BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water

    Partner Patrick Au Achieves a Major Arbitration Result on a Redevelopment Project in Downtown Los Angeles!

    Hawaii Supreme Court Construes Designated Premises Endorsement In Insured's Favor

    Coverage for Injury to Insured’s Employee Not Covered

    Insureds Prevail on Summary Judgment Addressing Responsibility for Water Leak

    Expert Excluded After Never Viewing Damaged Property

    Venue for Miller Act Payment Bond When Project is Outside of Us

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2021

    Home Prices Up, Inventory Down

    “Good Faith” May Not Be Good Enough: California Supreme Court to Decide When General Contractors Can Withhold Retention

    NYC’s Developers Plow Ahead With Ambitious Plans to Reshape City

    Some Work Cannot be Included in a Miller Act Claim

    Force Majeure, Construction Delays, Labor Shortages and COVID-19

    Justin Bieber’s Unpaid Construction Bill Stalls House Sale

    There Was No Housing Bubble in 2008 and There Isn’t One Now

    Progress, Property, and Privacy: Discussing Human-Led Infrastructure with Jeff Schumacher

    California Joins the Majority of States in Modifying Its Survival Action Statute To Now Permit Recovery for Pain, Suffering And Disfigurement

    Workers Compensation Insurance: Dangers of the Audit Process

    Engineer Pauses Fix of 'Sinking' Millennium Tower in San Francisco

    PSA: New COVID Vaccine ETS Issued by OSHA

    Catching Killer Clauses in Contract Negotiations

    Smart Construction and the Future of the Construction Industry

    The Contributors to This Blog Are Pleased to Announce That….

    MGM Seeks to Demolish Harmon Towers

    Appeals Court Affirms Civil Engineer Owes No Duty of Care to General Contractor

    Let’s Get Surety Podcast – #126 Building the Future: AI, Construction and Law

    Wildfire Risks Elevated for US Plains Due to Drought Conditions

    Another (Insurer) Bites The Dust: Virginia District Court Rejects Narrow Reading of Pollution Exclusion

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denies Review of Pro-Policy Decision

    Florida High-Rise for Sale, Construction Defects Possibly Included

    Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Injury To Subcontractor's Employee

    Gen Xers Choose to Rent rather than Buy

    No Repeal Process for Rejected Superstorm Sandy Grant Applications

    Storm Eunice Damage in U.K. Could Top £300 Million

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Indeed, You Just Design ‘Em”

    Wichita Condo Association Files Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/10/24) – New Type of Nuclear Reactor, Big Money Surrounding Sports Stadiums, and Positivity from Fannie Mae’s Monthly Consumer Survey

    Saudi Prince’s Megacity Shows Signs of Life

    Unravel the Facts Before Asserting FDUTPA and Tortious Interference Claims

    Last Call: Tokyo Iconic Okura Hotel Meets the Wrecking Ball

    Ruling Finds Builder and Owners at Fault in Construction Defect Case

    Contractor Side Deals Can Waive Rights

    The Pandemic, Proposed Federal Privacy Regulation and the CCPA

    Port Authority Approves Subsidies for 2 World Trade Project

    ASCE's Architectural Engineering Institute Announces Winners of 2021 AEI Professional Project Award

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/15/23) – Manufacturing Soars with CHIPS Act, New Threats to U.S. Infrastructure and AI Innovation for One Company

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 6: Ensuring Availability of Insurance and State Regulations

    Elizabeth Lofts Condo Owners Settle with Plumbing Supplier

    President Trump Announces New Steel Tariffs

    Another Guilty Plea In Nevada Construction Defect Fraud Case
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction claims related expert witness designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing in house resources which include credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Anaheim region.

    Anaheim California construction code expert witnessAnaheim California soil failure expert witnessAnaheim California consulting engineersAnaheim California expert witness commercial buildingsAnaheim California consulting architect expert witnessAnaheim California civil engineer expert witnessAnaheim California multi family design expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Federal Court Highlights the Strategic Value of Additional Insured Coverage

    June 22, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the District of Maryland underscores a recurring—but often underutilized—opportunity for policyholders: securing and enforcing additional insured coverage under another party’s liability policy. In Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. v. Builders Premier Insurance Co., the court held that an equipment lessor qualified as an additional insured under the lessee’s policy and was entitled to a primary defense. The decision is a useful reminder that additional insured coverage can fundamentally shift defense obligations and materially reduce a policyholder’s exposure. We build on the decision to highlight the practical steps policyholders should take to ensure that all potentially available insurance is identified and pursued. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Contractor Entitled to Defense Under Subcontractor’s Policy

    March 10, 2026 —
    The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the contractor’s insurer finding that the sumcontractor’s insurer had a duty to defend the contractor. Navigators Specialty Ins. Co. v. TBR Construction, LLC, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2177 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025). Greenscape Homes, LLC was the general contractor for a residential development. Greenscape hired TBR Construction, LLC as a carpentry-framing subcontractor pursuant to a “Trade Contractor Agreement.” The Trade Agreement required TBR to name Greenscape as an additional insured. TBR was insured by Utica. Greenscape was insured by Navigators. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Parking Garage Partially Collapses in Dearborn, Mich., Trapping One

    March 31, 2026 —
    A multi-level parking garage that partially collapsed in Dearborn, Mich., is fenced off and the city has started the legal process allowed under state law to demolish the privately-owned structure due to alleged dangerous conditions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    How AI Turns Construction Documents Into Procurement Intelligence

    May 05, 2026 —
    MEP equipment accounts for up to 40% of costs on data center or hospital projects, has lead times ranging from 20 weeks to over a year, and has historically been the most underserved area in construction software. In this episode, I speak with Victor Muchiri from BuildVision about what it actually takes to make AI useful in construction procurement, not as a pilot, but in production. We dig into why you cannot simply upload a set of construction drawings to ChatGPT and trust the output. Construction documents are complex, cross-referenced, and consequential. Without deep domain context, such as manufacturer ontologies, equipment taxonomies, and engineering expertise, AI produces plausible results, not reliable ones. BuildVision’s approach is to act as a harness around AI models, wrapping them in construction-specific knowledge so the output can be trusted for real procurement decisions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Congratulations to Reno Partner Karen Baytosh for Securing a Complete Dismissal via a Motion for Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    BWB&O is proud to announce that Reno Partner Karen Baytosh received a significant victory on behalf of the firm’s Developer Client in a high-exposure personal injury matter. Plaintiff, a teenager, was struck by an intoxicated driver while walking her dog at night, sustaining catastrophic injuries requiring 24-hour critical care for the remainder of her life. Plaintiff’s Guardian brought suit against the drunk driver and her husband, the City, and BWB&O’s Developer Clients, alleging that the City and Developers failed to improve street lighting and install a sidewalk that would have prevented the accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    When Rule 702 Motions Fail: A Close Look at AECOM v. Flatiron

    February 02, 2026 —
    In AECOM Tech. Servs., Inc. v. Flatiron | AECOM, LLC, 2024 WL 22640 (D. Colo. 2024), the United States District Court for the District of Colorado addressed when expert testimony is not subject to be limited or excluded pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Background In 2015, AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (“AECOM”) and Flatiron | AECOM, LLC (“Flatiron”) entered into an agreement, in which they agreed to work together to assemble a design/build team for the purposes of submitting a proposal to the Colorado Department of Transportation’s (“CDOT”) construction project known as C-470 Tolled Express Lanes Segment 1 Design-Build Project (the “Project”). AECOM provided the design and engineering services, and Flatiron submitted the proposal to CDOT. On or about June 16, 2016, CDOT awarded Flatiron the Project. Flatiron later claimed that AECOM’s design failed to follow basic engineering and project requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Cross-Office Team Secures Litigation Stay and Order of Arbitration on Behalf of Hotel Developer

    February 17, 2026 —
    New York Partner Minyao Wang, Chicago Partner Bryan Sugar, and Denver/Washington, D.C. Partner Christopher Wood secured a victory on behalf of Lewis Brisbois’ client, a hotel developer, when the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois granted the client’s motion to dismiss and ordered the parties to proceed to arbitration. In this matter, the 39 plaintiffs, represented by a New York based law firm that focuses on EB-5 litigation against high-end real estate developers, were foreign nationals living in China or Taiwan who were seeking EB-5 visas and invested in a lending company. The lending company loaned money to entities that were managing a project that involved renovating a hotel and constructing a mixed-use tower in downtown Chicago. Disputes developed among the parties. The foreign investors organized informally and ultimately filed suit against Lewis Brisbois’ client, alleging claims of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, conversion, and conspiracy, as well as aiding and abetting conversion. The defendants faced exposure of at least $20 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois