BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    The “Program Accessibility” Exception for Public Entities Under the ADA

    Cybersecurity “Flash” Warning for Construction and Manufacturing Businesses

    ALERT: COVID-19 / Coronavirus-Related Ransomware and Phishing Attacks

    Colorado’s New Construction Defect Law Takes Effect in September: What You Need to Know

    MGM Seeks to Demolish Harmon Towers

    South Carolina Supreme Court Finds that Consequential Damage Arise From "Occurrence"

    We've Surveyed Video Conferencing Models to See Who Fits the CCPA Bill: Here's What We Found

    Know What You’ve Built: An Interview with Timo Makkonen of Congrid

    When is Mediation Appropriate for Your Construction Case?

    Flint Water Crisis Prompts Call for More Federal Oversight

    Buy America/Buy American, a Primer For Contractors

    Apartment Construction Ominously Nears 25-Year High

    BofA Said to Near Mortgage Deal for Up to $17 Billion

    Potential Pitfalls Under the Contract Disputes Act for Federal Government Contractors

    Is the Obsession With Recordable Injury Rates a Deadly Safety Distraction?

    "Occurrence" May Include Intentional Acts In Montana

    Surfside Condo Collapse Investigators Uncover More Pool Deck Deviations

    Don’t Spoil Me: Oklahoma District Court Rules Against Spoliation Sanctions

    Is Arbitration Okay Under the Miller Act? It Is if You Don’t Object

    The Risks and Rewards of Sustainable Building Design

    Construction Costs Must Be Reasonable

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects at Trump Towers

    Cold Weather Causes Power Blackouts, Disruptions on Jobsites

    Tech Focus: Water Tech Getting Smarter

    2017 Construction Outlook: Slow, Mature Growth, but No Decline, Expected

    Cogently Written Opinion Finds Coverage for Loss Caused By Defective Concrete

    Resolve to Say “No” This Year

    Traub Lieberman Partner Eric D. Suben and Associate Laura Puhala Win Summary Judgment in Favor of Insurer, Determining it has No Duty to Defend

    Insurance Law Alert: Incorporation of Defective Work Does Not Result in Covered Property Damage in California Construction Claims

    Another Colorado City Passes Construction Defects Ordinance

    Texas Supreme Court Authorizes Exception to the "Eight-Corners" Rule

    Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Decision against Grader in Drainage Case

    Court Strikes Down Reasonable Construction Defect Settlement

    New World Cup Stadiums Failed at their First Trial

    Can an Architect, Hired by an Owner, Be Sued by the General Contractor?

    Quick Note: Notice of Contest of Claim Against Payment Bond

    Residential Construction Rise Expected to Continue

    Insurer in Bad Faith For Refusing to Commit to Appraisal

    Disjointed Proof of Loss Sufficient

    “But I didn’t know what I was signing….”

    Illusory Insurance Coverage: Real or Unreal?

    Do We Need Blockchain in Construction?

    California Imposes New Disabled Access Obligations on Commercial Property Owners

    Drawing the Line: In Tennessee, the Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Apply to Contracts for Services

    Progress, Property, and Privacy: Discussing Human-Led Infrastructure with Jeff Schumacher

    Trial Victory in San Mateo County!

    Register and Watch Partner John Toohey Present on the CLM Webinar Series!

    Florida’s Construction Defect Statute of Repose

    Safety Versus a False Sense of Security: Challenges to the Use of Construction Cranes

    Massachusetts Federal Court Holds No Coverage for Mold and Water Damage Claim
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 building and construction related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to lawyers and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Utilizing in house assets which include construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California architectural engineering expert witnessAnaheim California multi family design expert witnessAnaheim California construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessAnaheim California soil failure expert witnessAnaheim California structural engineering expert witnessesAnaheim California construction cost estimating expert witnessAnaheim California engineering consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Settlement Reached on Troubled Harbor Bridge in Corpus Christi, Texas

    November 16, 2023 —
    A $400-million settlement was reached between the Texas Dept. of Transportation and general contractor Flatiron/Dragados over Corpus Christi’s Harbor Bridge in mid-October. The accord ends all disagreements and damage claims concerning the cable-stayed bridge, a project halted multiple times. Reprinted courtesy of Daniel Tyson, Engineering News-Record Mr. Tyson may be contacted at tysond@enr.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/24/24) – Long-Term Housing Issues in Hawaii, Underperforming REITs, and Growth in a Subset of the Hotel Sector

    February 19, 2024 —
    In our latest roundup, commercial real estate’s relationship with technology, towns and cities across the country prevent dollar stores from opening, empty offices and other commercial buildings are reused for housing, and more! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    New Jersey Court Upholds Registration Requirement for Joint Ventures Bidding on Public Works Contracts

