Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder
July 06, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesWhen purchasing a home from a homebuilder, there is an important consideration when it comes to the limited warranty you receive around the time you close on the home. That limited warranty likely includes an arbitration provision requiring you to arbitrate your disputes, such as construction defect claims, against the homebuilder. That arbitration provision will most likely include all claims, including statutory claims (such as a statutory violation of a building code claim), requiring you to arbitrate, as opposed to litigate, your disputes against the homebuilder. This is an important consideration. If the arbitration provision does not allow you to arbitrate all of your claims, and eliminates your rights to legitimate statutory claims, the arbitration provision could be unenforceable.
By way of example, in a residential construction defect dispute, Anderson v. Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., 223 So.3d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), the appeal turned on whether the arbitration provision in the homebuilder’s limited warranty was valid. The homeowners took possession of their home in 2009. In 2015, the homeowners served a Florida Statutes Chapter 558 notice of construction defects that included a statutory violation of a building code claim under Florida Statute §553.84. The limited warranty included an arbitration provision that specified it was the “exclusive remedy” for all disputes arising out of or related to the warranty or issues with the home and property. When read together with the warranty’s disclaimer that precluded claims not covered by the warranty “whether in contract, tort, or otherwise,” the statutory building code violation claim could not be remedied through arbitration because it fell outside the warranty’s coverage.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars
May 14, 2026 —
Snell & WilmerSAN DIEGO – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that two attorneys in the San Diego office have been selected for inclusion in the
2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars publication.
Rising Stars is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. To be eligible for inclusion, a candidate must be either 40 years old or younger or in practice for 10 years or less. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research and peer nominations, with no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state named to the Rising Stars list.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Snell & Wilmer
Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit
April 14, 2026 —
Lewis Brisbois NewsroomNewark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan.
The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000.
The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction
July 13, 2026 —
Andrew Swift - Construction ExecutiveWater leaking into a building is a leading cause of
damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished.
Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures.
Reprinted courtesy of
Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season
April 08, 2026 —
Meghan Douris - The Construction SeytArtificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency.
What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong.
On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLPMs. Douris may be contacted at
mdouris@seyfarth.com
Court to General Contractor: Too Late to Reclaim $600K Sub Overpayment
March 03, 2026 —
Richard Korman - Engineering News-RecordMassachusetts contractors and their attorneys are once again testing the limits of the state's 15-year-old prompt-pay law, with concerned prime contractors asking an appeals court to overturn a lower court ruling that they believe gives subcontractors a powerful upper hand in payment disputes.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Richard Korman, Engineering News-RecordMr. Korman may be contacted at
kormanr@enr.com
Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements
April 27, 2026 —
Heather Frisch, Christopher Bouquet & Ashley Stein - The Construction SeytSeyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance.
This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law.
Reprinted courtesy of
Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP,
Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and
Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com
Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com
Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com
Read the full story...
Did You Get the Message? (And does it count?) The Legal Consequences of Text Messages, Group Chats, and Informal Digital Communication on Construction Projects
March 17, 2026 —
Kellie Ros & Curtis Martin - ConsensusDocsIntroduction: The New Reality of Construction Communication
Construction projects have always depended on a constant stream of communication. Today’s project managers, superintendents, and foremen have broadened the method of communication to include convenient forms of digital communication. Superintendents text photos of field conditions, owners send quick approvals through WhatsApp, architects clarify design intent in a Teams chat, and subcontractors coordinate sequencing through group texts. These channels are fast, convenient, and deeply embedded in modern project culture. Yet the legal framework governing construction contracts has not evolved at the same pace. Many contracts still assume – or require – that notice, directives, and approvals occur through formal written channels—letters, emails to designated recipients, or structured project‑management platforms. This disconnect creates significant legal risk, particularly for contractors who rely on informal messages as authorization for extra work or schedule changes. Courts are increasingly asked to interpret text messages, chat threads, and screenshots as evidence of notice, direction, or waiver. The outcomes vary, but the trend is unmistakable: informal digital communication is now part of the project record, and it can bind parties in ways they did not expect.
