates the personal financial hardship damages, the Board ruled, “Neither [the contractor’s] president nor his wife are a party to this contract, are in privity of contract with [the government], or are the beneficiaries under this contract. [The contractor], therefore, cannot recover for any losses that either one has suffered individually and that [the contractor] claimed in this appeal.” F.O.G., LLC, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Seattle’s Residential Zoning Transformation: What Property Owners, Buyers, and Investors Should Understand

    May 14, 2026 —
    Seattle is in the midst of a significant transformation in residential land use policy. Longstanding neighborhood zoning patterns that historically favored detached single-family development are being reexamined in response to housing supply pressures, affordability concerns, and evolving state mandates. For homeowners, purchasers, investors, and builders, these changes may create substantial new opportunities. They also create a heightened need for careful legal and practical due diligence. While zoning reform can expand potential uses of property, it does not eliminate the many other constraints that may still govern what can actually be built. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lawrence S. Glosser, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Glosser may be contacted at larry.glosser@acslawyers.com

    Texas Prepares to Restart Data Center Construction, with Around 300 Projects Under Review And 6,608 MW Awaiting Energization Approval, Driving Demand for Rapid-Response Lifting Operations

    October 20, 2026 —
    Texas is experiencing an unprecedented increase in power demand. The ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) power grid reached a record peak demand of 91.1 GW in summer 2026, 6% above the previous record, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). This is compounded by interconnection requests totaling around 474 GW, more than five times the record peak, with approximately 90% of these requests related to data centers, according to the Office of the Governor of Texas. Within this context, authorities have launched a comprehensive review process. In August , the Governor directed the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and ERCOT to audit all data centers progressing toward grid connection, covering around 300 projects. ERCOT has also suspended approvals to energize data centers of 75 MW or more and has set December 10 as the date for the publication of its reports. For the industry, this pause creates a valuable planning window. Goldman Sachs notes that it takes 18 to 24 months to build a data center once permits have been secured, while only 50% to 60% of planned capacity is delivered on schedule. Supply chain constraints and labor shortages are among the most common causes of delays. In this context, construction agility is becoming increasingly critical. A one-month delay at a typical 60 MW U.S. data center is estimated to cost up to $14.2 million in lost revenue, additional costs and penalties, according to STL Partners data. Against this backdrop, Sarens, which has operated in the U.S. since 2009 and is headquartered in Houston, with offices also in Odessa and Beaumont, positions as a logistics partner for developers and contractors preparing for the execution phase. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sarens

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    July 27, 2026 —
    In 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Group, the Sixth Circuit did something courts do not always do in coverage disputes: it refused to let an insurer avoid liability based on a technical policy condition that could never actually be satisfied. The decision is a straightforward reminder of two core principles. First, policies must be interpreted from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent insured. Second, hyper-technical conditions cannot be used to deny coverage where compliance is never possible. Reprinted courtesy of Kevin V. Small, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Adriana A. Perez, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Small may be contacted at ksmall@hunton.com Ms. Perez may be contacted at pereza@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy

    September 01, 2026 —
    Contract negotiation is where project expectations become enforceable business obligations. A reasonable bid can become a high-risk agreement when the final contract expands the scope, shortens notice periods, limits payment rights or transfers liability that was never included in the price. Construction attorneys help project leaders identify those consequences before execution. Their role is not to eliminate every risk or prolong negotiations. It is to determine which risks can be controlled, insured, priced, shared or rejected while preserving a workable deal. The financial stakes can be substantial. HKA's 2025 analysis of more than 2,200 distressed construction and engineering projects found that disputed costs averaged 33.4% of contract budgets. Scope changes affected more than 28% of the projects studied and remained the most common cause of conflict. In North America, the average dispute studied by Arcadis in 2024 had a value of $60.1 million and took 12.5 months to resolve. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    April 27, 2026 —
    Construction fatalities in the United States declined slightly in 2024, according to new data released from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sector recorded just over 1,000 worker deaths last year—a modest decrease from the previous year but still among the highest totals of any industry. Falls remained the leading cause of death, accounting for roughly one-third of all construction fatalities. Transportation incidents—including workers struck by vehicles or equipment—ranked second, followed by contact with objects or equipment and electrocutions. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...