BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Edwards County Kansas high-rise construction expert witness Edwards County Kansas mid-rise construction expert witness Edwards County Kansas hospital construction expert witness Edwards County Kansas landscaping construction expert witness Edwards County Kansas retail construction expert witness Edwards County Kansas custom home expert witness Edwards County Kansas townhome construction expert witness Edwards County Kansas low-income housing expert witness Edwards County Kansas production housing expert witness Edwards County Kansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Edwards County Kansas industrial building expert witness Edwards County Kansas office building expert witness Edwards County Kansas condominiums expert witness Edwards County Kansas multi family housing expert witness Edwards County Kansas tract home expert witness Edwards County Kansas condominium expert witness Edwards County Kansas casino resort expert witness Edwards County Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Edwards County Kansas parking structure expert witness Edwards County Kansas institutional building expert witness Edwards County Kansas custom homes expert witness Edwards County Kansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Edwards County, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Edwards County Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504
    http://www.hutchbuilders.org

    Wichita Area Builders Association
    Local # 1780
    730 N Main St
    Wichita, KS 67203
    http://www.wabahome.com

    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460


    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401
    http://www.salinahba.com

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046
    http://www.lhba.net

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604
    http://www.thba.com

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603
    http://www.kansasbuilders.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Edwards County Kansas

    Risk-Shifting Tactics for Construction Contracts

    2017 Construction Outlook: Slow, Mature Growth, but No Decline, Expected

    English v. RKK. . . The Saga Continues

    Seller's Silence on Unfinished Repairs Sinks Summary Judgment in Real Estate Dispute

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    Texas Supreme Court Finds Payment of Appraisal Award Does Not Absolve Insurer of Statutory Liability

    Home Prices on the Rise

    No Rest for the Weary: Project Completion Is the Beginning of Litigation

    Tariffs and the Art of the Price Escalation “Deal”

    Legislative Update: Bid Protest Law Changes to Benefit Contractors

    NJ Condo Construction Defect Case Dismissed over Statute of Limitations

    Lease-Leaseback Battle Continues as First District Court of Appeals Sides with Contractor and School District

    New Insurance Case: Owners'​ Insurance Barred in Reimbursement Action against Tenant

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    Who Will Pay for San Francisco's $750 Million Tilting Tower?

    Unlicensed Contracting and Florida Statute S. 489.128

    Lauren Motola-Davis Honored By Providence Business News as a 2021 Leader & Achiever

    Eleventh Circuit’s Noteworthy Discussion on Bad Faith Insurance Claims

    Will Superusers Future-Proof the AEC Industry?

    Delaware State Court Holds that Defective Workmanship Claims do not Trigger Coverage by a Builder’s Commercial General Liability Policy

    Lake Texoma, Texas Condo Case may go to Trial

    Party Loses Additional Insured Argument by Improper Pleading

    LA Lakers Partially Survive Motion to Dismiss COVID-19 Claims

    Stick to Your Guns on Price and Pricing with Construction Contracts

    Forget the Apple Watch. Apple’s Next Biggest Thing Isn’t for Sale

    California’s Fair Payment Act: What Every Owner, Developer, and Contractor Should Know About SB 440

    Lessons from the Sept. 19 Mexico Earthquake

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Las Vegas Team on Obtaining Summary Judgment for the Firm’s Landowner Client!

    John O’Meara is Selected as America’s Top 100 Civil Defense Litigators

    Construction Worker Dies after Building Collapse

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    Insurer Doomed in Delaware by the Sutton Rule

    “Freelance Isn’t Free” New Regulations Adopted in New York City Requiring Written Contracts with Independent Contractors

    Certificates as Evidence of Additional Insured Coverage Are All the Rage, But You Deserve Better

    LLMs in Construction: Where They Fail and Where They Shine

    Update Regarding New York City’s Climate Mobilization Act (CMA) and the Reduction of Carbon Emissions in New York City

    Expired Contract Not Revived Due to Sovereign Immunity and the Ex Contractu Clause

    Homebuilding Held Back by Lack of Skilled Workers

    Texas Couple Claim Many Construction Defects in Home

    “Good Faith” May Not Be Good Enough: California Supreme Court to Decide When General Contractors Can Withhold Retention

    A UK Bridge That Is a Lesson on How to Build Infrastructure

    Back to Basics – Differing Site Conditions

    Related’s $1 Billion Los Angeles Project Opens After 15-Year Wait

    Big Bertha Lawsuits—Hitachi Zosen Weighs In

    University of Tennessee Commits to $1.9B Capital Plan

    Insurer Waives Objection to Appraiser's Partiality by Waiting Until Appraisal Issued

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2025
    Corporate Profile

    EDWARDS COUNTY KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Edwards County, Kansas Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. In connection with in house assets comprising testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Edwards County and the surrounding areas.

