BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin custom home expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin tract home expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin production housing expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin housing expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin office building expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin condominium expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Van Dyne Wisconsin
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Van Dyne, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Van Dyne Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    La Crosse Area Builders Association
    Local # 5126
    816 2nd Ave S
    Onalaska, WI 54650
    http://www.labaonline.com

    Mid-Shore Home Builders Association Affil w/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5150
    PO Box 125 2104 Mary Ave
    New Holstein, WI 53061
    http://midshoreshomebuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Fond Du Lac & Dodge Cos
    Local # 5116
    490 W Rolling Meadows Dr
    Fond Du Lac, WI 54937
    http://www.homebuildersfdldodge.com

    Sheboygan Cty Home Builders Association
    Local # 5159
    435 E Mill Street
    Plymouth, WI 53073
    http://www.schba.org

    Winnebago Home Builders Association
    Local # 5190
    4041 State Road 91 Suite A
    Oshkosh, WI 54904
    http://www.whba.net

    Manitowoc County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5143
    1011 South 10th St Ste 103
    Manitowoc, WI 54220
    http://www.manitowoccountyhomebuilders.com

    Mid Wisconsin Home Builders Association
    Local # 5181
    PO Box 865
    Portage, WI 53901
    http://www.mwhba.org/


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Van Dyne Wisconsin

    Surveys: Hundreds of Design Professionals See Big COVID-19 Business Impacts

    Athletic Trainers Help Workers Get Back to the Jobsite and Stay Healthy After Injury

    Well-Insulated: Predict the Unpredictable Construction Costs

    Georgia Appellate Court Supports County Claim Against Surety Company’s Failure to Pay

    Payne & Fears Recognized by Best Lawyers in 2026 Best Law Firms®

    Manhattan Condo Resale Prices Reach Record High

    Quick Note: Not In Contract With The Owner? Serve A Notice To Owner.

    Lead Paint: The EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule

    Business Risk Exclusions Bar Faulty Workmanship Claim

    Calling the Shots

    Risky Business: Contractual Protections in the 'New Normal'

    Sacramento Water Works Recognized as a Historic Civil Engineering Landmark

    US Appeals Court Slams FERC on Long-Muddled State Environmental Permits

    Slowing Home Sales Show U.S. Market Lacks Momentum: Economy

    In Construction Your Contract May Not Always Preclude a Negligence Claim

    Fire Protection You Can Trust Starts With the Right Testing

    Wisconsin Court Applies the Economic Loss Doctrine to Bar Negligence Claims for Purely Economic Losses

    A Lawyer's Perspective on Current Issues Dominating the Construction Industry

    Home Repair Firms Sued for Fraud

    Construction Law Client Advisory: What The Recent Beacon Decision Means For Developers And General Contractors

    The EPA and the Corps of Engineers Propose Another Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States”

    Toll Brothers Shows how the Affluent Buyer is Driving Up Prices

    Kiewit Hired as EPC for Fire-Damaged Freeport Gas Terminal Fix

    What If There Is a Design Error?

    How Many New Home Starts are from Teardowns?

    Plehat Brings Natural Environments into Design Tools

    2018 California Construction Law Update

    In Real Life the Bad Guy Sometimes Gets Away: Adding Judgment Debtors to a Judgment

    Construction Executives Should Be Dusting Off Employee Handbooks

    Mitigation, Restructuring and Bankruptcy: Small Business Tools in the Era of COVID-19

    Negligent Misrepresentation Claim Does Not Allege Property Damage, Barring Coverage

    ASCE Statement on Senate Passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Denied

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “D’Oh!”

    Claim Against Broker for Failure to Procure Adequate Coverage Survives Summary Judgment

    Navigating Construction Contracts in the Energy Sector – Insights from Sheppard Mullin’s Webinar Series

    Defend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret Law

    Sometimes a General Damages Assessment is Enough. . .

    Wait! Don’t Sign Yet: Reviewing Contract Protections During the COVID Pandemic

    The Salt Lake Tribune Names Snell & Wilmer a Winner of the Top Workplaces 2025 Award

    NIBS Consultative Council Issues Moving Forward Report on Healthy Buildings

    Jersey Shore Town Trying Not to Lose the Man vs. Nature Fight on its Eroded Beaches

    Everyone Wins When a Foreclosure Sale Generates Excess Proceeds

    Does the Miller Act Trump Subcontract Dispute Provisions?

    Green Energy Can Complicate Real Estate Foreclosures

    Procedural Matters Matter!

