BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Smithfield Utah mid-rise construction expert witness Smithfield Utah custom homes expert witness Smithfield Utah casino resort expert witness Smithfield Utah production housing expert witness Smithfield Utah hospital construction expert witness Smithfield Utah tract home expert witness Smithfield Utah Medical building expert witness Smithfield Utah office building expert witness Smithfield Utah landscaping construction expert witness Smithfield Utah condominium expert witness Smithfield Utah concrete tilt-up expert witness Smithfield Utah condominiums expert witness Smithfield Utah high-rise construction expert witness Smithfield Utah structural steel construction expert witness Smithfield Utah parking structure expert witness Smithfield Utah retail construction expert witness Smithfield Utah industrial building expert witness Smithfield Utah townhome construction expert witness Smithfield Utah housing expert witness Smithfield Utah low-income housing expert witness Smithfield Utah custom home expert witness Smithfield Utah
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Smithfield, Utah

    Utah Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Smithfield Utah

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Bear Lake Home Builders Association
    Local # 4610
    PO Box 565
    Garden City, UT 84028


    Cache Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 4620
    120 East 200 North
    Logan, UT 84321
    http://www.cvhba.com

    Northern Wasatch Home Builders Association
    Local # 4640
    5728 S 1475 E Suite 100
    South Ogden, UT 84403
    http://www.nwhba.org

    Park City Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4690
    PO Box 980850
    Park City, UT 84098
    http://www.pcahba.com

    Home Builders Association of Utah (state)
    Local # 4600
    9069 South 1300 West
    West Jordan, UT 84088
    http://www.utahhba.com

    Salt Lake Home Builders Association
    Local # 4655
    9069 S 1300 W
    West Jordan, UT 84088
    http://www.slhba.com

    Utah Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 4670
    1443 W 800 N Ste 103
    Orem, UT 84057
    http://www.uvhba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Smithfield Utah

    WSDOT Excludes Non-Minority Women-Owned DBEs from Participation Goals

    America’s Bridges and the Need for Bridge Infrastructure Investment

    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    California Clarifies Its Inverse Condemnation Standard

    You’re Only as Good as Those with Whom You Contract

    Illinois Federal Court Applies Insurer-Friendly “Mutual Exclusive Theories” Test To Independent Counsel Analysis

    Brooklyn’s Hipster Economy Challenges Manhattan Supremacy

    Investigators Eye Fiber Optic Work in Deadly Wisconsin Explosion

    Builder Must Respond To Homeowner’s Notice Of Claim Within 14 Days Even If Construction Defect Claim Is Not Alleged With The “Reasonable Detail”

    How Contractors Can Prevent Fraud in Their Workforce

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (01/11/23) – Construction Tech, Housing Market Confidence, and Decarbonization

    California’s Housing Costs Endanger Growth, Analyst Says

    KONE is Shaking Up the Industry with BIM

    Updates to Residential Landlord Tenant Law

    No Cross-Complaint Needed: Contractor Can Fight Co-Defendant’s Summary Judgment

    As Recovery Continues, Home Improvement Stores Make Sales

    Hawaii Appellate Court Finds Duty to Defend Group Builders Case

    How a Robot-Built Habitat on Mars Could Change Construction on Earth

    The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation: A Redux

    Colorado Springs may be Next Colorado City to Add Construction Defects Ordinance

    Insured's Claim for Replacement Cost Denied

    Illinois Law Bars Coverage for Construction Defects in Insured's Work

    5 Questions about New York's Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act

    Miller Act Payment Bond Surety Bound to Arbitration Award

    Your Work Exclusion Applies to Damage to Tradesman's Property, Not Damage to Other Property

    Can Your Industry Benefit From Metaverse Technology?

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 05/04/22

    Ninth Circuit Reverses Grant of Summary Judgment to Insurer For Fortuitous Loss

    Updated Covid-19 Standards In The Workplace

    Scaffolding Purchase Suggests No New Building for Board of Equalization

    The Arbitration Club… Is Not So Exclusive

    Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy

    The CA Supreme Court Grants Petition for Review of McMillin Albany LLC v. Super Ct. 2015 F069370 (Cal.App.5 Dist.) As to Whether the Right to Repair Act (SB800) is the Exclusive Remedy for All Defect Claims Arising Out of New Residential Construction

    U.S. Judge Says Wal-Mart Must Face Mexican-Bribe Claims

    Are Untimely Repairs an “Occurrence” Triggering CGL Coverage?

    Property Owner Found Liable for Injuries to Worker of Unlicensed Contractor, Again

    Construction Defect Not a RICO Case, Says Court

    Purely “Compensatory” Debts Owed by Attorneys to Clients (Which Are Not Disciplinary or Punitive Fees Imposed by the State Bar) Are Dischargeable In Bankruptcy

    New York Restrictions on Flow Through Provision in Subcontracts

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Policyholder Can “Stack” the Limits of Each Primary Policy After Asbestos Claim

    9 Positive Housing Statistics by Builder

    Illinois Legislature Passes Bill Allowing Punitive Damages In Most Wrongful Death Actions

    Impairing Your Insurer’s Subrogation Rights

    Third Circuit Court of Appeals Concludes “Soup to Nuts” Policy Does Not Include Faulty Workmanship Coverage

    BWB&O Expands to North San Diego

    No Coverage for Repairs Made Before Suit Filed

    A Look Back at the Ollies

    California Is Running Out of Safe Places to Build Homes Due to Fires, Rising Seas

    Corps, State Agencies Prep for Flood Risks From California Snowmelt Runoff

    Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Broad Duty to Defend
    Corporate Profile

    SMITHFIELD UTAH CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Smithfield, Utah Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the construction industry's most recognized companies, legal professionals, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Utilizing captive assets which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Smithfield and the surrounding areas.