    Edwards County Kansas consulting engineersEdwards County Kansas construction expert witness consultantEdwards County Kansas architectural expert witnessEdwards County Kansas reconstruction expert witnessEdwards County Kansas construction scheduling expert witnessEdwards County Kansas slope failure expert witnessEdwards County Kansas expert witness structural engineer
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Edwards County, Kansas

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    April 20, 2026 —
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a package of 14 bills that includes measures to reauthorize several U.S. Environmental Protection Agency programs to protect and restore critical water ecosystems, expand access to broadband, reduce regulatory requirements on airport projects and programs and lower costs of federal buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com

    Can Foreclosure Sale Be Overturned Because Sale Price Is Grossly Inadequate?

    January 26, 2026 —
    Foreclosure actions are equity actions. See Verzura Construction, Inc. v. Hotel La Petitite Muse, LLC, 50 Fla.L.Weekly D2500a (Fla. 3d DCA 2025). Can a sale price at a foreclosure auction sale be set aside because the foreclosed party believes the sale price is grossly inadequate? A recent case discusses this question and, as you will see, the argument that the sale price is grossly inadequate is not enough to overturn a sale. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Newmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide

    May 26, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – May 14, 2026 - Prominent business and real estate law firm Newmeyer Dillion has been ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 guide and recognized as a leading firm in Litigation: General Commercial for Orange County. Newmeyer Dillion was selected based on an independent and in-depth market analysis, coupled with an assessment of the firm’s experience, expertise and caliber of talent where the firm stood out for its exceptional work and is recognized in Litigation: General Commercial. Managing Partner Paul Tetzloff expressed the firm's gratitude: “It is an honor for our firm to be recognized by Chambers and Partners in their Spotlight California 2026 guide. This acknowledgment reflects our commitment to providing high quality legal services tailored to the unique needs of our clients.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    New York Amends Prompt Payment Act: Retainage Above 5% in Private Construction Contracts Now Void

    February 10, 2026 —
    In 2023 New York overhauled its Prompt Payment Act. The 2023 amendments, largely aimed at restricting the amount of retainage that can be withheld on private projects, were unclear about whether parties could contract around the statute, as they can with other provisions of the statute. The State Legislature recently clarified that issue. On December 19, 2025, New York enacted a new law, tightening the State’s Prompt Payment Act retainage laws by amending the Prompt Payment Act under General Business Law § 757. Under § 757, the new law renders void any contract provision in private construction contracts that requires retainage in excess of 5% of the total contract sum, meaning owners cannot hold more than 5% from their prime contractors and prime contractors cannot hold more than 5% from their subcontractors. Reprinted courtesy of Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Patrick T. Murray, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Skyler L. Santomartino, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Murray may be contacted at pmurray@pecklaw.com Mr. Santomartino may be contacted at ssantomartino@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Elliott Backed Venture Sues Lloyds Over Avant Cladding, Times Reports

    February 17, 2026 —
    Elliott Investment Management and British housing tycoon Jeff Fairburn, joint-venture partners in UK homebuilder Avant Homes Group, are suing Lloyds Banking Group Plc over who should pay to fix properties that fail to meet post-Grenfell fire-safety standards, the Times reported. Avant, which faces remediation costs of at least £107 million ($146 million) for potentially dangerous cladding, argues that Lloyds should shoulder part of the bill because most of the developments were built before 2014, when the homebuilder was under the bank’s ownership, the Times reported. Cladding has become a contentious issue in the UK following the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017, in which dozens died after flames spread rapidly through flammable exterior cladding on the West London high-rise, laying bare deep failures in Britain’s building safety regulations. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eamon Farhat, Bloomberg

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    March 03, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Feb. 20, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, Sharon Oh-Kubisch, and Manuel Ugarte were selected to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers® list. Jason Feld is a founding partner of Kahana Feld. He focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    June 02, 2026 —
    California law requires that prime contractors furnish a payment bond – providing for payment to lower-tiered subcontractors and suppliers – on state and local public works projects with a value in excess of $25,000. There are three conditions that must be satisfied when a claimant makes a claim against a payment bond on a public works project in California:
    1. First, generally, the claimant must have served a preliminary notice, unless the claimant is a first-tier subcontractor or supplier;
    2. The claimant must have “ceased to provide work” on the project; and
    3. The claimant must file suit against the payment bond no later than six (6) months after the period in which a stop payment notice must be given or, in other words, the earlier of 270 days after completion of the public works project or 210 days after a notice of completion or cessation was recorded on a public works project.
    In Tarlton & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, 111 Cal.App.5th 376 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeal examined whether a subcontractor timely filed a claim against a payment bond when a prime contractor was terminated and replaced by another prime contractor who the subcontractor continued to perform work for. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com