BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin office building expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin housing expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin tract home expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin production housing expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin custom home expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin condominium expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Dunn County Wisconsin
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Dunn County, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Dunn County Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Wausau Area Builders Association
    Local # 5172
    141 W Thomas St
    Wausau, WI 54401
    http://www.wausauareabuilders.com

    St Croix Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5182
    1632 ROLLING HILLS LN
    River Falls, WI 54022
    http://www.scvhba.com

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235
    http://www.dchba.org

    Chippewa Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5104
    4319 Jeffers Rd Ste 200
    Eau Claire, WI 54703
    http://www.cvhomebuilders.com

    Wolf River Builders Association
    Local # 5193
    PO Box 595
    Shawano, WI 54166


    Heart of the North Builders Association
    Local # 5137
    PO Box 6
    Rice Lake, WI 54868
    http://www.hnbawi.org

    Brown County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5124
    PO Box 13194 811 Packerland Drive
    Green Bay, WI 54307
    http://www.bchba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Dunn County Wisconsin

    ICC/ASHRAE/USGBC/IES Green Model Code Integrates Existing Standards

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jonathan Harwood Wins Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of Insurer

    Insureds' Summary Judgment Motion on Mold Limitation Denied

    Conflicting Exclusions Result in Duty to Defend

    Taking the Stairs to Human Wellness and Greener Buildings

    Jury Could Have Found That Scissor Lift Manufacturer Should Have Included “Better” Safety Features

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds Lay Witness Can Provide Opinion Testimony on the Value of a Property If the Witness Had an Opportunity to Form a Reasoned Opinion

    ENR 2024 Water Report: Managers Look to Potable Water Reuse

    Key Takeaways For Employers in the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Halt to OSHA’s Vax/Testing Mandate

    Persimmon Offers to Fix Risky Homes as Cladding Crisis Grows

    Under Privette Doctrine, A Landowner Delegates All Responsibility For Workplace Safety to its Independent Contractor, and therefore Owes No Duty to Remedy or Adopt Measures to Protect Against Known Hazards

    General Contractor/Developer May Not Rely on the Homeowner Protection Act to Avoid a Waiver of Consequential Damages in an AIA Contract

    Construction Termination Issues Part 5: What if You are the One that Wants to Quit?

    ASBCA Validates New Type of Claim Related to Unfavorable CPARS Review [i]

    What You Need to Know About “Ipso Facto” Clauses and Their Impact on Termination of a Contractor or Subcontractor in a Bankruptcy

    Avoid Delay or Get Ready to Pay: The Risks of “Time-Is-of-The-Essence” Clauses

    Victoria Kajo Named One of KNOW Women's 100 Women to KNOW in America for 2024

    Pennsylvania Federal Court Finds No Coverage For Hacking Claim Under E&O Policy

    White House Seeks $310M To Fix Critical San Diego Wastewater Plant

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    Specification Challenge; Excusable Delay; Type I Differing Site Condition; Superior Knowledge

    Falling Tree Causing Three Injuries/Deaths Is One Occurrence

    Managing Rising Costs and Shifting Legal Risk for Florida High-Rise and Condominium Projects

    Beverly Hills Voters Reject Plan for Enclave's Tallest Building

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    Haight Lawyers Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2019

    Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV Show

    Buyer's Demolishing of Insured's Home Not Barred by Faulty Construction Exclusion

    Kahana Feld LLP Senior Attorney Rachael Marvin and Partner Dominic Donato Obtain Complete Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Labor Law Claims on Summary Judgment

    Brooklyn Atlantic Yards Yields Dueling Suits on Tower

    Sickened Employees at Kimley-Horn Lead to Multi-million-dollar Rent Dispute

    Deductibles Limited to Number of Suits Filed Against Insured, Not Number of Actual Plaintiffs

    Million-Dollar Home Sales Thrive While Low End Stumbles

    Federal Arbitration Act Preempts Pennsylvania Payment Act

    Idaho Federal Court Rules Against Sacketts After SCOTUS Decided Judicial Review of an EPA Compliance Order was Permissible

    Roni Most, Esq., Reappointed as a City of Houston Associate Judge

    Eliminating Waste in Construction – An Interview with Turner Burton

    Concrete Worker Wins Lawsuit and Settles with Other Defendant

    2016 Updates to CEB’s Mechanics Liens and Retail Leasing Practice Books Now Available

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2023 New York – Metro Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    David McLain Recognized Among the 2021 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America© for Construction Law

    Beyond the Disneyland Resort: World Class Shopping Experiences

    It’s Too Late, Lloyd’s: New York Federal Court Finds Insurer Waived Late Notice Defense

    Axa Unveils Plans to Transform ‘Stump’ Into London Skyscraper

    Insurance Policies and Indemnity Provisions Are Not the Same

    New York Court of Appeals Addresses Choice of Law Challenges

    Mechanic’s Liens and Leases Don’t Often Mix Well

    The Burden of Betterment

    Ninth Circuit Rules Supreme Court’s Two-Part Test of Implied Certification under the False Claims Act Mandatory

    Construction of New U.S. Homes Declines on Plunge in South
    Corporate Profile

    DUNN COUNTY WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand general contracting and design related expert designations, the Dunn County, Wisconsin Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Utilizing in house resources which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Dunn County and the surrounding areas.

    Dunn County Wisconsin building expertDunn County Wisconsin architecture expert witnessDunn County Wisconsin building envelope expert witnessDunn County Wisconsin construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessDunn County Wisconsin expert witness roofingDunn County Wisconsin architect expert witnessDunn County Wisconsin construction project management expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Dunn County, Wisconsin

    White and Williams LLP Secures a Clean Sweep Dismissal of Architect's Professional Liability Coverage Lawsuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP achieved a complete dismissal of professional liability coverage claims through a strategic defense led by Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group attorneys Daniel E. Bryer, Partner and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, Associate. In a nuanced action styled, Vincent Cusumano Architect P.C., et al. v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, et al., decided in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiffs asserted twelve pre-contractual and contractual-based causes of action against their liability insurer, Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, and its insurance agent (collectively, “Defendants”) for denying a professional liability claim arising from plaintiffs’ prior work. Reprinted courtesy of Daniel E. Bryer, White and Williams LLP and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, White and Williams LLP Mr. Bryer may be contacted at bryerd@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ruiz may be contacted at minayaruizb@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision

    March 24, 2026 —
    A powerful group representing the nation’s home builders is coming out against the most significant housing legislation in more than a decade over a provision negotiated by the White House that would restrict institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. The builders’ objection could imperil the bill’s chances of becoming law, even as leaders of both parties are desperate to show they are doing something to alleviate voters’ cost-of-living concerns. The Senate voted 90-8 to clear a procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, with a vote on final passage expected early next week. The inclusion of the investor ban in a broader housing bill was key to getting the White House on board, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told reporters Tuesday. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Katy O'Donnell, Bloomberg

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    July 27, 2026 —
    On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “…furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work….” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com

    Congratulations to Reno Partner Karen Baytosh for Securing a Complete Dismissal via a Motion for Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    BWB&O is proud to announce that Reno Partner Karen Baytosh received a significant victory on behalf of the firm’s Developer Client in a high-exposure personal injury matter. Plaintiff, a teenager, was struck by an intoxicated driver while walking her dog at night, sustaining catastrophic injuries requiring 24-hour critical care for the remainder of her life. Plaintiff’s Guardian brought suit against the drunk driver and her husband, the City, and BWB&O’s Developer Clients, alleging that the City and Developers failed to improve street lighting and install a sidewalk that would have prevented the accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    The Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry. The Facts Behind the Dispute The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tara Martens Miller, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Miller may be contacted at tmmiller@swlaw.com

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    May 26, 2026 —
    The insurer successfully moved for summary judgment, eliminating the insured’s claim for roof damage due to windstorm. Mulas v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20537 (Jan. 30, 2026). The insureds’ commercial property sustained windstorm damage during Hurricane Ian. Westchester denied the claim. The insureds believed Westchester wrongfully denied coverage for roof damage and various interior damage to property. The insureds also argued that Westchester’s actual cash value (ACV) payment did not reflect the fully insured loss. The insureds sued and Westchester moved for summary judgment. Westchester argued the roof damage was not covered because Hurricane Ian did not cause the damage. Westchester hired an engineer who determined the roof damage was not caused by wind from Hurricane Ian. Westchester pointed out that the insureds’ expert also found no wind damage on the roof. The insureds offered no other evidence suggesting the hurricane caused roof damage. Therefore, the insureds could not show that Westchester breached the policy by denying coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Judge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in Minnesota

    July 27, 2026 —
    Construction of a $1-billion Google data center planned by Ryan Cos. on 485 acres in southeastern Minnesota was expected to start in July but is now halted under a judge’s order. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com