BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Teaching An Old Dog New Tricks: The Spearin Doctrine and Design-Build Projects

    Contractors: Beware the Subordination Clause

    MDL Panel Grants Consolidation for One Group of COVID-19 Claims

    School District Practice Bulletin: Loose Lips Can Sink More Than Ships

    Builder Survey Focuses on Green Practices of Top 200 Builders

    PSA: Virginia DOLI Amends COVID Workplace Standard

    Seventh Circuit Confirms Additional Insured's Coverage for Alleged Construction Defects

    Couple Claims Poor Installation of Home Caused Defects

    NARI Addresses Construction Defect Claim Issues for Remodeling Contractors

    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    The Importance of Preliminary Notices on Private Works Projects

    Colorado Senate Bill 15-177: This Year’s Attempt at Reasonable Construction Defect Reform

    User Interface With a Building – Interview with Esa Halmetoja of Senate Properties

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 5: Valuation of Loss, Sublimits, and Amount of Potential Recovery

    Despite Feds' Raised Bar, 2.8B Massachusetts Offshore Wind Project Presses On

    California Supreme Court Holds “Notice-Prejudice” Rule is “Fundamental Public Policy” of California, May Override Choice of Law Provisions in Policies

    Delaware Strengthens Jurisdictional Defenses for Foreign Corporations Registered to Do Business in Delaware

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court: Fair Share Act Does Not Preempt Common Law When Apportioning Liability

    Florida Accuses Pool Contractor of Violating Laws

    Affordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 Trillion

    The Death of Retail and Legal Issues

    WSDOT Seeks Retraction of Waiver Excluding Non-Minority Woman-Owned Businesses from Participation Goals

    A Year Later, Homeowners Still Repairing Damage from Sandy

    Statutory Time Limits for Construction Defects in Massachusetts

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Based on New Information …”

    Mitigating the Consequences of Labor Unrest on Construction Projects

    It’s Time to Change the Way You Think About Case Complexity

    Design-Build Contracting: Is the Shine Off the Apple?

    Eight Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers

    Soldiers Turn Brickies as U.K. Homebuilders Seek Workers

    Power Point Presentation on Nautilus v. Lexington Case

    Designing a Fair Standard of Care in Design Agreements

    Stacking of Service Interruption and Contingent Business Interruption Coverages Permitted

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Maritime Charters and the Specter of a New Permitting Regime

    Congratulations to Haight’s 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers

    Lakewood Introduced City Ordinance to Battle Colorado’s CD Law

    Wildfires Threaten to Make Home Insurance Unaffordable

    Is There Direct Physical Loss Under A Property Policy When COVID-19 is Present?

    You Can Now Build a Multi-Million Dollar Home via Your iPad

    ‘Revamp the Camps’ Cabins Displayed at the CA State Fair

    Supreme Court of Wisconsin Applies Pro Rata Allocation Based on Policy Limits to Co-Insurance Dispute

    Second Circuit Revives Policyholder’s Negligence Claim Against Agent

    Solar and Wind Just Passed Another Big Turning Point

    Real Protection for Real Estate Assets: Court Ruling Reinforces Importance of D&O Insurance

    Federal Court Finds Occurrence for Faulty Workmanship Under Virginia Law

    Receiving a $0 Verdict and Still Being Deemed the Prevailing Party for Purposes of Attorney’s Fees

    In New Orleans, Katrina Taught a Lesson in Local Resilience

    Coverage For Advertising Injury Barred by Prior Publication Exclusion

    Los Angeles Recovery Crews Begin to Mobilize as Wildfires Continue to Burn

    Housing Starts in U.S. Beat 1 Million Pace for Second Month
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking meaningful resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California hospital construction expert witnessAnaheim California testifying construction expert witnessAnaheim California expert witness commercial buildingsAnaheim California building code compliance expert witnessAnaheim California civil engineering expert witnessAnaheim California construction expert witness consultantAnaheim California expert witnesses fenestration
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Science-Based Standards for Wildfire Recovery: What California Policyholders Need to Know About A.B. 1642

    March 03, 2026 —
    Wildfires continue to present serious risks for California property owners. Unfortunately, commercial property owners, corporate facilities, landlords, and homeowners need to overcome not only the flames themselves, but also remediating hazardous contamination against a backdrop of unpredictable and ambiguous environmental safety standards. In response to the destructive Los Angeles area fires in 2025, the California Legislature recently introduced Assembly Bill 1642 aimed at creating uniform science-based standards for evaluating, testing, and clearing wildfire-impacted properties. While A.B. 1642 is in its early stages of consideration, it could materially influence claims handling, remediation costs, risk management practices, and broader liability exposures for California policyholders. Reprinted courtesy of Geoffrey B. Fehling, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Yosef Itkin, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Fehling may be contacted at gfehling@hunton.com Mr. Itkin may be contacted at yitkin@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Bad Faith Claim Dismissed as Insurer’s Actions Found Reasonable

    December 08, 2025 —
    The insured’s bad faith claims failed as the court found that the insurer’s handling of the claim was reasonable. Terrazas v. State Farm Lloyds, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201925 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 20. 2025). Plaintiff filed a claim with State Farm when her home suffered hail damage. Claims Specialist Denice Gomez was assigned to inspect, but she was unable to access the roof. She inspected the interior of the home and found water damage and observed hail damage on the garage doors. Ms. Gomez retained SeekNow to complete the roof inspection. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI

    March 03, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a go‑to tool for aggregating and summarizing large volumes of data, formulating and testing arguments, and even sketching litigation strategies. But a recent ruling from the Southern District of New York serves as a stark warning: when clients turn to generative AI for legal strategy, they may be unknowingly turning privileged information over to a third party and then creating documents that may later be discoverable in litigation. In a closely watched bench decision, Judge Rakoff ruled that AI‑generated documents created by the target of a criminal investigation using Anthropic’s Claude were not privileged despite being generated with information learned from his attorneys to support his potential legal defense and then shared with his counsel. The decision highlights the unresolved and increasingly consequential intersection of AI, privilege, and discovery. Facts Bradley Heppner received a grand jury subpoena and hired attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to represent him. After learning he was a target of the investigation, but before he was arrested, he created 31 documents with Claude using information from his attorneys to outline a potential defense strategy. He was later arrested on charges of securities and wire fraud, and federal agents seized his electronic devices, which contained the 31 documents that had been provided to his attorneys. Mr. Heppner argued that the documents were created to prepare his potential defense strategy in anticipation of an indictment, but he conceded that he made the decision to prepare the reports on his own, i.e., not at the direction of counsel. He nevertheless claimed the documents were protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine; the government moved to overrule the objections. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher J. Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Freddy X. Muñoz, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Gary M. Stein, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Muñoz may be contacted at fmunoz@pecklaw.com Mr. Stein may be contacted at gstein@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Washington Court of Appeals Narrows Arbitrator Authority in Construction Dispute

    November 21, 2025 —
    In a recent opinion, Division III of the Washington Court of Appeals clarified arbitrator limits in Reecer Creek Excavating v. SRI-Rochlin Construction JV,[1] holding that consequential damage waivers are enforceable, fee-shifting depends on who “substantially prevails,” and arbitration awards can be vacated only in narrow circumstances. Reecer Creek Excavating (“Reecer”) was subcontracted by SRI-Rochlin Construction JV (“SRI”) to perform excavation and paving work on a housing development in Ellensburg, Washington. When payment disputes arose, both parties filed breach-of-contract claims and later agreed to private arbitration. Their arbitration agreement included terms mandating that “the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs” and providing for an exception to the finality of the award where the arbitrator exceeded its authority. After a multi-day arbitration, the arbitrator found both parties partly at fault - Reecer for incomplete and defective work, and SRI for withholding certain payments. The net award favored Reecer by about $55,000, with each side ordered to bear its own attorney’s fees. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joshua Lane, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Lane may be contacted at joshua.lane@acslawyers.com

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Honorees!

    February 23, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, John Toohey, and Tyler Offenhauser have been named to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers list. Notably, Nicole Whyte was also selected to the Top 50 Orange County Super Lawyers list, an honor reflecting her outstanding work, leadership, and impact in the legal community. Partners Kyle Riddles and Courtney Serrato, along with Associate Kevin Moore, were also recognized as 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Yet Another Reason That Your Contract Matters

    February 10, 2026 —
    I have discussed on several occasions the fact that construction contracts matter. The words in contracts matter and, in Virginia (as well as other states), most provisions, if not all will be enforced to the letter. Recently, the Western District of Virginia federal court ruled in a way that reminded me of another reason for a well-drafted contract. In Rockingham Precast, Inc. v. American Infrastructure – Maryland, Inc. the Western District of Virginia Court considered a motion to transfer the venue to Maryland filed by American Infrastructure. The plaintiff, Rockingham Precast, a Virginia-based company sued in Virginia. American Infrastructure conceded that VA could be a proper forum for the lawsuit but argued that the form was much too inconvenient and costly for the party and non-party witnesses and that the cost made the forum an unfair place to try the case. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Homeowners Associations Must Prepare for Cold Season Maintenance and Repairs in Western Washington

    November 21, 2025 —
    Washington experiences major winter storms in the Greater Puget Sound area approximately two or three times per winter. While this depends on whether the winter weather pattern is affected by either El Niño or the La Niña Pacific Ocean current, associations must prepare for storm impacts rather than scramble after a storm has hit. La Niña conditions are ongoing and are likely to persist into the winter of 2025-2026, though forecasts indicate it will remain weak. Here are some steps Homeowners Associations (HOA) can take to protect themselves. What Proactive Steps Can a Washington HOA Take to Identify and Minimize Potential Construction or Maintenance Risks Before a Major Storm? Knowing that the chances for heavier-than-usual rains are in the forecast, a local HOA should inspect roofs, gutters, building envelopes, and drainage systems to identify vulnerabilities to water intrusion inside the buildings or ice buildup on the outside. Trees, landscaping features, walkways, and retaining walls need to be checked for dangers like dead limbs, tripping hazards, or any signs of shifting structure. Mechanical and utility systems such as plumbing, HVAC, and exterior lighting must be inspected to ensure they have sufficient insulation, protection, and proper operation. Contractors must ensure that all active construction sites are properly secured. They should also have a plan in place to protect materials from storm damage and address any other hazardous conditions. What Key Questions Should HOA Boards and HOA Property Managers Ask Potential Contractors to Ensure Good Workmanship and Accountability? The following five core questions capture the essentials of a contractor’s quality, reliability, and accountability: (1) Are you licensed, bonded, insured (inquire into the policy types and the applicable limits), and able to provide references for similar HOA projects? (2) Who will manage the project on-site work (request that person’s CV or work history), and how will you communicate work progress, potential issues, and timelines to the HOA? (3) What materials, methods, and quality-control procedures will you use, and how will you protect the property while performing the work, particularly during the rainy and stormy season? (4) Can you provide a detailed, written scope of work and price estimate, and explain, in writing, your company procedures for handling change orders or unexpected conditions? (5) What warranties do you provide for labor and materials that you will be using, and how do you handle a warranty or “punch-list” issues after the job is complete? What are Some Insurance Pitfalls HOAs Often Overlook - and How to Avoid Them? Here are the most common insurance pitfalls that HOAs may overlook, along with proposed solutions for addressing them. Pitfall No.1: Outdated or generic replacement-cost estimates that do not reflect actual construction costs in Washington. Solution: Obtain a professional replacement-cost appraisal every 3–5 years and ensure that the policy includes full replacement cost, not actual cash value. Pitfall No.2: Misunderstanding of the division of responsibility for covered losses between the HOA and individual owners. Solution: Educate the owners that under most an HOA’s contemporary governing documents such as the Declarations Of Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (DCCRs) and the Bylaw, the association’s insurance primarily covers repairs not only to the association’s common areas and limited common areas, but also the repairs of structural and other building elements inside each individual units, and then collects from the unit owner a proportional share of the HOA’s insurance premium. That way, the repairs covered by the HOA’s property insurance are uniform, and the HOA - not the unit owner - will deal with the repair contractor and its insurer if the repairs are subpar. Pitfall No. 3: Gaps in Water Damage Coverage. Property and liability insurance policies often exclude slow leaks, sewer backups, and water intrusion - three types of claims that typically are most expensive for an HOA. Solution: To request that the HOA insurance broker add to the policy coverage of (a) a backup of sewer/drain coverage, (b) wind-driven rain, and (c) water intrusion, and (d) sudden pipe failures. Afterward, the HOA should ensure that owners consistently keep the plumbing in their units in good working order. Pitfall No. 4: Failing to Adjust Coverage After Renovations. Specifically, HOAs frequently forget to update insurance after roof replacements, building upgrades, or additions of new amenities. Solution: Notify the HOA’s insurance broker after any major capital project and update insurable values to reflect the improvements. Pitfall No. 5: Not reviewing vendor insurance requirements because contractors may frequently have inadequate coverage or let policies lapse in the middle of a construction or renovation project. Solution: At the time of contracting for the construction or renovation work at the HOA property, (i) request that contractors provide their current Certificates of Insurance (“COI”), additional insured endorsements, and insurance policies Declaration pages that show the limits or coverage, and (ii) re-verify the same insurance facts before the work begins. What is the Best Practice for Communicating with Residents of a Community Owned by an HOA to Maintain Trust and Transparency During and After a Winter Storm? First, before a storm, send a simple, fact-based, expectation-setting message outlining what the HOA will do (snow removal plans, inspections, vendor readiness) and what residents should be prepared to do. Utilize multiple channels, including email, text alerts, HOA portal, lobby postings, and social media (if applicable). Second, set realistic expectations about response times because trust is built when residents understand what the HOA can and cannot do. Share with residents: (a) snow/ice vendor schedules; (b) priority areas, e.g., roads, walkways, private drives; (c) any delays due to the severity of the weather, and (d) clear expectations meant to reduce the residents’ frustration. Third, provide regular updates, even if the update is “no change.” Residents want visibility and care, not perfection. Report: (i) storm status; (ii) timing of plow/ice treatment timing, (iii) any emerging hazards (e.g., downed branches, icy walkways), and (vi) instructions for safety or temporary restrictions on moving about the community. Fourth, keep a record of and clarify every step taken to address the storm’s impact, since being transparent helps build trust when residents see that the HOA operates in an organized and responsible manner. After each key action, such as plowing, salting, emergency repairs, and the like, share with residents a brief update stating (a) what was done, (b) when it was complete, (c) the name of the vendor that performed the work, and (d) the dangers that are yet to be addressed. Fifth, within 48 to 72 hours after the storm, call a meeting to conduct a post-event summary to discuss what worked well, what challenges the HOA had to deal with, what repairs or follow-up work will happen, and what improvements will be made to meet the next storm with a higher degree of preparedness. Such a meeting would be one of the strongest ways to build long-term trust in the residents of the community owned by the HOA. Andre Egle is an attorney at VF Law. He may be reached at andre.egle@vf-law.com.

    Promptly Notifying Your Insurer of a Claim Matters

    December 30, 2025 —
    Does promptly notifying your insurer of a claim matter? A recent case out of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals answers this question in the affirmative. MAKE SURE TO PROMPTLY NOTIFY YOUR INSURER OF A POTENTIAL CLAIM. In L. Squared Industries, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 31 Fla.L.Weekly C529a (11th Cir. 2025), an insured owned gas stations and had a claims-made storage tank liability insurance policy. The policy provided: “You must see to it that we are notified as soon as reasonably possible, but in any event, not more than seven (7) days after the insured first became aware of, or should have become aware of a pollution condition which may result in a claim or any action or proceeding to impose an obligation on the insured for cleanup costs . . . .” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com