BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Pensacola Bridge Repair Plan Grows as Inspectors Uncover More Damage

    Disappearing Data: Avoid Losing Electronic Information to Avoid Losing the Case

    Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Ordering Department of Defense to Resume Review of Wind Energy Projects

    Flushing Away Liability: What the Aqua Engineering Case Means for Contractors and Subcontractors

    Updated Covid-19 Standards In The Workplace

    House Passes ABC-Supported Permitting Reform Legislation

    Buy a House or Pay Off College? $1.2 Trillion Student Debt Heats Up in Capital

    The Economic Loss Rule and Tort Claims by Owners against Design Professionals

    California Fire Lawyers File Suit Against PG&E on Behalf of More Than 50 Wildfire Victims

    Construction Resumes after Defects

    BWB&O’s Los Angeles Office Obtains Major Victory in Arbitration!

    Chambers USA 2022 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    Brooklyn’s Hipster Economy Challenges Manhattan Supremacy

    Caterpillar Forecast Tops Estimates as Construction Recovers

    HB24-1014: A Warning Bell for Colorado Businesses Amid Potential Consumer Protection Changes

    Biden Unveils $2.3 Trillion American Jobs Plan

    Roots of Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Reach Back a Decade

    Another Way a Mechanic’s Lien Protects You

    Showdown Over Landmark Housing Law Looms at U.S. Supreme Court

    Case Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment Granted for BWB&O’s Client in Wrongful Death Case!

    Companies Move to Houston Area and Spur Home Building

    Aecmaster’s Digital Twin: A New Era for Building Design

    2014 WCC Panel: Working Smarter with Technology

    Workplace Safety–the Unpreventable Employee Misconduct Defense

    Professional Liability and Attorney-Client Privilege Bulletin: Intra-Law Firm Communications

    Federal Contractors – Double Check the Terms of Your Contract Before Performing Ordered Changes

    Sixth Circuit Finds No Coverage for Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Thank You!

    No Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Floating Crane on Job in NYC's East River Has a Storied Past of Cold War Intrigue

    Digitalizing the Construction Site – Interview with Tenderfield’s Jason Kamha

    Rise in Single-Family Construction Anticipated in Michigan

    Damages in First Trial Establishing Liability of Tortfeasor Binding in Bad Faith Trial Against Insurer

    2023 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Hunton Insurance Partner Among Top 250 Women in Litigation

    Immigrants, Accidents and Lawsuit Loans: Does NY Need New Rules?

    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage

    Insurance Law Alert: Incorporation of Defective Work Does Not Result in Covered Property Damage in California Construction Claims

    Couple Claims Contractor’s Work Is Defective and Incomplete

    The Contingency Fee Multiplier (For Insurance Coverage Disputes)

    Insurer Beware: Failure to Defend Ends with Hefty Verdict

    Rams Owner Stan Kroenke Debuts His $5.5 Billion Dream Stadium

    Best Construction Technology Podcasts in 2025

    The Texas Storm – Guidance for Contractors

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 38 White and Williams Lawyers

    Georgia Legislature Passes Additional Procurement Rules

    New York City Council’s Carbon Emissions Regulation Opposed by Real Estate Board

    Strategic Implementation of AI in AEC

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Employing in house resources which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Anaheim and the surrounding areas.

    Anaheim California building code compliance expert witnessAnaheim California construction claims expert witnessAnaheim California construction cost estimating expert witnessAnaheim California defective construction expertAnaheim California expert witness concrete failureAnaheim California expert witness windowsAnaheim California expert witnesses fenestration
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Over 50 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys Recognized in 7th Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

    September 01, 2026 —
    56 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 26 offices have been named to the 7th edition of “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.” Congratulations to the following attorneys on this recognition! You can see the full list of Lewis Brisbois attorneys named to Best Lawyers' 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America here. Akron, OH
    • Partner Meleah M. Skillern - Commercial Litigation
    Atlanta, GA
    • Partner Catherine Crawley - Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; and Transportation Law
    • Associate Davis Lackey - Insurance Law; and Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Court Finds Potential Conflicts In Denying Insurer’s Motion to Dismiss Claim for Independent Counsel

    October 12, 2026 —
    The District Court denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the additional insured’s claim that the appointment of independent counsel was required. S. Cal. Edison Co. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co of Am., 2025 U.S. DIst. LEXIS 148495 (C.D Calif. July 15, 2025). Southern California Edison Company (SCE) entered a Master Services Agreement with its contractor, SASCO whereby SASCO agreed to provide services concerning electrical pole repair and replacement. SASCO was required to obtain primary and excess general liability policies and to name SCE as an additional insured. SASCO obtained such policies from Travelers, naming SCE as an additional insured. The policies limited coverage for SCE to covered damages arising from SASCO’s work. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Chambers USA 2026 Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Attorneys and Practices

    August 11, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its attorneys have received 57 individual recognitions in their respective fields, by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2026. These prestigious rankings are driven by independent interviews with clients of the firm and members of the legal community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Connecticut Expands Construction Wage-Theft Liability and Prevailing Wage Recordkeeping Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    This post was co-authored by Labor + Employment group lawyer Christopher Costain, Hayden Eckblom (Summer Intern), and Pasqualina Fox-Mina (Summer Associate). Hayden and Pasqualina are not admitted to practice law. On May 11, 2026, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed into law Public Act 26-12, a wide-ranging bill centered around employee rights. Our colleagues in Robinson+Cole’s Labor, Employment, Benefits + Immigration group recently published a legal update summarizing the key components of Public Act 26-12. Here, we focus on the Wage Theft and Prevailing Wage concepts in the bill that directly relate to the construction industry. Wage Theft With exceptions for public works and small residential projects, general contractors will be jointly and severally liable for any unpaid wages owed to an employee of a subcontractor of any tier on private construction projects, beginning with contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2027. As we know, there is a separate regime for public works projects involving payment bonds. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anand Gupta, Robinson & Cole LLP
    Mr. Gupta may be contacted at agupta@rc.com

    Can Anything Supersede Excel in AEC?

    April 27, 2026 —
    If there’s one piece of software that dominates the business world across industries, it’s Microsoft Excel. Can AI finally dethrone the mighty spreadsheet? Memorable Spreadsheet Moments Everyone has memorable spreadsheet moments. I have a few. For example, my then-architecture firm was involved in more than a dozen housing developments abroad. I developed an Excel workbook that took the required number of households as input and automatically generated a breakdown of buildings and their apartment types for AutoCAD. This was urban planning and architectural design done with a spreadsheet. I also developed business software using Excel for project portfolio management. The prototype was later scaled into a commercial SaaS that is now used globally. Another memorable moment was when a property owner told me their Excel file grew so large that it ran out of rows and columns. That must have been before 2007, when the maximum number of columns on a sheet was still just 256 and the maximum number of rows was 65,536. The current limits are 1,048,576 rows and 16,384 columns, which I hope no one will exceed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com