    New Illinois Supreme Court Trigger Rule for CGL Personal Injury “Offenses” Could Have Costly Consequences for Policyholders

    Representation and Warranties Claims Reach Record Payouts in 2024

    General Contractor Gets Fired [Upon] for Subcontractor’s Failure to Hire Apprentices

    Non-compliance With Endorsement Means No Indemnity Coverage
    Corporate Profile

    VAN DYNE WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction claims related expert witness designations, the Van Dyne, Wisconsin Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which comprise building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Van Dyne and the surrounding areas.

    Van Dyne Wisconsin expert witness windowsVan Dyne Wisconsin architecture expert witnessVan Dyne Wisconsin construction expert witnessVan Dyne Wisconsin construction claims expert witnessVan Dyne Wisconsin construction defect expert witnessVan Dyne Wisconsin construction forensic expert witnessVan Dyne Wisconsin expert witness roofing
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Van Dyne, Wisconsin

    Modular Construction’s Big Boom: New Risks Outpacing Standard Contracts in Industrial Projects

    March 24, 2026 —
    Modular construction is revolutionizing the construction industry, tackling labor shortages, sustainability goals and supply-chain challenges, with the global market for modular and prefabricated construction projected to reach over $200 billion by 2030. While residential builders have embraced modular’s speed and affordability, the greatest risks—and opportunities—are emerging in the industrial sector, where project scale and complexity demand new legal strategies. In 2023, Chad Theriot explored industrial and infrastructure applications of modular construction, addressing risks like offsite fabrication and integration complexities in his article, “The Rise of Modular Construction—Impacts for Consideration.” Since that time, modular construction has continued to experience significant advancements and has been increasingly adopted by contractors across a broad spectrum of industrial and commercial projects. As modular construction continues to reshape the industrial landscape, contractors and owners alike must be mindful of the legal implications associated with its use, specifically as it relates to liability and risk allocation, regulatory compliance, quality control and upstream factors such as transportation and intellectual property concerns. Reprinted courtesy of Chad Theriot and Jack Mayo, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    How to Fireproof a Neighborhood

    March 17, 2026 —
    As builders in fire-prone areas like California race to reimagine homes for a more fiery future, one developer is zooming out to build entire fire-resilient neighborhoods. KB Home’s developments tackle an issue that’s hard for any individual homeowner to overcome: “You can do your home perfectly, but if your neighbor didn’t, you still have a fire risk,” said Roy Wright, chief executive officer of the research nonprofit Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety. In other words, to slow the spread of urban fires it takes a village. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg

    Turnover Traps for Community Associations: Investigate First, Release Claims Later

    April 14, 2026 —
    Turnover of a community association from developer control to owner control is a uniquely vulnerable moment. Developers are increasingly presenting Florida condominium and homeowners’ associations with “standard” settlement or release agreements at turnover, often being framed as routine steps to finalize the transition of control. In reality, these agreements can have sweeping consequences, including the release of construction-defect claims before the association has conducted any meaningful independent evaluation. The developer has years of project knowledge and access to plans, subcontractors, and internal records. The newly elected board is just beginning to organize, obtain documents, and understand the property’s condition. Many defects, especially those involving roofing, waterproofing, windows, or structural components, are latent and not yet visible. Signing a release at this stage means the association is making a binding decision under conditions of uncertainty, without full information, to release all future potential claims. Over the last few years, there has been a rise in reports of developers offering a packaged deal: they agree to complete certain repairs, often minor punch-list or cosmetic items, and to “forgive” an alleged financial deficit (often around $50,000) supposedly owed by the association from the developer-control period. In exchange, the association is asked to sign a broad release covering all claims, including known and unknown construction defects. To a new HOA board that received their community with limited operating and reserve funds, they are left with a difficult decision to either accept the developer’s offer or assess their owners to pay this alleged debt. These agreements are occasionally presented through community management companies, which may describe them as “standard” or "routine.” Whether due to misunderstanding or influence from the developer, management companies can unintentionally reinforce the idea that signing is expected. Any recommendation provided to HOAs about whether to sign these releases could open community management to liability down the road. The best practice for both associations and community managers is to refer any agreements to be reviewed by general counsel for the association. The following two case studies illustrate the real-world consequences: Case Study One: A newly transitioned board relies on its management company to negotiate with the developer-builder to resolve irrigation issues, pond concerns, and signage deficiencies, along with forgiving an asserted financial shortfall. In exchange, the board signs a broad release covering all claims, including latent defects. Within a year, several punch-list items remain incomplete, and more serious issues arise. When the association demands completion, the developer delays, prompting the association to seek advice on how to enforce the settlement agreement. The association hires counsel to hold the developer responsible for both the previously agreed-upon items and newly identified construction defects. However, when the association brings claims against the developer, the developer points to the release of all potential construction defects in the community. Thus, the only remaining remedy is limited to enforcement of the specific punch-list terms. The community, still relatively new, has no viable claims against the developer-builder for the construction defects. With warranties expired and the release, the association must fund repairs through special assessments, despite defects that would otherwise have been actionable. Case Study Two: A community is presented with a similar agreement as above. The management company encourages execution, suggesting it is standard and even telling the board to “name your price.” The developer also pressures the newly elected board to sign. Instead of signing, the board consults with their attorney. Counsel advises the board not to sign the release and recommends further investigation. Engineers are retained and identify early indicators of broader issues, including stucco cracking, water intrusion, and irrigation deficiencies. Based on this information, the association declines to sign the release. Subsequent evaluation reveals potentially significant construction-defect claims, allowing the community to pursue recovery that would have been lost under the proposed agreement. These scenarios underscore a fundamental point: signing a release at turnover is not an administrative formality—it is a major legal decision. Board members act in a fiduciary capacity on behalf of their community, and their decisions can bind all current and future owners. At turnover, an association’s right is to investigate and pursue claims. Preserving that right until a full and independent evaluation is completed is not adversarial—it is responsible governance. Accordingly, associations should retain independent evaluations of the property and consult qualified legal counsel before signing any “standard” agreements, especially ones involving a release of future claims. Nicholas B. Vargo is a partner in Ball Janik LLP’s Construction Practice Group. He may be reached at nvargo@balljanik.com.

