BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand construction and design related expert witness designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which comprise construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California expert witness structural engineerAnaheim California construction forensic expert witnessAnaheim California hospital construction expert witnessAnaheim California building code compliance expert witnessAnaheim California defective construction expertAnaheim California consulting general contractorAnaheim California fenestration expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Not Every Job Is Worth Winning: Contract Risk Questions Contractors Should Ask Before They Bid

    September 29, 2026 —
    Introduction Winning the work is not the same as winning the project, at least financially. Consider a contractor that commits to procure custom or long-lead materials before receiving complete construction documents. Depending on the language of the contract, if the final design is altered after those materials have been ordered, the contractor may be left responsible for replacement costs, procurement delays, or both. Alternatively, a subcontractor that accepts a pay-if-paid provision without investigating the owner’s financing, or prematurely waives lien rights, potentially risks nonpayment for properly performed work. Such concessions can quickly transform an apparently profitable project into a significant financial burden. A successful bid can therefore become an unsuccessful project if the contractor accepts contractual “red flags” without evaluating their consequences and the long-term financial impacts that they may have. The significance of each risk will depend on the project, the parties, the proposed contract, applicable law, and the contractor’s business objectives. Although not comprehensive, this article identifies several key considerations for that process to help mitigate certain risks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Water Leak Damage

    August 11, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the insured’s claim due to late notice. Global Approach, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120183 (S. D. Fla. June 1, 2026). Global suffered water damage on September 3, 2021, which originated in the bathroom of one of its rental properties. Global reported the claim to its insurer, Scottsdale, on October 19, 2021. Prior to reporting the claim, Global hired a handyman to inspect the property and then demolished the damaged area and repaired the bathroom. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    The Construction Defect Litigation Podcast: Navigating Multi-Party Construction Defect Litigation

    September 08, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld Construction Defect Practice Group Chair Ivette Kincaid and attorney Thomas McCarrick recently joined the Construction Defect Litigation podcast to discuss the challenges—and strategies—behind complex construction defect matters involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on their experience, Ivette and Thomas explore practical approaches to:
    • Identifying key parties and understanding how claims and crossclaims develop
    • Working with experts to evaluate defects, causation and damages
    • Managing procedural challenges, including scheduling, document management and depositions
    • Applying thoughtful case management strategies to position complex matters for successful resolution
    Reprinted courtesy of Ivette Kincaid, Kahana Feld and Thomas McCarrick, Kahana Feld Ms. Kincaid may be contacted at ikincaid@kahanafeld.com Mr. McCarrick may be contacted at tmccarrick@kahanafeld.com Read the full story...

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Tony Sonnett Secures Highly Favorable Verdict for Client in Admitted Liability Case in Which Plaintiff Sought $34.5M

    September 29, 2026 —
    Los Angeles Partner Tony Sonnett recently obtained a highly favorable verdict for his property owner client in an admitted liability case in which the plaintiff had asked for $34.5 million, with a jury awarding just $75,000. The plaintiff, who was a tenant at one of the client’s rental properties, was injured in October 2020 as he was attempting to close the heavy metal blinds that were affixed to the 12-foot floor-to-ceiling windows of the property. The blinds and their heavy metal covering detached from the wall and fell on the plaintiff’s head, causing him to suffer a scalp laceration that required stitches. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    The Race to Reengineer Cybersecurity

    October 06, 2026 —
    It took six days for Colonial Pipeline Co.'s 5,500-plus miles of connected refined petroleum supply infrastructure from Houston to New York City, to come back on line after a May 7, 2021 ransomware cyberattack forced the company to shut down operations and pa
    Appellate Court of Maryland Construes Notice Conditions of A312 Performance Bond in Favor of Surety

    Builders Beware: A New Class Of Defendants In Asbestos Lawsuits

    Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Secured by Lewis Brisbois in Coverage Dispute Involv
    Prejudice to Insurer After Late Notice of Hurricane Damage Raises Issue of Fact

    Thanks to All for My 9th Straight Super Lawyers Election

    US Secretary of Labor Withdraws Guidance Regarding Independent Contractors

    Melissa Pang Elected Vice President of APABA-PA Board of Directors

    Clean Water Act Cases: Of Irrigation and Navigability

    An Insurance Policy Isn’t Ambiguous Just Because You Want It to Be

    Hunton Insurance Group Advises Policyholders on Issues That Arise With Wildfire Claims and Coverage – A Seven-Part Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series

    California to Require Disclosure of Construction Defect Claims

    Builders Can’t Rely on SB800

    Final Furnishing Date is a Question of Fact

    Blog Completes Fifteenth Year

    SB800 Not the Only Remedy for Construction Defects

    Workers Compensation Insurance: Dangers of the Audit Process

    Remote Depositions in the Post-Covid-19 World

    Is Your Home Improvement Contract Putting You At Risk?

    Additional Insured Secures Defense Under Subcontractor's Policy

    Meet the Forum's Neutrals: TOM DUNN

    Counter the Rising Number of Occupational Fatalities in Construction

    Safe Commercial Asbestos-Removal Practices

    Sales of New Homes in U.S. Increased 5.4% in July to 507,000

    The AVOID Act: A New Timeline for Liability in New York Construction Projects

    California Appellate Court Rules That Mistakenly Grading the Wrong Land Is Not an Accident

    2017 Legislative Changes Affecting the Construction Industry

    Finding Insurer's Declaratory Relief Action Raises Unsettled Questions of State Law, Case is Dismissed

    Newmeyer & Dillion’s Alan Packer Selected to 2018 Northern California Super Lawyers List

    Meet the Hipster Real Estate Developers Building for Millennials

    A Court-Side Seat: Waters, Walls and Pipelines

    White and Williams LLP Attorneys Recognized as PA and DE Super Lawyers

    Australia Warns of Multi-Billion Dollar Climate Disaster Costs

    The Choice Is Yours – Or Is It? Anti-Choice-of-Laws Statutes Applicable to Construction Contracts

    Limited Number of Insurance-Related Bills Passed by 2014 Hawaii Legislature

    Union THUGS Plead Guilty

    Dorian’s Wrath: How Event Cancellation Insurance Helps Businesses Recoup Losses from Severe Weather

    How to Protect the High-Tech Home

    Senior Housing Surplus Seen as Boomers Spur Building Boom

    Be Careful with “Green” Construction

    Transition Study a Condo Board’s First Defense against Construction Defects

    Legislative Changes that Impact Construction 2017

    Court Finds That $400 Million Paid Into Abatement Fund Qualifies as “Damages” Under the Insured’s Policies

    Anthony Luckie Speaks With Columbia University On Receiving Graduate Degree in Construction Administration Alongside His Father

    Miller Act CLAIMS: Finding Protections and Preserving Your Rights

    Construction Defects through the Years

    Failing to Release A Mechanics Lien Can Destroy Your Construction Business

    Macron Visits Notre Dame 2 Years After Devastating Fire

    So a Lawsuit Is on the Horizon…

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    French Government Fines National Architects' Group $1.6M Over Fee-Fixing

    Depreciation of Labor in Calculating Actual Cash Value Against Public Policy

    Nevada Bill Aims to Reduce Legal Fees For Construction Defect Practitioners

    New Jersey Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Coverage Gap Dispute