BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Dorian Lashes East Canada, Then Weakens Heading Out to Sea

    Environmental Justice Update: The Justice40 Initiative

    A UK Bridge That Is a Lesson on How to Build Infrastructure

    Alaska District Court Sets Aside Rulings Under New Administration’s EO 13795

    New OSHA Rule Creates Electronic Reporting Requirement

    Kahana Feld Secures Discontinuance with Prejudice in Fraudulent Case

    KY Mining Accident Not a Covered Occurrence Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    Fifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect Decision

    California Builders’ Right To Repair Is Alive

    Nevada Court Adopts Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/19/25) – Data Center REITs, AI-Based Tools and CHIPS on the Chopping Block

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (11/02/22) – Flexible Workspaces, Sustainable Infrastructure, & Construction Tech

    Corporate Formalities: A Necessary Part of Business

    CGL Insurer’s Duty to Defend Insured During Pre-Suit 558 Process: Maybe?

    The Importance of Retrofitting Existing Construction to Meet Sustainability Standards

    U.S. District Court for Hawaii Again Determines Construction Defect Claims Do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    Asserting Non-Disclosure Claim Involving Residential Real Property and Whether Facts Are “Readily Observable”

    Is it time for a summer tune-up?

    The California Legislature Passes SB 496 Limiting Design Professional Defense and Indemnity Obligations

    Where Did That Punch List Term Come From Anyway?

    Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe.

    BIM Legal Liabilities: Not That Different

    How One Squirrel Taught us a Surprising Amount about Insurance Investigation Lessons Learned from the Iowa Supreme Court

    California Ballot Initiative Seeks to Repeal Infrastructure Funding Bill

    Constructive Suspension (Suspension Outside of an Express Order)

    A Funny Thing Happened to My Ground Lease in Bankruptcy Court

    Addressing Safety on the Construction Site

    Is a Violation of a COVID-19 Order the Basis For Civil Liability?

    Quick Note: Staying, Not Dismissing, Arbitrable Disputes Under Federal Arbitration Act

    Wildfire Is Efficient Proximate Cause of Moisture Reaching Expansive Soils Under Residence

    Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship Is Not an "Occurrence"

    Shoring of Problem Girders at Salesforce Transit Center Taking Longer than Expected

    Lease-Leaseback Battle Continues as First District Court of Appeals Sides with Contractor and School District

    Property Owner’s Defense Goes Up in Smoke in Careless Smoking Case

    BHA Has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports NCHV and Final Salute at 2017 WCC Seminar

    Disjointed Proof of Loss Sufficient

    Construction Defects Survey Results Show that Warranty Laws Should be Strengthened for Homeowners & Condominium Associations

    Understanding California’s Pure Comparative Negligence Law

    The G2G Year in Review: 2020

    RCW 60.30 – Contract Considerations

    Professor Senet’s List of 25 Decisions Every California Construction Lawyer Should Know:

    EEOC Sues Whiting-Turner Over Black Worker Treatment at Tennessee Google Project

    Recent Environmental Cases: Something in the Water, in the Air and in the Woods

    Waive Not, Want Not: Waivers and Releases on California Construction Projects

    Construction Law Alert: Unlicensed Contractors On Federal Projects Entitled To Payment Under The Miller Act

    The New “White Collar” Exemption Regulations

    Joint Venture Dispute Over Profits

    Details of Sealed Whistleblower Charges Over Cuomo Bridge Bolts Burst Into Public View

    Human Eye Resolution Virtual Reality for AEC

    Pursuing Claims for Loss Caused by Recent Kona Low Storms for Homeowners and Businesses
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with the effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the building industry's most recognizable companies, insurers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Employing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California civil engineer expert witnessAnaheim California building consultant expertAnaheim California construction expert testimonyAnaheim California construction project management expert witnessAnaheim California roofing and waterproofing expert witnessAnaheim California consulting general contractorAnaheim California concrete expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    $27B Meta Data Center Pushes Louisiana Toward Massive Power Expansion

    April 27, 2026 —
    Meta Platforms has reached an agreement with Entergy Louisiana to fund new energy infrastructure to support its planned $27-billion data center in Richland Parish, a project the company says could ultimately scale to 5 GW, becoming its largest facility to date. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has described the site as large enough to cover a significant portion of Manhattan. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Vince Kong, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Kong may be contacted at kongv@enr.com

    Fort Lauderdale Associate Secures Summary Judgment in Rare Premises Liability Win

