PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand
May 12, 2026 —
Stephen J. Humes, Alicia M. McKnight, Jason Drogin Atwood & Andrew H. Jacobs - Gravel2GavelIn January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth.
RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity.
Reprinted courtesy of
Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury,
Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury,
Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and
Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury
Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com
Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com
Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com
Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com
Read the full story...
Conditional Payment Bond Consideration-Make Sure There Is Pay-If-Paid Provision
June 29, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesIf a general contractor is going to have a conditional payment bond, it needs to ensure it subcontracts contain pay-if-paid or pay-when-paid provisions. This conditional payment language in subcontracts is the general contractor’s defense that it doesn’t have to pay a subcontractor UNTIL owner has paid the general contractor for the subcontractor’s work.
The general contractor (and the surety) can look at the conditional payment bond with the s. 713.245 legend stamped on its face designating the conditional nature of the bond, and assume the conditional structure is locked in against the bond: no payment from the owner, no obligation to the subcontractors under the bond. But what happens when the subcontracts contain no express conditional payment language despite having a valid conditional payment bond?
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Nicole Whyte is the Newly Elected Secretary of the Orange County Bar Association
September 28, 2026 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP“I am deeply honored to serve as Secretary of the Orange County Bar Association. To everyone who supported me, endorsed me, encouraged me, shared my message, and cast a ballot, thank you.
I am profoundly grateful for your trust and confidence. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. I am ready to get to work.” – Nicole Whyte
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP
Emerging Issues in Construction CGL Insurance Part 2: The Separation of Insureds and Additional Insured Interests
September 29, 2026 —
Eric M. Clarkson - SDV FenchurchMany coverage disputes hinge on first principles—the fundamentals of insurance —rather than the minutiae. Unfortunately, the basic anatomy of insurance policies can get lost sometimes when parties are laser-focused on a particular term or set of circumstances. This is true not just in disputes, but also when writing coverage. One of the fundamentals that is commonly misunderstood and overlooked—but which is absolutely critical to the intended operation of insurance coverage—is what is commonly known as the “separation of insureds.”
The “separation of insureds” is the concept that each “insured” under a policy are referred to and treated differently, and most of all that the distinctions matter. The concept is usually included as a condition in the policy. It embodies the requirement that the policy applies to each insured distinctly from how it applies to other insureds. The ISO Form CGL policies specifically state that they apply “[s]eparately to each insured against whom a claim is made or ‘suit’ is brought.” The separate and distinct treatment of insureds is more critical in construction operations than anywhere else. This distinction is essential to ensure coverage works as intended, especially when contracted operations are involved, because the policy must insure the subcontractor that purchased the policy, the general contractor who hired the subcontractor, and the owner that hired the general contractor. Even small modifications can easily frustrate the intent of the parties.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Eric M. Clarkson, SDV FenchurchMr. Clarkson may be contacted at
eric.clarkson@sdvfenchurch.us
Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act
June 15, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesMost, if not all, jurisdictions, including the federal government, have what is known as a “Prompt Payment Act.” The objective is to ensure prompt payment. If prompt payment is not made, the Prompt Payment Act provides for interest penalties, as well as potentially other costs such as attorney’s fees.
But the thing is, it’s not as simple as untimely payment to support the recourse and interest penalties the applicable Prompt Payment Act affords. And the teeth associated with the applicable Prompt Payment Act are not as sharp as perhaps the party claiming untimely payment prefers.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
At the Frontier of Change: How—or Where—to Rebuild as Alaska's Permafrost Disappears
September 28, 2026 —
Pam McFarland - Engineering News-RecordIn some areas of the tiny subsistence coastal village of Kwigillingok along the Bering Sea in western Alaska, pockets of ground feel squishy, almost gelatinous, rather than solid. It’s an odd sensation, as if there is only a thin layer of muddy soil preventing people from falling into the water beneath their feet.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Pam McFarland, Engineering News-RecordMs. McFarland may be contacted at
mcfarlandp@enr.com
373 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®
October 06, 2026 —
Snell & WilmerPHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 373 of the firm’s attorneys were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® including the prestigious “Lawyer of the Year” honors, and “Ones to Watch” list. Attorneys listed as Ones to Watch typically have been in practice for five to nine years.
“Lawyer of the Year” recognition is awarded to individual lawyers with the highest overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic region. Only one lawyer is recognized for each practice area and location. The following Snell & Wilmer attorneys were named 2027 “Lawyer of the Year” award recipients: Cortland P. Andrews, Troy J. Aramburu, Brian L. Blaylock, M. Lawrence Brown, Brian D. Cunningham, Michael M. Donahey, Jason Ebe, Matthew P. Fischer, Brett W. Johnson, Nathan G. Kanute, William A. Kastin, Timothy J. Kay, James D. Kilroy, Joseph A. Kroeger, Matthew L. Lalli, John F. Lomax, Anne M. Meyer, Robin L. Miskell, Patrick J. Paul, Amit D. Ranade, and M. Roxanne Veliz.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Snell & Wilmer
Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case
June 15, 2026 —
Leigh Katz - Kahana FeldKahana Feld partner Leigh Katz obtained a significant victory in a recent matter involving a videotaped alleged trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of the client’s commercial residence. The plaintiff claimed he suffered a knee injury that necessitated surgery, along with other assorted injuries that prevented him from continuing high-level athletic activities. Leigh was able to demonstrate that the fall was staged and received a voluntary discontinuance with prejudice.
