Court Compels Appraisal Although Coverage Issues Exist
February 17, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe California federal district court granted the insured’s motion to compel appraisal despite the existence of outstanding coverage issues. K4 Dev. LLC v. ACE Am. Ins. Co., et al., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211337 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6. 2025).
The insured owned hotel property. It was insured by ACE while the hotel was under construction. During construction, the hotel suffered rainwater damage due to incomplete roofing systems. The water damaged the interior finishes and furnishings from the 6th floor down to the basement, including 32 guestrooms.
The insured’s experts determined that the covered water losses delayed the hotel’s opening by 144 days. The insured submitted a claim for the water damage, covered claim expenses, and delay in opening losses. ACE denied the claim for delay in opening losses, stating that its expert determined the Water Events did not delay the hotel’s opening. ACE, however, did pay for the repair damage caused by the Water Events.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season
April 08, 2026 —
Meghan Douris - The Construction SeytArtificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency.
What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong.
On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLPMs. Douris may be contacted at
mdouris@seyfarth.com
Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict
May 26, 2026 —
Gray Development GroupPHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction.
The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale.
The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market.
According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona.
Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing.
ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997.
About Gray Development Group
Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.
Brenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction Delays
May 26, 2026 —
Brenda Radmacher - The Construction SeytBrenda Radmacher, a partner in Seyfarth’s Construction Law practice and a mediator and arbitrator serving on the American Arbitration Association’s panels, is among the contributing authors to the American Bar Association’s forthcoming guide on construction disputes: Time – The Legal Implications of Project Delay in Construction.
Drawing on three decades of experience, Radmacher authors Chapter 8, Contractor Delay Damages, offering practical insight into one of the most contested issues in construction litigation and arbitration.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Damage from Frozen Pipes Excluded from Coverage
March 31, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiApplying Texas law, the federal district court found there was no coverage for damage to the insured’s commercial building due to the bursting of frozen pipes. Barona v. State Farm Lloyds, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 257379 (S.D. Texas Dec. 12, 2025).
Freezing weather froze Barona’s plumbing fixtures, causing significant water damage to the commercial property when the plumbing eventually expanded and burst. State Farm sent an inspector. During the inspection, Barona stated that he turned off the heat to his building but did not shut off the water supply or drain the pipes. State Farm denied covered based on the policy’s exclusion for frozen plumbing.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Contractor Dispute Resolution Framework and Prevention
July 06, 2026 —
Construction ExecutiveWHAT DEFINES A CONTRACTOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION FRAMEWORK
A contractor dispute resolution framework is a structured system of contractual terms, governance processes and escalation pathways designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts between contracting parties with minimal disruption to cost, schedule and performance.
The framework operates as both a preventive control and a corrective mechanism. Preventive elements establish clarity in scope, expectations and accountability before work begins. Corrective elements define how disagreements are identified, documented, escalated and resolved once they arise.
Reprinted courtesy of
Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit
April 14, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025).
Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood.
Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Delay Matters: Florida’s Fourth DCA Reverses Hurricane Irma Dismissal
June 08, 2026 —
Andrea DeField, Machaella Reisman & Cary D. Steklof - Hunton Insurance Recovery BlogThe mantra “delay, deny, defend” is frequently referenced in discussions of insurance claims handling, though insurers will invariably disavow these tactics. While it would be facially improper for an insurer to delay a coverage decision to gain a tactical advantage, empirical examples nonetheless exist. This very dynamic was addressed by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals when it handed policyholders a win in
Hypoluxo Mariner’s Cay Condo. Assoc’n, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 4D2024‑2250 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 1, 2026), reversing a trial court order dismissing a condominium association’s Hurricane Irma coverage lawsuit against its property insurer.
