The Best Lawyers in America® - Ball Janik Attorneys Earn Multiple Recognitions
September 01, 2026 —
Ball Janik LLPOrlando, FL, August 20, 2026 – Ball Janik LLP is pleased to announce that 24 of its attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. The 33rd Best Lawyers edition recognitions are based on peer review and highlight attorneys across a range of practice areas. This recognition underscores the broad experience Ball Janik's attorneys bring to the firm's construction defect practice.
"We're proud to be recognized by Best Lawyers again this year," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. "These honors reflect the expertise and depth of our team, our continued growth across Florida, and our commitment to providing strong counsel to clients in complex construction, insurance recovery, and litigation matters."
Ball Janik attorneys recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® include:
Keegan A. Berry — Construction Law
Brian T. Crevasse — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Todd Demetriades — Litigation - Construction
Joseph R. Fitos — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Megan A. Picataggio — Construction Law
Jon E. Lemole — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Salvatore G. Scro — Construction Law
Nicholas B. Vargo — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Kelly M. Corcoran — Construction Law
Gabriel Z. Coelho — Construction Law
Evan J. Small — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Franchesco Soto — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Phillip E. Joseph — Litigation - Construction; Real Estate Law
James C. Prichard — Construction Law
Ball Janik attorneys recognized in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America include:
Nicholas Passantino — Litigation - Construction
Amanda L. Gonzalez — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Morgan N. Lester — Litigation - Construction
Chris S. Tribbey — Construction Law
Kyle Bugden — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Brian Tannenbaum — Construction Law
Kayla Mosquera — Insurance Law
Natasha L. Biela — Commercial Litigation
Elijah C. Waring, Jr. — Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Greg K. Demers — Construction Law
About Ball Janik LLP
Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel, to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 70-plus attorneys and paralegals in five offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, including for its construction law capabilities in Florida, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, Super Lawyers, and Corporate International. Read more at www.balljanik.com.
EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360
June 08, 2026 —
Gordon Rees Scully MansukhaniThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) addition of sodium perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS-Na) to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) introduces new federal reporting requirements for businesses that manufacture, process, or use the chemical. Because reporting obligations apply retroactively to the start of the year, affected facilities must quickly evaluate their compliance and recordkeeping practices.
In a recent Law360 article, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, explains why PFHxS-Na was automatically added to the TRI, how the EPA’s public reporting system works, and which businesses may be affected by the new rule. The article also touches upon key compliance considerations, including supply chain reviews, reporting thresholds for chemicals of special concern, and preparation for public disclosure requirements.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
What Is the Independent Tort Doctrine? New Case Explains…
August 24, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesFlorida’s Sixth District Court of Appeals in Atout v. HHM Land Trust Dated October 29, 2013, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1569a (Fla. 6th DCA 2026) recently included an extensive discussion on Florida’s independent tort doctrine. The independent tort doctrine is an important legal doctrine, particularly when parties are in contractual privity. This doctrine stands for the proposition that tort claims must be independent of any breach of contract. See Atout, supra. The Sixth District’s extensive discussion analyzed the indicators to determine this “independence,” which may arise from the source of the duty, the asserted conduct, the damages sought, or even public policy:
Unlike claims that rely on contractual relationships, an “independent” tort is often characterized by a duty imposed by law rather than by agreement. As to this consideration, United States District Court Judge Steven Merryday has explained that the independent tort doctrine honors the same divide as the economic loss rule, but rather than looking at the nature of the loss, it focuses on the source of the duty allegedly breached. “If a contract imposes a duty, and the defendant breaches that duty, the plaintiff must sue for breach of contract. If society imposes the duty, the plaintiff must sue in tort.” Following this reasoning, courts should consider whether the alleged breach of a duty in tort coincides or overlaps with a duty imposed by a contract. If the duty at issue is within the scope of a contract, and the relationship of the parties that led to the creation of that duty stems from a contract, then that duty’s source is from contract and any alleged tort claims based on a breach of those duties may not be “independent.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy
July 20, 2026 —
Anna M. Perry, Rachel S. Kindseth & Nina Catanzaro - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.I. Course of Construction Exclusions
Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy.
General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party.
Reprinted courtesy of
Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.,
Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and
Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com
Read the full story...
OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh
July 20, 2026 —
Richard Korman - Engineering News-RecordWalsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million.
