Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits
May 12, 2026 —
Lorelie S. Masters & Joseph T. Niczky - Hunton Insurance Recovery BlogIn the case of
County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits.
Reprinted courtesy of
Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and
Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com
Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com
Read the full story...
EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward
May 12, 2026 —
Patrick J. Paul, John Habib & Sukhmani K. Singh - Snell & WilmerIn a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings.
The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality.
Reprinted courtesy of
Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer,
John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and
Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer
Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com
Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com
Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com
Read the full story...
Massachusetts Settlement Targets Mortgage-Backed “Homeowner Benefit” Agreements
April 08, 2026 —
A.J. S. Dhaliwal, Mehul N. Madia & Maxwell Earp-Thomas - SheppardOn March 11, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell announced a consent order with a real estate-related lender’s subsidiary, and affiliated individuals resolving allegations that the company violated the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act by deceptively marketing mortgage-backed “Homeowner Benefit Agreements” to financially struggling homeowners.
According to the complaint, the company offered homeowners relatively small upfront cash payments, typically less than $1,500, in exchange for a 40-year exclusive right to act as the listing broker if the homeowner later sold the property. The Attorney General alleged that the agreements also triggered substantial payment obligations upon other transfers, including death or foreclosure, and that the transactions were secured by recorded mortgages that could interfere with refinancing, home-equity access, or the ability to sell the home. The complaint further alleged that the company marketed the product to vulnerable consumers searching for loans or public benefits while obscuring the true nature of the transaction.
Reprinted courtesy of
A.J. S. Dhaliwal, Sheppard,
Mehul N. Madia, Sheppard and
Maxwell Earp-Thomas, Sheppard
Mr. Dhaliwal may be contacted at adhaliwal@sheppard.com
Mr. Madia may be contacted at mmadia@sheppard.com
Mr. Earp-Thomas may be contacted at mearp-thomas@sheppard.com
Read the full story...
USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects
June 15, 2026 —
Zachary F. Jacobson - The Construction SeytIn our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California.
This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLPMr. Jacobson may be contacted at
zjacobson@seyfarth.com
Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros Secure a $0.00 Settlement on a Multimillion-Dollar Construction Defect Case!
April 14, 2026 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLPPartner
Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader
D. Ryan Efros’ client was a construction supervisor on a palatial mansion. The homeowners claimed millions of dollars in damages and asserted the client was a general contractor (GC) and so responsible for the alleged defects. Jeff and Ryan took more than 15 depositions, reinforcing their trial strategy theme: that the client was not a GC, but Plaintiffs were. They secured significant concessions from Plaintiffs, pressed Plaintiffs’ own negligent construction choices, and made the risk of trying the case intolerable. On the eve of trial, Plaintiffs backed down, settling out Jeff and Ryan’s client for $0.00.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP
Builders Support Most of Bipartisan Housing Reform Bill in Congress
March 31, 2026 —
Esther D'Amico - Engineering News-RecordSeveral homebuilding groups say they support most of the massive housing reform bill making its way through Congress but want to see certain provisions including those related to build-to-rent and manufactured homes changed before it advances any further.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Esther D'Amico, Engineering News-RecordENR may be contacted at
enr@enr.com
Florida's Third DCA Reasserts the Teeth of Chapter 558 and the Future of Construction Defect Litigation
February 23, 2026 —
Ryan C. Brooks & Keith G. Salhab - Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLPThe case of Moss & Associates, LLC v. Daystar Peterson and Brickell Heights East Condominium Association, Inc. represents a quiet but significant correction in Florida construction law litigation. The Florida Third District Court of Appeal granted a petition for writ of certiorari and quashed a trial court order that denied a contractor's motion to stay litigation under Chapter 558, Florida Statutes.
Though procedurally narrow, the ruling reflects an increasingly assertive appellate stance. Chapter 558's pre-suit notice and right-to-repair process is mandatory, jurisdictional in effect, and not subject to dilution by trial-level discretion. At its core, the opinion reinforces a foundational principle. Florida intends for construction defect disputes to be managed, investigated, and often resolved before they reach a courtroom. The Third DCA's insistence on strict statutory compliance signals to trial courts, and to the plaintiffs' bar, that procedural shortcuts will not be tolerated.