Reprinted courtesy of
Kellie Ros, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/20/25) – Hotel Growth Forecast, Data Center Availability and an AI Rental RevolutionN.J. Voters Approve $116 Million in School ConstructionAlthough Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk ExclusionsKiewit Seeks Millions in Added Connecticut Pier Renovation CostsCourt Addresses Damages Under Homeowners Insurance PolicyMissouri Protects Subrogation RightsTax Increase Pumps $52 Billion Into California ConstructionA Duty to Design and Maintain Reasonably Safe Roadways Extends to All Persons. (WA)TOLLING AGREEMENTS: Construction Defect Lawyers use them to preserve Association Warranty Claims during Construction Defect Negotiations with DevelopersIs The Enforceability Of A No-Damage-For-Delay Provision Inappropriate For Summary JudgmentNevada Assembly Passes Construction Defect BillHawaiian Electric Finalizes $2 Billion Maui Fire SettlementSummary Judgment in Favor of General Contractor Under Privette Doctrine Overturned: Lessons LearnedConstruction Materials Company CEO Sees Upturn in Building, Leading to JobsPatagonia Will Start Paying for Homeowners' Solar Panels#5 CDJ Topic: David Belasco v. Gary Loren Wells et al. (2015) B254525The Project “Completion” Paradox in CaliforniaNot All Work is Covered Under the Federal Miller ActThe Economic Loss Rule: From Where Does the Duty Arise?Blackstone Suffers Court Setback in Irish Real Estate DramaConstruction Litigation Roundup: “You Left Out a Key Ingredient!”New York Court Grants Insured's Motion to Dismiss Construction Defect Case and Awards Fees to InsuredBuilding Group Has Successful 2012, Looks to 2013Arizona Court of Appeals Rules Issues Were Not Covered in Construction Defect SuitBaltimore Project Pushes To Meet Federal DeadlineIs It Time to Revisit Construction Defects in Kentucky?Strategic Implementation of AI in AECBest Lawyers® Recognizes 29 White and Williams LawyersWhat Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia ConstructionSamuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla EstatesThe Washington Supreme Court Rules that a Holder of a Certificate of Insurance Is Entitled to CoverageBest Practices for ESI Collection in Construction LitigationCelebrating BWB&O’s 28 Years of Service!Barratt Said to Suspend Staff as Contract Probe ContinuesInsurer Must Pay To Defend Product Defect Claims From Date Of Product InstallationWater Damage Sub-Limit Includes Tear-Out CostsNinth Circuit Holds that 1993 Budget Appropriations Language Does Not Compel the Corps of Engineers to use 1987 Wetlands Guidance IndefinitelyCutting the Salt Out: Tips for Avoiding Union Salting ChargesManaging Rising Costs and Shifting Legal Risk for Florida High-Rise and Condominium ProjectsMore Details Emerge in Fatal Charlotte, NC, Scaffold CollapseSubcontract Requiring Arbitration Outside of FloridaDesign-Build – An International Perspective on Best Practices for Sustained Design-Build SuccessSettlement between IOSHA and Mid-America Reached after Stage Collapse FatalitiesNew Megablimp to Deliver to Remote Alaskan Construction SitesInsurers Refuse Indemnification of Subcontractors in Construction Defect SuitASCE Statement on Hurricane Milton and Environmental ThreatsUnited States Supreme Court Upholds Class Action Waivers in Arbitration AgreementsNew York Appellate Court Applies Broad Duty to Defend to Property Damage CaseAnother Colorado District Court Refuses to Apply HB 10-1394 RetroactivelyBeyond the Flow-Down Clause: Subcontract Provisions That Can Expose General Contractors to Increased Liability and Inconsistent OutcomesConstruction in the Time of CoronavirusTitle II under ADA Applicable to Public Rights-of-Way, Parks and Other Recreation Areas