    December 22, 2025 —
    Fort Lauderdale, Fla. (October 29, 2025) - Fort Lauderdale Associate Kyle Hollander recently secured a summary judgment victory for his client, Winn-Dixie, in a contested premises liability case. This was a hotly disputed liability case of water on the floor near an ice cooler with surveillance footage of a customer constantly bringing bags of ice to and from the cooler to the register. The plaintiff unknowingly stepped into the area of dripped melted ice and fell. Kyle successfully argued based on the plaintiff’s own deposition testimony and the surveillance footage that Winn-Dixie didn’t have the requisite actual notice. Additionally, Kyle argued that the brief duration the condition remained on the floor was legally insufficient to establish constructive notice under Florida law. The Court agreed, finding that the evidence would not survive a directed verdict and granting summary judgment in favor of the defense. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Chambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    Sheppard has been recognized by Chambers Global 2026 in the following practice areas:
    • Privacy & Data Security in the United States
    • Projects: Power & Renewables: Transactional in the United States
    • Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy in the United States
    Additionally, the following Sheppard partners have been recognized by Chambers Global 2026:
    • Justin Boose (Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy – USA)
    • Will Chen (Intellectual Property: International Firms – South Korea)
    • David Chun (Intellectual Property – South Korea)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard

    Leaders in Dispute Resolution Need to Make Unbiased Decisions for Mediation to Succeed

    March 31, 2026 —
    As a mediator helping to settle construction disputes and as an arbitrator deciding outcomes of these disputes, I found certain lessons to be especially helpful after graduating last summer from the Executive Education program at Harvard Kennedy School (HKS). The exceptional HKS curriculum included courses focused on negotiation strategies for multiparty disputes, decisive leadership during crisis, and human behavior affecting dispute resolution. In particular, our HKS class debated the impact of cognitive bias in dispute resolution, and we studied a central theme that decision-making is universally scientific. That is, parties making decisions in dispute resolution exhibit and rely upon empirical factors that good mediators and decision makers should appreciate and understand. Bias, for example, can cause key players to discount persuasive witnesses, admissible evidence, and reliable expert opinions that influence the outcome of a construction dispute. Biased decision makers may also choose to withhold key information from the mediator, as though doing so will help rather than hurt what is supposed to be an objective and diplomatic process. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Rick G. Erickson, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Erickson may be contacted at rerickson@swlaw.com

    EPA Proposes New WOTUS Definition, Narrowing Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

    December 30, 2025 —
    On November 17, 2025, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a proposed rule that would significantly narrow its regulatory authority over Waters of the United States (WOTUS). Under the new proposed WOTUS rule, EPA would effectively have jurisdiction only over relatively permanent waters and a smaller subset of directly connected wetlands. The WOTUS definition outlines the geographic reach of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ and EPA’s authority under the 1972 Clean Water Act to regulate streams, wetlands, and other water bodies. As such, it has been reviewed in boardrooms, courtrooms, and government offices for over fifty years. Most recently, on May 25, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Sackett v. EPA. In Sackett, the Supreme Court determined that WOTUS are only (1) relatively permanent bodies of water, such as oceans, lakes, rivers, and streams; or (2) adjacent wetlands indistinguishable from those waters because of a continuous surface connection. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, Chris P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and John Habib, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Microscopic Soot, Major Win: Policyholder Coverage Expands

    January 06, 2026 —
    In a recent opinion, the 8th Circuit rejected an insurer’s attempt to expand insurer victories in a COVID-19 context to other more traditional claims of property damage. Reaffirming long standing principles, the court held soot and water damage associated with a fire constituted “direct physical loss or damage” under a commercial property insurance policy. The policyholder, Maxus Metropolitan, sued their insurer, Travelers, which had refused to reimburse Maxus for remediation costs associated with a fire at their building. The dispute arose after one of six buildings in a complex owned by Maxus caught fire. Travelers covered part of the damage for the building that caught fire. However, seven months after the fire, Maxus learned of soot and water damage throughout the other five buildings, some of which were under construction and some that had residents. The commercial property policy Travelers issued to Maxus covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss…or damage.” Travelers refused to reimburse for the remediation and in response Maxus sued Travelers for breach of contract and vexatious refusal to pay in Missouri. Reprinted courtesy of Scott P. DeVries, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Natalie Reed, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. DeVries may be contacted at sdevries@hunton.com Ms. Reed may be contacted at nreed@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    The Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry. The Facts Behind the Dispute The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tara Martens Miller, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Miller may be contacted at tmmiller@swlaw.com