    Collapse Claim Dismissed as Untimely

    January 26, 2026 —
    The insureds’ suit for coverage due to a collapse of their barn was dismissed while the bad faith against the insurer survived. Funaro v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227346 (W. D. Pa. Nov 19, 2025). The insureds’ barn was insured by State Farm. The insureds alleged that the barn roof collapsed from the weight of snow, causing damage to the structure of the barn itself and the contents of the barn (including a custom French stove that the insureds alleged was worth between $90,000 and $100,000). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    New Survey Reveals Overwhelmingly Optimistic Results on the Use of AI in Construction

    May 14, 2026 —
    On December 5, 2025, CMiC and Dodge released a survey asking over 6,000 companies across various sectors of the construction industry their stance on artificial intelligence—whether they use it or not; whether they like it or not; whether they have or are planning to implement it or not; and so on. Considering its reputation for skepticism and reluctance when it comes to adopting new forms of technology, the construction industry pleasantly surprised CMiC and Dodge with its answers to these questions, with 87% of contractors believing AI will have a meaningful impact on construction. “The research indicates the construction industry is nearing a tipping point for AI adoption,” says Steve Jones, senior director of industry insights at Dodge Construction Network, who sat down with Construction Executive to delve further into the survey questions and answers and what the industry’s current position on them means for AI’s future role in construction. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    June 15, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld partner Leigh Katz obtained a significant victory in a recent matter involving a videotaped alleged trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of the client’s commercial residence. The plaintiff claimed he suffered a knee injury that necessitated surgery, along with other assorted injuries that prevented him from continuing high-level athletic activities. Leigh was able to demonstrate that the fall was staged and received a voluntary discontinuance with prejudice. At mediation, Leigh emphasized that KF’s expert witness challenged the plaintiff’s claim that the fall was caused by a sidewalk height differential after reviewing the videotape footage and determining the plaintiff’s fall began before his feet made contact with the alleged defect. Based on this analysis, the expert concluded the reported height differential did not initiate the fall, which supported KF’s position that the incident depicted in the video was unrealistic and appeared staged. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Leigh Katz, Kahana Feld
    Ms. Katz may be contacted at lkatz@kahanafeld.com

    HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team

    May 12, 2026 —
    HDR last year agreed to pay $12 million to the design-build construction contractor Archer Western-de Moya Group to settle its claims that the engineer had incompletely designed and under-designed Miami's new Signature Bridge when the joint venture committed to a fixed price prior to construction in 2018. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Damage from Frozen Pipes Excluded from Coverage

    March 31, 2026 —
    Applying Texas law, the federal district court found there was no coverage for damage to the insured’s commercial building due to the bursting of frozen pipes. Barona v. State Farm Lloyds, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 257379 (S.D. Texas Dec. 12, 2025). Freezing weather froze Barona’s plumbing fixtures, causing significant water damage to the commercial property when the plumbing eventually expanded and burst. State Farm sent an inspector. During the inspection, Barona stated that he turned off the heat to his building but did not shut off the water supply or drain the pipes. State Farm denied covered based on the policy’s exclusion for frozen plumbing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com