Executive Order Addresses Wildfire Rebuilding Delays Through Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting
February 10, 2026 —
Olivia LaCasto & Josh Schneiderman - Snell & WilmerQuick Take
On January 23, 2026, one year after the Los Angeles wildfires, the President issued Executive Order 14377 directing the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to consider regulations that would preempt state and local permitting requirements for federally funded reconstruction projects in the Pacific Palisades and Eaton Canyon areas. The Order mandates expedited federal environmental and historic preservation reviews, directs the development of legislative proposals, and orders an audit of California’s use of Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HGMP) funding.
Key Provisions
Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting
The Order directs FEMA and the SBA to consider promulgating regulations that would preempt state or local permitting processes found to have “unduly impeded” the timely use of federal emergency-relief funds by homeowners, businesses, or houses of worship seeking to rebuild. Under the proposed framework, preempted permitting regimes would be replaced with a self-certification requirement, whereby builders would certify to a federal designee that they have complied with all applicable substantive state and local health and safety standards. FEMA would retain authority to review all repairs and construction for compliance with applicable health and safety standards. Proposed regulations must be published within 30 days, with final regulations due within 90 days.
Reprinted courtesy of
Olivia LaCasto, Snell & Wilmer and
Josh Schneiderman, Snell & Wilmer
Ms. LaCasto may be contacted at olacasto@swlaw.com
Mr. Schneiderman may be contacted at jschneiderman@swlaw.com
Read the full story...
Virginia Multi-Employer Site Safety Issues–and How to Deal with Them
February 02, 2026 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsThe world of the Owner, Contractor, Subcontractor “straight line” project model is long gone. Increasingly complex construction needs for commercial owners require the services of numerous trades, and even multiple “prime” contractors at times, to perform the various stages of construction.
Because of the complex and multi-employer nature of the modern commercial worksite, as a contractor, you may no longer be responsible only for the safety of your own employees. Depending on the state in which your project is being built, you, as a general contractor, may be responsible for hazards at your worksite that you did not create. On federal job sites (or in states that have merely adopted the federal OSHA standard), one rule applies. In some states that have their own safety regulations, another rule applies.
Under the Federal OSHA guidelines, the state regulations must be at least as stringent as those of the Federal safety regulations. This flexibility allows states to impose stricter (though not more lenient) rules upon construction site contractors. While this flexibility allows state safety officials to better tailor their policies, it has caused confusion in the multi-employer realm.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
Texas Restricts Foreign Ownership of Real Property
November 09, 2025 —
Anna Luczkow - Lewis Brisbois NewsroomHouston, Tex. (October 9, 2025) - Effective September 1, 2025, certain foreign individuals and entities are no longer able to purchase or acquire an interest in real property in Texas. Governor Abott signed
Senate Bill 17 into law on June 20, 2025, amending
Chapter 5 of the Texas Property Code to add Subchapter H.
The new legislation targets governmental entities of and companies, organizations, and individuals from “designated countries,” which Subchapter H defines as countries that the U.S. Director of National Intelligence identifies as posing a risk to United States national security, or additional countries that the governor designates after determining that the purchase or acquisition poses a risk to national security. Subchapter H initially designates China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea as posing such risk. “Companies” and “organizations” collectively include not only associations, corporations, partnerships, and limited liability companies, but real estate investment trusts, joint ventures, insurance companies, and non-profit organizations.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Anna Luczkow, Lewis BrisboisMs. Luczkow may be contacted at
Anna.Luczkow@lewisbrisbois.com
Standing When It Comes to Real Property Owned by a Trust
February 23, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesIt is not uncommon for property to be owned in the name of the trust as part of an estate planning agenda. In construction, improvements are made all the time to real property owned in the name of a trust or later transferred to a trust for estate planning purposes.
In a recent case, the question became that if the property is owned by the trust does only the trust have standing to file the lawsuit. In this case, homeowners, in their individual capacities, sued a flooring contractor for defective work; however, prior to the lawsuit, the homeowners deeded the home (which would include the flooring in the home) to a revocable trust. The plaintiffs, though, were the trustees of the revocable trust and the settlors of the trust.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Contractor Entitled to Defense Under Subcontractor’s Policy
March 10, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe appellate court affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the contractor’s insurer finding that the sumcontractor’s insurer had a duty to defend the contractor. Navigators Specialty Ins. Co. v. TBR Construction, LLC, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2177 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025).
Greenscape Homes, LLC was the general contractor for a residential development. Greenscape hired TBR Construction, LLC as a carpentry-framing subcontractor pursuant to a “Trade Contractor Agreement.” The Trade Agreement required TBR to name Greenscape as an additional insured. TBR was insured by Utica. Greenscape was insured by Navigators.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Texas Court Revives Construction Defect Claims: Key Lessons for Managing Latent Defect Risk
January 21, 2026 —
Spencer E. Dunn & Melissa Osio Martinez - Wood Smith Henning BermanConstruction projects often involve intricate designs, multiple stakeholders, and complex performance obligations. When problems surface years after completion, parties must navigate a difficult landscape that blends contract law, tort doctrines, and statutory deadlines. A recent decision from the Fourth Court of Appeals of Texas provides meaningful guidance on how courts will evaluate latent construction defect claims, the applicability of the discovery rule, and the limits of the economic loss doctrine. In Morningside Ministries v. Koontz McCombs Construction, Ltd., the court reversed summary judgment entered in favor of the general contractor and project manager, reviving the owner's claims and offering important lessons for owners, contractors, and insurers facing construction defect disputes.
Background of the Dispute
Morningside Ministries operates senior living communities across Texas. In 2012, It contracted with Koontz McCombs Construction, Ltd. (Koontz) to construct The Overlook, a significant expansion of Morningside's Menger Springs campus in Boerne. The contract required Koontz to build 100 new senior living units along with common areas and site improvements, and placed responsibility for construction quality, including the work of subcontractors, on Koontz.
Reprinted courtesy of
Spencer E. Dunn, Wood Smith Henning Berman and
Melissa Osio Martinez, Wood Smith Henning Berman
Mr. Dunn may be contacted at sdunn@wshblaw.com
Ms. Martinez may be contacted at mosiomartinez@wshblaw.com
Read the full story...
Substantiating Termination for Convenience Costs
November 09, 2025 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesA termination for convenience clause is an important provision in construction contracts, particularly for the owner. An owner needs the contractual right to terminate a contractor for
convenience. This means the owner does NOT need a reason to exercise a termination. This is night-and-day different from a termination for cause (or default) wherein an owner must have a material basis to exercise that right. Sometimes, the relationship is not where it should be, or not what was expected, or performance does not rise up to the level you require but does not rise up to a material breach. The termination for convenience clause gives the owner the discretion to just end the relationship.
As a contractor, you need to understand the types of damages (costs) you are entitled if an owner exercises the termination for convenience. Don’t overlook this, because if an owner exercises the termination for convenience, you want to make sure you feel like you are protected. This could include a termination for convenience fee. There are a number of ways this can be accomplished, but you need to be sure you are entitled to costs incurred through the date of termination with reasonable overhead and profit, demobilization costs, early return fees, and costs incurred due to the termination. Regardless, keep in mind that it is your burden, as the contractor, to prove these costs with a reasonable degree of certainty.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Homeowners Associations Must Prepare for Cold Season Maintenance and Repairs in Western Washington
November 21, 2025 —
Andre Egle - VF LawWashington experiences major winter storms in the Greater Puget Sound area approximately two or three times per winter. While this depends on whether the winter weather pattern is affected by either El Niño or the La Niña Pacific Ocean current, associations must prepare for storm impacts rather than scramble after a storm has hit. La Niña conditions are ongoing and are likely to persist into the winter of 2025-2026, though forecasts indicate it will remain weak. Here are some steps Homeowners Associations (HOA) can take to protect themselves.
What Proactive Steps Can a Washington HOA Take to Identify and Minimize Potential Construction or Maintenance Risks Before a Major Storm?
Knowing that the chances for heavier-than-usual rains are in the forecast, a local HOA should inspect roofs, gutters, building envelopes, and drainage systems to identify vulnerabilities to water intrusion inside the buildings or ice buildup on the outside. Trees, landscaping features, walkways, and retaining walls need to be checked for dangers like dead limbs, tripping hazards, or any signs of shifting structure. Mechanical and utility systems such as plumbing, HVAC, and exterior lighting must be inspected to ensure they have sufficient insulation, protection, and proper operation. Contractors must ensure that all active construction sites are properly secured. They should also have a plan in place to protect materials from storm damage and address any other hazardous conditions.
What Key Questions Should HOA Boards and HOA Property Managers Ask Potential Contractors to Ensure Good Workmanship and Accountability?
The following five core questions capture the essentials of a contractor’s quality, reliability, and accountability: (1) Are you licensed, bonded, insured (inquire into the policy types and the applicable limits), and able to provide references for similar HOA projects? (2) Who will manage the project on-site work (request that person’s CV or work history), and how will you communicate work progress, potential issues, and timelines to the HOA? (3) What materials, methods, and quality-control procedures will you use, and how will you protect the property while performing the work, particularly during the rainy and stormy season? (4) Can you provide a detailed, written scope of work and price estimate, and explain, in writing, your company procedures for handling change orders or unexpected conditions? (5) What warranties do you provide for labor and materials that you will be using, and how do you handle a warranty or “punch-list” issues after the job is complete?
What are Some Insurance Pitfalls HOAs Often Overlook - and How to Avoid Them?
Here are the most common insurance pitfalls that HOAs may overlook, along with proposed solutions for addressing them. Pitfall No.1: Outdated or generic replacement-cost estimates that do not reflect actual construction costs in Washington. Solution: Obtain a professional replacement-cost appraisal every 3–5 years and ensure that the policy includes full replacement cost, not actual cash value. Pitfall No.2: Misunderstanding of the division of responsibility for covered losses between the HOA and individual owners. Solution: Educate the owners that under most an HOA’s contemporary governing documents such as the Declarations Of Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (DCCRs) and the Bylaw, the association’s insurance primarily covers repairs not only to the association’s common areas and limited common areas, but also the repairs of structural and other building elements inside each individual units, and then collects from the unit owner a proportional share of the HOA’s insurance premium. That way, the repairs covered by the HOA’s property insurance are uniform, and the HOA - not the unit owner - will deal with the repair contractor and its insurer if the repairs are subpar. Pitfall No. 3: Gaps in Water Damage Coverage. Property and liability insurance policies often exclude slow leaks, sewer backups, and water intrusion - three types of claims that typically are most expensive for an HOA. Solution: To request that the HOA insurance broker add to the policy coverage of (a) a backup of sewer/drain coverage, (b) wind-driven rain, and (c) water intrusion, and (d) sudden pipe failures. Afterward, the HOA should ensure that owners consistently keep the plumbing in their units in good working order. Pitfall No. 4: Failing to Adjust Coverage After Renovations. Specifically, HOAs frequently forget to update insurance after roof replacements, building upgrades, or additions of new amenities. Solution: Notify the HOA’s insurance broker after any major capital project and update insurable values to reflect the improvements. Pitfall No. 5: Not reviewing vendor insurance requirements because contractors may frequently have inadequate coverage or let policies lapse in the middle of a construction or renovation project. Solution: At the time of contracting for the construction or renovation work at the HOA property, (i) request that contractors provide their current Certificates of Insurance (“COI”), additional insured endorsements, and insurance policies Declaration pages that show the limits or coverage, and (ii) re-verify the same insurance facts before the work begins.
What is the Best Practice for Communicating with Residents of a Community Owned by an HOA to Maintain Trust and Transparency During and After a Winter Storm?
First, before a storm, send a simple, fact-based, expectation-setting message outlining what the HOA will do (snow removal plans, inspections, vendor readiness) and what residents should be prepared to do. Utilize multiple channels, including email, text alerts, HOA portal, lobby postings, and social media (if applicable). Second, set realistic expectations about response times because trust is built when residents understand what the HOA can and cannot do. Share with residents: (a) snow/ice vendor schedules; (b) priority areas, e.g., roads, walkways, private drives; (c) any delays due to the severity of the weather, and (d) clear expectations meant to reduce the residents’ frustration. Third, provide regular updates, even if the update is “no change.” Residents want visibility and care, not perfection. Report: (i) storm status; (ii) timing of plow/ice treatment timing, (iii) any emerging hazards (e.g., downed branches, icy walkways), and (vi) instructions for safety or temporary restrictions on moving about the community. Fourth, keep a record of and clarify every step taken to address the storm’s impact, since being transparent helps build trust when residents see that the HOA operates in an organized and responsible manner. After each key action, such as plowing, salting, emergency repairs, and the like, share with residents a brief update stating (a) what was done, (b) when it was complete, (c) the name of the vendor that performed the work, and (d) the dangers that are yet to be addressed. Fifth, within 48 to 72 hours after the storm, call a meeting to conduct a post-event summary to discuss what worked well, what challenges the HOA had to deal with, what repairs or follow-up work will happen, and what improvements will be made to meet the next storm with a higher degree of preparedness. Such a meeting would be one of the strongest ways to build long-term trust in the residents of the community owned by the HOA.
Andre Egle is an attorney at
VF Law. He may be reached at andre.egle@vf-law.com.