Delay
Arctic Fires Are Melting Permafrost That Keeps Carbon Underground
Issuing Judgment After Confirmation of Appraisal Award Overturned
Housing Starts Plunge by the Most in Four Years
Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Tar Escaping From Roof
Viva La France! 2024 Summer Olympics Construction Features Sustainable Design, Including, Simply Not Building at All
Locals Concerns over Taylor Swift’s Seawall Misdirected
Thank You for Seven Years of Election to Super Lawyers
Contractual Indemnification Limitation on Florida Public Projects
The Peak of Hurricane Season Is Here: How to Manage Risks Before They Manage You
White and Williams Announces the Election of Five Lawyers to the Partnership and the Promotion of Five Associates to Counsel
Expired Contract Not Revived Due to Sovereign Immunity and the Ex Contractu Clause
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/24/24) – Omni Hotels Hit with Cyberattack, Wisconsin’s Low-Interest Loans for Home Construction, and Luxury Real Estate Sales Increase
Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Replace Lawyers Anytime Soon
New Law Limits Withheld Retention on Qualified Private Works Projects to 5% Effective 2026
Haight has been named a Metropolitan Los Angeles Tier 1 “Best Law Firm” in four practice areas and Tier 2 in one practice area by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” in 2021
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Asbestos Exclusion in Alleged Failure to Disclose Case
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/11/25) – An AI Inflection Point for Hotels, Investor Pivot in Build-to-Rent and Looming Legislation for Single-Family Investors
ACS Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Recognized
Waste Not: NJ Digester Plant Transforms Food Waste to Fuel
Judge Dismisses Suit to Block Construction of Obama Center
Duty to Defend Broadly Applies to Entire Action; Insured Need Not Apportion Defense Costs, Says Maryland Appeals Court
Stormy Seas Ahead: 5th Circuit to Review Whether Maritime Law Applies to Offshore Service Contract
Los Angeles Wildfires Rage on, Destroying Structures and Displacing Residents
In Colorado, Repair Vendors Can Bring First-Party Bad Faith Actions For Amounts Owed From an Insurer
Motion to Strike Insureds' Experts Denied, Claims under Fair Claims Settlement Act Survives Summary Judgment
Texas Supreme Court to Review Eight-Corners Duty-to-Defend Rule
Resurgent Housing Seen Cushioning U.S. From World Woes: Economy
Solar Power Inc. to Build 30-Megawatt Project in Inner Mongolia
Eleventh Circuit Rules That Insurer Must Defend Contractor Despite “Your Work” Exclusion, Where Damage Timing Unclear
Liebherr Claims Crane Not Cause of Brazil Stadium Construction Accident
Terminating Contracts for Convenience — “Just Because”
World’s Biggest Crane Lifts Huge Steel Ring at U.K. Nuclear Site
Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide
Recent Federal Court Decision Favors Class Action Defendants
Health Care Construction Requires Compassion, Attention to Detail and Flexibility
A Word to the Wise about Construction Defects
Construction Calamity: Risk Transfer Tips for Contractors After a Catastrophic Loss
Contractor Given a Wake-Up Call for Using a "Sham" RMO/RME
Idaho District Court Affirms Its Role as the Gatekeeper of Expert Testimony
Federal Contract Termination For Convenience
After Elections, Infrastructure Talk Stirs Again
Benefits to Insureds Under Property Insurance Policy – Concurrent Cause Doctrine
Contractor Turns Former Sears Into Interim High School Following Palisades Wildfires
Predicting Our Future with Andrew Weinreich
Judgment Proof: Reducing Litigation Exposure with Litigation Risk Insurance
Buyer Beware: Insurance Agents May Have No Duty to Sell Construction Contractors an Insurance Policy Covering Likely Claims
Texas Shortens Cut-Off Date for Suits Against Homebuilders Who Provide a 6-Year Written Warranty
World-Famous Architects Design $480,000 Gazebos for Your Backyard
Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Fire Damage Resulted from Single Occurrence
A Lien Might Just Save Your Small Construction Business
op="name">PSA: Latest Updates from AGC-VA on COVID Rules (UPDATED)
Is Equipment Installed as Part of Building Renovations a “Product” or “Construction”?
Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim Against Insurer Survives Motion to Dismiss
Loss of Use From Allegedly Improper Drainage System Triggers Defense Under CGL Policy
San Francisco Bucks U.S. Trend With Homeownership Gains
Las Vegas Partner Sarah Odia Named a 2023 Mountain States Super Lawyer Rising Star
Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2022 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars
