Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment
July 27, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesA recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026
May 05, 2026 —
Maggie Murphy - Construction ExecutiveConstruction safety has long been a top priority across the industry. Yet fatality rates have remained stubbornly flat for more than a decade. Steven Carter, global health and safety director at
Gilbane chair company for
Construction Safety Week 2026—believes the industry has reached a pivotal moment. This year’s theme—”
All In Together: Recognize. Respond. Respect.”—is a unified call to action for owners, designers, contractors and craft professionals around a shared, risk-based approach to preventing serious injuries and fatalities.
In a recent interview with Construction Executive, Carter discusses why the industry must move beyond incremental improvements, how technology and AI can support better planning and what it will take to create a true culture of psychological safety on jobsites.
Reprinted courtesy of
Maggie Murphy, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Water Leak Damage
August 11, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the insured’s claim due to late notice. Global Approach, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120183 (S. D. Fla. June 1, 2026).
Global suffered water damage on September 3, 2021, which originated in the bathroom of one of its rental properties. Global reported the claim to its insurer, Scottsdale, on October 19, 2021. Prior to reporting the claim, Global hired a handyman to inspect the property and then demolished the damaged area and repaired the bathroom.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
HHMR Attorneys Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain Named to 2026 Super Lawyers List
April 08, 2026 —
Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLCHiggins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce that Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain have been selected to the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers list for construction litigation.
Mr. Heisdorffer has been consistently recognized in recent years for his work in construction litigation and related business disputes. Mr. McLain has been recognized by Super Lawyers each year from 2020 through 2026, following his earlier inclusion on the Rising Stars list from 2009 through 2012.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation
May 12, 2026 —
Lee M. Peacocke & Benjamin Perkins - Lewis BrisboisThe Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found
here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana.
The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages.
Reprinted courtesy of
Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and
Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois
Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com
Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com
Read the full story...
$356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium
August 16, 2026 —
Nicholas D. Cowie - Cowie Law GroupOn July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page
Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group:
DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act.
Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law GroupMr. Cowie may be contacted at
ndc@cowielawgroup.com
Insured General Contractor Prevails on Motion for Summary Judgment to Establish Builder’s Risk Coverage
July 06, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe general contractor’s motion for partial summary judgment successfully established that damage to footings in place before the policy period was covered after the collapse of a building. Big D Builders, Inc. v. Am Zurich Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72012 (D. Idaho March 31, 2026).
Big D was the general contractor for building a new airplane hangar by erecting a 38,000 square foot structure. Before Big D began construction, the site of the hangar did not contain any pre-existing structures or buildings. Before completion of the hangar, it collapsed and caused extensive property damage.
The builder’s risk policy issued by Zurich covered certain aspects of the construction project for the policy period December 28, 2023, to December 28, 2024. Zurich accepted coverage for most of the damage but not for damage to footings and columns in
Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be MessyHurricane Handbook: A Policyholder's Guide to Handling Claims during Hurricane SeasonAntidiscrimination Clause Required in Public Works and Goods and Services Contracts –Effective January 1, 2024Loss Caused by Theft, Continuous Water Discharge Not CoveredReminder: Just Being Incorporated Isn’t EnoughThank Your Founding Fathers for Mechanic’s LiensThe National Building Museum’s A-Mazing ShowpieceUnpaid Subcontractor Walks Off the Job and WinsBig Builder’s Analysis of the Top Ten Richest CountiesLas Vegas HOA Conspiracy & Fraud Case Delayed AgainSnell & Wilmer’s San Diego Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the San Diego Business JournalProspective Additional Insureds May Be Obligated to Arbitrate Coverage DisputesZero-Net Energy Homes Costly Everywhere but at the Electric MeterCardinal Change Examines the Entire, Factual UndertakingSix-Month Prison Term for Role in HOA ScamThe Treasures Inside Notre Dame CathedralHow to Deal with Contractor Delays – Bad Contractor Series Part 2Supreme Court Set to Alter Law on Key Project, Workforce IssuesWhite and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2020Construction on the Rise in Washington TownWill Superusers Future-Proof the AEC Industry?Victoria Kajo Named One of KNOW Women's 100 Women to KNOW in America for 2024Buffett’s $11 Million Beach House Is Still on the MarketBid Bonds: The First Preventative Measure for Your ProjectOne to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional DutiesLandmark Contractor Licensing Case Limits Disgorgement Remedy in CaliforniaOver a Hundred Thousand Superstorm Sandy Cases Re-OpenedCA Civil Code § 8850: What Private Multi-state Owners and Developers Building in California in 2026 Need to KnowResidential Construction Rise Expected to ContinueMore Thoughts on “Green” (the Practice, not the Color) BuildingTrial Court’s Grant of Summary Judgment On Ground Not Asserted By Moving Party UpheldGeneral Contractor’s Professional Malpractice/Negligence Claim Against Design ProfessionalStatutory Time Limits for Construction Defects in MassachusettsVisual Construction Diaries – Interview with Jeff Sassinsky of Fovea AeroPowering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next MoveBill Seeks to Protect Legitimate ContractorsJust Because You Allege There Was an Oral Contract Doesn’t Mean You’re Off the Hook for Attorneys’ Fees if you LoseNew Orleans Terror Attack Lawsuit Targets Engineer Mott MacDonald, Contractor and CityIf You Get ‘Reported to the Board’ for Your Professional License (Law Note)Miller Act Payment Bond Surety Bound to Arbitration AwardFEMA, Congress Eye Pre-Disaster Funding, ProjectsFlorida extends the Distressed Condominium Relief ActCross-Motions for Summary Judgment Denied in Collapse ClaimSeventh Circuit Remands “Waters of the United States” Case to Corps of Engineers to Determine Whether there is a “Significant Nexus”ConsensusDOCS Updates its FormsQuick Note: Attorney’s Fees and the Significant Issues TestCourts Generally Favor the Enforcement of Arbitration ProvisionsThink Twice Before Hedging A Position Or Defense On A Speculative Event Or OccurrenceCongratulations to Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, Vik Nagpal, and Devin Gifford, and Associates Shelly Mosallaei and Melissa Youngpeter on Their Inclusion in 2024 Best Lawyers in America!Agree to Use your “Professional Best"? You may Lose Insurance Coverage! (Law Note)Product Manufacturers Beware: You May Be Subject to Jurisdiction in MassachusettsConstruction Defects not Creating Problems for Bay BridgeLegal Battle Kicks Off to Minimize Baltimore Bridge LiabilitiesThe Small Stuff: Small Claims Court and Limited Civil Court Jurisdictional LimitsCalifornia Supreme Court Adopts Vertical Exhaustion for Long-Tail ClaimsGood News on Prices for Some Construction MaterialsApartment Projects Fuel 13% Jump in U.S. Housing StartsNo Duty to Defend Construction Defect ClaimsDeducting 2018 Real Property Taxes Prepaid in 2017 Comes with CaveatsBHA at the 10th Annual Construction Law Institute, OrlandoAt the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing WagesChambers USA 2023 Recognizes Six Partners and Three Practices at Lewis BrisboisBlockbuster Breakwater: Alternative Construction Method Put to the Test in Tampa Bay
