BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    How to Determine the Deadline for Recording a California Mechanics Lien

    Intellectual Property And Employment Law Best Practices: Are You Covering Your Bases In Protecting Construction-Related Trade Secrets?

    New Mexico Holds One-Sided Dispute Resolution Provisions Are Unenforceable

    New York City Dept. of Buildings Explores Drones for Facade Inspections

    For Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?

    New Becker & Poliakoff Attorney to Expand Morristown Construction Litigation Practice

    To Settle or Not Settle: Factors to Weigh and Practical Considerations

    Traub Lieberman Partner Rina Clemens Selected as a 2023 Florida Super Lawyers® Rising Star

    You’ve Made Your Bed…Maybe Don’t Lie in It (Yet)!

    Rikus Locati Selected to 2024 Northern California Rising Stars!

    New Jersey Law Firm Announces $4 Million Settlement from Construction Site Accident

    Revisiting Statutory Offers to Compromise

    Attorney’s Fees Entitlement And Application Under Subcontract Default Provision

    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara LLP Attorneys to Speak at the 2016 National Construction Claims Conference

    Broker for Homeowners Policy Has No Duty to Advise Insureds on Excess Flood Coverage

    Texas Supreme Court Rules on Contractual Liability Exclusion in Construction Cases

    Arbitrator May Use Own Discretion in Consolidating Construction Defect Cases

    Professional Services Exclusion in CGL Policies

    California Imposes New Disabled Access Obligations on Commercial Property Owners

    Not So Fast, My Friend: Pacing and Concurrent Delay

    CEO: Power Isn’t the Only Electrical Challenge for AI Data Centers

    Protect Projects From Higher Repair Costs and Property Damage

    Professor Senet’s List of 25 Decisions Every California Construction Lawyer Should Know:

    One Shot to Get It Right: Navigating the COVID-19 Vaccine in the Workplace

    California Bullet Train Clears Federal Environmental Approval

    Commercial Real Estate Brokerages in an Uncertain Russian Market

    New York Federal Court Enforces Construction Exclusion, Rejects Reimbursement Claim

    Risk Associated with Design-Build Project Delivery Method

    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit

    Building the Secondary Market for Reclaimed Building Materials

    Subcontractors Essential to Home Building Industry

    Delaware River Interstate Bridge Shut to Assess Truss Fracture

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Paid by Other Insurers

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Excess Can Sue Primary for Equitable Subrogation

    Chambers USA 2021 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    Fewer NYC Construction Deaths as Safety Law Awaits Governor's Signature

    “Pay When Paid” Provisions May Not Be Dead, at Least Not Yet

    Jobsite Safety Should Be Every Contractors' Priority

    Seven Trends That Impact Commercial Construction Litigation in 2021

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Construction Defects and Warranties in Maryland

    Architect Named Grand Custom Home Winner for Triangular Design

    Noncompete Agreements: How to Navigate the Changing Landscape

    Good and Bad News on Construction Employment

    State Audit Questions College Construction Spending in LA

    Predicting Our Future with Andrew Weinreich

    Contractor Entitled to Defense for Alleged Faulty Workmanship of Subcontractor

    Rebuilding the West: Construction Considerations After the Smoke Clears

    140 Days Until The California Consumer Privacy Act Becomes Law - Why Aren't More Businesses Complying?

    Allen, TX Board of Trustees Expected to Approve Stadium Repair Plans
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand building and construction related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the construction industry's most recognized companies, legal professionals, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. In connection with in house assets comprising licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California expert witnesses fenestrationAnaheim California construction expert witnessAnaheim California construction claims expert witnessAnaheim California expert witness roofingAnaheim California building code expert witnessAnaheim California construction code expert witnessAnaheim California engineering consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    AI in AEC 2026: Doing AI Right and Rethinking Your Business Model

    April 08, 2026 —
    The sixth AI at the AEC 2026 conference showcased the evolution of AI discussions. There were, naturally, many talks about software and technologies. But more than before, there were conversations about realizing AI’s business value. Two themes appeared in nearly every session I attended. First, many companies struggle with AI adoption, not because they lack tools, but because their thinking isn’t right. Second, when AI works, it disrupts the business model that brought them there. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    Brenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction Delays

    May 26, 2026 —
    Brenda Radmacher, a partner in Seyfarth’s Construction Law practice and a mediator and arbitrator serving on the American Arbitration Association’s panels, is among the contributing authors to the American Bar Association’s forthcoming guide on construction disputes: Time – The Legal Implications of Project Delay in Construction. Drawing on three decades of experience, Radmacher authors Chapter 8, Contractor Delay Damages, offering practical insight into one of the most contested issues in construction litigation and arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Finding of No Coverage for Interior Leak

    March 24, 2026 —
    Applying California law, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that water damage caused by a leaking pipe over time was not covered under the insured’s homeowners’ policy. Mojica v. State Farm General Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32405 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 2025). A small hole, slightly larger than a pen tip in size, developed in a pressurized hot water pipe. The resulting leak lasted for nearly six days and released enough water to saturate and ruin all the subflooring and flooring in the insureds’ home. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Urban Digital Twins: How Virtual Cities Could Help Build Smarter Cities

    August 11, 2026 —
    Traffic congestion, endless construction, flooded streets and power outages. For city leaders and residents alike, these disruptions are simply part of daily urban life. But an emerging tool, known as the urban digital twin, could help cities anticipate problems before they occur by allowing planners to simulate responses, stress-test infrastructure, and evaluate decisions before implementing them in the real world. What Is an Urban Digital Twin? An urban digital twin is a dynamic, data-driven virtual model of a real city. It uses AI analytics and combines 3D modeling with real-time data and information from sources such as IoT sensors, traffic cameras, satellite feeds, infrastructure databases, utility networks, and environmental data including weather systems and heat maps to create a continuously updated digital representation of the urban environment that mirrors infrastructure, movement and systems in real time. In other words, it is a living digital replica of a city. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury

    No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment

    August 03, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding no bad faith despite the appraisal award exceeding the amount the insurer initially paid. Jazi Kat 4659 Rockridge LLC, et al. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105634 (D. Ariz. May 13, 2026). Plaintiffs sued Travelers for breach of contract and bad faith, alleging that Travelers failed to pay money plaintiffs were owed under the policy. Plaintiffs held a commercial property policy for two properties. A fire destroyed one of the properties. Travelers adjusted the claim and issued two payments. Plaintiffs disagreed with the amount of the payments and demanded an appraisal. Travelers agreed to the appraisal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com