    Smithfield Utah architectural engineering expert witnessSmithfield Utah OSHA expert witness constructionSmithfield Utah concrete expert witnessSmithfield Utah ada design expert witnessSmithfield Utah construction code expert witnessSmithfield Utah roofing construction expertSmithfield Utah construction defect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Smithfield, Utah

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    August 03, 2026 —
    It is well known in California Construction circles that the “Pay If Paid” clause is illegal in this state. There is a great distinction, though, between this clause and a similar clause, known as a “Pay When Paid” clause. A pay if paid clause allows a contractor to tell a subcontractor that if the contractor is unpaid for the subcontractor’s work, then the contractor has no legal obligation to pay the subcontractor, ever. For a great variety of reasons, the California Supreme Court, in the case of Wm. R. Clarke Corp v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America (1997) 15 Cal.4th 882, declared this type of clause illegal in California Construction. Although the pay if paid clause is illegal in California, the pay when paid clause is still perfectly legal and is found in many subcontracts that contractors issue to their subcontractors. The pay when paid clause allows a contractor to delay paying its subcontractors until the dispute between the contractor and the property owner over payment has been resolved and the contractor is paid by the property owner. Although seemingly reasonable (since it merely delays payment until the contractor is paid by the owner, thereby providing a funding source to pay subcontractors), significant problems still arise. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    Chambers USA 2026 Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Attorneys and Practices

    August 11, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its attorneys have received 57 individual recognitions in their respective fields, by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2026. These prestigious rankings are driven by independent interviews with clients of the firm and members of the legal community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals confirms that “only a ‘contractor’ may file an appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision.” Wattiker v. General Services Administration, 2026 WL 846001 (CBCA 2026) (citation omitted). The term “contractor is not an ambiguous term. A ‘contractor’ refers to a party to a federal government contract. Wattiker (citing the Contract Disputes Act). This is why the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to parties that are NOT in contract with the federal government. Id. In Wattiker, an appellant (appealing party) challenged the dismissal of a co-appellant. The co-appellant was dismissed because he was not a contractor, i.e., a party in contract with the federal government. In other words, the co-appellant had no privity of contract with the federal government. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Risks of Using an AI Chatbot for Legal Advice: Lessons from United States v. Heppner

    April 08, 2026 —
    Imagine that you are an executive (who is not a lawyer) and are concerned about what your company plans to do is legal. You could call your lawyer who might bill you for the call. Or, you can ask your AI chatbot, such as Claude or ChatGPT, about the legal risk. The chatbot will likely compliment you on the incisive question, provide you with highly confident answer (that may or may not be right) and will not bill you on an hourly basis. That is essentially what financial services executive Bradley Heppner did. It did not end well. A federal court recently ruled that Heppner’s chats with the AI tool Claude were not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. That means that the other side (in this case, the federal government) could get access to his chatbot prompts, uploads and responses, and learn a great deal about, for example, whether Heppner knew what he was doing was illegal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears LLP

    Tampa Team Obtains Highly Favorable Verdict for Property Owner Client in Lawsuit over Traffic Accident

    March 24, 2026 —
    Tampa Managing Partner John Rine and Partner Nick Dareneau obtained a very favorable verdict for their property owner client in a Sarasota County trial in a lawsuit arising from a traffic accident. At the end of closing arguments, plaintiff’s counsel requested appropriately $18 million from the jury. The jury returned a net verdict of just over a thousand dollars. The plaintiff was on a scooter and was involved in an accident with an SUV in a parking lot intersection. Our firm represented the property owner. The plaintiffs argued that the landscape vegetation was too tall and violated the sight lines of the two drivers, and that the height of the shrubbery violated the owner’s landscaping contract and a local sight line ordinance. They also argued that the intersection lacked a stop sign in contrast to the other six parking lot entrances, which had stop signs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Supreme Court Rules Tariffs Unconstitutional: Why the Construction Industry Shouldn’t Expect Calm Just Yet

    March 31, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump did what many expected: It held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. What few anticipated was the speed of what followed: Within hours of the ruling, the administration announced replacement tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, imposed a 10% global surcharge effective February 24, and signaled forthcoming Section 301 investigations against most major trading partners. For those in the construction industry hoping the Learning Resources ruling would restore market stability, the message was unambiguous. The constitutional question may be settled, but the market disruption is not. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Barnett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    How AI Turns Construction Documents Into Procurement Intelligence

    May 05, 2026 —
    MEP equipment accounts for up to 40% of costs on data center or hospital projects, has lead times ranging from 20 weeks to over a year, and has historically been the most underserved area in construction software. In this episode, I speak with Victor Muchiri from BuildVision about what it actually takes to make AI useful in construction procurement, not as a pilot, but in production. We dig into why you cannot simply upload a set of construction drawings to ChatGPT and trust the output. Construction documents are complex, cross-referenced, and consequential. Without deep domain context, such as manufacturer ontologies, equipment taxonomies, and engineering expertise, AI produces plausible results, not reliable ones. BuildVision’s approach is to act as a harness around AI models, wrapping them in construction-specific knowledge so the output can be trusted for real procurement decisions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi