BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Insurance and Your Roof

    Paola Perkins Secures Summary Judgment for Client in Slip and Fall Lawsuit

    HP Unveils Cheaper, 3-D Printing System to Spur Sales

    State And Local Bid Protests: Sunk Costs and the Meaning of a “Win”

    Local Government’s Claims on Developer Bonds Dismissed for Failure to Pursue Administrative Remedies

    Seattle Independent Contractor Ordinance – Pitfalls for Unwary Construction Professionals

    Limitation on Coverage for Payment of Damages Creates Ambiguity

    Michigan Court of Appeals Remands Construction Defect Case

    Committeewoman Requests Refund on Attorney Fees after Failed Legal Efforts

    The LA Fires Destroyed 11,000 Homes. Less Than 10% Have Permits to Rebuild

    If Passed, New Bill AB 2320 Will Mandate Cyber Insurance For State Government Contractors

    Update Regarding New York’s New Registration Requirement for Contractors and Subcontractors Performing Public Works and Covered Private Projects

    Novation Agreements Under Federal Contracts

    Navigate the New Health and Safety Norm With Construction Technology

    Prison Contractors Did Not Follow the Law

    Near-Zero Carbon Cement Powers Sustainable 3D-Printed Homes

    No Coverage Based Upon Your Prior Work Exclusion

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell Attorneys Recognized in the 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Owner’s Slander of Title Claim Against Contractor Recording Four Separate Mechanics Liens Fails Under the Anti-SLAPP Statute

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    Trial Court’s Grant of Summary Judgment On Ground Not Asserted By Moving Party Upheld

    Preventing Acts of God: Construction Accidents Caused by Outside Factors

    Eleventh Circuit’s Noteworthy Discussion on Bad Faith Insurance Claims

    South Carolina Couple Must Arbitrate Construction Defect Claim

    Blue-Sky Floods Take a Rising Toll for Businesses

    Pennsylvania Court Extends Construction Defect Protections to Subsequent Buyers

    Quick Note: Be Careful with Pay if Paid Clauses (Both Subcontractors and General Contractors)

    Repair of Fractured Girders Complete at Shuttered Salesforce Transit Center

    The Ghosts of Baha Mar: How a $3.5 Billion Paradise Went Bust

    Lawsuits over Roof Dropped

    San Francisco House that Collapsed Not Built to Plan

    Urban Digital Twins: How Virtual Cities Could Help Build Smarter Cities

    Navigating Construction Contracts in the Energy Sector – Insights from Sheppard Mullin’s Webinar Series

    The Problem with One Year Warranties

    Client Alert: Catch Me If You Can – Giorgio Is No Gingerbread Man

    Trump Abandons Plan for Council on Infrastructure

    Balancing the Right to Repair With Evidence Preservation in Construction Defect Litigation

    CGL Policies and the Professional Liabilities Exclusion

    Firm Announces Remediation of Defective Drywall

    HHMR Attorneys Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain Named to 2026 Super Lawyers List

    Navigating Turbulent Waters Ashore: Insurance Lessons from a Navy Project Dispute

    Flushing Away Liability: What the Aqua Engineering Case Means for Contractors and Subcontractors

    24/7 Wall Street Reported on Eight Housing Markets at All-Time Highs

    The Project “Completion” Paradox in California

    Mechanic’s Liens and Contracts: A Roundup

    MSJ Granted Equates to a Huge Victory for BWB&O & City of Murrieta Fire Department!

    No One to Go After for Construction Defects at Animal Shelter

    Vancouver’s George Massey Tunnel Replacement May Now be a Tunnel Instead of a Bridge

    Washington Court of Appeals Narrows Arbitrator Authority in Construction Dispute

    Why’d You Have To Say That?
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Employing in house resources which comprise construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California engineering consultantAnaheim California expert witnesses fenestrationAnaheim California civil engineer expert witnessAnaheim California construction expert testimonyAnaheim California expert witness roofingAnaheim California soil failure expert witnessAnaheim California hospital construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    June 02, 2026 —
    Developers and practitioners evaluating data center projects in Arizona face a regulatory environment shifting on three fronts simultaneously. Federal executive orders are opening new land, streamlining permitting, and channeling financial incentives toward qualifying projects — but they are not preempting the state and local rules that most directly affect project economics. A carve-out in the December 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Executive Order preserves Arizona’s authority over data center infrastructure, meaning the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) rate-classification docket, municipal zoning restrictions, water-use ordinances, and pending grid cost-allocation legislation remain the binding constraints on project feasibility. Understanding where federal tailwinds end and state and local headwinds begin is essential for any developer sizing risk or selecting sites in the state. The Federal Landscape: An Interlocking Framework of Executive Orders Five interlocking executive orders are accelerating data center development nationally, but none overrides Arizona’s authority over siting energy, or infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    The GKN Aerospace Chemical Release and the Laws Designed to Address It

    July 06, 2026 —
    On May 21, 2026, a 34,000-gallon storage tank at the GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California began leaking methyl methacrylate (MMA), a volatile and highly flammable industrial chemical used to manufacture high-strength acrylic plastics. GKN Aerospace makes advanced military and commercial transparencies, such as aircraft canopies, windshields, cabin windows, bullet-resistant glass, and spacecraft windows. In polymer chemistry lingo, MMA is known as a monomer. Monomers are like individual links to a chain. Under the right conditions they link up (react) with each other to form long-chained polymers, or plastics. MMA is an unstable monomer that requires controlled storage conditions to avoid setting off a polymerization (chain) reaction. According to early reports, the MMA tank at GKN Aerospace overheated. The cause of the overheating is not yet clear, but the overheating may have created conditions enabling the MMA to initiate polymerization, which in turn generated heat, which in turn generated pressure, activating the tank’s pressure-relief system and releasing MMA vapor into the atmosphere. Concerns about a runaway reaction, massive release, and explosion led the Orange County Fire Authority to order evacuation of approximately 40,000 residents and closure of thirteen schools. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com

    Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law

    June 29, 2026 —
    Daily Journal (California) featured an article by Construction Law partner Brenda Radmacher, “A new path for construction defects in California.” The piece, published on June 15, 2026, examines Assembly Bill 1903 and its potential to significantly reshape California’s construction defect framework, particularly for common interest properties. The article highlights how AB 1903 would overhaul the state’s current right-to-repair system by mandating completion of prelitigation procedures, raising requirements for defect claims, strengthening developers’/builders’ rights to repair, and introducing a voluntary “certified building” program. The legislation aims to rebalance competing interests by reducing litigation-driven costs while preserving protections for homeowners. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Radmacher may be contacted at bradmacher@seyfarth.com

    Location, Location, Location — But Which One? The Few Words in Your Construction Contract that Pick Where You Fight

    June 29, 2026 —
    Most professionals know the old real estate line: location, location, location. It turns out to be just as true for construction contracts as it is for property. Consider a recent case involving a project owner that hired two design firms for a project. When issues arose during construction, the owner sued the design firms in state court in Brazoria County, Texas, pursuant to the forum selection clause in the parties’ contracts. The defendants then removed the case to the federal district court in Galveston, a courthouse in a different county. But the owner wanted the case back in Brazoria County state court. Whether it got its wish came down to two words in the contract: “situated in.” This article is about words like those. A construction contract’s forum selection clause names the place for the fight nobody plans to have, and where that fight happens can shape how it goes. This article explains why the wording in your forum selection clause deserves careful reading before you sign a construction contract. It is not a deep dive into the mechanics of federal removal jurisdiction, and it is not an academic comparison of the terms “forum” and “venue.” Instead, it is a practical look at how courts actually read these clauses, so the location of a future fight is the one you intended. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brad Sands, Jones Walker, LLP
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    May 12, 2026 —
    Three weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins. White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Reprinted courtesy of Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Global Insights Center: Monthly Newsletter

    June 15, 2026 —
    May in Review Last month, inflation moved higher, with Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rising to 3.8% year over year, up from 3.3% the prior month. The increase was driven primarily by energy prices, particularly gasoline, reflecting ongoing disruptions tied to the Middle East conflict. Labor market data were broadly stable. The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%, wage growth increased modestly to 3.6%, while job growth continued to be geographically concentrated in the Southern states, particularly cities in Texas. On an occupational basis, healthcare once again led job gains, especially in home health services, a trend we have consistently highlighted. Business formations increased during the month, with notable strength in e commerce and digital services firms. Manufacturing activity also improved, particularly in semiconductors, IT equipment, and natural gas–related energy infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Global Insights Center Staff, The Hartford

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Indiana District Court Finds Crane Inspection Services Do Not Trigger “Professional Services” Exclusion in Liability Policy

    February 17, 2026 —
    In Crane 1 Holdco, Inc. et al. v. Continental Ins. Co., 23-cv-205 (N.D. Ind. Jan 12, 2026), the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana had occasion to interpret the scope and meaning of the term “professional services” in an excess liability policy exclusion. By way of background, Robert Coppage was crushed by a crane while at work. He was seriously injured and later received a significant settlement in a state court civil action against the company that inspected the crane, Crane1. Crane1 sought coverage for the settlement under a first layer excess policy issued by Continental Insurance Company, which included an exclusion for any “liability arising out of the actual or alleged rendering of, or failure to render, any professional services by the Insured or any other person for whose acts the Insured is legally responsible.” The underlying complaint alleged that Crane1 was negligent in its modification, services, maintenance, inspection, and/or repair of the crane. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com