Angela Zanin Featured in LACBA List of Women’s History Month Honorees
March 17, 2026 —
Lewis Brisbois NewsroomLos Angeles Partner Angela Zanin was recently honored for her leadership and diversity initiatives in the California legal community by the Los Angeles County Bar Association (LACBA) as part of the organization’s Women’s History Month initiative.
LACBA highlighted Ms. Zanin’s efforts in the community. After serving as President of the Italian American Lawyers Association (IALA) in 2023, she co-founded the Los Angeles County Unity Bar (LACUB), an alliance of bar associations dedicated to promoting diversity in the judiciary. Consisting of ten member organizations, the LACUB takes pride in its endorsement of over 40 candidates appointed to the California Court of Appeal, U.S. District Courts, Los Angeles Superior Court, and Orange County Superior Court.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Delay Matters: Florida’s Fourth DCA Reverses Hurricane Irma Dismissal
June 08, 2026 —
Andrea DeField, Machaella Reisman & Cary D. Steklof - Hunton Insurance Recovery BlogThe mantra “delay, deny, defend” is frequently referenced in discussions of insurance claims handling, though insurers will invariably disavow these tactics. While it would be facially improper for an insurer to delay a coverage decision to gain a tactical advantage, empirical examples nonetheless exist. This very dynamic was addressed by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals when it handed policyholders a win in
Hypoluxo Mariner’s Cay Condo. Assoc’n, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 4D2024‑2250 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 1, 2026), reversing a trial court order dismissing a condominium association’s Hurricane Irma coverage lawsuit against its property insurer.
Delay to Run the Statute of Limitations
Following Hurricane Irma, a condominium association suffered roof and exterior envelope damage, reported an insurance claim, and submitted a sworn proof of loss to its property insurer in compliance with Florida Statute § 627.70132 (2020). The statute establishes a timeframe within which a policyholder must submit a claim for hurricane damage.
Reprinted courtesy of
Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP,
Machaella Reisman, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and
Cary D. Steklof, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com
Ms. Reisman may be contacted at reismanm@hunton.com
Mr. Steklof may be contacted at csteklof@hunton.com
Read the full story...
Tampa Team Obtains Highly Favorable Verdict for Property Owner Client in Lawsuit over Traffic Accident
March 24, 2026 —
Lewis Brisbois NewsroomTampa Managing Partner John Rine and Partner Nick Dareneau obtained a very favorable verdict for their property owner client in a Sarasota County trial in a lawsuit arising from a traffic accident. At the end of closing arguments, plaintiff’s counsel requested appropriately $18 million from the jury. The jury returned a net verdict of just over a thousand dollars.
The plaintiff was on a scooter and was involved in an accident with an SUV in a parking lot intersection. Our firm represented the property owner. The plaintiffs argued that the landscape vegetation was too tall and violated the sight lines of the two drivers, and that the height of the shrubbery violated the owner’s landscaping contract and a local sight line ordinance. They also argued that the intersection lacked a stop sign in contrast to the other six parking lot entrances, which had stop signs.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Research Illuminates Pollution Problem in Tijuana River Valley
June 29, 2026 —
Jeff Yoders - Engineering News-RecordThe Tijuana River watershed between southern California and northern Mexico has been the epicenter of an environmental and public health crisis for more than two decades. Since October 2023 alone, more than 31 billion gallons of raw sewage and polluted water have flowed into the U.S. and, eventually, the Pacific Ocean.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Jeff Yoders, Engineering News-RecordMr. Yoders may be contacted at
yodersj@enr.com
Surety Liability Is Coextensive with Its Bond Principal
April 14, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesA recent Miller act payment bond case, U.S. f/u/b/o Whitetail General Constructors v. Northcon, Inc., 2026 WL 46671 (D.Mont. 2026), contains a short noteworthy discussion as to a surety’s liability being coextensive with that of its bond principal. If you are bonded, or you are pursuing a bond, you need to appreciate this, which is why this is a noteworthy discussion:
A “surety’s liability on a Miller Act bond must be at least coextensive with the obligations imposed by the Act if the bond is to have its intended effect.” “Therefore, ‘the liability of a surety and its principal on a Miller Act payment bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of the principal only to the extent that it is consistent with the rights and obligations created under the Miller Act.’” In other words, “[w]here a subcontract’s terms are consistent with the Miller Act’s provisions, the surety’s liability on the Miller Act bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of its princip[al].”
“The liability of a surety under the Miller Act is controlled by federal law, rather than state contract law[.]” The court may, however, “look to state law when interpreting contractual provisions” in a Miller Act case.
“[T]he measure of recovery under the Miller Act is generally determined by the terms of the subcontract [or underlying contract].”
Northcon, supra, at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment
June 08, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026).
On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment
August 03, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding no bad faith despite the appraisal award exceeding the amount the insurer initially paid. Jazi Kat 4659 Rockridge LLC, et al. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105634 (D. Ariz. May 13, 2026).
Plaintiffs sued Travelers for breach of contract and bad faith, alleging that Travelers failed to pay money plaintiffs were owed under the policy. Plaintiffs held a commercial property policy for two properties. A fire destroyed one of the properties. Travelers adjusted the claim and issued two payments. Plaintiffs disagreed with the amount of the payments and demanded an appraisal. Travelers agreed to the appraisal.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Seattle’s Residential Zoning Transformation: What Property Owners, Buyers, and Investors Should Understand
May 14, 2026 —
Lawrence S. Glosser - Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCSeattle is in the midst of a significant transformation in residential land use policy. Longstanding neighborhood zoning patterns that historically favored detached single-family development are being reexamined in response to housing supply pressures, affordability concerns, and evolving state mandates.
For homeowners, purchasers, investors, and builders, these changes may create substantial new opportunities. They also create a heightened need for careful legal and practical due diligence.
While zoning reform can expand potential uses of property, it does not eliminate the many other constraints that may still govern what can actually be built.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lawrence S. Glosser, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCMr. Gl
2023 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect SeminarWhen is Mediation Appropriate for Your Construction Case?Federal Judge Refuses to Limit Coverage and Moves Forward with Policyholder’s Claims Against Insurer and BrokerHow One Squirrel Taught us a Surprising Amount about Insurance Investigation Lessons Learned from the Iowa Supreme CourtArizona Court of Appeals Awards Attorneys’ Fees in Quiet-Title ActionBlog Completes Seventeenth YearNuclear Fusion Pushes to Reach Commercial Power Plant StageDrop in Civil Trials May Cause Problems for Construction Defect CasesWater Alone is Not Property Damage under a CGL policy in ConnecticutHyundai to Pay 47M to Settle Construction Equipment's Alleged Clean Air ViolationsTraub Lieberman Partner Eric D. Suben and Associate Laura Puhala Win Summary Judgment in Favor of Insurer, Determining it has No Duty to Defend#2 CDJ Topic: Valley Crest Landscape v. Mission PoolsPennsylvania Superior Court Fires up a Case-By-Case Analysis for Landlord-Tenant, Implied Co-Insured QuestionsMeet BWB&O’s Super Lawyers Rising Stars in Colorado!Texas Supreme Court Rules That Subsequent Purchaser of Home Is Bound by Original Homeowner’s Arbitration Agreement With BuilderToward Increased Citizen Engagement in Urban PlanningBuilding Inspector Refuses to State Why Apartments CondemnedNewmeyer & Dillion Announces New Partner Bahaar CadambiQuick Note: Liability Insurer’s Duty to Defend and Duty to IndemnifyJust Because You Can, Doesn’t Mean You Should. The “Retained Control” Exception to the Privette DoctrineIn Contracts, One Word Makes All the DifferenceIn Matter of First Impression, California Appellate Court Finds a Claim for a Real Estate Professional’s Breach of Fiduciary Duty is AssignableBalancing Tradition and Technology in Bringing AI to AECPremises Liability: Everything You Need to KnowU.S. Homeowners Are Lingering Longer, and the Wait Is Paying OffTimely Filed, Wrongly Rejected: Court of Appeal Reinforces Summary Judgment RightsThe Administrative Procedure Act and the Evolution of Environmental LawBuilders Beware: A New Class Of Defendants In Asbestos LawsuitsHistorical Long-Tail Claims in California Subject to a Vertical Exhaustion RuleHuh? Action on Construction Lien “Relates Back” Despite Notice of Contest of LienGilbane Project Exec Completes His Mission Against the OddsOSHA Again Pushes Back Record-Keeping Rule DeadlineHaight Expands California Reach – Opens Office in SacramentoFrench Government Fines National Architects' Group $1.6M Over Fee-FixingNegligent Inspection Claim Against Supervising Design Professional / ConsultantBusiness Risk Exclusions (j) 5 and (j) 6 Found AmbiguousResearch Institute: A Shared Information Platform Reduces Construction Costs ConsiderablyBuilding Industry Association of Southern California Announces 2025 Legends NomineesChina Construction Bank Sued in US Over Reinsurance Fraud LossesNew York Team’s Win Limits Scope of Property Owners’ Duties to Workers for Hazards Inherent in Their WorkRepairing One’s Own Work and the one Year Statute of Limitations to Sue a Miller Act Payment BondThe Ups and Downs of Elevator Maintenance Contractor's Policy LimitsCrisis Averted! Pennsylvania Supreme Court Joins Other Courts in Finding that Covid-19 Presents No Physical Loss or Damage for BusinessesCourt Grants Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment After Insured Fails to Provide Evidence of Systemic CollapseConnecting IoT Data to BIMCC&Rs Not the Place for Arbitration Agreement, Court RulesClient Alert: Stipulated Judgment For Full Amount Of Underlying Claim As Security For Compromise Settlement Void As Unenforceable PenaltyIt Was a Wild Week for Just About Everyone. Ok, Make that Everyone. Badly Constructed Masonry Walls Not an Occurrence in Arkansas LawDistrict Court of Missouri Limits Whining About the Scope of Waiver of Subrogation Clauses in Wine Storage AgreementsGiving Insurance Carrier Prompt Notice of Claim to Avoid “Untimely Notice” Defenses=575106540">
Include Contract Clauses for Protection Against Ever-Evolving Construction ChallengesFifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect DecisionContractor Succeeds At the Supreme Court Against Public Owner – Obtaining Fee Award and Determination The City Acted In Bad FaithMaui Wildfire Cleanup Advances to Debris Removal PhaseContractor Gets Green Light to Fix Two Fractured Girders at Salesforce Transit CenterA Networked World of BuildingsCDJ’s #6 Topic of the Year: Does Colorado Need Construction Defect Legislation to Spur Affordable Home Development?Accounting for Payments on Projects Became Even More Crucial This Year
