BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin condominium expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin Medical building expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin custom homes expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin retail construction expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin housing expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin tract home expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin office building expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin production housing expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin condominiums expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin custom home expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin casino resort expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin industrial building expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin institutional building expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin parking structure expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness La Crosse County Wisconsin
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    La Crosse County, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines La Crosse County Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Fond Du Lac & Dodge Cos
    Local # 5116
    490 W Rolling Meadows Dr
    Fond Du Lac, WI 54937
    http://www.homebuildersfdldodge.com

    Sheboygan Cty Home Builders Association
    Local # 5159
    435 E Mill Street
    Plymouth, WI 53073
    http://www.schba.org

    La Crosse Area Builders Association
    Local # 5126
    816 2nd Ave S
    Onalaska, WI 54650
    http://www.labaonline.com

    Mid-Shore Home Builders Association Affil w/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5150
    PO Box 125 2104 Mary Ave
    New Holstein, WI 53061
    http://midshoreshomebuilders.com

    Winnebago Home Builders Association
    Local # 5190
    4041 State Road 91 Suite A
    Oshkosh, WI 54904
    http://www.whba.net

    Mid Wisconsin Home Builders Association
    Local # 5181
    PO Box 865
    Portage, WI 53901
    http://www.mwhba.org/

    Manitowoc County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5143
    1011 South 10th St Ste 103
    Manitowoc, WI 54220
    http://www.manitowoccountyhomebuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For La Crosse County Wisconsin

    The Biggest Thing Keeping Young Homebuyers out of the Market Isn't Student Debt

    Parks and Degradation: The Mess at Yosemite

    Just Because I May Be An “Expert” Does Not Mean I Am Giving Expert Testimony

    Developer Pre-Conditions in CC&Rs Limiting Ability of HOA to Make Construction Defect Claims, Found Unenforceable

    NYC Shuts 9 Pre-Kindergartens for Health, Safety Issues

    Climate Disasters Are an Affordable Housing Problem

    Broker for Homeowners Policy Has No Duty to Advise Insureds on Excess Flood Coverage

    Updated 3/13/20: Coronavirus is Here: What Does That Mean for Your Project and Your Business?

    BUILD Act Inching Closer To Reality

    Augmented and Mixed Reality in Construction

    Texas House Passes Medical Damages Reform: What It Means for Insurance Defense Attorneys

    Funding the Self-Insured Retention (SIR)

    Filling Out the Contractor’s Final Payment Affidavit

    Lenders Facing Soaring Costs Shutting Out U.S. Homebuyers

    COVID-19 Is Not Direct Physical Loss Or Damage

    Strategic Implementation of AI in AEC

    California Supreme Court Finds that When it Comes to Intentional Interference Claims, Public Works Projects are Just Different, Special Even

    Subsequent Owners of Homes Again Have Right to Sue Builders for Construction Defects

    Is New York Heading for a Construction Defect Boom?

    Alabama Supreme Court States Faulty Workmanship can be an Occurrence

    Summary Judgment in Construction Defect Case Cannot Be Overturned While Facts Are Still in Contention in Related Cases

    Alaska District Court Sets Aside Rulings Under New Administration’s EO 13795

    Issuing Judgment After Confirmation of Appraisal Award Overturned

    Economic Damages Cannot be Based On Speculation

    Subcontractor’s Claim against City Barred by City’s Compliance with Georgia Payment Bond Statute

    Buffalo-Area Roof Collapses Threaten Lives, Businesses After Historic Snowfall

    Competitive Bidding Statute: When it Applies and When it Does Not

    Contractors: Consult Your Insurance Broker Regarding Your CGL Policy

    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    False Implied Certifications in Making Payment Requests: What We Can Learn from Lance Armstrong

