BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Jackson Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Jackson Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Jackson Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Jackson Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Jackson Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Jackson Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Jackson Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Jackson Wisconsin tract home expert witness Jackson Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Jackson Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Jackson Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Jackson Wisconsin condominium expert witness Jackson Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Jackson Wisconsin production housing expert witness Jackson Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Jackson Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Jackson Wisconsin office building expert witness Jackson Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Jackson Wisconsin custom home expert witness Jackson Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Jackson Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Jackson Wisconsin
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Jackson, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Jackson Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Wisconsin Builders Association (State)
    Local # 5100
    4868 High Crossing Blvd
    Madison, WI 53704
    http://www.wisbuild.org

    Mid Wisconsin Home Builders Association
    Local # 5181
    PO Box 865
    Portage, WI 53901
    http://www.mwhba.org/

    Metro Builders Association of Gr Milwaukee
    Local # 5148
    N16 W23321 Stoneridge Dr
    Waukesha, WI 53188
    http://www.mbaonline.org

    Madison Area Builders Association
    Local # 5132
    5936 Seminole Centre Ct
    Madison, WI 53711
    http://www.maba.org

    Sheboygan Cty Home Builders Association
    Local # 5159
    435 E Mill Street
    Plymouth, WI 53073
    http://www.schba.org

    Home Builders Association of Fond Du Lac & Dodge Cos
    Local # 5116
    490 W Rolling Meadows Dr
    Fond Du Lac, WI 54937
    http://www.homebuildersfdldodge.com

    Lakeland Builders Association
    Local # 5128
    1560 N Country Club Pkwy
    Elkhorn, WI 53121
    http://www.lakelandba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Jackson Wisconsin

    How AI Turns Construction Documents Into Procurement Intelligence

    Partner Bradley T. Guldalian Secures Summary Judgment Win for National Hotel Chain

    Weyerhaeuser Leaving Home Building Business

    Earth Movement Exclusion Precludes Coverage

    How BIM Can Serve Building Owners

    EEOC Builds on Best Practice Guidance Regarding Harassment Within the Construction Industry

    Reminder: In Court (as in life) the Worst Thing You Can Do Is Not Show Up

    Sierra Pacific v. Bradbury Goes Unchallenged: Colorado’s Six-Year Statute of Repose Begins When a Subcontractor’s Scope of Work Ends

    Real-Estate Pros Fight NYC Tax on Wealthy Absentee Owners

    New York Appellate Court Expands Policyholders’ Ability to Plead and Seek Consequential Damages

    Colorado Chamber of Commerce CEO Calls for Change to Condo Defect Law

    Navigating the DOT’s Interim Final Rule on DBE Certification Standards - and Preparing for the (Bumpy) Road Ahead

    City of Sacramento Approves Kings NBA Financing Plan

    Phillips & Jordan Awarded $176M Everglades Restoration Contract

    South Dakota Supreme Court Holds That Faulty Workmanship Constitutes an “Occurrence”

    Jenny Michel Named Top Lawyer by Acadiana Profile Magazine

    Use Your Instincts when Negotiating a Construction Contract

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    US Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Chicago Cubs Stadium Renovation

    May Heat Wave Deaths Prompt New Cooling Rules in Chicago

    President Trump Issued Two New EOs on Energy Infrastructure and Federal Energy Policy

    Where There’s Smoke, Is There Coverage? A Closer Look at Bottega, LLC v. National Surety and Gharibian v. Wawanesa

    Ambitious Building Plans in Boston

    Is Settling a Bond Claim in the Face of a Seemingly Clear Statute of Limitations Defense Bad Faith?

    Senate Committee Approves Military Construction Funds

    Property Owner’s Defense Goes Up in Smoke in Careless Smoking Case

    Quick Note: Attorney’s Fees on Attorney’s Fees

    California Court of Appeal: Inserting The Phrase “Ongoing Operations” In An Additional Endorsement Is Not Enough to Preclude Coverage for Completed Operations

    Arizona Contractor Designs Water-Repellant Cabinets

    Insurer Motion to Intervene in Underlying Case Denied

    New Zealand Using Plywood Banned Elsewhere

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- The Claim

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    Road to Record $199 Million Award Began With Hunch on Guardrails

    Bankruptcy on a Construction Project: Coronavirus Edition

    Slump in U.S. Housing Starts Led by Multifamily: Economy

    Jury Could Have Found That Scissor Lift Manufacturer Should Have Included “Better” Safety Features

    Learning a Lesson by Sweating the Small Stuff

    Chicago Makes First Major Update to City's Building Code in 70 Years

    Domtar Update

    Balcony Collapses Killing Six People

    Slavin Doctrine and Defense from Patent Defects

    Singer Akon’s Multibillion-Dollar Futuristic City in Africa Gets Final Notice

    Builder Survey Focuses on Green Practices of Top 200 Builders

    Construction Employers Beware: New, Easier Union Representation Process

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2025 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    Risk Spotter Searches Internal Data Lakes For Loaded Words

    Blog Completes Fifteenth Year

    A “Flood” of Uncertainty; Massachusetts SJC Finds Policy Term Ambiguous
    Corporate Profile

    JACKSON WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 general contracting and design related expert designations, the Jackson, Wisconsin Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to developers, risk managers, and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets comprising licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Jackson region.

