Surety Requiring Collateral Security Under General Agreement of Indemnity
September 08, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesIn order to procure bonds (payment and performance bonds), you need to sign a General Agreement of Indemnity (referred to as the “GAI”) with the surety (bonding company). It does not matter the surety issuing the bonds, the terms and conditions in the General Agreement of Indemnity are largely consistent. These terms and conditions are one-sided written in favor of the surety. This is because bonds are not insurance. When a surety issues such bonds, it is doing so under the premise that it will get reimbursed every penny that it incurs relative to its exposure- whether incurred in attorney’s fees, consulting costs, or remediating a default or claim under the applicable bond. The General Agreement of Indemnity is one of the most powerful contracts in construction and is a contract that is not to be taken lightly. It provides the surety numerous rights in the event of a claim.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes
May 14, 2026 —
Brandon Wright & Manuel Gurule - Lewis BrisboisNevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000.
By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3].
Reprinted courtesy of
Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and
Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois
Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com
Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com
Read the full story...
2026 Top Business Risks for Construction and Engineering Companies
May 26, 2026 —
Darren Tasker - Construction ExecutiveThe 2026 Allianz Risk Barometer revealed some surprising findings for construction and engineering businesses. Now in its fifteenth year, this
annual business risk ranking by corporate insurer
Allianz Commercial incorporates the views of 3,338 global risk management professionals on the main perils on their radar for the year.
Survey respondents included construction and engineering risk experts who identified the threats keeping them up at night. Here is how they ranked the top industry risks for 2026:
Natural Catastrophes
Natural catastrophe risk retains the top spot, with 38% of construction and engineering respondents citing this risk as their leading concern for 2026. From the insurance perspective, economic and insured losses remained high, albeit lower than the 10-year average. The evolving nature of natural catastrophes continues to pose significant challenges to businesses and the (re)insurance industry. Insured losses from natural catastrophes are set to reach $107 billion for 2025, according to Swiss Re—the sixth year in a row they have exceeded $100 billion, while economic losses are well in excess of $200 billion.
Reprinted courtesy of
Darren Tasker, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
Leaders in Dispute Resolution Need to Make Unbiased Decisions for Mediation to Succeed
March 31, 2026 —
Rick G. Erickson - Snell & WilmerAs a mediator helping to settle construction disputes and as an arbitrator deciding outcomes of these disputes, I found certain lessons to be especially helpful after graduating last summer from the Executive Education program at Harvard Kennedy School (HKS). The exceptional HKS curriculum included courses focused on negotiation strategies for multiparty disputes, decisive leadership during crisis, and human behavior affecting dispute resolution.
In particular, our HKS class debated the impact of cognitive bias in dispute resolution, and we studied a central theme that decision-making is universally scientific. That is, parties making decisions in dispute resolution exhibit and rely upon empirical factors that good mediators and decision makers should appreciate and understand. Bias, for example, can cause key players to discount persuasive witnesses, admissible evidence, and reliable expert opinions that influence the outcome of a construction dispute. Biased decision makers may also choose to withhold key information from the mediator, as though doing so will help rather than hurt what is supposed to be an objective and diplomatic process.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Rick G. Erickson, Snell & WilmerMr. Erickson may be contacted at
rerickson@swlaw.com
No Ink, No Problem: When Employees and Agents Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements
August 11, 2026 —
Jordan Heath & Jacob Morrison - ConsensusDocsArbitration is a fundamental component of modern construction contracting. Many in the industry recognize the potential benefits and protections arbitration can provide to the business in the event of a dispute. But an important question many contracts do not address is: who does the arbitration agreement cover? Does it include the business entity only, or the individuals acting on behalf of the entity?
As courts have long recognized, entities can generally only act through their employees, representatives, or agents.[1] This article discusses the circumstances in which an agent may rely on an arbitration provision entered by its employer. This is known as the agency doctrine.
Reprinted courtesy of
Jordan Heath, Associate, Jones Walker LLP and Jacob Morrison, Law Student University of Georgia, Jones Walker LLP
Read the full story...Mr. Heath may be contacted at
jheath@joneswalker.com
A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance
July 13, 2026 —
Stephen E. Irving - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Following the
Department of Labor’s 2023 Davis-Bacon rule changes, federal construction contractors faced a pressing question: not whether paying prevailing wages is required, but how far those obligations could extend. Could they reach off-site material suppliers? Delivery drivers? Contracts that omitted Davis-Bacon clauses entirely? A recent federal court decision in AGC of America v. US Department of Labor answers these questions in important ways, vacating several disputed provisions and giving contractors greater certainty when pricing, bidding, and administering federal construction projects.
The ruling addresses three aspects of the 2023 regulations that sought to extend Davis-Bacon obligations beyond their traditional scope. By vacating those provisions, the decision creates a more predictable compliance environment and reinforces an important principle: Davis-Bacon enforcement works best when contractors, workers, and regulators operate under clear, objective rules.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Mr. Irving may be contacted at
sirving@pecklaw.com
NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration
May 26, 2026 —
Levi W. Barrett & Aaron C. Schlesinger - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive.
The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs.
Reprinted courtesy of
Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com
Mr. Schlesinge
Unrelated Claims Against Architects Amount to Two Different ClaimsContractor Owed a DefenseSpecific Performance: Equitable Remedy to Enforce Affirmative ObligationThe Unwavering Un-waivable Implied Warranty of Workmanship and Habitability in ArizonaThe Project “Completion” Paradox in CaliforniaInsurer Granted Summary Judgment, in Part, After Partial Payment of ClaimWill The New U.S.-Mexico-Canada Trade Deal Calm Industry Jitters?BHA Has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports NCHV and Final Salute at 2017 WCC SeminarShoring of Problem Girders at Salesforce Transit Center Taking Longer than ExpectedUnpaid Hurricane Maria Insurance Claims, New Laws in Puerto Rico, and the Lesson for all PolicyholdersMontana Theater Threatened by Closure due to Building SafetyAre Defense Costs In Addition to Policy Limits?A Bill for an Act Concerning Workers’ Compensation – 2014 EditionWilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in 2021 Best Lawyers in America and Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch!The Other Side of the North Dakota Oil Boom: EvictionsWhy Are Developers Still Pouring Billions Into Waterlogged Miami?South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability CoverageConsequential Damages Flowing from Construction Defect Not Covered Under Florida LawVirtual Jury Trials of Construction Disputes: The Necessary Union of Both Sides of the BrainUntangling Unique Legal Issues in Modern Modular ConstructionNevada OSHA Provides Additional Requirements for Construction Employers to Address Feasibility of Social Distancing at Construction SitesCalifornia Court of Appeal Provides Clarity On What Triggers Supplemental Analysis Under California Environmental Quality ActReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (5/8/24) – Hotel Labor Disputes, a Congressional Real Estate Caucus and Freddie Mac’s New PoliciesGRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior CourtSnell & Wilmer Partner Jonathan Frank Named Winner of 2025 Connect CRE’s Lawyers in Real Estate Award A Court-Side Seat: A FACA Fight, a Carbon Pledge and Some Venue on the SCOTUS MenuMajor Changes in Commercial Construction Since 2009Florida Decides Against Adopting DaubertMid-Session Overview of Colorado’s 2017 Construction Defect Legislation Customer’s Agreement to Self-Insure and Release for Water Damage Effectively Precludes Liability of Storage Container CompanyWe've Surveyed Video Conferencing Models to See Who Fits the CCPA Bill: Here's What We FoundA Court-Side Seat: Flint Failures, Missed Deadlines, Toad Work and a Game of ChickenSurety Bond Now a Valid Performance Guarantee for NC Developers (guest post)Delaware State Court Holds that Defective Workmanship Claims do not Trigger Coverage by a Builder’s Commercial General Liability PolicyA Court-Side Seat: May Brings Federal Appellate Courts Rulings and Executive OrdersCase Alert Update: SDV Case Tabbed as One of New York’s Top Three Cases to WatchU.S. Housing Starts Exceed Estimates After a Stronger DecemberThe Cost of Overlooking Jury FeesCan a Receiver Prime and Strip Liens Against Real Property?Start-up to Streamline Large-Scale Energy RenovationSeller Faces Federal Charges for Lying on Real Estate Disclosure FormsA Survey of New Texas Environmental and Regulatory Laws Enacted in the 88th Session (Updated)Gordon & Rees Ranked #4 of Top 50 Construction Law Firms in the Nation by Construction Executive MagazineHawaii Supreme Court Reaffirms an "Accident" Includes Reckless Conduct, Finds Green House Gases are PollutantsCoverage Rejected Under Owned Property and Alienated Property ExclusionsAnother Exception to Fraud and Contract Don’t MixIs a Text a Writing?Will Maryland Beltway Developer's Exit Doom $7.6B P3 Project?Virginia Decision Emphasizes Importance of Naming All Necessary PartiesESFI Spreads Awareness of Overhead Power Line Safety With "Always Look Up" Campaignected Use of AI in Brief Writing a Stark Reminder of the Increasing Prevalence of AI
Surplus Lines Carriers Cannot Compel Arbitration in LouisianaAs California Faces Mandatory Water Use Reductions How Will the Construction Industry be Impacted?Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage CoverageNavigate the New Health and Safety Norm With Construction TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court Allows Claim Under Unfair Competition Statute To ProceedFederal Lawsuit Accuses MOX Contractors of Fraud2022 Project of the Year: Linking Los AngelesWhite House Plan Would Break Up Corps Civil-Works FunctionsIs Arbitration Okay Under the Miller Act? It Is if You Don’t Object
