BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Preventing Acts of God: Construction Accidents Caused by Outside Factors

    TV Kitchen Remodelers Sued for Shoddy Work

    Lessons from the Sept. 19 Mexico Earthquake

    Ahead of the Storm: Preparing for Dorian

    Michigan Bid-Rig Plea Lands Former Asphalt Paving Executive in Prison

    “It’s My Retainage and I Want It Now!” - Fundamentals to Requirements and Entitlement for Retainage

    Sometimes You Get Away with Unwritten Contracts. . .

    Dot I’s and Cross T’s When It Comes to Construction Licensure Requirements

    Part II: Key Provisions of School Facility Construction & Design Contracts

    HUD Homeownership Push to Heed Lessons From Crisis, Castro Says

    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    Revisiting OSHA’s Controlling Employer Policy

    Massive Redesign Turns Newark Airport Terminal Into a Foodie Theme Park

    Homeowner's Mold Claim Denied Due to Spoilation

    New York Office Secures Appellate Win in Labor Law 240(1) Fall in Basement Accident Case

    Indiana Court of Appeals Holds That Lease Terms Bar Landlord’s Carrier From Subrogating Against Commercial Tenant

    Overruling Henkel, California Supreme Court Validates Assignment of Policies

    U.S. Navy Sailors Sue Tokyo Utility Company Over Radiation Poisoning

    Insured's Claim for Cyber Coverage Rejected

    Defective Stairways can be considered a Patent Construction Defect in California

    Georgia Federal Court Says Fact Questions Exist As To Whether Nitrogen Is An “Irritant” or “Contaminant” As Used in Pollution Exclusion

    Lead Paint: The EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule

    Bill Proposes First-Ever Federal Workforce Housing Tax Credit for Middle-Class Housing

    Pa. Contractor Pleads No Contest to Prevailing-Wage Charges, Pays Workers $20.7M

    Federal Courts Keep Chipping Away at the CDC Eviction Moratorium

    Tariffs As Taxes — What Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump Means for Contractors and the WSDOT Specifications

    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend Additional Insured in Construction Defect Case

    Excessive Corrosion Cause of Ohio State Fair Ride Accident

    California Supreme Court Rejects Third Exception to Privette Doctrine

    CISA Clarifies – Construction is Part of Critical Infrastructure Activities

    Does a Contractor (or Subcontractor) Have to Complete its Work to File a Mechanics Lien

    Sewage Treatment Agency Sues Insurer and Contractor after Wall Failure and Sewage Leak

    Not in My Kitchen – California Supreme Court Decertifies Golden State Boring Case

    Disrupt a Broken Industry—The Industrial Construction Sandbox

    Guidance for Structural Fire Engineering Making Its Debut

    The G2G Mid-Year Roundup (2022)

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims

    California’s SB 61: New Limits on Retention Payments in Private Construction Contracts

    Texas Voids Out-of-State Forum and Choice of Law Clauses in Construction Contracts

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Don’t Miss Bremer Whyte Attorneys at West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar in Downtown Disney!

    Communications between Counsel and PR Firm Hired by Counsel Held Discoverable

    Structural Failure of Precast-Concrete Span Sets Back Sydney Metro Job

    Construction Defect or Just Punch List?

    Augmenting BIM Classifications – Interview with Eveliina Vesalainen of Granlund

    The Indemnification Limitation in Section 725.06 does not apply to Utility Horizontal-Type Projects

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Nevada for Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    How Philadelphia I-95 Span Destroyed by Fire Reopened in Just 12 Days

    ASCE Report Calls for Sweeping Changes to Texas Grid Infrastructure
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand building and construction related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Utilizing in house resources which comprise construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California construction project management expert witnessesAnaheim California construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessAnaheim California construction cost estimating expert witnessAnaheim California consulting engineersAnaheim California civil engineer expert witnessAnaheim California architecture expert witnessAnaheim California construction forensic expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Court Ends Trump Shutdown of NY's $5B Empire Wind, Second Offshore Project Revived

    February 17, 2026 —
    In a much-anticipated decision Jan. 15, the federal district court in Washington, D.C., revoked a construction shutdown ordered by the Trump administration against another major East Coast offshore wind project—the $5-billion Empire Wind underway south of New York City. The project's developer, Norway-based Equinor, won a stay and preliminary injunction in response to its lawsuit and one from the state, which aims to direct most of the project's planned 810 MW of power generation to the city's metro area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Rubin may be contacted at rubind@enr.com

    Seattle’s Residential Zoning Transformation: What Property Owners, Buyers, and Investors Should Understand

    May 14, 2026 —
    Seattle is in the midst of a significant transformation in residential land use policy. Longstanding neighborhood zoning patterns that historically favored detached single-family development are being reexamined in response to housing supply pressures, affordability concerns, and evolving state mandates. For homeowners, purchasers, investors, and builders, these changes may create substantial new opportunities. They also create a heightened need for careful legal and practical due diligence. While zoning reform can expand potential uses of property, it does not eliminate the many other constraints that may still govern what can actually be built. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lawrence S. Glosser, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Glosser may be contacted at larry.glosser@acslawyers.com

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    Modern Building-Sundt $17M Claim Is Stranded by Hospital Bankruptcy

    April 27, 2026 —
    A $16.9-million claim for work on a hospital addition by a joint venture of contractors Modern Building Co. and Sundt Construction is stuck and delayed indefinitely following the California hospital's December bankruptcy filing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    White and Williams LLP is Proud to Host the 20th Anniversary Virginia Barton Wallace Award and Reception

    May 05, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to host the 20th Anniversary Virginia Barton Wallace (VBW) Award and Reception, which will celebrate this year’s honoree, The Rendell Center for Civics & Civic Engagement. This award was created to celebrate the remarkable career of Virginia “Ginny” Barton Wallace, the first woman to be elected to partnership not only at White and Williams but also at any law firm in Philadelphia. The VBW Award is presented to a woman or organization that embodies the same qualities that Ginny possessed: leadership, drive, exemplary work ethic, overall excellence in her field, or an ability to inspire other women to succeed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Arbitration Provision Must Be Incorporated into a Bond for Surety to Elect Arbitration

    March 03, 2026 —
    “Sureties cannot exercise unilateral election rights that are reserved for the principal of the underlying contract.” Anderson Service Corp. v. Old Republic Surety Company, 2026 WL 61436, *2 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). This was the holding in a recent case dealing with arbitration. In this case, a subcontractor entered into a contract with a contractor that gave the contractor the right to elect arbitration in Pennsylvania. A dispute arose and the subcontractor recorded a construction lien. The contractor transferred the lien to a lien transfer bond under Florida law. (The contractor was the principal of the lien transfer bond.) The lien transfer bond surety then moved to compel the subcontractor to arbitration based on the underlying subcontract. The trial court agreed to compel arbitration but this was reversed on appeal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Texas Court Revives Construction Defect Claims: Key Lessons for Managing Latent Defect Risk

    January 21, 2026 —
    Construction projects often involve intricate designs, multiple stakeholders, and complex performance obligations. When problems surface years after completion, parties must navigate a difficult landscape that blends contract law, tort doctrines, and statutory deadlines. A recent decision from the Fourth Court of Appeals of Texas provides meaningful guidance on how courts will evaluate latent construction defect claims, the applicability of the discovery rule, and the limits of the economic loss doctrine. In Morningside Ministries v. Koontz McCombs Construction, Ltd., the court reversed summary judgment entered in favor of the general contractor and project manager, reviving the owner's claims and offering important lessons for owners, contractors, and insurers facing construction defect disputes. Background of the Dispute Morningside Ministries operates senior living communities across Texas. In 2012, It contracted with Koontz McCombs Construction, Ltd. (Koontz) to construct The Overlook, a significant expansion of Morningside's Menger Springs campus in Boerne. The contract required Koontz to build 100 new senior living units along with common areas and site improvements, and placed responsibility for construction quality, including the work of subcontractors, on Koontz. Reprinted courtesy of Spencer E. Dunn, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Melissa Osio Martinez, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Dunn may be contacted at sdunn@wshblaw.com Ms. Martinez may be contacted at mosiomartinez@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.