Reprinted courtesy of
Ryan C. Brooks, Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP and
Keith G. Salhab, Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP
Mr. Brooks may be contacted at rbrooks@wshblaw.com
Mr. Salhab may be contacted at ksalhab@wshblaw.com
Las Vegas Student Housing Developer Will Name Replacement ContractorWest Coast Casualty Promises Exciting Line Up at the Nineteenth Annual ConferenceHOA Has No Claim to Extend Statute of Limitations in Construction Defect CaseWhat Construction Contractors Should Know About the California Government Claims ActLenders Facing Soaring Costs Shutting Out U.S. HomebuyersSixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a TechnicalityBefore Collapse, Communications Failed to Save Bridge ProjectOSHA Fines Alabama Contractor After Site Manager ElectrocutedFix for Settling Millennium Tower May Start This FallKahana Feld Partner Noelle Natoli Named President of Women Lawyers Association of Los AngelesPending Home Sales in U.S. Increase Less Than ForecastSouth Carolina Legislature Redefining Occurrences to Include Construction Defects in CGL PoliciesDoing Construction Lead Programs the Right WayTraub Lieberman Recognized in the 2025 Edition of Chambers USANew York Appellate Court Applies Broad Duty to Defend to Property Damage CaseNY Supreme Court Rules City Not Liable for Defective SidewalkNIBS Consultative Council Issues Moving Forward Report on Healthy BuildingsArkansas: Avoiding the "Made Whole" Doctrine Through DépeçageHaight’s Sacramento Office Has MovedHome Sales and Stock Price Up for D. R. HortonSurety’s Several Liability Under BondsConstruction Litigation Roundup: “Tender Is the Fight”Legislatures Shouldn’t Try to Do the Courts’ JobFor Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?Before Celebrating the Market Rebound, Builders Need to Read the Fine Print: New Changes in Construction Law Coming Out of the RecessionThere Are Consequences to Executed Documents Such as the Accord and Satisfaction DefenseImprovements to AIA Contracts?New York Court Holds That the “Lesser of Two” Doctrine Limits Recoverable Damages in Subrogation ActionsLis Pendens – Recordation and DissolutionCalifornians Swarm Few Listings Cuts to Affordable HomesWest Coast Casualty’s Quarter Century of ServiceRisk-Shifting Tactics for Construction ContractsFERC’s New Order on Data Center Co-Location: What Utilities Need to KnowStrategic Implementation of AI in AECAhlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC recognized by Construction Executive in The Top 50 Construction Law Firms™ of 2025Don’t Ignore Prejudgment InterestCondo Buyers Seek to Void Sale over Construction Defect LawsuitPolicy Language Matters: New Jersey Court Bars Cleanup Coverage Under Broad Policy TermsWalking the Tightrope of SB 35Code Changes Pave Way for CLT in Tall Buildings and Spark Flammability DebateTerminating Contracts for Convenience — “Just Because”Ethical Limits on Preparing a Witness for Deposition or TrialStephen Henning Receives “Legend of an Era” AwardNew York Developers Facing Construction Defect LawsuitMontana Significantly Revises Its Product Liability LawsReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/30/25) – Data Centers in Space, Low-Income Housing Problems and Spike in Multifamily CompletionsICC/ASHRAE/USGBC/IES Green Model Code Integrates Existing StandardsTurkey to Start Building 200,000 Homes in March, Erdogan SaysCorporate Formalities: A Necessary Part of Business Boston Contractor Faces More OSHA PenaltiesMortgage Bonds Stare Down End of Fed Easing as Gains PersistTraub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2024 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®Almost Half of Homes in New York and D.C. Are Now Losing ValueNew Report: Civil Engineering Salaries and Job Satisfaction Are Strong and Climbing at a Faster Rate Than Past ReportsInverse Condemnation and RoadworkA Property Tax Exemption, Misapplied, in TexasSouthern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages
