Are Robotic Coworkers Soon a Reality in Construction?
March 24, 2026 —
Aarni Heiskanen - AEC BusinessGeneral-purpose humanoid robots are in the headlines, but is the hype justified? What’s the point of having a robot home assistant when it still needs a “guy behind the curtain” to control it remotely?
Despite the challenges, robots, even those that look like humans, are seriously considered as future coworkers in business environments.
According to the McKinsey report
‘Will embodied AI create robotic coworkers?‘ the idea that AI-powered robots will become general-purpose coworkers is grounded in real technological progress, but not an overnight reality.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Aarni Heiskanen, AEC BusinessMr. Heiskanen may be contacted at
aec-business@aepartners.fi
Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation
June 08, 2026 —
Lewis BrisboisThe Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys.
Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners.
The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy
July 20, 2026 —
Anna M. Perry, Rachel S. Kindseth & Nina Catanzaro - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.I. Course of Construction Exclusions
Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy.
General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party.
Reprinted courtesy of
Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.,
Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and
Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com
Read the full story...
What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction
July 13, 2026 —
Anthony LaPlaca & Luke Marston - The Construction SeytIntroduction
On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.
[1]
Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”
[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.
[3]
Reprinted courtesy of
Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and
Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com
Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com
Read the full story...
Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit
April 14, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025).
Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood.
Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
White and Williams LLP Recognized on the List of Largest Law Firms in Greater Philadelphia
March 03, 2026 —
White and Williams LLPWhite and Williams LLP was recently recognized on the list of Largest Law Firms in Greater Philadelphia by the Philadelphia Business Journal. The Firm is ranked #10 among the largest law firms in the Greater Philadelphia area.
This listing ranks over 500 law firms in the counties of Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, or Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, or Gloucester in New Jersey, and Kent or New Castle in Delaware. White and Williams has been named on the list since 2023.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
White and Williams LLP
Land Use Team Wins Appeal for Affordable Senior Housing Development in San Francisco
February 23, 2026 —
SheppardSheppard successfully defended client Mitchelville Real Estate Group and its non-profit development partner Bernal Heights Housing Corporation in an appeal of a 70-unit, 100% affordable senior housing development at 3333 Mission Street in San Francisco’s Bernal Heights neighborhood. The team secured approval of the project, representing the developer on complex land use issues including split zoning, SB 35, the State Density Bonus Law, the Housing Crisis Act, tribal cultural resources and the Subdivision Map Act. Although the ministerially approved parcel map for the project utilized SB 35, it was appealed to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and unanimously rejected. Sheppard’s real estate transactional team also assisted with the acquisition of the property.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Sheppard
Supreme Court Rules Tariffs Unconstitutional: Why the Construction Industry Shouldn’t Expect Calm Just Yet
March 31, 2026 —
Christopher Barnett - Construction ExecutiveThe U.S. Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump did what many expected: It held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. What few anticipated was the speed of what followed: Within hours of the ruling, the administration announced replacement tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, imposed a 10% global surcharge effective February 24, and signaled forthcoming Section 301 investigations against most major trading partners.
For those in the construction industry hoping the Learning Resources ruling would restore market stability, the message was unambiguous. The constitutional question may be settled, but the market disruption is not.
Reprinted courtesy of
Christopher Barnett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Trump Administration Directs Agencies to Use PLAs for Large Projects, With ExceptionsEndorsements Preclude Coverage for Alleged Faulty WorkmanshipSafety Data: Noon Presents the Hour of Greatest DangerInsurance Alert: Insurer Delay Extends Time to Repair or Replace Damaged PropertyBlurred Lines: New York Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Privileged Documents in Connection with Pre-Denial Communications Prepared by Insurer's Coverage CounselCourt of Appeal Opens Pandora’s Box on Definition of “Contractor” for Forum Selection ClausesKeeping Detailed Records: The Best Defense to Constructive EvictionASHRAE Seeks Comments by May 26 on Draft of Pathogen Mitigation StandardRulemaking to Modernize, Expand DOI’s “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment Rules Expected Fall 2023FirstEnergy Fined $3.9M in Scandal Involving Nuke PlantsFlorida's Third DCA Reasserts the Teeth of Chapter 558 and the Future of Construction Defect LitigationBrazil Congress Chiefs Deny Wrongdoing in Petrobras ScandalIdaho Construction Executive Found Guilty of Fraud and Tax EvasionQuick Note: Don’t Sue Your ArbitratorSupreme Court of Idaho Rules That Substantial Compliance With the Notice and Opportunity to Repair Act Suffices to Bring SuitOregon Supreme Court Provides Much-Needed Clarity on the State’s Law Regarding Whether Damage from Construction Defect Constitutes An “Occurrence”Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2025 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising StarsApartment Building Damaged by Cable Installer’s Cherry PickerMontana Federal District Court Finds for Insurer in Pollution Coverage DisputeCurtain Wall Suppliers Claim Rival Duplicated Unique SystemGRSM Named Among 2025 “Best Law Firms” by Best LawyersProduct Manufacturers Beware: You May Be Subject to Jurisdiction in MassachusettsCourt Compels Appraisal Although Coverage Issues ExistDenial of Motion to Dissolve Lis Pendens Does Not Automatically Create Basis for Certiorari ReliefReversing Itself, Alabama Supreme Court Finds Construction Defect is An OccurrencePJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load DemandHomebuyers Get Break as Loan Rates Defy Fed Tapering: MortgagesNew Home for the Aged Suffers Construction DefectsForce Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) PandemicNo Rest for the Weary: Project Completion Is the Beginning of LitigationMandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .Pursuing Claims for Loss Caused by Recent Kona Low Storms for Homeowners and BusinessesU.S. Homeownership Rate Falls to Lowest Since Early 19955 Questions about New York's Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure ActRainwater Collecting on Rooftop is not Subject to Policy's Flood SublimitsEfficient Proximate Cause Applies to Policy's Collapse ProvisionsVoluntary Payments Affirmative Defense Does Not Apply in Contract CasesColorado’s Housing Crisis: How S.B. 25-131 Could Be a Step in the Right DirectionContract Change #9: Owner’s Right to Carry Out the Work (law note)Fifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect DecisionBest Practices in Construction– What are Yours?First-Party Statutory Bad Faith – 60 Days to Cure Means 60 Days to CureMediation Success – Strategies for Avoiding Prolonged Litigation and Getting To “Settled”The Impact of the IIJA and Amended Buy American Act on the Construction IndustryYellen Has Scant Power to Relieve U.S. Housing SlowdownCorps of Engineers to Prepare EIS for Permit to Construct Power Lines Over Historic James RiverThree Firm Members Are Top 100 Super Lawyers & Ten Are Recognized As Super Lawyers Or Rising Stars In 2018The Court Rules in Favor of Partners Benjamin Price and Ajay Ahluwalia’s Arbitration Ruling Awarding Damages!Travelers’ 3rd Circ. Win Curbs Insurers’ Asbestos ExposureConstruction Employment Rises in Half of the StatesOrion Group Holdings Honored with Leadership in Safety Award
