BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 building and claims related expert witness designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which include licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim region.

    Anaheim California eifs expert witnessAnaheim California construction claims expert witnessAnaheim California civil engineering expert witnessAnaheim California roofing construction expertAnaheim California fenestration expert witnessAnaheim California slope failure expert witnessAnaheim California building expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    White and Williams LLP Attorneys Recognized as PA and DE Super Lawyers

    July 06, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to announce that eight attorneys in the firm’s Philadelphia office and one attorney in the firm's Delaware Office have been recognized on the 2026 Super Lawyers® and Rising Star lists. This recognition highlights our attorney's exceptional legal acumen and their commitment to client service excellence. Lawyers are selected for inclusion in Pennsylvania and Delaware Area Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars through a process that considers independent research, peer recognition and the professional achievements of attorneys from more than 70 practice areas. Approximately 2.5% of lawyers in each state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers® to receive this honor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Managing Rising Costs and Shifting Legal Risk for Florida High-Rise and Condominium Projects

    May 05, 2026 —
    Florida's construction defect landscape is experiencing a major shift. The convergence of material and labor cost volatility, regulatory tightening, and increasingly complex litigation strategies is forcing associations, developers, and their counsel to rethink how they approach risk management and dispute resolution. For those managing large-scale condo and high-rise projects, the stakes have never been higher. The Cost Volatility Trap Construction material prices rose at a "staggering" 12.6% annualized rate during the first two months of 2026, according to recent industry analysis. Tariff impacts are projected to lead to more increases of 5.4% to 6.8%, depending on property type. For associations facing construction defect claims, this volatility creates a cascading problem: repair scopes defined two years ago are now dramatically underpriced, and damage calculations that appeared reasonable at discovery are obsolete by the time of settlement. Courts and mediators are increasingly scrutinizing how cost estimates were developed and whether they account for existing market circumstances. Associations must now commission updated repair assessments more frequently, a practice that increases investigation costs but strengthens the credibility of damage claims. Conversely, defendants are weaponizing cost inflation as a defense, arguing that claimed damages are speculative or inflated. The practical result: repair sequencing and phasing strategies have become critical litigation tools. Associations that can demonstrate a rational, cost-effective repair plan tied to current market data are more favorably placed in settlement negotiations. Regulatory Pressure and Deliberate Timing Florida's 2026 condo compliance regime has significantly changed the defect claims landscape. Elevated transparency requirements, stricter reserve funding mandates, and tightened building safety inspection protocols mean that associations now face dual pressures: Comply with new regulations while simultaneously handling construction defect exposure. This regulatory environment is changing investigation and documentation strategy. Associations that delay defect investigation to avoid triggering reserve funding obligations or disclosure requirements are taking on considerable legal risk. Recent case law such as the Third District Court of Appeal's reaffirmation of Chapter 558's pre-suit mediation requirements, underscores Florida's intent to resolve disputes early. Associations that move deliberately and record carefully during the pre-suit phase gain leverage in mediation and reduce the risk of expensive litigation. Timing also intersects with repair sequencing. Associations must now balance the urgency of compliance inspections against the strategic advantage of phased repairs. Some associations are using compliance deadlines as a forcing mechanism to accelerate settlement discussions, while others are sequencing repairs to demonstrate good-faith remediation efforts before litigation commences. The Emerging Risk Transfer Challenge As construction defect claims grow more complex and costly, the traditional risk transfer systems, such as design-build warranties, contractor bonds, and insurance, are proving inadequate. Developers and general contractors are increasingly shifting risk to subcontractors and material suppliers, fragmenting liability and complicating recovery efforts for associations. Permitting and approval friction is also creating new litigation pressure points. Delays in municipal approvals, changes to building code interpretations, and disputes over remedial work compliance continue to spawn collateral claims that go beyond the original defect. Associations must now anticipate not only defect liability but also regulatory compliance disputes with municipalities, creating a dual-front legal challenge. For large communities, this means reconsidering the entire risk architecture. Insurance carriers are tightening coverage, and traditional indemnification chains are breaking down. Forward-thinking associations are engaging counsel earlier in the development process to negotiate clearer risk allocation provisions and more robust insurance requirements. Taking a Data-Driven Approach Managing rising costs and shifting legal risk in Florida's high-rise and condo market requires a more sophisticated, data-driven approach. Associations must commission frequent cost updates, move deliberately through pre-suit investigation and mediation, and challenge traditional assumptions about risk transfer. Developers and their counsel should view regulatory compliance not as a burden but as an opportunity to demonstrate good-faith risk management and strengthen settlement positioning. The firms and associations that succeed in 2026 will be those that treat cost volatility, regulatory change, and litigation strategy not as separate challenges but as linked elements of a coherent risk management framework. Stephen Hauptman is special counsel in Ball Janik LLP’s Fort Lauderdale office. He may be reached at shauptman@balljanik.com.

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    May 05, 2026 —
    The court denied the insured’s motion for summary judgment finding genuine issues of fact regarding implication of the policy’s ensuing loss provision. Stella Prop. Dev.. & Event Productions, LLC v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15854 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2026). Stella owned a cultural center that was insured under a commercial property all-risk policy issued by Auto-Owners. A windstorm with gusts of 65 miles per hour struck the Center causing damage. The Center’s inspector found extensive wind damage on nearly all facets of the roof. Further, the inspector found the existing organic shingles were in “very poor condition” and were “defective, discontinued, and no longer available.” The estimated cost of repairs to the roof was $108,010.52. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    August 11, 2026 —
    BuiltWorlds published its 2026 Robotics Top 50 this summer, and the list is genuinely wide. Fifty solutions across nine categories, from 3D printing and prefabricated component manufacturing to earthmoving, demolition, material transport, layout, installation, inspection, and drilling. The honorees come from sixteen countries. It looks like robotics has finally spread across the whole project lifecycle. However, having vendors in nine categories does not mean that contractors are robotizing their work en masse. Zacua Ventures, in its 2026 construction robotics report, estimates that on-site robotics accounted for less than 0.03% of global construction spending in 2025. Zacua says: “That is not a failed market. It is a market at the beginning of an adoption S-curve”, while warning that its estimates rest on private vendor data and may be high if vendors overstate how widely their machines are deployed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Endorsement is Void Where Compliance is Impossible

    September 21, 2026 —
    The Sixth Circuit found that the insured’s loss of property due to fire was covered despite noncompliance with an endorsement requiring encompassing the property. 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mut Group, Inc., et al., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19156 (6th Cir. June 29, 2026). The insured, 3371 Reading, owned a building undergoing renovation. After the structure burned down, 3371 Reading made a claim under its policy with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. Ohio Casualty relied on an endorsement requiring fencing round the jobsite. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.comYear and a Half Old Las Vegas VA Emergency Room Gets Rebuilt

    The Importance of Preliminary Notices on Private Works Projects

    AI-Powered Construction Optioneering Today

    Unions Win Prevailing Wage Challenge Brought By Charter Cities: Next Stop The Supreme Court?

    New Executive Orders Expedite the Need for Contractors to Go Green

    Haight Welcomes Robert S. Rucci

    A Contract Is a Contract: Releases and Change Orders / Bilateral Modifications Are Construed as Contracts

    Contractor Owed a Defense

    Wait! Don’t Sign Yet: Reviewing Contract Protections During the COVID Pandemic

    $5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon Townhomes

    Power Hungry: AI-Fueled Data Center Boom Sets Energy Delivery’s New Course

    A WARNing for Companies

    Women Make Their Mark on Construction Leadership

    Cliff White Expands Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team

    Avoiding Disaster Due to Improper Licensing

    My Employees Could Have COVID-19. What Now?

    The New Jersey Theme Park Where Kids’ Backhoe Dreams Come True

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    California Ballot Initiative Seeks to Repeal Infrastructure Funding Bill

    How the Cumulative Impact Theory has been Defined

    Congress Relaxes Several PPP Loan Requirements

    Massachusetts Construction Industry Continues to Wait While Prompt Payment Law Is Put to the Test

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/1/26) – President Trump’s EO Affects Federal Funding, Fannie Mae Accepts Crypto-Backed Mortgages, Private Sector Construction Weakness Offsets Public Sector Gains

    Denver Council Committee Approves Construction Defects Ordinance

    Nebraska Court Ruling Backs Latest Keystone XL Pipeline Route

    Narrow Promissory Estoppel Exception to Create Insurance Coverage

    Los Angeles Recovery Crews Begin to Mobilize as Wildfires Continue to Burn

    Chattanooga Bridge Collapse Likely Resulted From Impact

    How Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court Decision Affects Coverage of Faulty Workmanship Claims

    NLRB Finalizes Rule for Construction Industry Unions to Obtain Majority Support Representational Status

    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Recognized as Largest Litigation Presence in Sacramento

    Construction Defect Claim Survives Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion Due to Lack of Evidence

    Boston Contractor Faces More OSHA Penalties

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Paid by Other Insurers

    Policy's One Year Suit Limitation Does Not Apply to Challenging the Insurer's Claims Handling

    No Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims under Kentucky Law

    Enerpac Plays Critical Role in Industry-changing Discovery for Long Span Bridges at The University of Nebraska-Lincoln

    Economy in U.S. Picked Up on Consumer Spending, Construction

    Miller Act Bond Claims Subject to “Pay If Paid”. . . Sometimes

    World’s Biggest Crane Gets to Work at British Nuclear Plant

    A Third of U.S. Homebuyers Are Bidding Sight Unseen

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 45 White and Williams Lawyers

    “You Can’t Climb a Tile Wall”

    Seventh Circuit Finds Allegations of Occurrence and Property Damage Require a Defense

    Slowing Home Sales Show U.S. Market Lacks Momentum: Economy

    OSHA Finalizes PPE Fitting Requirement for Construction Workers

    Vancouver’s George Massey Tunnel Replacement May Now be a Tunnel Instead of a Bridge

    NAHB Speaks Out Against the Clean Water Act Expansion

    Construction Defects and Commercial General Liability in Illinois

    How is Negotiating a Construction Contract Like Buying a Car?

    How New York City Plans to Soak Up the Rain

    Dealing with Hazardous Substances on the Construction Site

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    Will Millennial’s Desire for Efficient Spaces Kill the McMansion?

    Consultant Says It's Time to Overhaul Construction Defect Laws in Nevada

    Motion for Summary Judgment Gets Pooped Upon

    CDC Issues Moratorium on Residential Evictions Through 2020

    Preparation Is Key: How Condo and Homeowner Associations Can Protect Their Communities Amid Hurricane Season

    Mass-Timber Furnished Apartments Fare Well in Fire Tests

    "Your Work" Exclusion Bars Coverage for Contractor's Faulty Workmanship

    Condo Building Hits Highest Share of Canada Market Since 1971

    Exploring the Future of Robotic Construction with Dr. Thomas Bock

    Construction Goes Green in Orange County

    Defining Constructive Acceleration

    Collapse Claim Dismissed as Untimely