BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    When “Substantially Similar” Means “Fundamentally Identical”: Delaware Court Enforces Related Claim Provision to Deny D&O Coverage for Securities Class Action

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Kept Climbing in January

    Louisiana Couple Sues over Defects in Foreclosed Home

    Subcontractors Have Remedies, Even if “Pay-if-Paid” Provisions are Enforced

    Terminating Contracts for Convenience — “Just Because”

    Dispute Resolution Provision in Subcontract that Says Owner, Architect or Engineer’s Decision Is Final

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    Kiewit-Turner Stops Work on VA Project—Now What?

    California Court Invokes Equity to Stretch Anti-Subrogation Rule Principles

    Florida Project Could Help Address Runoff, Algae Blooms

    Florida Passes Tort Reform Bill

    Bad News for Buyers: U.S. Mortgage Rates Hit Highest Since 2014

    Insurers Get “Floored” by Court of Appeals Regarding the Presumptive Measure of Damages in Consent Judgments

    Measure Of Damages for Breach of Construction Contract

    Florida Lien Law and Substantial Compliance vs. Strict Compliance

    School District Settles Over Defective Athletic Field

    OIRA Best Practices for Administrative Enforcement and Adjudicative Actions

    Industry Groups Decry Jan. 6 Riot; DOT Chief Chao Steps Down in Protest

    Forecast Sunny for Solar Contractors in California

    Japan Quake Triggers Landslides, Knocks Power Plant Offline

    Near-Zero Carbon Cement Powers Sustainable 3D-Printed Homes

    Mercury News Editorial Calls for Investigation of Bay Bridge Construction

    Newmeyer Dillion Named One of "The Best Places To Work In Orange County" by Orange County Business Journal

    No Ink, No Problem: When Employees and Agents Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements

    Expert Excluded After Never Viewing Damaged Property

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Goldberg Segalla Welcomes William L. Nimick

    Property Damage, Occurrences, Delays, Offsets and Fees. California Decision is a Smorgasbord of Construction Insurance Issues

    Federal Court Rejects Insurer's Argument that Wisconsin Has Adopted the Manifestation Trigger for Property Policy

    Subcontractor Not Estopped from Enforcing Lien Not Listed In Bankruptcy Petition

    Kahana Feld Partner Dominic Donato Receives a Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss

    Delays in Filing Lead to Dismissal in Moisture Intrusion Lawsuit

    Construction Defects Are Not An Occurrence Under New York, New Jersey Law

    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Recognized as Largest Litigation Presence in Sacramento

    Newmeyer & Dillion Partner Aaron Lovaas & Casey Quinn Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Bank Sues over Defective Windows

    Jury Awards Aluminum Company 35 Million in Time Element Losses

    Kahana Feld Texas Team Obtains a Summary Judgment Motion

    What I Learned at My First NAWIC National Conference

    U.K. Construction Growth Unexpectedly Accelerated in January

    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor

    How to Document Changes and Preserve Claims Without Starting a Fight

    Granting Stay, Federal Court Reviews Construction Defect Coverage in Hawaii

    What You Don’t Know About Construction Law Can Hurt Your Engineering Firm (Law Note)

    Structuring Water Resilience for Data Center Development: Water Rights, Reuse Incentives, and Emerging Disclosure Risk

    It’s Time to Start Planning for Implementation of OSHA’s Silica Rule

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (2/21/24) – Fed Chair Predicts More Small Bank Closures, Shopping Center Vacancies Hit 15-year Low, and Proptech Sees Mixed Results

    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    Specific Performance of an Option Contract to Purchase Real Property is Barred Absent Agreement on All Material Terms

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related trial support and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim region.

    Anaheim California civil engineering expert witnessAnaheim California construction defect expert witnessAnaheim California expert witness windowsAnaheim California consulting engineersAnaheim California roofing and waterproofing expert witnessAnaheim California construction expert testimonyAnaheim California testifying construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Court Denies Cross Summary Judgment Motions on Coverage for Odors in Newly Purchased Home

    October 06, 2026 —
    The federal district court denied cross motions seeking to establish whether the policy covered damage due to smells in the insureds’ newly purchased home. Akina v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S Dist. LEXIS 162817 (W. D. Wash. July 22, 2026). Plaintiffs bought a home in May 2024 but never conducted an inspection before purchasing the property. Before moving in, plaintiffs secured a homeowners’ polilcy from State Farm. After moving in, plaintiffs began noticing smells in the house and started suffering from health symptoms. Plaintiffs learned from neighbors that the prior occupants had been witnessed in “drug activity.” Plaintiffs moved out of the house and had testing done. The home tested positive for methamphetamine pollution. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    373 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    October 06, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 373 of the firm’s attorneys were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® including the prestigious “Lawyer of the Year” honors, and “Ones to Watch” list. Attorneys listed as Ones to Watch typically have been in practice for five to nine years. “Lawyer of the Year” recognition is awarded to individual lawyers with the highest overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic region. Only one lawyer is recognized for each practice area and location. The following Snell & Wilmer attorneys were named 2027 “Lawyer of the Year” award recipients: Cortland P. Andrews, Troy J. Aramburu, Brian L. Blaylock, M. Lawrence Brown, Brian D. Cunningham, Michael M. Donahey, Jason Ebe, Matthew P. Fischer, Brett W. Johnson, Nathan G. Kanute, William A. Kastin, Timothy J. Kay, James D. Kilroy, Joseph A. Kroeger, Matthew L. Lalli, John F. Lomax, Anne M. Meyer, Robin L. Miskell, Patrick J. Paul, Amit D. Ranade, and M. Roxanne Veliz. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Emerging Issues in Construction CGL Insurance Part 2: The Separation of Insureds and Additional Insured Interests

    September 29, 2026 —
    Many coverage disputes hinge on first principles—the fundamentals of insurance —rather than the minutiae. Unfortunately, the basic anatomy of insurance policies can get lost sometimes when parties are laser-focused on a particular term or set of circumstances. This is true not just in disputes, but also when writing coverage. One of the fundamentals that is commonly misunderstood and overlooked—but which is absolutely critical to the intended operation of insurance coverage—is what is commonly known as the “separation of insureds.” The “separation of insureds” is the concept that each “insured” under a policy are referred to and treated differently, and most of all that the distinctions matter. The concept is usually included as a condition in the policy. It embodies the requirement that the policy applies to each insured distinctly from how it applies to other insureds. The ISO Form CGL policies specifically state that they apply “[s]eparately to each insured against whom a claim is made or ‘suit’ is brought.” The separate and distinct treatment of insureds is more critical in construction operations than anywhere else. This distinction is essential to ensure coverage works as intended, especially when contracted operations are involved, because the policy must insure the subcontractor that purchased the policy, the general contractor who hired the subcontractor, and the owner that hired the general contractor. Even small modifications can easily frustrate the intent of the parties. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at eric.clarkson@sdvfenchurch.us

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Southwest Super Lawyers Recognizes 50 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    PHOENIX (April 22, 2026) – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 50 attorneys in the Phoenix and Tucson offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers publication. Of those 50, four were recognized for the first time and 24 were recognized as Southwest Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. Super Lawyers was first published in 1991 by Law & Politics and was acquired by Thomson Reuters, Legal in February 2010. Thomson Reuters is a leading source of information for businesses and professionals. The below Snell & Wilmer attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers rankings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    June 08, 2026 —
    The Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys. Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners. The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    September 15, 2026 —
    A $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    May 05, 2026 —
    I was a T.A. for my high school history teacher, a really smart and nice guy, Mr. Reynolds. In the room at the back of the classroom which served as his office he had the picture above. It’s called “My Wife and My Mother-in-Law” and is taken from a German postcard from 1888. Depending on how you look it, you might see fashionable young lady, or an old lady. Cases can sometimes be like that: You see what you want to see. The next case is also like that. In Lorenzo v. Calex Engineering, Inc., 110 Cal.App.5th 49 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeals reversed a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of an owner and its contractors in a case involving the death of two minors struck by a dump truck enroute to a non-permitted off-site staging area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com