A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance
July 13, 2026 —
Stephen E. Irving - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Following the
Department of Labor’s 2023 Davis-Bacon rule changes, federal construction contractors faced a pressing question: not whether paying prevailing wages is required, but how far those obligations could extend. Could they reach off-site material suppliers? Delivery drivers? Contracts that omitted Davis-Bacon clauses entirely? A recent federal court decision in AGC of America v. US Department of Labor answers these questions in important ways, vacating several disputed provisions and giving contractors greater certainty when pricing, bidding, and administering federal construction projects.
The ruling addresses three aspects of the 2023 regulations that sought to extend Davis-Bacon obligations beyond their traditional scope. By vacating those provisions, the decision creates a more predictable compliance environment and reinforces an important principle: Davis-Bacon enforcement works best when contractors, workers, and regulators operate under clear, objective rules.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Mr. Irving may be contacted at
sirving@pecklaw.com
Emerging Issues in Construction CGL Insurance Part 2: The Separation of Insureds and Additional Insured Interests
September 29, 2026 —
Eric M. Clarkson - SDV FenchurchMany coverage disputes hinge on first principles—the fundamentals of insurance —rather than the minutiae. Unfortunately, the basic anatomy of insurance policies can get lost sometimes when parties are laser-focused on a particular term or set of circumstances. This is true not just in disputes, but also when writing coverage. One of the fundamentals that is commonly misunderstood and overlooked—but which is absolutely critical to the intended operation of insurance coverage—is what is commonly known as the “separation of insureds.”
The “separation of insureds” is the concept that each “insured” under a policy are referred to and treated differently, and most of all that the distinctions matter. The concept is usually included as a condition in the policy. It embodies the requirement that the policy applies to each insured distinctly from how it applies to other insureds. The ISO Form CGL policies specifically state that they apply “[s]eparately to each insured against whom a claim is made or ‘suit’ is brought.” The separate and distinct treatment of insureds is more critical in construction operations than anywhere else. This distinction is essential to ensure coverage works as intended, especially when contracted operations are involved, because the policy must insure the subcontractor that purchased the policy, the general contractor who hired the subcontractor, and the owner that hired the general contractor. Even small modifications can easily frustrate the intent of the parties.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Eric M. Clarkson, SDV FenchurchMr. Clarkson may be contacted at
eric.clarkson@sdvfenchurch.us
Wilke Fleury is proud to congratulate attorneys recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America.
September 15, 2026 —
Wilke FleuryThe Best Lawyers in America®:
Dan Egan,
Daniel Foster,
David Frenznick, and
George Guthrie.
Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America:
Islam M. Ahmad,
Kathryne Baldwin,
Melissa Eaton,
Jason Eldred, and
Mustafa Karim.
Congratulations to this outstanding group!
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Wilke Fleury
My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI
June 08, 2026 —
Garret D. Murai - California Construction Law BlogIt’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit.
While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI.
Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law
June 29, 2026 —
Brenda Radmacher - The Construction SeytDaily Journal (California) featured an article by Construction Law partner
Brenda Radmacher, “A new path for construction defects in California.” The piece, published on June 15, 2026, examines Assembly Bill 1903 and its potential to significantly reshape California’s construction defect framework, particularly for common interest properties.
The article highlights how AB 1903 would overhaul the state’s current right-to-repair system by mandating completion of prelitigation procedures, raising requirements for defect claims, strengthening developers’/builders’ rights to repair, and introducing a voluntary “certified building” program. The legislation aims to rebalance competing interests by reducing litigation-driven costs while preserving protections for homeowners.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLPMs. Radmacher may be contacted at
bradmacher@seyfarth.com
Integration Can Inoculate in Utah
July 20, 2026 —
Mark O. Morris - Snell & WilmerThe Utah Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed, in the construction context, Utah’s strict approach to enforcing integration clauses to preclude parol evidence and other legal theories that would vary the written terms of a contract. In Reid v. All Surface LC, 2025 UT App 134, decided last September, the court affirmed in all respects the trial court’s grant of summary judgment based on the strength of an integration clause against a homeowner who sued a contractor for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, negligence, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability. More recently, however, the same court rejected those same arguments in Tidwell v. Jensen, 2026 UT App 13 as to tort claims arising from a used car sale.
The facts in Reid were sympathetic to the plaintiff. After being told she had a mold issue near a defective basement shower, the plaintiff solicited bids. A remediation contractor advised that while it could address the mold, the shower replacement should be handled by someone else. The plaintiff contacted All Surface LC, a shower replacement contractor. During an interview, the sales representative stated that All Surface could “do full mold remediation, tear everything out, and reframe the shower.” The plaintiff ultimately retained All Surface, expecting it would both resolve the mold issues and replace the shower.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Mark O. Morris, Snell & WilmerMr. Morris may be contacted at
mmorris@swlaw.com
SB 342 Eliminates the “All-or-Nothing” Rule Under Dreaded Business and Professions Code Section 7031
November 02, 2026 —
Garret D. Murai - California Construction Law BlogMost California contractors are aware of dreaded Business and Professions Code section 7031 which has been described even by courts – who typically veer away from ascribing judgment to legislation – as being “harsh[ ],” “draconian” and “unjust.”
For those less familiar with Section 7031, the statute provides two remedies, described as a shield and a sword, against unlicensed contractors who perform work requiring a license. The first, the “shield” also referred to as the “claim preclusion” provision, precludes unlicensed contractors from suing for payment when performing work requiring a license. The second, the “sword” also referred to as the “disgorgement” provision, allows a property owner to sue an unlicensed contractor for disgorgement of all money paid to the unlicensed contractor.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction
June 29, 2026 —
James P. Bobotek, Arielle L. Murphy & Robert A. James - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogData center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial
Dave McLain named Barrister’s Best Construction Defects Lawyer for Defendants for 2019 'Major' Mass. Gas Leak Follows Feds Call For Regulation Changes One Year After Deadly Gas ExplosionsConstruction Defects in Home a Breach of ContractLorelie S. Masters Nominated for Best in Insurance & Reinsurance for the Women in Business Law Awards 2021Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/08/23) – Buy and Sell With AI, Urban Real Estate Demand and Increasing Energy CostsKF-103 v. American Family Mutual Insurance: Tenth Circuit Upholds the “Complaint Rule”Evaluating Smart Home Technology: It’s About More Than the Bottom LineBanks Loosening U.S. Mortgage Standards: Chart of the DayA General Contractors Guide to Bond Thresholds by StateBenefits to Insureds Under Property Insurance Policy – Concurrent Cause DoctrineInjured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred ThousandMeet BWB&O’s 2026 Best Lawyers in America!#10 CDJ Topic: Carithers v. Mid-Continent Casualty CompanyFirstEnergy Fined $3.9M in Scandal Involving Nuke PlantsRisky Business: Contractual Protections in the 'New Normal'Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 04/13/22Consequential Damages Flowing from Construction Defect Not Covered Under Florida LawFormer NYC Condo Empire Executive Arrested for Larceny, Tax FraudCity of Aspen v. Burlingame Ranch II Condominium Owners Association: Clarifying the Application of the Colorado Governmental Immunity ActTwo Injured in Walkway Collapse of Detroit Apartment ComplexFTC Issues Warning Letters to Property Management Software Providers on Price TransparencyIs it the End of the Story for Redevelopment in California?Oklahoma Finds Policy Can Be Assigned Post-LossThe Prompt Payment RollercoasterStructural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC TowerParty Loses Additional Insured Argument by Improper PleadingArizona Supreme Court Clarifies Area Variance Standard; Property Owners May Obtain an Area Variance When Special Circumstances Existed at PurchaseThe Condo Conundrum: 10 Reasons Why There's a 'For Sale' Shortage in SeattlePotential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory FrameworkCertified Question Asks Hawaii Supreme Court to Determine Coverage for Allegations of Greenhouse Gas Emissions2016 Updates to CEB’s Mechanics Liens and Retail Leasing Practice Books Now AvailableFederal Regulatory Recap: A Summary of Recent Rulemaking Actions Taken or Proposed Affecting the Energy IndustryCourthouse Reporter Series - How to Avoid Having Your COVID-19 Expert StrickenHow the Election Could Affect the Housing Industry: Steven Cvitanovic Authors Construction Today ArticleGuarantor’s Liability on Partially Secured Debts – The Impacts of Pay Down Provisions in Serpanok Construction Inc. v. Point Ruston, LLC et al.Missouri Construction Company Sues Carpenter Union for Threatening BehaviorSan Francisco Bay Bridge Tower Rod Fails Test$10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability FightCourt Holds That Public Entity Can Unilaterally Replace Subcontractor Under California’s Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act Construction Executives Expect Improvements in the Year AheadDespite Construction Gains, Cement Maker Sees LossCommon Construction Contract Provisions: No-Damages-for-Delay ClauseNevada Supreme Court Clarifies the Litigation Waiver of the One-Action RuleAlbert Reichmann, Builder of NY, London Finance Hubs, Dies at 93Another Possible “Out” of Uniwest?Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Andrea DeField Among Nation’s Top Young LitigatorsQuick Note: Discretion in Determining Prevailing Party for Purposes of Attorney’s FeesThe Metaphysics of When an Accident is an “Accident” (or Not) Under Your Insurance PolicyTimely Legal Trends and Developments for ConstructionSkyline Bling: A $430 Million Hairpin Tower and Other Naked Bids for TourismThe Impact of Sopris Lodging v. Schofield Excavation on Timeliness of Colorado Construction Defect ClaimsVancouver’s George Massey Tunnel Replacement May Now be a Tunnel Instead of a BridgeMiller Act Claim for Unsigned Change OrdersProviding Notice of Claims Under Your Construction ContractThis Times Square Makeover Is Not a Tourist AttractionMontana Theater Threatened by Closure due to Building SafetyNomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super LawyersCalifornia Supreme Court Finds that When it Comes to Intentional Interference Claims, Public Works Projects are Just Different, Special Even