At mediation, Leigh emphasized that KF’s expert witness challenged the plaintiff’s claim that the fall was caused by a sidewalk height differential after reviewing the videotape footage and determining the plaintiff’s fall began before his feet made contact with the alleged defect. Based on this analysis, the expert concluded the reported height differential did not initiate the fall, which supported KF’s position that the incident depicted in the video was unrealistic and appeared staged.
Bad Faith Claim Dismissed as Insurer’s Actions Found ReasonableJean Nouvel’s NYC ‘Vision Machine’ Sued Over Construction DefectsArizona Supreme Court Leaves Limits on Construction Defects Unclear“Slow and Steady Doesn’t Always Win the Race” – Applicability of a Statute of Repose on Indemnity/Contribution Claims in New HampshireFlorida Decides Against Adopting DaubertIs the Manhattan Bank of America Tower a Green Success or Failure?Kaylin Jolivette Named LADC's Construction and Commercial Practice ChairStandard For Evaluating Delay – Directly from An Armed Services Board Of Contract Appeal’s OpinionFlorida’s Third District Court of Appeal Suggests Negligent Repairs to Real Property Are Not Subject to the Statute of ReposeLegislative Changes that Impact Construction 2017Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to ContractorGeorgia Super Lawyers Recognized Two Lawyers from Hunton’s Insurance Recovery GroupFalse Implied Certifications in Making Payment Requests: What We Can Learn from Lance ArmstrongSummary Judgment in Construction Defect Case Cannot Be Overturned While Facts Are Still in Contention in Related CasesNew York High Court: “Issued or Delivered” Includes Policies Insuring Risks in New YorkCalifornia’s Prompt Payment Laws: Just Because an Owner Has Changed Course Doesn’t Mean It’s Changed Course on Previous PaymentsGeorgia Local Government Drainage Liability: Nuisance and TrespassNew York Court Holds Insurer Can Recover Before Insured Is Made WholeCalifornia Supreme Court Finds Vertical Exhaustion Applies to First-Level Excess PoliciesOSHA Penalties—What Happened with International NutritionAB 685 and COVID-19 Workplace Exposure: New California Notice and Reporting Requirements of COVID Exposure Starting January 1, 2021The Best Lawyers in America® - Ball Janik Attorneys Earn Multiple RecognitionsArizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury VerdictNew Proposed Regulations Expand CFIUS Jurisdiction Regarding Real EstateSales of U.S. New Homes Decline After Record May RevisionCrowdfunding Comes to Manhattan’s World Trade CenterBuilding Materials Price Increase Clause for Contractors and Subcontractors – Three OptionsIn All Fairness: Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Arbitration Clause in a Residential Construction Contract Was Unconscionable and UnenforceableAppraisal Can Go Forward Prior to Resolution of Coverage DisputeComparative Breach of Contract – The New Benefit of the Bargain in Construction?Ten Years After Colorado’s Adverse Possession Amendment: a brief look backwards and forwardsWhat ENR.com Construction News Gained the Most ViewsBalfour in Talks With Carillion About $5 Billion MergerHarmon Towers Demolition Still UncertainPurely “Compensatory” Debts Owed by Attorneys to Clients (Which Are Not Disciplinary or Punitive Fees Imposed by the State Bar) Are Dischargeable In BankruptcyIs Construction in Arizona Back to Normal?Court Provides Guidance on ‘Pay-When-Paid’ Provisions in Construction Subcontracts"Abrupt Falling Down of Building or Part of Building" as Definition of Collapse Found AmbiguousReal Estate & Construction News Round-Up 05/04/22Supreme Court Rejects “Wholly Groundless” Exception to Question of ArbitrabilityHomeowners May Not Need to Pay Lien on Defective Log CabinSpecific Performance: Equitable Remedy to Enforce Affirmative ObligationAurora Joins other Colorado Cities by Adding a Construction Defect OrdinanceIndemnitor Owes Indemnity Even Where Indemnitee is Actively Negligent, California Court Holds Seventh Circuit Confirms that Appraisers May Determine Cause of Loss in Addition to Amount of LossA Performance-Based Energy Code in Seattle: Will It Save Existing Buildings?Traub Lieberman Partners Lenhardt and Smith Obtain Directed Verdict in Broward County Failed Repair Sinkhole TrialNY Attorney General to Propose Bill Requiring Climate Adaptation for UtilitiesNevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through ChangesWhat Clauses Must a Contract Include?