    December 16, 2023 —
    Introduction In a matter of “first impression,” on November 30, 2023, the Appellate Division affirmed the New Jersey Superior Court decision in Ernest Bock & Sons-Dobco Pennsauken Joint Venture v. Township of Pennsauken and Terminal Construction Corp., finding that the New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.48 to -56.57 (“PWCRA” or the “Act”), applies to a joint venture formed for the sole purpose of bidding on a public works contract. Therefore, the Court held that the PWCRA requires any joint venture bidding on public works projects in New Jersey to be registered under the Act at the time of bid submission. Accordingly, the Township of Pennsauken acted within its authority and properly rejected the bid submission of the Ernest Bock & Sons-Dobco Joint Venture which was not registered under the Act in the name of the joint venture at the time of its bid submission, despite the individual members of the joint venture being registered. Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas J. Zaita, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Brian Glicos, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Zaita may be contacted at nzaita@pecklaw.com Mr. Glicos may be contacted at bglicos@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Meet the Forum's In-House Counsel: KATE GOLDEN

    February 19, 2024 —
    Company: Mortenson Email: kate.golden@mortenson.com Website: www.mortenson.com College: University of Iowa (Bachelor of Science in Engineering, 1991) Graduate School: University of Minnesota (Master of Science in Civil Engineering, 1994) Law School: William Mitchell College of Law (now Mitchell | Hamline School of Law) (JD 1999) States Where Company Operates/Does Business: Mortenson is a national builder and developer with 13 regional office locations. Q: Describe your background and the path you took to becoming in-house counsel. A: In high school, I loved math and science, so I attended the University of Iowa College of Engineering and studied civil engineering, with a focus on environmental engineering. To practice environmental engineering at that time, you generally needed a master’s degree, so I attended the University of Minnesota, where my thesis for my degree program was “Organochlorines in Lake Michigan.” I then worked as an environmental engineer for a consulting firm called Montgomery Watson (now MWH) assisting clients with various environmental issues from air permitting to watershed reports to risk assessments of contaminated sites. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jessica Knox, Stinson LLP
    Ms. Knox may be contacted at jessica.knox@stinson.com

    DOI Aims to Modernize its “Inefficient and Inflexible” Type A Natural Resource Damages Assessment Regulations

    March 25, 2024 —
    The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) published a proposed rule aimed at modernizing and streamlining the “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA). (The comment deadline was later extended.) The revisions, first previewed in a January 2023 Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR), are intended to fulfill “the original statutory purpose of providing a streamlined and simplified assessment process” with the overarching goal of facilitating settlements and expediting restoration efforts following injury resulting from pollution in a broader range of cases. The NRDA regulations provide two paths to assessing natural resource damages (NRD): (1) the more complex, site-specific Type B procedures for detailed NRDAs and (2) what is intended to be the standard, simplified Type A assessment procedures requiring minimal field observation. Particularly, the Type A process is reserved for two specific aquatic environments (coastal and marine areas or Great Lakes environments) when a relatively minor release of a single hazardous substance occurs, resulting in a smaller scale and scope of natural resource injury, and the rebuttal presumption for the Type A procedure is limited to damages of $100,000 or less under the current version of the rule. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Meet Orange County Bar Associations 2024 Leaders

    April 08, 2024 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to share that CEO/Founding Partner Nicole Whyte and Orange County Bar Association’s (“OCBA”) leaders are featured in the Orange County Lawyer (“OCL”) publication, Who’s Who In The OCBA, that was released earlier this month. To see this year’s 2024 board of directors, section leaders, committee chairs, task forces, and charitable fund board, please click here. Nicole Whyte provides individualized counseling and representation in all areas of Family Law. She has served on various OCBA legal committees and boards for over two decades and was elected to OCBA’s Board of Directors in 2024. She is committed to supporting the needs of the OCBA and its thriving and diverse OC legal community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Lewis Brisbois Ranked Tier 1 Nationally for Insurance Law, Mass Tort/Class Actions Defense, Labor & Employment Litigation, and Environmental Law in 2024 Best Law Firms®

    November 06, 2023 —
    (November 2, 2023) - Lewis Brisbois has been ranked Tier 1 nationally by Best Lawyers for ‘Insurance Law,’ ‘Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Defendants,’ ‘Litigation - Labor and Employment,’ and ‘Environmental Law,’ as well as ranking Tier 1 in an array of practice areas across 25 metro regions in its 2024 edition of Best Law Firms®. In addition to Lewis Brisbois' national ranking, the firm was also ranked Tier 1 in the following regional categories: Akron
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Corporate Law
    • Mergers & Acquisitions Law
    • Tax Law
    • Trusts & Estates Law
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Expanded Virginia Court of Appeals Leads to Policyholder Relief

    January 29, 2024 —
    Exercising its newly expanded jurisdiction that now permits Virginia’s intermediate appellate courts to hear insurance coverage disputes, the Court of Appeals recently reversed a lower court decision that allowed a two-year “Suits Against Us” provision to serve as a basis for an insurer’s refusal to reimburse repair and replacement costs incurred more than two years after the date of loss. Bowman II v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., Record No. 1256-22-3 (Nov. 21, 2023). CAV (unpublished opinion). In the proceeding below, the circuit court found no justiciable controversy and dismissed the complaint where repairs to the policyholder’s fire-damaged home continued more than two years after the date of the fire. The circuit court relied on a two-year limitation in the policy that governed the period within which the policyholder must bring suit against the insurer. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth and Olivia G. Bushman, Hunton Andrews Kurth Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@HuntonAK.com Ms. Bushman may be contacted at obushman@HuntonAK.com Read the full story...