OSHA Begins Enforcement of its Respirable Crystalline Silica in Construction Standard. Try Saying That Five Times Real FastIllinois Court of Appeals Addresses What It Means to “Reside” in Property for Purposes of CoverageFlorida “get to” costs do not constitute damages because of “property damage”Recognize: A Construction Safety Week Technical BulletinInsurer’s Broad Duty to Defend in Oregon, and the Recent Ruling in State of Oregon v. Pacific Indemnity CompanyThe Value of Photographic Evidence in Construction LitigationState Supreme Court Cases Highlight Importance of Wording in Earth Movement ExclusionsTemporary Obstructions Are a Permanent Problem Under the Americans with Disabilities ActSinking Buildings on the Rise?Florida Issues Emergency Fraud Prevention Rule to Protect Policyholders in Wake of Catastrophic StormsLenders and Post-Foreclosure Purchasers Have Standing to Make Construction Defect Claims for After-Discovered ConditionsTLSS Partner Burks Smith and Associate Katie Keller Win Summary Judgment on Late Reported Water Seepage Case in South FloridaClient Alert: Naming of Known and Unknown Defendants in Initial Complaints: A Cautionary TaleDeductibles Limited to Number of Suits Filed Against Insured, Not Number of Actual PlaintiffsEconomic Damages Cannot be Based On SpeculationChicago Debt Document Says $8.5B O'Hare Revamp May Be DelayedPreparing the Next Generation of Skilled Construction Workers: AGC Workforce Development PlanCoverage Denied for Faulty Blasting and Improper FillNew York Team Secures Appellate Win on Behalf of National Home Improvement ChainEx-Turner Exec Gets 46 Months for Bloomberg Construction BribesWhat I Love and Hate About Updating My Contracts From an Owners’ PerspectiveBeverly Hills Voters Reject Plan for Enclave's Tallest BuildingLegal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 GuideSixth Circuit Affirms Liability Insurer's Broad Duty to Defend and Binds Insurer to Judgment Against LandlordNew Executive Orders Expedite the Need for Contractors to Go GreenApprentices on Public Works Projects: Sometimes it’s Not What You Do But Who You Do the Work For That CountsWall Street’s Palm Beach Foray Fuels Developer Office RushRestoring the USS Alabama: Surety Lessons From an 80-Year-Old BattleshipSeven Former North San Diego County Landfills are Leaking ContaminantsConstruction Activity on the UpswingAppeals Court Finds Manuscript Additional Insured Endorsements Ambiguous Regarding Completed Operations Coverage for Additional InsuredIn a Win for Design Professionals, California Court of Appeals Holds That Relation-Back Doctrine Does Not Apply to Certificate of Merit LawProfessional Services Exclusion Bars Coverage Where Ordinary Negligence is Inseparably Intertwined With Professional ServiceMicromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in MotionSome Work Cannot be Included in a Miller Act ClaimProfessional Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Construction ContextGiving Insurance Carrier Prompt Notice of Claim to Avoid “Untimely Notice” DefenseUnderstanding Entitlement to Delays and Proper SupportNew Spending Measure Has Big Potential Infrastructure BoostInsurer's Attempt to Strike Experts in Collapse Case FailsLumber Liquidators’ Home-Testing Methods Get EPA ScrutinyHawaii Supreme Court Construes Designated Premises Endorsement In Insured's FavorWalmart and Alquist 3D Set New Standards with 3D Printed Supercenter ExpansionSavannah Homeowners Win Sizable Judgment in Mold Case against HVAC ContractorCalifornia Clarifies Basis for Inverse Condemnation ClaimsEye on Housing Examines Costs of Green FeaturesOut of Sight, Out of Mind: Texas Court Finds Construction Defect Claims Were Inherently Undiscoverable, Tolls Statute of LimitationsCan Baltimore Get a Great Bridge?Deterioration Known To Insured Forecloses Collapse CoverageIs the Issuance of a City Use Permit Referable? Not When It Is an Administrative ActWilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in “The Best Lawyers in America” & “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch” 2025 EditionsConvictions Obtained in Las Vegas HOA Fraud CaseIt’s Too Late, Lloyd’s: New York Federal Court Finds Insurer Waived Late Notice DefenseHow Helsinki Airport Uses BIM to Create the Best Customer ExperienceDon’t Just Document- Document Right!Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP Expands into GeorgiaSignificant Victory for the Building Industry: Liberty Mutual is Rejected Once Again, This Time by the Third Appellate District in Holding SB800 is the Exclusive RemedyFormal Request for Time Extension Not Always Required to Support Constructive AccelerationBrief Discussion of Enforceability of Anti-Indemnity Statutes in CaliforniaBill to Include Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Introduced in New JerseyCongress Considers Pandemic Risk Insurance Act to Address COVID-19 Business Interruptions LossesIndemnification Against Release/“Disposal” of Hazardous MaterialsCouple Claims Contractor’s Work Is Defective and IncompleteMaryland Court Affirms Condo Association’s Right to Sue for Construction DefectsBest Lawyers Honors 43 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Recognizes Three Partners as 'Lawyers of The Year'Legal Risks of Green BuildingAmazon’s Fatal Warehouse Collapse Is Being Investigated by OSHADrafting the Bond Form, Particularly Performance Bond FormNew Jersey Rules that Forensic Lab Analysts Can’t be Forced to TestifyDoes the Russia Ukraine War Lead to a Consideration in Your Construction Contracts?Fifth Circuit Affirms District Court's Grant of Summary Judgment to Insurer on Property Loss ClaimCourt Resolves Disagreement on the Amount of the DeductibleSubstantial Completion Explained: What Contractors & Owners Should KnowA Lesson from the Criminal Courtroom to Construction Contractors About Videos and PhotosWelcome to SubTropolis: The Massive Business Complex Buried Under Kansas CityWhat is the Implied Warranty of Habitability?No Coverage For Construction Defect Under Illinois LawHome Builder Doesn’t See Long Impact from HurricaneAI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak SeasonChris Konzelmann Appointed to NASP Board of DirectorsSt. Mary & St. John Coptic Orthodox Church v. SBS Insurance Services, Inc.Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes Four Snell & Wilmer Attorneys As Rising StarsManhattan Site for Supertall Condo Finds New Owner at AuctionReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/10/23) – Wobbling Real Estate, Booming (and Busting) Construction, and Eye-Watering Insurance PremiumsIs Modular Construction Destined to Fail?Unbilled Costs Remain in Tutor Perini's FinancesThe United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, Finds Wrap-Up Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage of Additional InsuredsAffordable Housing should not be Filled with Defects