    2021 Executive Insights: Leaders in Construction Law

    Risk Spotter Searches Internal Data Lakes For Loaded Words

    Labor Development Impacting Developers, Contractors, and Landowners

    Hawaii Bill Preserves Insurance Coverage in Lava Zones

    Industry Groups Decry Jan. 6 Riot; DOT Chief Chao Steps Down in Protest

    2018 Update to EPA’s “Superfund Task Force Report”

    Insurers' Motion to Void Coverage for Failure to Attend EUO Denied

    Final Thoughts on New Pay If Paid Legislation in VA

    Tenth Circuit Finds Appraisal Can Decide Causation of Loss Under Colorado Law

    Waiver of Subrogation and Lack of Contractual Privity Bars Commercial Tenants’ Claims

    Colorado Construction Defect Action Reform: HB 17-1279 Approved by Colorado Legislature; Governor’s Approval Imminent

    Construction Problem Halts Wind Power Park

    Insurance Policy’s “No Voluntary Payment” Clauses Lose Some Bite in Colorado

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Lisa Rolle and Christopher Acosta Win Motion to Dismiss in Bronx County Trip and Fall

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    The Cheap and Easy Climate Fix That Can Cool the Planet Fast

    Insured’s Motion to Compel Production of Underwriting Materials Granted

    Court Says No to Additional Lawyer in Las Vegas Fraud Case

    Bremer Whyte’s Newport Beach Team Prevails on a Motion for Summary Judgment in a Wrongful Death Case!

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role
    Corporate Profile

    LA CROSSE COUNTY WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the La Crosse County, Wisconsin Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with the effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides general construction investigation, trial and claims support services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which include construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to La Crosse County and the surrounding areas.

    La Crosse County Wisconsin construction expert witness public projectsLa Crosse County Wisconsin eifs expert witnessLa Crosse County Wisconsin expert witness concrete failureLa Crosse County Wisconsin expert witness commercial buildingsLa Crosse County Wisconsin building envelope expert witnessLa Crosse County Wisconsin structural engineering expert witnessesLa Crosse County Wisconsin civil engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    La Crosse County, Wisconsin

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    June 08, 2026 —
    In a case out of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, F.O.G., LLC v. Department of the Interior, CBCA 8203, 2026 WL 1191881 (CBCA 2026) a contractor claimed damages that included “financial hardship” damages due to slow payments. The financial hardship damages included personal damages to the contractor’s president and his wife. Are these damages recoverable? Drumroll…The Board ruled that the contractor cannot recover such financial hardship damages. As it relates the personal financial hardship damages, the Board ruled, “Neither [the contractor’s] president nor his wife are a party to this contract, are in privity of contract with [the government], or are the beneficiaries under this contract. [The contractor], therefore, cannot recover for any losses that either one has suffered individually and that [the contractor] claimed in this appeal.” F.O.G., LLC, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    The Firm Turns 16!

    July 20, 2026 —
    I have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want. Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wildlife biology degree and is currently in Casper, Wyoming working for Wyoming Game & Fish, my second oldest is an assistant director of admissions at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, and has celebrated his second wedding anniversary, and my oldest has celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. Our home in Captiva, Florida continues its recovery from from Hurricane Ian and subsequent hurricanes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Four HHMR Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Editions of Best Lawyers®

    September 21, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is proud to announce that Best Lawyers® has recognized four HHMR attorneys in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America for their work in construction law and construction litigation. David M. McLain, Lisa Bondy Dunn, and Steven L. Heisdorffer earned recognition in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®. Ricky L. Nolen, Jr. earned recognition in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. For a firm that has deliberately focused its practice on construction law and construction litigation for nearly 25 years, we take particular pride in seeing that focus reflected in the recognition of lawyers across different generations of HHMR. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Insurer Cannot Dispose of Water Leak or Bad Faith Claims on Motion for Summary Judgment

    July 20, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for summary judgment seeking to eliminate the insured’s claims for damage from a water leak, bad faith and punitive damages failed. Nargizyan v, State Farm General Ins. Co., 2026 Cal App. LEXIS 302 (Cal. Ct. App. April 15, 2026). The insured noticed tiles on his kitchen floor were warmer than usual. He found water dripping from the top of the crawl space under the house. He noticed water was “dripping in different places” but not pouring like a faucet. “There were too many places to count where water was dripping and there was water all over the place.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com