    Jackson Wisconsin construction defect expert witnessJackson Wisconsin construction expert witnessesJackson Wisconsin soil failure expert witnessJackson Wisconsin consulting architect expert witnessJackson Wisconsin construction project management expert witnessesJackson Wisconsin expert witness structural engineerJackson Wisconsin architectural engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Jackson, Wisconsin

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    May 26, 2026 —
    The insurer successfully moved for summary judgment, eliminating the insured’s claim for roof damage due to windstorm. Mulas v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20537 (Jan. 30, 2026). The insureds’ commercial property sustained windstorm damage during Hurricane Ian. Westchester denied the claim. The insureds believed Westchester wrongfully denied coverage for roof damage and various interior damage to property. The insureds also argued that Westchester’s actual cash value (ACV) payment did not reflect the fully insured loss. The insureds sued and Westchester moved for summary judgment. Westchester argued the roof damage was not covered because Hurricane Ian did not cause the damage. Westchester hired an engineer who determined the roof damage was not caused by wind from Hurricane Ian. Westchester pointed out that the insureds’ expert also found no wind damage on the roof. The insureds offered no other evidence suggesting the hurricane caused roof damage. Therefore, the insureds could not show that Westchester breached the policy by denying coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    July 27, 2026 —
    On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “…furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work….” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Fourth Circuit in APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Co., No. 24-1969, 2026 WL 458402 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026) recently endorsed broad coverage for additional insureds, interpreting “arising out of” broadly under North Carolina law to extend coverage to a repaving company under its subcontractor’s liability insurance policy. The court held that an additional insured’s liability “arising out of” a named insured’s work in an additional-insured endorsement means liability “relating to” or “causally connected to” the named insured’s operations, rather than liability defined more narrowly as “caused by” or “the fault of” the named insured. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Federal Court Highlights the Strategic Value of Additional Insured Coverage

    June 22, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the District of Maryland underscores a recurring—but often underutilized—opportunity for policyholders: securing and enforcing additional insured coverage under another party’s liability policy. In Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. v. Builders Premier Insurance Co., the court held that an equipment lessor qualified as an additional insured under the lessee’s policy and was entitled to a primary defense. The decision is a useful reminder that additional insured coverage can fundamentally shift defense obligations and materially reduce a policyholder’s exposure. We build on the decision to highlight the practical steps policyholders should take to ensure that all potentially available insurance is identified and pursued. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy

    July 20, 2026 —
    I. Course of Construction Exclusions Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy. General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party. Reprinted courtesy of Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C., Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized Among the Top 10 Largest Law Firms in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal for the Ninth Consecutive Year

    April 27, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its Orange County office has been named the eighth largest law firm in Orange County on the Orange County Business Journal’s 2026 List of Law Firms. The office has been ranked among the top 10 largest law firms in the region by the Orange County Business Journal for nine consecutive years. “We are proud to once again be recognized among the top law firms in Orange County,” said Jonathan E. Frank, managing partner of the firm’s Orange County office. “This recognition is a testament to the outstanding attorneys and professionals in our Orange County office and the clients who trust us with their most important matters. Being ranked among the top 10 largest firms in the region for nine consecutive years reflects both the strength of our team and our deep commitment to serving the Orange County business community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    How AI Turns Construction Documents Into Procurement Intelligence

    May 05, 2026 —
    MEP equipment accounts for up to 40% of costs on data center or hospital projects, has lead times ranging from 20 weeks to over a year, and has historically been the most underserved area in construction software. In this episode, I speak with Victor Muchiri from BuildVision about what it actually takes to make AI useful in construction procurement, not as a pilot, but in production. We dig into why you cannot simply upload a set of construction drawings to ChatGPT and trust the output. Construction documents are complex, cross-referenced, and consequential. Without deep domain context, such as manufacturer ontologies, equipment taxonomies, and engineering expertise, AI produces plausible results, not reliable ones. BuildVision’s approach is to act as a harness around AI models, wrapping them in construction-specific knowledge so the output can be trusted for real procurement decisions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    From Dark Data to Building Intelligence

    July 13, 2026 —
    In this episode, I talk with Mark Sorsa-Leslie, founder and CEO of Auttaa AI, whose team just won first place in Luotea’s inaugural hackathon in Helsinki for turning property maintenance from reactive firefighting into proactive forecasting with AI. Mark is a chartered surveyor with 30 years of real estate data experience, previously the founder of the UK sensor company Beringar. We discuss why so much building data stays dark and siloed, from outdated networking technology to the shortage of people who understand both engineering and property. Mark explains how Auttaa bridges real-time building data with large language models, using what he calls an “influence graph” to surface correlations and causation across previously disconnected systems, such as linking occupancy patterns to CO2 readings to diagnose ventilation problems in minutes rather than days. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi